CC BY
0Public Health
RESEARCH ARTICLE Open Access
Factors associated with history of drug use among female sex workers (FSW) in a high HIV prevalence state of India
Gajendra Kumar Medhi1'6*, Jagadish Mahanta1, Michelle Kermode2, Ramesh S Paranjape3, Rajatashuvra Adhikary4, Sanjib Kumar Phukan1 and P Ngully5
Abstract
Background: The intersection between illicit drug use and female commercial sex work has been identified as an important factor responsible for rising HIV prevalence among female sex workers (FSW) in several northeastern states of India. But, little is know about the factors associated with the use of drugs among FSWs in this region. The objective of the paper was to describe the factors associated with history of drug use among FSWs in Dimapur, an important commercial hub of Nagaland, which is a high HIV prevalence state of India.
Methods: FSWs were recruited using respondent driven sampling (RDS), and were interviewed to collect data on socio-demographic characteristics and HIV risk behaviours. Biological samples were tested for HIV, syphilis gonorrhea and Chlamydia. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors associated with drug use.
Results: Among the 426 FSWs in the study, about 25% (n = 107) reported having ever used illicit drugs. Among 107 illicit drug users, 83 (77.6%) were non-injecting and 24 (22.4%) were injecting drug users. Drug-using FSWs were significantly more likely to test positive for one or more STIs (59% vs. 33.5%), active syphilis (27.1% vs. 11.4%) and Chlamydia infection (30% vs. 19.9%) compared to their non-drug using peers. Drug-using FSWs were also significantly more likely to be currently married, widowed or separated compared with non-drug-using FSWs. In multiple logistic regression analysis, being an alcohol user, being married, having a larger volume of clients, and having sexual partners who have ever used or shared injecting drugs were found to be independently associated with illicit drug use.
Conclusions: Drug-using FSWs were more vulnerable to STIs including HIV compared to their non-drug using peers. Several important factors associated with being an FSW who uses drugs were identified in this study and this knowledge can be used to plan more effectively targeted harm reduction strategies and programs.
Keyword: FSW, Drug Use, HIV, STIs, Condom Use
Background
The intersection between illicit drug use and female commercial sex work has been recognized for many years [1]. Drug use among female sex workers (FSWs) is an important public health concern because of the link with HIV transmission. Injecting drug use is a major
* Correspondence: gkmedhi_ro@rediffmail.com
Regional Medical Research Centre (RMRC), N.E. Region (ICMR),
Dibrugarh-786001, Assam, India
6RegionalMedicalResearch Centre, NE Region, Indian Councilof Medical Research, Dibrugarh-786001, Assam, India
Fulllist of author information is available at the end of the article
Bio Med Central
route of HIV transmission and other blood-borne infections among FSWs in a variety of settings [1-5]. Several studies have also documented substantially higher prevalence of HIV and other infections among non-injecting drug users compared to non-drug users [3,6-10]. Several plausible explanations account for the higher HIV prevalence among non-injecting drug users compared to the general population [8].
The overlap between illicit drug use and female sex work has been identified as an important factor responsible for rising HIV prevalence among FSWs in several northeastern states of India [4]. The state of Nagaland
© 2012 Medhi et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.Org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, anc reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
borders Myanmar and is one of the highest HIV prevalence states in India - in 2009 the prevalence among the general population was 0.8% [11]. The HIV epidemic in Nagaland has historically been attributed to the high prevalence of injecting drug use (mostly with a propoxyphene-based pharmaceutical Spasmoproxyvon, and heroin), but the importance of sexual transmission has been increasingly recognized in recent years. Surveillance reports indicate that HIV prevalence among injecting drug users (IDUs) in Nagaland has reduced from 8.4% in 2003 to 1.9% in 2007, whereas the prevalence among FSWs went up sharply from 4.4% in 2003 to 16.5% in 2006, and still remains above 10% [12,13]. Drug involvement is reported to be the main factor for such sudden increase of HIV among them [14]. A previous study of FSWs in Nagaland (n = 220) found that about 15% had entered sex work to support their drug use and that, at the time of entry into sex work, 60% were regularly using alcohol or other drugs, 17% were using heroin and 6% had ever injected drugs [15,16]. To date, very little is known about the characteristics of FSWs who use illicit drugs in this region. It is important to identify the factors associated with this highly vulnerable sub-group of FSWs so that effective HIV prevention strategies can be appropriately targeted. The present study was conducted in Dimapur, which is the commercial capital of Nagaland, and the main hub for commercial sex work. The specific objective of this paper is to identify factors associated with illicit drug use among FSWs in Nagaland in order to more effectively target this high risk group with HIV prevention interventions.
