New Journal of Physics

The open access journal atthe forefront of physics

Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft DPG

IOP Institute of Physics

Published in partnership with: Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft and the Institute of Physics

OPEN ACCESS

RECEIVED

23 January 2015

REVISED

11 April2015

ACCEPTED FOR PUBLICATION

28 April2015

PUBLISHED

27 May 2015

Content from this work may be used under the terms ofthe Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence.

Electrical conductivity ofthe thermal dusty plasma under the conditions of a hybrid plasma environment simulation facility

Dmitry I Zhukhovitskii1, Oleg F Petrov1,2,3, Truell W Hyde3, Georg Herdrich3,4, Rene Laufer3,4, Michael Dropmann3,4 and Lorin S Matthews3

1 Joint Institute of High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, Izhorskaya 13, Bd. 2,125412 Moscow, Russia

2 Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 9 Institutskiyper., 141700 Dolgoprudny, Moscow Region, Russia

3 Center for Astrophysics, Space Physics and Engineering Research (CASPER), Baylor University, One Bear Place #97310, Waco, TX 76798-7310, USA

4 Institute of Space Systems (IRS), University of Stuttgart, RaumfahrtzentrumBaden-Wuerttemberg, Pfaffenwaldring 29, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany

E-mail: dmr@ihed.ras.ru Keywords: plasma, complex, thermal

Any further distribution of this work must maintain

attribution to the Abstract

author(s)andthetitleof the work, journal citation andDOI.

We discuss the inductively heated plasma generator (IPG) facility in application to the generation of the thermal dusty plasma formed by the positively charged dust particles and the electrons emitted by them. We develop a theoretical model for the calculation of plasma electrical conductivity under typical conditions of the IPG. We show that the electrical conductivity of dusty plasma is defined by collisions with the neutral gas molecules and by the electron number density. The latter is calculated in the approximations of an ideal and strongly coupled particle system and in the regime of weak and strong screening of the particle charge. The maximum attainable electron number density and corresponding maximum plasma electrical conductivity prove to be independent of the particle emissivity. Analysis of available experiments is performed, in particular, of our recent experiment with plasma formed by the combustion products of a propane-air mixture and the CeO2 particles injected into it. A good correlation between the theory and experimental data points to the adequacy of our approach. Our main conclusion is that a level of the electrical conductivity due to the thermal ionization of the dust particles is sufficiently high to compete with that of the potassium-doped plasmas.

1. Introduction

Dust immersed in a weakly ionized plasma has long been recognized as a ubiquitous state of matter throughout the universe [1]. In space, dusty plasmas are found in protostellar clouds, planetary rings, cometary tails, and the interstellar medium [2-4]. On earth, the physics of dusty plasma is important in understanding the glow of a candle flame, lightning discharges in volcanic plumes [5], plasma processing of silicon wafers for computer chips [6], and the safety of tokamaks, such as ITER [7]. The basic physics and chemistry of dusty plasmas as well as their diagnostics and technological implications have been the subject ofnumerous papers (see for example [8] and the references therein) and possible applications such as nanostructured materials, plasma cleaning devices, adaptive electrodes, particle manipulation and modification are actively being investigated [9].

The dust particles in the plasma, ranging in size from tens of nanometers to hundreds of microns, become charged due to a variety of charging mechanisms. The amount of charging depends on the grain size, morphology, and composition, as well as the plasma environment [10-14]. In many environments, the equilibrium charge is mainly a result of the primary charging currents, in which electrons and ions within the plasma impinge upon and stick to the dust surface. However, there are some environments where secondary charging currents are the dominant charging mechanism: energy absorbed by the dust grain is gained by electrons, which are then emitted from the grain surface. These mechanisms include secondary electron

© 2015 IOP Publishing Ltd and Deutsche Physikalische Gesellschaft

emission, photoemission, and thermionic emission [15-18]. It is possible in some cases for these emitted electrons to be major contributor to the electron density within the plasma, such as for UV-induced dusty plasmas [19,20], or in flames, where the thermionic emission from carbonaceous soot elevates the electron density by several orders of magnitude [21,22]. For a comprehensive discussion of these plasma types, see the review [23] and references therein. Recent studies based on the treatment of quantum states of the surplus electrons near the surface of charged particles make it possible to calculate such quantities as the electron sticking coefficient and desorption time, to account for the infrared extinction of dielectric particles etc [24-27].

The characteristics of such complex plasmas have implications for applications as disparate as understanding volcanic eruptions, the explosiveness of dust clouds and powders, communications, wildfires, rocket propulsion, and fusion energy. Lightning associated with volcanic plumes is a direct result of the electrification of the particulate matter within the plume. As these particles are transported over large distances, the electric potentials which develop lead to lightning discharges. The electrical activity ofvolcanic eruptions is a possible method to monitor volcanic activity, both here on earth and on exoplanets [28]. Many industries handle large amount of powders such as paint, chemical fertilizer, grain powder, starch, detergent. As airborne dust particles become charged, a spark introduced into the system can ignite an explosion [29]. Care must be taken during transport to mitigate the effects, which can lead to accidental dust explosions [30]. Wildfires are weakly ionized gas where the temperatures are great enough to cause thermal dissociation of the inorganic plant species drawn into the combustion zone. The conductor-to-ground short-circuiting caused by conductive wildfires is responsible for a number of the power outages in many countries [31]. The failure to maintain radio communication at HF to UHF during wildfire suppression is also a safety concern for fire fighters [32]. In a similar vein, spacecraft and vehicles traveling at hypersonic velocities within Earth's atmosphere become enveloped by a plasma layer which attenuates microwave and radio signals, leading to 'radio blackout' [33]. The ionized exhaust plumes also interfere with radio frequency transmission under certain conditions [34].

