Scholarly article on topic ' Detection of bla IMP4 and bla NDM1 harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in a university hospital in Malaysia '

Detection of bla IMP4 and bla NDM1 harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in a university hospital in Malaysia Academic research paper on "Clinical medicine"

Share paper
Academic journal
Emerging Health Threats Journal
OECD Field of science

Academic research paper on topic " Detection of bla IMP4 and bla NDM1 harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in a university hospital in Malaysia "

Emerging Health Threats



Detection of blaIMP4 and blaNDM1 harboring Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates in a university hospital in Malaysia

Nurul Izzati Hamzan, Chan Yean Yean, Rosliza Abdul Rahman, Habsah Hasan and Zaidah Abdul Rahman*

Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia

Background: Antibiotic resistance among Enterobacteriaceae posts a great challenge to the health care service. The emergence of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is attracting significant attention due to its rapid and global dissemination. The infection is associated with significant morbidity and mortality, thus creating challenges for infection control and managing teams to curb the infection. In Southeast Asia, there have been limited reports and subsequent research regarding CRKP infections. Thus, the study was conducted to characterize CRKP that has been isolated in our setting.

Methods: A total of 321 K. pneumoniae were included in the study. Each isolate went through an identification process using an automated identification system. Phenotypic characterization was determined using disk diffusion, modified Hodge test, Epsilometer test, and inhibitor combined disk test. Further detection of carbapenemase genes was carried out using polymerase chain reaction and confirmed by gene sequence analysis.

Results: All together, 13 isolates (4.05%) were CRKP and the majority of them were resistant to tested antibiotics except colistin and tigercycline. Among seven different carbapenemase genes studied (blaKPC, blaIMP, blaSME, blaNDM, blaIMI blaVIM, and blaOXA), only two, blaIMP4 (1.87%) and blaNDM1 (2.18%), were detected in our setting.

Conclusion: Evidence suggests that the prevalence of CRKP in our setting is low, and knowledge of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae and CRKP has improved and become available among clinicians.

Keywords: carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae; carbapenemase; Klebsiella pneumoniae; Modified Hodge test

Correspondence to: Zaidah Abdul Rahman, Department of Medical Microbiology & Parasitology, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, 16150 Kubang Kerian, Kelantan, Malaysia, Email:

Received: 13 September 2014; Revised: 11 February 2015; Accepted: 11 February 2015; Published: 10 March 2015

The overuse and misuse of antibiotics have led to the emergence of resistance in bacteria. Problems related to multidrug-resistant (MDR) organisms or superbugs are worrisome these days as they are becoming increasingly serious (1). One of the mechanisms of resistance in Enterobacteriaceae is caused by hydrolyzing enzymes, the most important being carbapenem-hydrolyzing enzyme (2). Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) is emerging, and carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is the most common CRE detected.

Since its first detection in 1996 in North Carolina, CRKP has been reported worldwide, including in Asia (3-6). In Southeast Asia, a few cases of infection associated with CRKP were recently reported in Singapore (7). Therefore, there is evidence that CRKP isolates have undergone extensive dissemination in many countries and

continue to spread in new geographical locations. It is a matter of great concern that the prevalence of these pathogens has continued to rise worldwide (8).

With the emergence of CRKP, clinicians are left with very limited antibiotic options to treat infections, because CRKP is completely resistant to all antibiotics, including carbapenem (9). Further complicating the matter is the fact that infections caused by CRKP are associated with increased mortality, length of hospital stay, and cost of hospitalization (10). Therefore, early detection of CRKP and notification are crucial steps for the infection control team to implement strict infection control practice.

With reference to the Malaysian context, to date, including during the preparation of this manuscript, little published data regarding the epidemiology of CRE and CRKP was readily available. For this reason, the study

Emerging Health Threats Journal 2015. © 2015 Izzati NH et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 1 4.0 International License (, allowing third parties to copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format and to remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially, provided the original work is properly cited and states its license.

Citation: Emerg Health Threats J 2015, 8: 26011 -

(page number not for citation purpose)

attempted to determine the prevalence of the CRKP and its genotype among clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae in our hospital. Subsequently, knowledge of CRE and CRKP has improved and become available among clinicians.