Methods
Study design
This cross-sectional study among FSWs was conducted in the Dimapur district of Nagaland from February to April 2006 as a part of large multi-centre study known as the Integrated Biological and Behavioural Assessment (IBBA). A detailed summary of the IBBA objectives, sampling methods used, and questionnaire are described elsewhere [17,18].
Sampling design
Respondent driven sampling (RDS) was adopted to recruit study participants. RDS is a variant of chain-referral sampling which has been proved to be feasible and successful to recruit hidden populations such as injecting drug users (IDU), FSWs and men who have sex with men (MSM) in a more representative manner [19-21]. RDS method allows calculating asymptomatic unbiased estimates of population parameters extenuating the biases of chain referral sampling [22] using RDSAT (RDS analysis tool). In RDS, sampling begins with few non-randomly selected initial recruits (called 'seed') from the target population who meet the eligibility criteria. These seeds then start the chain referral
by recruiting fixed numbers of eligible peers from their personal network who, in turn, recruit other peers for the study. This recruitment process continues until the target sample size is attained [19]. The target sample size for the study was calculated as 400 [14,18]. In this study, we recruited ten purposively selected seeds to initiate recruitment process. Then, all the seeds were given three uniquely coded coupons to recruit three eligible peers from their personal networks. This recruitment process continued till the target sample size was achieved in the study. One seed could not produce any recruits; while other two seeds propagated only upto 2nd waves. Number of waves for other seven seeds ranged from 6 to 11. Only about 8 weeks was required to recruit the required samples in the study. More detailed description of sampling design adopted to recruit participants in this study has been already described elsewhere [14,17,18].
Data collection and variables
The definition of an FSW was a female, aged 18 years or older, who had sex with men in exchange for cash or kind at least once within the past one month. Anonymous face to face interviews were conducted by trained female interviewers who collected data using a structured questionnaire after obtaining written informed consent from the eligible participants. The dependent variable was lifetime use of illicit drugs (injecting and/or consuming illicit drugs) among FSWs. Respondents were asked to report if they had ever consumed or ever injected any illicit drugs (e.g., spasmoproxivon, heroin, marijuana, and methamphetamine etc.). Other variables of interest were socio-demographic characteristics, patterns of sex work, sexual risk behaviors, and knowledge about HIV. The socio-demographic variables included respondents' age, educational status, and marital status. Variables related to sex work and sexual practices included consistent condom use with sex partners (regular, occasional clients and regular non-paid partners), volume of clients per week, types of clients, venues for soliciting and having sex with clients, age at first sexual experience. Consistent condom use was defined as the every time condom use during a sexual act.
The participants were also asked to provide blood and urine samples. Blood samples were tested for HIV and syphilis. Urine samples were tested for Neisseria gonorrhoeae (NG) and Chlamydia trachomatis (CT). Serum samples were tested for HIV by Microelisa (J. Mitra and Company, India), and positive tests were confirmed by Genedia HIV 1/2 ELISA 3.0 (Green Cross Life Science Corporation, South Korea). Serum samples were also tested for syphilis by rapid plasma reagin (RPR) test and confirmed by Treponema pallidum haemagglutination assay (TPHA). Urine samples were tested with nucleic acid amplification assay (Gen-Probe Aptima) for the detection of Neisseria gonorrhoeae and Chlamydia trachomatis. The
methods and procedures adopted for testing the biological samples have been described elsewhere in details [18]. Having a sexually transmitted infection (STI) was defined as a positive test result for any of the gonorrhea, chlamydia and/or syphilis.