This effect can be put to good use, as the regression rates of solid rocket propellants have been measured using the attenuation of microwaves passing through flames [35]. However, 'background ionization' of particles must be taken into account quantitatively in order to properly interpret the data [21], and a more sensitive method for obtaining the concentration ofelectrons in luminous flames is to determine the conductivity ofthe flame [22]. Such data can also be used in the design of divertors [36,37]. Note that carbon particles in the plasma environment which are to be encountered in these devices are similar to the carbon particles in the complex plasma of flames investigated in the pioneer works in the field of thermal dusty plasma [21,22,38,39].

The development of the inductively heated plasma generator (IPG) enables the electrode-less generation of high enthalpy plasmas, such as those found in the divertor region of fusion experiments or plasma wind tunnels, for the simulation of atmospheric entry in the development, investigation, and qualification of heat shield materials [40].

The objective ofthis paper is to develop a theoretical method for the estimation ofthe electrical conductivity of the thermal plasma formed by the dust particles and the electrons emitted by them in the state of thermal ionization equilibrium under typical conditions of the IPG6-B at Baylor University. We will completely ignore ionization of impurities entering into the carrier gas from the particle material, the effect of these impurities on the work function ofthe particle material, and carrier gas ionization. The magnitude ofthe electrical conductivity in an equilibrium plasma is determined by two factors, namely, the electron number density and the frequency of collisions with the molecules of the carrier gas and the dust particles. As shown in what follows, the contribution to the total collision frequency from collisions with the dust particles is inversely proportional to the particle radius at a constant mass fraction of particles in the plasma. However, even for the smallest particle size, this contribution does not exceed the contribution due to collisions with molecules ofthe carrier gas, the frequency of which can be regarded as known (it is determined by the composition of the plasma). Therefore, the problem ofcalculating the plasma conductivity is reduced to the problem ofcalculating the number density of electrons in the plasma. For different temperatures, pressures, and particle composition, various plasma states from an ideal to strongly coupled one are realized. However, regardless ofthe state, an estimate for the maximum particle charge can be written and, therefore, in view of the condition of quasineutrality, for the maximum electron number density as well. It turns out that this number density increases dramatically with decreasing particle radius. To reach the maximum conductivity it makes sense to use the smallest possible particle radius, which results from the volume condensation of a material with a small work function. We analyze available data on the electrical conductivity ofthe thermal dusty plasma. The correspondence between our theory and experiment demonstrates the relevance of our approach. This makes it possible to calculate some reference values ofthe electrical conductivity typical for the conditions ofthe hybrid IPG facility at Baylor University.

The paper is organized as follows. In section 2, the IPG is discussed in detail. In sections 3 and 4, the electron mean free path and number density are calculated allowing the determination of the plasma electrical conductivity. In section 5, we demonstrate a good correlation between our calculations and available

Figure 1. Working principle of an inductively heated plasma generator.

Figure 2. Left: IPG6-B test facility in operation with working gas helium. Right: block diagram of the test facility.

experimental data. In section 5.1, emphasis is made on a recent experiment with the thermal dustyplasma of combustion products ofthe propane-air mixture [41-43]. In section 5.2, we calculate the plasma electrical conductivity to be expected in experiments with the IPG6-B. The results of this study are summarized in section 6.

2. The IPG facility

IPGs use the transformer principle to create a plasma. An RF (radio frequency) current is fed into a coil inducing a strong electric field in the plasma which acts like the secondary coil of a transformer, with plasma heating then occurring due to the resulting electric current. A rough scheme of the IPG6-B working principle is shown in figure 1 (for details, see [40,44]). Cold gas is injected into one side of the plasma generator. By adding an azimuthal component to the gas flow, stabilization of the plasma can be achieved. After injection, the gas enters the quartz tube discharge channel, which can withstand both high temperatures and reactive gases. The discharge channel is surrounded by a water jacket to facilitate cooling. Further it is surrounded by the induction coil, which heats the plasma. The IPG6 test facilities at the University of Stuttgart (IPG6-S) and at Baylor University (IPG6-B; figure 2) are small scale versions ofthe IPGs IPG3,4, and 5 at IRS [45]. The general setup for both facilities is similar. The IPG6-B test facility and its schematic setup are shown in figure 2. Important operating parameters are listed in table 1.

3. The mean free path of electrons in a dustyplasma

The electron mean free path is determined by the number of collisions between the dust particles and carrier gas molecules. The mean free path of collisions with the particles can be estimated using the formula Xp = \jnp Op where np is the number density of the dust particles, and Op is the electron-particle scattering cross section. Regardless of whether the plasma formed by the dust particles and the electrons emitted by them is strongly coupled in the parameter ofthe particle-particle interaction, the plasma is quasi-homogeneous in the spatial distribution of the electron number density [46]. This means that the electrostatic potential of a charged particle

Table 1. Important operating parameters of the IPG6-B test facility.