Study design and setting

This cross-sectional, descriptive study was conducted between April 2010 and June 2012 in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia (Hospital USM), Kelantan, Malaysia. Hospital USM is a tertiary teaching hospital as well as the referral hospital for the eastern coastal region of Peninsular Malaysia. The hospital has 700 beds and 28 wards, including medical, surgical, pediatric, and orthopedic wards. It also has general, surgical, and two neonatal intensive care units (ICUs).

Clinical isolates

The study was conducted in the Medical Microbiology & Parasitology Laboratory. Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from various clinical specimens such as endotracheal aspirate, pus, sputum, urine, wound/tissue, and blood during the study period were collected and screened. Samples were processed according to standard laboratory procedures. Isolates were identified based on growth characteristics and basic biochemical testing and confirmed by the Vitek2 automated identification system, using the Vitek GNI card (bioMerieux Vitek, Durham, North Carolina, USA).

Antibiotics susceptibility testing

Antibiotics susceptibility testing was performed for all isolates using disc diffusion method as described by Clinical and Laboratory Standard Institute and interpreted accordingly (11). The antimicrobials tested include amikacin, gen-tamicin, piperacillin-tazobactam, amoxicillin-clavulanate, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, cefu-roxime, ciprofloxacin, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ertapenem, meropenem, and imipenem. Isolates which demonstrated a reduced susceptibility toward ertapenem, imipenem, or meropenem were further tested for minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) by E-test method. CRKP isolates were further tested for tigercycline and colistin susceptibility.

Phenotypic test

Modified Hodge test was performed according to the procedure recommended by Amjad et al. (12). Combined disc test with 3? aminophenylboronic acid and ethylene-diaminetetra-acetic acid was performed as described by Hung et al. with some modifications (13). Klebsiella pneumoniae BAA-1705 and K. pneumoniae BAA-1706 were used as positive and negative controls, respectively, through out this study.

Molecular detection and DNA sequencing

Detection of CRKP genes for CRKP isolates was conducted by conventional in-house polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using primers targeting 11 blaKPC variants. The forward (KPC-F 5-GCCGTCTAGTTCTGCTGTCTT G-3?) and reverse primers (KPC-R 5-GCCCAATCCCTC GAGCGCG-3 ) detecting KPC-1 to KPC-11 were designed using Vector NTI and GeneDoc software. BLAST program searches were performed using the National Center for Biotechnology Information website to check the specificity of the primer designed (4). The detection of other resistant genes, namely blaSME, blaIMI, blaIMP blaNDM, blaVIM, and blaOXA, was done using published primers (14-18). DNA was isolated from bacterial colonies using the boiling lysis method as previously recommended (19). Internal control (hemM: 519-bp) was incorporated in each reaction for validation. The PCR was run using a Peltier thermal cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, Massachusetts, USA). PCR products were detected by an agarose gel electrophoresis and visualized by UV transilluminator (Alpha Innotech, San Leandro, CA, USA). PCR products were sent for DNA sequencing and compared with existing databases by multiple-sequence alignment using the BLAST program.


Altogether, 321 K. pneumoniae were screened in the study with 13 (4.05%) isolates showing reduced susceptibility to ertapenem, imipenem, or meropenem by disc diffusion method. Results were further confirmed using E-test. The MICs for imipenem and meropenem ranged between 0.25 and >32 mg/ml. The majority of patients with CRKP, 9/13 (70%), were managed in the ICU. Other patients were treated in general wards: medical (2/13), surgical (1/13), and orthopedic (1/13). Seven (54%) CRKP were isolated from endotracheal aspirate, and the rest were isolated from blood (2/13, 15%), urine (2/13, 15%), and wound swab (2/13, 15%).

All CRKP were resistant to 2nd and 3rd generation cephalosporin tested which include cefuroxime, cefepime, cefotaxime, ceftazidime, cefoperazone, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, and amoxicillin-clavulanate. A few CRKP isolates were still susceptible to aminoglycosides, whereas 5/13 (38.5%) were susceptible to gentamicin, amikacin, and netilmycin. In addition, 4/13 (30.7%) of isolates were susceptible to ciprofloxacin and 4/30 (13.3%) to piperacillin-clavulanate. Eight isolates (61.5%) were resistant to all tested antibiotics except colistin and tigercycline. The results of antibiotic susceptibility testing for all CRKP isolates are shown in Table 1.