Statistical analysis
We compared the characteristics of drug-using FSWs and non-drug-using FSWs using Pearson's Chi-square test. RDS-weighted univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses was used to estimate crude and adjusted odds ratios (OR, 95% confidence interval) using SPSS software to identify the factors associated with illicit drug use among FSWs. Only variables that were found to be significantly associated with drug use in univariate analysis at 5% level were included in the multiple logistic regression model to identify the factors independently associated with drug use. The individualized weights generated for the dependent variable (i.e. ever drug use) using RDS Analysis Tool version 5.6 [23] were applied to the logistic regression analysis using SPSS in order to adjust for the RDS sampling process [23].
Ethical approval
The Health Ministry Screening Committee of the Government of India and ethical review bodies of the participating institutions (Family Health International, Regional Medical Research Center, and National AIDS Research Institute) granted ethical approval for the study.
Results
Of the 426 FSWs who took part in the study, 107 (25%) reported having ever used illicit drugs for non-medical reasons. Of the 107 illicit drug users, 83 were exclusively oral drug users, 2 were exclusively injecting drug users, and 22 were both oral and injecting drug users. Three individuals were excluded from the further analysis due to their non-discloser about drug use behaviour.
Table 1 displays the characteristics of the sample of FSWs disaggregated by drug-using status. Drug-using-FSWs were older compared with non-drug-using FSWs, but the groups did not differ significantly in terms of their educational status or age of sexual debut. A higher proportion of drug-using FSWs was widowed (15% vs. 8.9%), separated (24.3% vs. 19.6%) and married (44.9% vs. 38.3%).
Drug-using FSWs were more likely to have consumed alcohol at least once weekly in the past month compared to non-drug-using FSWs, and they reported more sexual relationships with IDU clients who shared needles compared to non-drug-using FSWs (58.9% vs. 22.1%). The average duration of sex work was longer for drug-using FSWs compared to non-drug-using FSWs (6 years vs 4.8 years), and they reported more clients in the last
working week (7.7 clients vs 5.7 clients). A higher proportion of drug-using FSWs served their clients at lodges/ hotels (72% vs. 56%), and they were more likely to report using condoms for every sexual act with both regular (14% vs. 7.3%) and occasional clients (25.2% vs. 13.3%). The proportion of FSWs who used condoms consistently with their main regular sex partners (husband/boy-friends) was very low for both groups (5% and 3.7%) (Table 1).
Compared to non-drug-using FSWs, drug-using FSWs were significantly more likely to test positive for HIV, syphilis, and Chlamydia infection. Overall, at least one STI (syphilis, Chlamydia, and/or gonorrhea) was detected among 59% (n = 63) of drug-using FSWs compared to 33.5% (n = 106) among non-drug-using FSWs. A higher proportion of drug-using FSWs had HIV (25.2% vs. 9.5%), syphilis (27.1% vs. 11.4%), and Chlamydia (30% vs. 19.9%). Drug-using FSWs were more likely to have heard about HIV compared to their non-drug-using peers (94.4% vs. 85.1%).
The results of univariate and multiple logistic regression analysis are shown in the Table 2. In the univariate analysis, compared with non-drug-using FSWs, drug-using FSWs were more likely to: be older (>25 years of age); be widowed/separated or currently married; consume alcohol (daily/at least once a week during last month); have sexual partners who have ever used or shared injecting drugs; have sex with clients at lodges/hotels; have a longer duration in sex work (> 4 years); have served 5 or more clients in the last working week; use condoms consistently while having sex with regular clients; use condoms consistently or most of the time while having sex with occasional clients; have heard about HIV/AIDS; and have active syphilis. Although statistically non-significant, the odds of being a drug-using FSW were about 2-times higher for those who tested positive for NG and 1.6 times higher for those who tested positive for CT.
Additional analysis indicates that the factors significantly associated with illicit drug use (oral and/or injecting drug use) remained fairly constant even when the injectors were removed from the group, with the exception of age, duration of sex work and having ever heard of HIV (Table not shown).