Parameter

Comment

Operating frequency Vacuum system Maximum electric power Volume flow rate Operating pressure

Specific enthalpy Flow velocity

13.56 MHz 160 m3 h-1

15 kW 0.35-10 slm >20 Pa

He, Ar, O2, Air

He: several 100 MJ kg-1 Air: several 10 MJ kg-1 Ma <0.3

A maximum of 5 kW has been tested. A wider range is possible. Lower limit due to vacuum pump. Upper limit not tested yet. Maximum used pressure is 400 Pa. The IPG can theoretically work with most gases including oxidizing gases.

The specific enthalpy depends strongly on the working gas, the respective efficiency and mass flow rate. A nozzle will allow supersonic flows in future.

is screened at a distance of the order r/2 (see equation (8)), where r = (3/4nnp )1/3 is the radius of the cell in a cell model of the plasma (i.e., r is of the order of the average distance between the particles in the plasma). Obviously, Op cannot exceed n r2/4. Therefore, one can use Op = n r2/4 as a lower bound estimate for X p.We introduce the quantity k = ncjng, the mole fraction of particulate dust matter in the combustion products, where nc = (4n/3) R3np nl is the number ofmolecules in the condensed phase per unit volume ofthe plasma, R is the dust particle radius, nl is the number density ofmolecules in the condensed phase, and ng is the number density of molecules of the carrier gas (i. e., of the combustion products). In this case, the lower bound estimate

for X p,

x p ^ f R [ —

3 [ Kng,

is directlyproportionalto the particle radius.

For collisions with the carrier gas molecules, we have the mean free path

1 ee-s/kT

"dfi, (2) 0 n„ (fi)

k2 T2Jo ag(fi)

where og (e) is the transport cross section for electron scattering by molecules ofthe carrier gas. Consider as representative example the combustion ofhydrocarbon fuels with a temperature T = 2500 K (kT = 0.215 eV) at atmospheric pressure pg = ngkT = 1 atm, where k is the Boltzmann constant, and ng = 3 X 1018 cm2.We assume that the major components ofthe combustion products are molecules of nitrogen (78%), carbon dioxide (12% ) and oxygen (10%) (excess air). The transport scattering cross sections for these molecules are given in [47]. Under these conditions, og ~ 10-15 cm2, andwe obtain from equation (2), Xg = 3 X 10-4cm.To establish a lower bound of Xp, we choose the smallest possible particle size R = 10-6 cm and the greatest part of the mole fraction attainable for this size k = 0.02. Then we obtain from equation (1) X p ^ 4.2 X 10-4 cm. Thus, for combustion products X p > X g, regardless of the dust particle size and number density. This condition means that when calculating the plasma conductivity one can always neglect collisions between particles and calculate the conductivity using the formula [48]

1011 4Xgneoe2 _ 1011 4ne0 e2 r™ ee—e'kT

c2 3^2nmekT c2 3ngk2 T2^2nmekT J 0 ag (e) 1011 4ne0 e2 1 1 çœ ee—filkT

1 rœ £e—e/kl

t / ^T dfi' (3)

■.T J 0 a„(fi)

c2 3ngO^2nmekT ' Og kT J 0 Og (e)

where a is the conductivity in S m-1 and other quantities are measured in CGS units, c is the speed of light, e is the elementary charge, me is the mass of the electron, and ne0 is the electron number density.

4. The electron number density in the equilibrium dusty plasma

Consider a complex (dusty) plasma formed by the positively charged dust particles and the electrons emitted by them and assume the plasma to be in a state of thermal ionization equilibrium. Assuming that the fluctuations of the particle charge are small (which is true if the charges are sufficiently great), we denote by Z the charge (in units of e) of a particle with the radius R. At the ionization equilibrium, the local number density of electrons ne(r) at the distance r from the center of a particle is defined by the Boltzmann distribution

a u sf 10-5

101 103 10s 107 np, cm-3

Figure 3. Regions of dusty plasma states for T=2500 Kand W = 2.75 eV. Boundaries ofthe ideal and strongly coupled plasmas are indicated by curves 1 and 2, respectively; curve 3 indicates the boundary between the regimes of weak and strong screening.

ne (r) = ne oe0(r), (4)

where 0 (r) = ecp (r)/kT and p (r) is the electrostatic potential of the particle charge at the distance r from the center of a particle.

First we consider the case of a weak interaction between the particles, for which the interparticle interaction parameter is small: ypp = Z2e2/rkT ^ 1. Since a particle bears typically a great charge (Z » 1), the parameters ofinteraction between the particles and electrons ype = Ze2/rkT and ye = Z1/3e2/rkT are particularly small. As canbeseenin figure3, screening ofthe particle charge is negligibly small if ypp ^ 1 (see the discussion below). Then we can neglect the contribution of inhomogeneity of the electron distribution in the vicinity of the particles to the quasineutrality condition and write it as ne0 = Znp [46,49]. At the particle surface, we have from equation (4) 0 (R) = L1, where L1 = In(ne5/ne0),

T/2 i W \

1 exp(—T

. mekT . . .. . nes = 21 I eXP I (5)

is the number density ofthe thermally emitted electrons near the surface of a particle [39], and W is the work function of its material. Here, we suggest that W is independent of R. Since p (R) = ZeIR, we obtain the particle charge and the electron number density [38,39,46,49]

RkT RkTnp Z = —— Li, neo = -2— Li. (6)

Consider now an opposite case (ypp » 1), in which, at least, a short-range order in the particle spatial position must take place. Then the plasma is divided in cells with the radius r similar to the Wigner-Seitz cells. The combination of equation (4) with the Poisson equation inside a cell A0 = (4ne V kT) ne (r) leads to the Poisson-Boltzmann equation

d20 2 d0

—7 + —r

dr2 r dr

where XD = ^kT/4nne0 e2 is the Debye length, with the boundary conditions 0' (R) = —Ze2 /kTR2 and 0' (r) = 0 (the latter condition is due to the cell electrical neutrality).