Thirteen CRKP isolates were subjected to conventional PCR testing for the detection of common carbapenemase genes as described earlier. PCR amplified two genes: blaNDM1, 7 (2.18%); and blamP4, 6 (1.87%). PCR products were sent for DNA sequencing and compared with existing

Table 1. Antibiotic susceptibility patterns of Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP)

Antibiotic tested and zone of inhibition (mm) Isolate ETP MEM IPM SXT AK CN NET TZP AMC CIP FEP CTX CAZ CXM

1 15 14 19 6 22 20 21 24 12 19 13 6 6 6

2 14 15 18 6 20 18 17 19 11 16 10 6 6 6

3 7 11 10 6 13 6 8 6 6 10 6 6 6 6

4 15 15 19 6 23 19 17 22 11 19 10 6 6 6

5 14 14 15 6 19 17 15 21 11 14 8 6 6 6

6 17 14 18 6 21 15 19 25 14 20 16 9 6 6

7 11 13 15 6 17 6 6 6 9 6 9 6 6 6

8 14 15 18 26 6 6 6 6 10 6 11 6 6 6

9 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

10 12 14 17 6 6 6 6 6 8 6 9 6 6 6

11 10 12 14 6 6 10 6 6 6 9 6 6 6 6

12 12 16 17 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6

13 14 14 17 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 10 6 6 6

ETP, ertapenem; IMP, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; SXT, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole; AK, amikacin; CN, gentamicin; NET, netilmycin; TZP, piperacillin-tazobactam; AMC, amoxicillin-clavulanate; CIP, ciprofloxacin; FEP, cefepime; CTX, cefotaxime; CAZ, ceftazidime; CXM, cefuroxime.

databases for confirmation. Gene accession numbers for blaNDM1 and blaIMP4 are listed in Table 2. A summary of phenotypic and genotypic results is given in Table 3.


This study provides the first reported data on the prevalence of CRKP among clinical isolates of K. pneumoniae in Kelantan, Malaysia. The prevalence of CRKP worldwide varies, partially depending on the cultural or population exchange relationship between countries and possible reservoirs of the carbapenemase producer (20). The prevalence of CRKP among K. pneumoniae was high in some regions: 13% in Greece, 8% in USA, 5.5% in Israel, and 5% in Argentina (4, 21-23).

More recently, some cases of CRKP were detected in neighboring countries. For example, in Singapore the OXA-181 genotype was found to be the second most common after NDM-1 producers (24). Vietnam detected their first two cases of CRE in 2010 (25). The isolated CRE were Escherichia coli and K. pneumoniae of NDM genotype. There is a possible danger that CRE and CRKP have emerged in Malaysia, as a result of the movements of individuals unknowingly or knowingly carrying CRE or CRKP.

In this study, the proportion of CRKP (4.05%) detected was lower than those previously reported elsewhere.

Concomitant with this finding, studies in Singapore and Taiwan divulged that the prevalence of CRKP was < 1 and 1.2%, respectively (26). In addition, only 1.17% was found in King Aziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia (10). These findings indicate that although the problems do exist, the prevalence of CRKP is still low in the Asian region (7).

The majority of the study on CRE focused on patients admitted in critical care and long-term care facilities with a higher rate of antibiotic exposure (27). In contrast, our study was not focused on any specific ward, but rather on a specific organism from various departments. Thus, being non-selective of patient population might have contributed to the lower prevalence of CRKP in our study. However, looking at the isolates distribution, the majority (61.5%) of CRKP were isolated from patients admitted to the ICU.

From sequencing analysis, only two genes, blaIMP4 and blaNDM1, were detected. These carbapenemase genes were increasingly isolated at rapid velocity. A study in Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in 2011 reported that 5% of CRKP were either blaIMP or blaNDM producers (28). In Malaysia, the first documented carbapenem-resistant case was blaNDM in 2010 and the distribution was as low as <0.2% (29). Other carbapenemase genes were not discovered in our study as blaSME and blaIMI were

Table 2. List of GeneBank accession numbers for blaNDM1 and blaIMP4 reference

Beta lactamase genes GenBank Accession No.