In the multiple regression analysis, after controlling for all the significant factors in univariate analysis, daily alcohol use (OR = 5.15, CI: 2.27-11.66), alcohol use at least once a week (OR = 3.01, CI: 1.45-6.23), being widowed (OR = 2.58, CI: 0.84-7.95), being separated (OR = 2.55, CI: 0.88-5.8), serving 5-9 (OR = 2.59, CI: 1.30-5.13) or more than 9 clients (OR = 2.87, CI: 1.30-6.34) in the last working week, and having sexual partners who have ever used or shared injecting drugs (OR = 4.91, CI: 2.69-8.92) were all found to be factors significantly associated with a history of ever having used illicit drugs.
Table 1 Characteristics of FSW participants disaggregated by drug using status
Table 1 Characteristics of FSW participants disaggregated by drug using status (Continued)
Characteristics
Ever used drugs (N = 107)
Current age (years)
Never used drugs p-value (N = 316) n (%)
18-19 13 (12.1) 74 (23.4) 0.018
20-24 27 (25.2) 88 (27.8)
25+ 67 (62.6) 154 (48.7)
Mean age 26 25
Median age 25 24
Marital status
Married 48 (44.9) 121 (38.3) 0.005
Divorced/separated 26 (24.3) 62 (19.6)
Widowed 16 (15.0) 28 (8.9)
Unmarried 17 (15.9) 105 (33.2)
Educational status
Illiterate 52 (48.6) 139 (44.0) 0.666
Upto 10th standard 48 (44.9) 151 (47.8)
> 10th standard 7 (6.5) 26 (8.2)
Consumed alcohol
(past month)
Everyday 34 (31.8) 40 (12.6) <0.001
At least once a week 48 (44.9) 121 (38.3)
Never/< once a week 25 (23.4) 155 (49.1)
Have sexual partners
who have used or
shared injecting
drugs (ever) *
No 42 (39.3) 239 (75.6) <0.001
Yes 63 (58.9) 70 (22.1)
Age at first sex*
<=15 years 49 (45.8) 131 (41.5) 0.447
> 16 years 58 (54.2) 184 (58.2)
Place of sex work#
Hotel/brothel 77 (72) 177 (56) 0.014
Public place 6 (5.6) 24 (7.6)
Home 24 (22.4) 115 (36.4)
Duration of sex work*
< 2 years 12 (11.2) 59 (18.7) 0.019
2-4 years 39 (36.4) 144 (45.7)
5-9 years 37 (34.6) 72 (22.9)
> = 10 years 19 (17.8) 40 (12.7)
Mean duration (years) 5.91 4.83
Client volume
per week*
0-4 31 (29.0) 156 (49.4) 0.001
5-9 49 (45.8) 108 (34.2)
> = 10 27 (25.2) 51 (16.1)
Mean no. clients/week 7.72 5.72
Condom use with occasional clients*
Sometimes/never 56 (52.3) 221 (70.0) 0.002
Most of the time 24 (22.4) 49 (15.5)
Every time 27 (25.2) 42 (13.3)
Condom use with regular clients*
Sometimes/never 73 (68.2) 248 (78.5) 0.034
Most of the time 19 (17.8) 39 (12.3)
Every time 15 (14.0) 23 (7.3)
Condom use with main regular partners
Sometimes/never 98 (91.6) 283 (89.6) 0.815
Most of the time 5 (4.7) 17(5.4)
Every time 4 (3.7) 16 (5.0)
Ever heard of HIV*
No 6 (5.6) 46 (14.6) 0.014
Yes 101 (94.4) 269 (85.1)
Negative 76 (70.0) 253 (80.1) 0.052
Positive 31 (30.0) 63 (19.9)
Negative 100 (93.4) 305 (96.5) 0.175
Positive 7 (6.54) 11 (3.5)
Active syphilis
No 78 (72.9) 280 (88.6)
Yes 29 (27.1) 36 (11.4) <0.001
N.B: '#'Hotel/brothel = bar, night club, brothel, Public place = public place, vehicle, others. Home = home (client/FSWs) and rented room. '*'Data with missing cases.
dhaba, hotel and lodge.
Discussion
This study found that about a quarter of FSWs in Dimapur district of Nagaland reported having ever used illicit drugs. The drug-using FSWs substantially differed from their non-drug-using peers in terms of their demographic profile, sexual risk profile and burden of sexually transmitted diseases.