Here, we will distinguish between the cases ofweak and strong screening of the particle charge. As is seen from (4), the electrons form a layer in the vicinity of the particle surface. If the absolute value of this charge is much less than the particle charge, the weak screening regime is realized. In addition, if R ^ r then in the most part of the cell (sufficiently far from the particle), the distribution of electrons is almost uniform, i.e., 0 (r) ^ 1, and the solution of equation (7) has the form

+ = X—2e0, (7)

0 (r) = 777

I 3 1 (LJ2

r 2 2 v r '

In the opposite case, a layer of electrons in the neighborhood of a particle screens strongly its charge. One can assume that this occurs in a thin layer, in which the problem is one-dimensional and the condition (2X2/r) \d&/dr | ^ 1, where X = ^kT/4nne (r) e2 is the local Debye length, is satisfied. Hence, the maximum charge that is weakly screened or the minimum charge that is strongly screened Z is defined by the condition

In the regime of the weak screening, the condition of cell neutrality can be written as ne0 ~ Znp. Then it follows from (8) that near the particle surface, 0 (r) ~ RL Jr. We substitute this in (9) to derive L1 = L2 and Z* = RkTL2/e2, where the quantity

L 2 = -ln(2nnpR3) (10)

is independent of nes, i.e., of the emissivity of the particle material [46,49].

In the regime of the strong screening, we have R2/XS2 » 2L1, where XS = -<J kT/4nnese2 is the surface Debye length. In this case, we assume that near the particle surface, 0 (r) decreases with the increase of r until the condition (9) is satisfied at some point r = R1 .If (R1 — R)/R ^ 1 then the total charge inside the sphere with the

radius R1, which can be termed the effective charge, is Z *. In the most part of the cell (r > R1), the weak screening regime still takes place for the effective charge, and the electron number density is defined by the ratio

RkTnpL2

ne0 = -2-• (11)

Note that (11) is independent of the particle emissivity. The above-discussed model reproduces to a reasonable precision the results of numerical solution of the Poisson-Boltzmann equation (7) [50].

We can summarize the obtained results as follows. Regardless of the value of the parameter yp, the particle charge is defined by the expression

z = Ml, (12)

and the electron number density is

npRkT 3 Kpg ne0 = -L =--L, (13)

e2 4n R2e 2nl

L = min( Li, L2), Li = ln( njneo),

L 2 = -ln(2nnpR3) = ln

2ni 3Kng

For small nes, ne k nes, and by virtue of the quasineutrality condition, the particle charge is positive, Z > 0 and ne < nes. Thus, L = L1. Then, with an increase of nes (due to an increase in temperature or decrease in the work function), L1 and L increase until they reach L2. After that, L does not change. Consequently, an estimate for the maximum number density of electrons in the plasma nmax, which is attained at sufficiently low W and coincides with that at W = 0, is given by the expression

3 Kpg , i 2n, X

4n R2e2nf I 3Kn

The difference between the actual and the maximum electron number density is given by the ratio

ne/nmax = LL 2.

For the above conditions typical for combustion products of hydrocarbon fuels, L2 = ln(2n^/ 3Kng) = 12.7. When L = L1 < L2, the charges on the particles are weakly screened by the electrons near the surface, while at L = L2 < L1 (ne = nmax), they are strongly screened. In the first case, (12)defines a real dust particle charge, while in the second case, it defines an effective one, which is equal to the difference between the actual charge of the particle and the charge of the screening layer of electrons near the surface.

Figure 3 shows the state diagram for the dusty plasma with respect to the parameter of dust interparticle interaction. The ideal plasma region is located below curve 1 (= 1) and a strongly nonideal plasma region situated above curve 2. Curve 2 was calculated for Yp = 6.4, which corresponds to the emergence of a short-range order in the model of one-component plasma of electrons and ions [51]. In the region above curve 3 (L1 = L2) particles are in the strong screening regime, while below curve 3, they are in the weak screening regime.

Table 2. Parameters of the work function of dust particle material [52].

CaO BaO CeO2

A, eV 1.32 1.40 2.75

B, 10-4 eV K-1 4.5 7.0 0.0

Table 3. Electron work function of CaO.

T, K W, eV, processing the data [53] W, eV, extrapolation of the data [54]

2200 3.35 3.29

2400 3.43 3.42

2530 3.79 3.51

As can be seen in the figure, at R > 10-4 cm, the particle charge is strongly screened and the particles typically form a strongly coupled system, while at R < 10-5 cm, the particle charge is weakly screened and the particle system can be strongly coupled only at high particle number densities. At R < 10-6 cm, the particle charge is always weakly screened and the particle system is almost ideal.