b/aNDM1 KC539432.1; KC539430.1; KC310727.1; JF798499.1; KF016990.1; AP012055.1; JN157804.1

b/aIMP4 JX517203.1; KF250428.1; KF184388.1; JX457479.1; JN106667.1; AJ609296.3; FJ384365.1

Table 3. Summary of phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of carbapenem-resistant K pneumoniae

MIC (mg/ml) of carbapenem


Isolate IPM MEM MHT CD-APB CD-EDTA detected

1 0.5 2 + - + b/aIMP4

2 4 >32 + - + b/aIMP4

3 > 32 >32 + - + b/aIMP4

4 8 >32 + - + b/aIMP4

5 4 >32 + - + b/aIMP4

6 0.25 2 + - + b/aIMP4

7 > 32 >32 + - + b/aNDM1

8 > 32 >32 + - + b/aNDM1

9 > 32 >32 + - + b/aNDM1

10 16 8 + - + b/aNDM1

11 > 32 >32 + - + b/aNDM1

12 16 8 + - + b/aNDM1

13 > 32 >32 + - + b/aNDM1

MIC, minimal inhibitory concentration; IPM, imipenem; MEM, meropenem; MHT, modified Hodge test; CD-APB, combined disc with 3? aminophenylboronic acid; CD-EDTA, combined disc with ethylene-diaminetetra-acetic acid.

chromosomally encoded carbapenemase. Being chromo-somally encoded enzymes, with no evidence of mobile element association, they have not disseminated well globally. This fact may have contributed to their rarity and limited distribution (14), which subsequently suggests a smaller likelihood of it going viral in Malaysia.

The limitation of our study was that we did not screen other mechanisms related to high MICs shown in some of our isolates and the genetic relatedness among positive isolates. More clinical samples from hospitals with diverse bacterial species are required in order to determine the prevalence of carbapenem-resistant bacteria in Malaysia. In this manner a better understanding of CRE and CRKP may be achieved.


In conclusion, the present study indicated that the prevalence of CRKP in our hospital setting was low. The data presented showed blaNDM1 and blaIMP4 were mainly responsible for the carbapenem resistance in our K. pneumoniae isolates. Further studies are warranted to determine other resistant mechanisms and also the genetic relatedness among these isolates.

Authors' contributions

All authors contributed equally to this work. All authors contributed and participated in the study, preparation of the manuscript, and statistical analysis, and read and approved the final manuscript.


I would like to express my gratitude to all the staff working in the Medical Microbiology & Parasitology division who were involved in this project. I also want to convey my appreciation to Universiti Sains Malaysia short-term grant, No: 304/PPSP/61311033, for financial support. The study was approved by the ethical committee of the School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia [Reg. No: USMKK/PPP/JEPeM(233.4.(1.4))].

Conflict of interest and funding

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. There are not any non-financial competing interests involved in this publication.


1. Kim SY, Park YJ, Yu JK, Kim HS, Park YS, Yoon JB, et al. Prevalence and mechanisms of decreased susceptibility to carbapenems in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates. Diag Microb Infect Dis. 2007;57(1):85-91.

2. KanjSS, Kanafani ZA. Current concepts in antimicrobial therapy against resistant gram-negative organisms: extended-spectrum ß-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae, and multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mayo Clin Proc. 2011;86(3):250-259.

3. Ben-David D, Kordevani R, Keller N, Tal I, Marzel A, Gal-Mor O, et al. Outcome of carbapenem resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infections. Clin Microb Infect. 2012; 18(1):54-60.

4. Pasteran F, Mendez T, Guerriero L, Rapoport M, Corso A. sensitive screening tests for suspected class A carbapenemase production in species of Enterobacteriaceae. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(6):1631-1639.

5. Rhee JY, Park YK, Shin JY, Choi JY, Lee MY, Peck KR, et al. KPC-producing extreme drug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolate from a patient with diabetes mellitus and chronic renal failure on hemodialysis in South Korea. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54(5):2278-2279.

6. Lauderdale TL, Shi ZY, Lin CF, Lai JF, Tan MC, Wang JT, et al. KPC-2-producing sequence type 11 Klebsiella pneumoniae detected in Taiwan. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2012;56(4): 2207-2208.

7. Balm MND, Ngan G, Jureen R, Lin RTP, Teo J. Molecular characterization of newly emerged blaKPC-2-producing Kleb-siella pneumoniae in Singapore. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(2): 475-476.