Younger FSWs were less likely to have ever used drugs, which may reflect a true declining trend of drug use. It is also possible that those who remain in sex work for longer are more likely to have been exposed to drugs, and to have begun to use them as a means of coping with the challenges inherent in being an FSW in this context. An earlier study of FSWs in Dimapur noted an increase in the proportion of FSWs regularly using
Table 2 Factors associated with ever drug use in univariate (crude OR) and multiple (adjusted OR) logistic regression analysis
Table 2 Factors associated with ever drug use in univariate (crude OR) and multiple (adjusted OR) logistic regression analysis (Continued)
Characteristic Crude OR 95% CI Adjusted OR 95% CI
Current age (years) 18-19 Reference Reference
20-24 1.75 0.80-3.84 1.56 0.57-4.27
25+ 2.48* 1.22-5.02 1.20 0.43-3.38
Marital status
Married 2.45** 1.27-4.74 2.33* 1.01 -5.40
Divorced/separated 2.59* 1.24-5.42 2.55 0.88-5.80
Widowed 3.53** 1.50-8.28 2.58 0.84-7.95
Unmarried Reference Reference
Educational status
Illiterate 1.39 0.533-3.62
Up to 10th standard 1.18 0.45-3.09
> 10th standard Reference
Consumed alcohol (past month)
Everyday 5.27** 2.72-10.20 5.15** 2.27-11.66
At least once a week 2.46** 1.38-4.39 3.01** 1.45-6.23
Never/< once a week Reference Reference
Have sexual partners who have used or shared injecting drugs (ever) *
No Reference Reference
Yes 5.12** 3.13-8.45 4.91** 2.69-8.92
Place of sex work
Hotel/brothel 2.09** 1.20-3.62 1.20 0.59-2.42
Public place 1.20 0.41 -3.50 1.40 0.34-5.76
Home Reference Reference
Age at first sex
<=15 years 1.19 0.74-1.90
> 16 years Reference
Duration of sex work
< 2 years Reference Reference
2-4 years 1.33 0.62-2.88 0.73 0.28-1.90
5-9 years 2.53* 1.15-5.57 1.42 0.48-4.18
> = 10 years 2.34* 0.96-5.66 1.92 0.55-6.66
Client volume per week
0-4 Reference Reference
5-9 2.28** 1.32-3.95 2.59** 1.30-5.13
>=10 2.66** 1.40-5.08 2.87** 1.30-6.34
Condom use with occasional clients
Sometimes/never Reference Reference
Most of the time 1.93* 1.06-3.54 1.25 0.49 3.13
Every time 2.54** 1.40-4.61 1.98 0.69 5.68
Condom use with regular clients
Sometimes/never Reference Reference
Most of the time 1.66 0.87-3.15 1.69 0.62 4.61
Every time 2.22* 1.06-4.64 0.89 0.24 3.25
Condom use with main regular partners
Sometimes/never Reference
Most of the time 1.39 0.42-4.61
Every time 1.16 0.24-5.77
Ever heard of HIV
No Reference Reference
Yes 2.88* 1.11 -7.48 2.74 0.91 8.22
Negative Reference
Positive 1.64 0.96-2.79
Negative Reference
Positive 1.94 0.70-5.41
Active syphilis
No Reference Reference
Yes 2.98** 1.67-5.33 1.79 0.85 3.79
' refers p-value < 0.05 and ' ' for p-value < 0.01.
alcohol and other drugs after the commencement of sex work [16]. In terms of marital status, we found that those FSWs who were or had been married were more likely to report drug use compared to those who had never married. Furthermore, among the married FSWs those who were widowed were more vulnerable to drug use. The probability of using drugs among the married group remained elevated even in the multivariate model indicating an independent relationship. The drug use of husbands' seems to play an important role in the development of drug use among married women in India [24]. A higher rate of drug use among widows may be related to the influence of their husband's drug use, as many young widows in Nagaland are in this situation due to the drug-related death of their husbands [25]. Drug use by one or both marital partners contributes to family disharmony, and can lead to separation or divorce [24]. These drug-using women may be forced into sex work in order to sustain their livelihood and their drug use [4,15]. In this study, drug-using FSWs and non-drug-using FSWs did not differ from one another in terms of their educational
status. Our results are contrary to previous reports from this region that indicated a strong link between illiteracy and substance use for women [26-29].