From formulas (3) and (15), it follows that the theoretical limit for experimentally achievable conductivity of the plasma formed by the dust particles and the electrons emitted by them is given by

1011 k I kT 2ni X In

R2nfOg y 2n3me I 3Kng

It is worth mentioning that the electrical conductivity (16) is weakly dependent on the temperature, since the ratio -JT ag (T) is approximately proportional to T, but it is sensitive to the average size of the particles being inversely proportional to its square. Therefore, to achieve a high electrical conductivity it makes sense to use only smaller particles. For conditions of the experiments [41-43] at R = 10-6 cm, when T = 2500 K, k = 0.02, Uf = 3.62 X 1022 cm-3, and o„ = 10-15 cm2, we have nmax = 7.4 X 1012 cm-3, Z = 19, and omax = 2 S m-1.

5. Comparison between the calculation results and experimental data

5.1. Early experiments

Calculation of the electric conductivity of a thermal dusty plasma with the particles of CaO, BaO, and CeO2 was carried out using equations (3), (13), and (14) for different temperatures and buffer gases. In so doing, we took into account the dependence of the work function of the particles on the temperature, which significantly affects the emission properties of their material. The work function of the particle material was approximated by the expression W=A + BTwith the constants A and B shown in table 2.

In [53], the conductivity of methane-air (oxygen-methane) combustion products mixed with fine powders of CaO and BaO was measured. The temperature was varied in the range from 2200 to 2530 K, and the powder flow rate, from 0.2 to 18% of the mass flow rate of combustion products. The measured conductivity varied from 0.01 to ca. 0.3 S m-1, and the data scatter was considerable. A considerable uncertainty in the particle radius R is characteristic of this experiment. We will assume that according to the state classification of section 6, the dust particles are weakly screened, and, therefore, the electron number density is defined by equation (12) with L = L1. Assuming in addition that the ratio of the mass flow rate of the powder to that of the combustion products is f = plKjMgnl, where p€ is the specific weight ofthe particle material and Mg is the average mass of the combustion products molecule, we rewrite equation (3) in the form

In ß = In a — In

4e np.

3ng ag*J 2nmekT

— In a

c2 nR2pfag\ 2nm,

where nes (5) is afunction of W. Thus, the dependence ln f (ln a) is almost linear. We fitted the experimental data [53] by variation of W and R in (17). This allowed us to determine these quantities. As a result, for CaO, we obtained a good agreement between the values of W obtained by processing the experimental data and extrapolation to the high-temperature region of the results of the work function measurement for CaO [54] (see

table 3). Note, however, that at T > 2000 K, there is a considerable discrepancy between the extrapolation of the data [54] and [52]. The values of R also derived from the processing ofthe experiment, are in qualitative agreement with the estimate [53]: (1 ± 0.5) X 10-5 cm.

Comparison of the theory and experiment for BaO particles for the considered experiment is impossible because in this temperature range, a significant portion of barium is in the gas phase (melting point of BaO is 2196 K), and it can be shown that the ionization of BaO molecules is comparable with the corresponding ionization of the dust particles.

In the experiment [55], the electrical conductivity of the plasma with the particles ofBaO in argon at T = 1600 K was measured. The mass flow rate ofBaO particles with the radius R = 3 X 10-5 cm was f = 0.2 of the argon mass flowrate (k = 0.05); the measured conductivity was 0.1 S m-1. Under these conditions, the temperature is low, so the ionization ofbarium compounds is negligible. Calculation ofthe effective cross section for electron scattering yields ag = 2.49 X 10-17 cm2, and from formulas (3), (13), and (14), we obtaina theoretical estimate for the electrical conductivity a = 0.12 S m-1, which is in a good agreement with experiment.

5.2. Recent experimental data and prospects

Consider the experiment performed at the Joint Institute for High Temperatures, Russian Academy of Sciences, where the particles of CeO2 were injected into the plasma of combustion products of the propane-air mixture. The experimental facility includes a plasma generator and the diagnostic means for determining the parameters ofthe particles and gas [56]. The main part ofthe plasma source consists of a two-flame propane-air Meeker burner with inner and outer flames. The laminar diffusion flame design was used to support a premixed propane-air flat flame and provide a uniform exit profile of the plasma parameters (temperature, velocity, and electron and ion densities). To shield the flame from entrained room air, a central region, 25 mm in diameter, of the burner surface was surrounded by a shroud of combustion gases flowing through an annular area with inner and outer diameters of 25 and 50 mm, respectively. During operation, the velocity Vg of the plasma stream was varied over 2^3m s-1 and the electron number density in the flame, over 109 - 1011 cm-3. The temperatures of the electrons and ions were equal and were varied over the range T = Te = Tg = 1700 - 2200 K, where Tgis the gas temperature. The spectroradiometric measurements of the temperature of the particles Tp [57] showed that it was close to the gas temperature (Tp &Tg). The combustion products were at atmospheric pressure.

We studied thermal plasma with two types of chemically inert particles, Al2O3 and CeO2. The dust particles were slightly impure and contained sodium and potassium. As a result, the spectra measurements revealed that a plasma spray of particles contains sodium and potassium atoms, which have a low ionization potential. Typical plasma spectra include continuous dust radiation and K spectral lines (see figure 2 of [58]).