8. Daikos GL, Markogiannakis A. Carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae: (when) might we still consider treating with carbapenems? Clin Microbiol Infect. 2011;17(8):1135-1141.

9. Keynan Y, Rubinstein E. The changing face of Klebsiella pneumoniae infections in the community. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2007;30(5):385-389.

10. Balkhy HH, El-Saed A, Johani SM, Francis C, Al-Qahtani AA, Al-Ahdal MN, et al. The epidemiology of the first described carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae outbreak in a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia: how far do we go? Euro J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2012;31(8):1901-1909.

11. CLSI. Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing; Twenty-Fourth Informational Supplement. CLSI document M100-S24. Wayne, PA: Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2012.

12. Amjad A, Mirza I, Abbasi S, Farwa U, Malik N, Zia F. Modified Hodge test: a simple and effective test for detection of carbapenemase production. Iran J Microbiol. 2011;3(4): 189-193.

13. Hung KH, Yan JJ, Lu JJ, Chen HM, Wu JJ. Characterization of the modified Hodge test-positive isolates of Enterobacteriaceae in Taiwan. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2013;46(1):35-40.

14. Queenan AM, Bush K. Carbapenemases: the versatile ß-lactamases. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2007;20(3):440-458.

15. Aktas Z, Kayacan CB, Schneider I, Can B, Midilli K, Bauernfeind A. Carbapenem-hydrolyzing oxacillinase, OXA-48, persists in Klebsiella pneumoniae in Istanbul, Turkey. Chemotherapy. 2008;54(2):101-106.

16. Poirel L, Dortet L, Bernabeu S, Nordmann P. Genetic features of blaNDM-1-positive Enterobacteriaceae. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2011;55(11):5403-5407.

17. Giakkoupi P, Xanthaki A, Kanelopoulou M, Vlahaki A, Miriagou V, Kontou S, et al. VIM-1 metallo-ß-lactamase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae strains in Greek hospitals. J Clin Microbiol. 2003;41(8):3893-3896.

18. Jeanette T, My VL, Prabha K, Brend A, Roland J, Raymond TPL. Enterobacter cloacae producing an uncommon class A carbapenemase, IMI-1, from Singapore. J Med Microbiol. 2013;62:1086-1088.

19. Wang L, Gu H, Lu X. A rapid low-cost real-time PCR for the detection of Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase genes. J Microbiol Methods. 2012;91(3):361-363.

20. Canton R, Ruiz-Garbajosa P. Co-resistance: an opportunity for the bacteria and resistance genes. Curr Opin Pharmacol. 2011; 11(5):477-485.

21. Schwaber MJ, Carmeli Y. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae. JAMA. 2008;300(24):2911-2913.

22. Kotlovsky T, Shalginov R, Austin L, Sprecher H. Rapid detection of positive Klebsiella pneumoniae in a clinical setting. Euro J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2009;28(3):309-311.

23. Centers for Disease and Infection. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). 2013. [cited 2013 Aug 28]. Available from:

24. Balm MND, Ngan G, Jureen R, Lin RP, Teo JWP. OXA-181-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae establishing in Singapore. BMC Infect Dis. 2013;13:58.

25. Hoang TH, Wertheim H, Minh NB, Duong TN, Anh DD, Phuong TTL, et al. Carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae strains containing new Delhi metallo-beta-lactamase isolated from two patients in Vietnam. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51:373-374.

26. Chen PL, Ko WC. A continuous challenge from Gram-negative bacteria: more carbapenemases. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2010;43(5):351 -353.

27. Guillermo VS, Ronald NM, Richard BC, Madiha F, Padmaraj D, Gupta J. Klebsiella pneumoniae antimicrobial drug resistance, United States, 1998-2010. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(1): 133-136.

28. Karuniawati A, Saharman YR, Lestari DC. Detection of carbapenemase encoding genes in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii isolated from patients at Intensive Care Unit Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital in 2011. Acta Med Indones. 2013;45(2):101-106.

29. National surveillance of antibiotic resistance report ministry of health, Malaysia 2012. [cited 2014 Jan 3]. Available from: http:// resistance_2012

Copyright of Emerging Health Threats is the property of Co-Action Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.