This study also found that alcohol use among drug-using FSWs was more common compared with non-drug-using FSWs. This finding is consistent with previous reports, which showed that co-use of alcohol and illicit drugs was very common among drug users in northeast India, including female drug users [4,24,30]. Consuming alcoholic drinks at least once weekly was independently associated with having ever used drugs among FSWs in this study. Panda et al. (2006) reported that 98% female drug users consumed alcohol prior to use of illicit drug in Manipur [4]. This is certainly a cause for concern because concomitant use of drugs and alcohol are synergistic risk factors for transmission of HIV and other STIs [31]. Probably, alcohol use can be used as a behavioural marker for identifying suspected illicit drug users as illicit drug use is a more stigmatized and socially unacceptable behaviour particularly among women in comparison to alcohol use. FSWs may not be hesitant to disclose their habit of consuming culturally acceptable home brewed alcohol.
Studies in this region indicate that many female drug users resort to sex work to obtain drugs from their sexual partners or to earn money for purchasing drugs [4,15,24]. The drug-using FSWs in our study were more likely to report sexual interactions with clients who had ever injected or shared injecting drugs, and they also reported a higher volume of clients compared with non-drug-using FSWs. Volume of clients was found to be independently associated with being a drug-using FSW. Overall, our data indicate that drug-using FSWs are more likely to be exposed to HIV and other STIs due to their higher volume of clients and more sexual interactions with male drug users.
Contrary to previous reports, in our study drug-using FSWs compared to non-drug-using FSWs were more likely to report using condoms consistently or most of the time with both regular and occasional clients [9]. But, such results should be interpreted with caution since studies have shown that sex work conducted under the influence of drugs is associated with lower rates of condom use in other settings [32-34]. One possible explanation for the higher rate of condom use among drug-using FSWs in the context of Nagaland may be their greater awareness about the importance of condom use, since drug users have been a major target group for HIV prevention programmes in this region for a long time. In fact, we also found that prior knowledge of HIV was strongly associated with being a drug-using FSW. The venue for having sex with clients was significantly associated with having ever used illicit drugs in the univariate analysis. We found that drug-using FSWs were more likely to operate from lodges/hotels and least likely to be street-based. Probably lodges/hotels were used
clandestinely for the dual purposes of drug use and sex by FSWs.
In our previous report from this study, we showed that both injecting and oral drug use were significantly associated with HIV among FSWs in Dimapur [14]. Prevalence of HIV was almost three times higher among drug-using FSWs compared to non-drug using group [14]. This analysis throws further light on the relationship between drug use and other STIs among FSWs. We could not establish a significant multivariate association between drug use and individual STIs in this study, but prevalences of individual STIs were generally higher among drug-using FSWs. Similarly, the overall prevalence of one or more STIs was almost two times higher among drug-using FSWs compared to non-drug-using FSWs (59% vs. 33.5%) indicating their greater vulnerability to STIs. Even after exclusion of the IDUs from the drug-using group, prevalence of one or more STIs was significantly higher among life time illicit drug users compared with non-drug-using FSWs (results not shown) highlighting the importance of illicit drug consumption in the epidemiology of HIV and other STIs among FSWs in this region. These findings suggest that the drug-using FSWs need to be targeted by the prevention programs with greater urgency to make the HIV and STI prevention programs more successful.