In our experiments we use the plasma ofcombustion products ofthe propane-air mixture in stoichiometry, so we may expect that the combustion products will not contain soot (carbon) dust. Thus, the main components of the plasma in one case were charged CeO2 particles, electrons, and singly charged Na+ ions, and, in the other, charged Al2O3 particles, electrons, and Na+ and K+ ions. The measurements of the gas temperature and the number densities of sodium and potassium atoms were carried out with the aid of the generalized line reversion and full-absorption techniques, correspondingly (the errors were less than 1% and 30%, respectively) [56]. The local density ni of positive ions was determined by an electrical probe method [59]. Under typical experimental conditions, the diagnostic measurements showed that the ion number density (n ~ 109 cm-3) appeared to be almost an order of magnitude lower than the electron number density (ne ~ 1010 cm-3). The estimate based on the experimentally determined Na and K atom number densities and the Saha equation results in the electron number density, which is much lower than the measured one. Hence, it follows from the plasma quasineutrality condition that the contribution from the ionization of the Na and K admixtures to the total electron number density (and, respectively, to the electrical conductivity of the complex plasma) is negligibly small as compared to that from the electrons emitted by the dust particles. In order to study Coulomb ordered structures in the plasma, it is necessary to have data on the charge of the particles, as well as on the basic plasma parameters. An important feature of this plasma device is that it provides a dusty plasma of large enough dimensions (plasma column of 25 mm diameter and 70 mm long) so that a variety of plasma experiments may be conducted. As a result, various parameters ofthe gas and macroscopic particles were determined, such as the electron and alkali ion densities, the gas temperature, and the size and density of the macroparticles.

The plasma was diagnosed by probe and optical techniques. The arrangement of the probe measurements is shown in figure 4. The density ni of the positive alkali metal ions was measured with an electrical probe [41,42]. The random error in ni results in an uncertainty of 20%. The local electron number density ne was determined by a method based on measuring the current I and longitudinal electric field E in the plasma [59]. An electrode at constant voltage relative to the burner was placed in the plasma flow to determine the current I. Two probes were introduced into the plasma to determine the tangential component E of the electric field. The electrical

Figure 4. The arrangement of the probe measurements. It includes (1) the electrical probe to measure the number density of the positive alkali metal ions n{ and (2) the upper electrode at constant voltage relative to the burner and two movable probes to determine the current I and the tangential component E of the electric field, respectively (for the electron number density characterization). Open dots are holes in the top ofthe burner and filled dots are the dust particles.

Beam stop

Rotating disk

Figure 5. The setup for the optical measurements of the sizes, density, and spatial structures of the macroparticles.

conductivity of the plasma a = ne was determined on the basis of Ohm's law j = oE (j is the current density and ¡a is the mobility of the electrons). The electron number density was found from known ¡¡,. The uncertainty in the electron number density ne did not exceed 30%. The original laser method is used for characterization of the mean diameter and density of dust particles in the plasma flow. The method is based on the measurements of transmittance (extinction of a light beam passing through a dispersed medium) at small scattering angles. This technique is intended for determining the characteristics ofparticles with sizes of 0.5 - 15 ¡m. The setup for measuring the extinction of optical radiation includes a rotating disk with aperture stops of various diameters locatedin front ofaphotodetector (figure 5). AHe-Nelaser (A = 0.633 ¡m) is used as the light source. For an error in the measurement of the extinction of about 2%, the errors in recovering the particle sizes and density were about 3% and 10%, respectively. The ordered structures were analyzed using the binary correlation function [41] obtained with a laser time-of-flight counter (figure 5). The measurement volume is formed by focusing the beam of an Ar+ laser (wavelength A = 0.488 ¡m) onto the axial region of the plasma stream. Radiation scattered by individual particles at the angle of 90° when they cross the waist of the laser beam is collected by a lens and directed onto the 15 ¡m-wide monochromator entrance slit. The diameter of the measurement volume was less than 10 ¡m. The resulting pulsed signals were then processed to calculate the pair correlation function g(r), which characterizes the probability of finding a particle at a distance r = Vpt from a given particle. Here, t is the time and Vp is the average particle velocity (Vp « Vg for micron-sized particles

1e-H)01 1

S 0.01

0.001 0.0001 1e-005

R = 10"5 cm 7 = 2000 K

Figure 6. Conductivity of the combustion products plasma with the dust particles of the radius 10-5 cm (blue solid line denotes the CaO particles and red solid line, the CeO2 particles) and of the combustion products plasma doped with potassium seed: dashed line corresponds to equal mass fractions of the particles and the seed and dashed-dotted lines, to the condition na = np.

[41,42]). An analysis ofg(r) makes it possible to describe the spatial structure and interparticle correlations of the particles.

If we estimate the average radius of CeO2 particles as 8 X 10-5 cm and take into account that their number density ranges from 0.2 X 107 to 5.0 X 107 cm-3 then at T = 1700 - 2200 K, the particle charge is weakly screened according to the condition L1 < L2 (equation (14). Hence the electron number density estimated by formulas (13) and (14) which yield ne ~ (2.2 - 4.2) X 1010 cm-3. This result agrees well with the experimentally determined value of (2.5 - 7.2) X 1010 cm-3. Based on the thermodynamic data [60] it can be shown that the equilibrium ionization of CeO2 molecules in the gas phase is negligibly small as compared with the ionization of the dust particles. This means that the main contribution to the electron number density is that from the electrons produced by thermonic emission from the macroparticles. According to the state classification of section 4, the dust particles form a strongly coupled system, i. e., the particle positions must be noticeably correlated. This also agrees with the correlations registered in the above-discussed experiment.

In figures 6 and 7, the conductivity of the plasma combustion products of hydrocarbon fuels with CeO2 and CaO particles is compared with the electrical conductivity of the combustion products when doped with potassium at T = 2000 K. Similar plasma parameters are expected for the IPG facility discussed in section 2. The component composition of the combustion products was calculated using [60]. In these figures, the lower limit of the range of np is defined by the minimum electrical conductivity that can be reliably measured in experiment. An upper limit corresponds to the mole fraction ofparticulate matter in the combustion products k = 0.52, which can be considered the maximum attainable in the experiment. The seed ionization was calculated by the Saha equation. It is seen that for the particles with the radius 10-6 cm at sufficiently large np, the electrical conductivity of dusty plasma has the same order of magnitude as the potassium-doped combustion products even for equal mass fraction of particles and seed in the combustion products, and when na = np, where na is the

number density of seed atoms, the electrical conductivity of dusty plasma exceeds that of the combustion products significantly.

6. Conclusion

In this paper, we have discussed the IPG facility and developed a theoretical method for the estimation of the electrical conductivity of the thermal plasma formed by the dust particles and the electrons emitted by them under typical conditions of the IPG facility. To this end, we first find that under these conditions, the electron mean free path is defined by collisions with the neutral gas molecules rather than with charged particles. Then we calculated the equilibrium electron number density and demonstrated that for any given dust particle radius there existed an upper bound for the electron number density, which is reached when the electron work function from the particle material is sufficiently low, and the particle charge is strongly screened by the electron gas in the vicinity of the particle surface. Correspondingly, there is a similar upper bound for the electrical conductivity of the plasma. In the vicinity of this upper bound, the conductivity is independent of the electron work function and depends weakly on the temperature.

To verify our calculation formulas, we analyzed available experimental data on the conductivity ofthermal dusty plasma and discussed in detail a recent experiment, where particles of CeO2 were injected into a plasma consisting of the combustion products of a propane-air mixture. A good agreement between the theory and experiment testifies to the relevance of our theoretical approach. Employing this approach we make the estimates for future experiments on the IPG facility and show that the level of attainable electrical conductivity is competitive with that of the plasmas doped with potassium.

Although our theory is in satisfactory agreement with available experimental data, these data are currently too few in number to draw definitive conclusions. Calculation of the conductivity of a dusty plasma is also complicated by a considerable uncertainty in the work function ofthe particle material W, the particle radius R, and the effective transport cross section for electron scattering by the carrier gas molecules ag involved in the calculation formulas. Large scatter in the values of Wfor the same substance at the same temperature (about 1 eV) available in the literature has already been discussed above. In particular, this scatter can be due to the admixtures adsorbed on the particle surface. Values ofR, which are not always precisely known even for the powder used in the plasma of combustion products, can vary significantly due to cracking of the particles during thermal shock at the moment of their introduction into the plasma and due to partial evaporation of the particle material and its subsequent nucleation to form a new fine fraction. Calculation of ag in the combustion products requires a detailed calculation oftheir component composition, which is a separate problem.

Despite the difficulties of theory and experiment, we can conclude that the maximum electrical conductivity, which is proportional to R-2 (see (16)), can onlybe achieved in aplasma containing extremely small particles. As such, it may make sense to create experimental conditions suitable for initial particle evaporation and subsequent nucleation of the substance. Note that in some technologies, the effect of enhancing the electrical conductivity due to the particles maybe undesirable. It is known that during the process of nucleation in the combustion products, microdroplets with a characteristic size R ~ 10-6 cm are formed [61]. Their ionization can lead to large values of a. Apparently, BaO particles should be regarded as most promising for such purposes. For more conventional experiments, where the size range of particles to be injected into the plasma is assumed to be controlled, it makes sense to use LaB6.

The model introduced in this paper maybe a simplified approach due to its equilibrium assumptions. However, for equilibrium conditions it has to be considered as acceptable assessment and, moreover, as adequate point of departure for further modeling and calculation. Furthermore, it is evident that verification activities—also on basis of academically reduced experiments—can be performed which in turn will strengthen the sustainability of the approach. In addition, relevant sensitivities can be derived from this assessment, which will provide a feedback to the experiments and their potential layout.

Acknowledgments

The support of the Russian Science Foundation for development of the theoretical background for calculation of the electrical conductivity of the thermal dustyplasma (GrantNo. 14-50-00124, DI Zh) and ofthe Russian Foundation for Basic Research for the experimental investigation of the thermal plasma and development of the diagnostic technique (Grant No. 14-02-90052, O F P) are gratefully acknowledged.

References

[1] SpitzerL 1941 Astrophys.J. 93 369

[2] GoertzCK 1989 Rev.Geophys. 27 271

[3] Mendis D A 2002 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 11A219

Shukla P K 2001 Phys. Plasmas 8 1791 Mather T A and Harrison R G 2006 Surv. Geophys. 27 387 Boufendi L and Bouchoule A 1994 Plasma Sources Sci. Technol. 3 262 Winter J and Gebauer G1999 J. Nucl. Mater. 266-9 228

Bouchoule A 1999 Dusty Plasmas Physics Chemistry and Technologcial Impacts in Plasma Processing (New York: Wiley) Morfill G and Kersten H 2003 New J. Phys. 5

Kersten H, DeutschH andKroesenGMW2004 Int. J. Mass Spectrom. 233 51 special issue: in honour of Tilmann Mark Matthews LS,Shotorban Band Hyde TW 2013 Astrophys.J. 776 103 Matthews L S, Land V and Hyde T W 2012 Astrophys. J. 744 8

Matthews L S and Hyde T W 2007 Charging of fractal dust agglomerates in a plasma environment 16th IEEE Int. Pulsed Power Conf.

(7-22 June2007) vol 2, p 1577

Northrop T G 1992 Phys. Scr. 45 475

Kimura H and Mann 1 1998 Astrophys. J. 499 454

Ma Q, Matthews L S, Land V and Hyde T W 2013 Astrophys. J. 763 77

MendisDA, Rosenberg M and Chow VW1998 Physics of Dusty Plasmas ed M Horanyi, S Robertson and B Walch (New York: AIP) p 1 Rosenberg M, Mendis D A and Sheehan D P 1999 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 27 239

Fortov V E, Nefedov A P, Nikitsky V P, Ivanov AI and Lipaev A M 2000 Experimental studies of UV-induced dusty plasmas under

microgravity Frontiers in Dusty Plasmas ed YN YK Shukla (Amsterdam: Elsevier) p 535

Rosenberg M, Mendis D A and Sheehan D P 1996 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 241422

Shuler K E and Weber J1954 J. Chem. Phys. 22 491

Sugden T M and Thrush B A 1951 Nature 168 703

SodhaMS2014 Kinetics of Complex Plasmas (Springer Series on Atomic, Optical, and Plasma Physics) edGWFDrake (Dordrecht: Springer) vol 81

Bronold F X, Fehske H, Kersten H and Deutsch H 2008 Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 175002 Bronold F X, Fehske H, Kersten H and Deutsch H 2009 Contrib. Plasma Phys. 49 303 Heinisch R L, Bronold F X and Fehske H 2011 Phys. Rev. B 83 195407 Thiessen E, Heinisch R L, Bronolda F X and Fehske H 2014 Eur. Phys. J.D 68 98 Mather T A and Harrison R G 2006 Surv. Geophys. 27 387 Boyle A Rand Llewellyn F J1950 J. Soc. Chem.Ind. 69 173 Nifuku M and Katoh H 2003 Powder Technol. 135-136 234 Mphale K and Heron M 2007 Tellus B 59 766

Mphale K M, Luhanga P V C and Heron M L 2008 Combust. Flame 154 728

Gillman E D and Amatucci W E 2014 Phys. Plasmas 21 060701

Kinefuchi K, OkitaK, Funaki I and Abe T 2014 J. Spacecr. Rockets 0 1

Anicin B A, Jojic B, Blagojevic D, Adzic M and Milosavljevic V1986 Combust. Flame 64 309

HerdrichG, Laufer R, GabrielliRA, Dropmann M, HydeT WandRoeser H-P2012 J. FrontiersAerosp. Eng. 1 27

Roth J R1986 Introduction to Fusion Energy (Charlottesville, VA: Ibis)

Einbinder H 1957 J. Chem. Phys. 26 948

SodhaMSandGuhaS 1971 Adv. PlasmaPhys. 4219

Herdrich G and Petkow D 2008 J. Plasma Phys. 74 391

Fortov V E, Nefedov A P, PetrovO F, Samarian A A and Chernyschev A V1996 Phys. Rev. E 54 R2236 Fortov V E, Nefedov A P, PetrovO F, Samaryan A A and Chernyshev A V1997 JETP 84 256 Nefedov A P, PetrovO F and Fortov V E 1997 Sov. Phys.—Uspekhi 1671215

Dropmann M, HerdrichG, Laufer R, PuckertD, FulgeH, FasoulasS, Schmoke J, Cook M and Hyde TW 2013 IEEE Trans. Plasma Sci. 31 804

Herdrich G, Auweter-Kurtz M, Kurtz H L, Laux T and Winter M 2002 J. Thermophys. Heat Transfer 16 440 Zhukhovitskii D I, KhrapakAGandYakubovIT 1984 Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 22 833 KhrapakAGand YakubovI T 1981 Electrons in Dense Gases and Plasmas (Moscow: Nauka) Lifshitz E M and Pitaevskii L P 1981 Physical Kinetics (Oxford: Pergamon)

Zhukhovitskii D I, KhrapakAGandYakubovIT 1984 Ionization equilibrium in the plasma with a condensed disperse phase Plasma Chemistry vol 11 ed B M Smirnov (Moscow: Energoatomizdat) p 130 Gibson E G 1966 Phys. Fluids 9 2389 Hansen J P 1976 Phys. Rev. A 8 3096

Fomenko V S 1981 Emission Properties of Materials (Kiev: Naukova Dumka)

Zimin EP, MihnevichZGandPopovVA 1966 Proc. Symp. Electricity from MHD (Salzburg, Vienna) vol 3, p 97 Beinar K S and Nikonov V P 1965 Technol. Electron. 10 476 Waldie B and Fells 11967 Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 261 490

Kondrat'ev A B, Nefedov A P, PetrovO F and Samaryan A A1994 Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 32 452 Nefedov A P, PetrovO F and Vaulina OS 1995 J. Quant. Spectrosc. Radiat. Transfer 54 453 VaulinaOS, Samaryan A A, ChernyshovAV, Nefedov A P and Petrov OF 1999 Plasma Phys. Rep. 25 170 Kosov VF, MolotkovV I and NefedovA P 1991 Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 29 633 GlushkoA (ed) 1985ThermodynamicProperties of Individual Substances (Moscow: Nauka) ZhukhovitskiiDI, KhrapakAGandYakubovIT 1983 Teplofiz. Vys. Temp. 21982

Copyright of New Journal of Physics is the property of IOP Publishing and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.