This study has certain limitations. Firstly, RDS was used to recruit FSWs in the study because random selection of the target population was not a possibility according to our pre-survey assessment. However, RDS can be considered as the best sampling option to obtain better representative samples of a target population where random sampling is not feasible. The statistical theory upon which RDS is based suggests that if peer recruitment proceeds through a sufficiently large number of waves, the composition of the sample will stabilize, becoming independent of the seeds from which recruitment began, and thereby overcoming any bias the nonrandom choice of seeds may have introduced [35]. This stable sample composition is termed the "equilibrium". Therefore, it is after the point of equilibrium that the sample becomes representative of the study population [36]. In this study, we could achieve equilibrium for most of the key characteristics after 5th-6th waves. Secondly, we relied on self-reported data regarding sensitive personal information such as use of illicit drugs and sexual behaviours, hence the results are subject to social acceptability bias. To improve the veracity of the self-reported data, participants were assured of anonymity, and told that there would be no adverse consequences for disclosing this information to the interviewers. Further, it is difficult from a cross-sectional study to establish temporal relationships between dependent and independent variables. Lastly, only data regarding ever drug use was collected in this study. Therefore, we are unable to describe the extent and pattern of current drug use among FSWs in
Dimapur, and the relationship between these variables, their sexual risk behaviours, and infection with HIV and STIs.
Conclusions
This is the first ever study from northeast India to demonstrate that predominantly non-injecting drug-using-FSWs were disproportionately more vulnerable to HIV and other STIs. The impact of HIV prevention efforts is likely to be enhanced if this more vulnerable sub-group of FSWs were effectively targeted. Several factors such as alcohol use, marital status, larger volume of clients, and sexual partners' drug injecting status were identified as having association with drug use among FSWs. The findings of this report will be helpful in planning future harm reduction strategies among the FSWs in the region.
Competing interests
The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Acknowledgements
The authors are thankfulto Billand Melinda Gates Foundation (BMGF) for funding the study. The views expressed herein are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the officialpolicy or position of the Billand Melinda Gates Foundation. We are also thankfulto FHIfor their support to the study. The authors also acknowledge the contribution of all the research staffs of the project and other stakeholders associated with the project for their contribution to the study. The authors also thanks to Gregory Armstrong, NossalInstitute for GlobalHealth, Melbourne for reviewing the data analysis.
Author details
1RegionalMedicalResearch Centre (RMRC), N.E. Region (ICMR), Dibrugarh-786001, Assam, India. 2TechnicalDirector, Northeast India Knowledge Network, NossalInstitute for GlobalHealth, University of Melbourne, Carlton, Victoria, 3010, Australia. 3NationalAIDS Research Institute (NARI), Plot No. 73, Block G, MIDC Complex, Bhosari, Pune-411026, India. 4FHI 360, 1825 Connecticut Avenue, Washington, DC 20009, USA. 5Kripa Foundations, Kohima-797001, Nagaland, India. 6RegionalMedicalResearch Centre, NE Region, Indian Councilof MedicalResearch, Dibrugarh-786001, Assam, India.
Authors' contributions
JM, RSP, RA contributed to the study design, review of the manuscript. GKM is responsible for the concept of the manuscript, drafting of the paper, data acquisition and data analysis. PN contributed to the data acquisition and interpretation of data. SKP was involved in the data management and analysis. MK contributed to the data interpretation and review of the manuscript. Allauthors read and approved the finalmanuscript.
Received: 3 February 2012 Accepted: 5 April 2012 Published: 5 April 2012
References
1. Nguyen AT, Nguyen TH, Pham KC, Le TG, Bui DT, Hoang TL, Saidel T, Detels R: Intravenous drug use among street-based sex workers: a high-risk behavior for HIV transmission. Sex Transm Dis 2004, 3:15-19.
2. Khabbaz RF, Darrow WW, Hartley TM, Witte J, Cohen JB, French J, Gill PS, Potterat J, Sikes RK, Reich R, Kaplan JE, Lairmore MD: Seroprevalence and Risk Factors for HTLV-I/II Infection among Female Prostitutes in the United States. JAMA 1990, 263:60-64.
3. Patterson TL, Semple SJ, Staines H, Lozada R, Orozovich P, Bucardo J, Philbin MM, Pu M, Fraga M, Amaro H, Torre AL, Martinez G, Magis-Rodriguez C, Strathdee SA: Prevalence and correlates of HIV infection among female sex workers in 2 Mexico-US border cities. J Infect Dis 2008, 197:728-732.
4. Panda S, Bijaya L, Sadhana DN, Foley E, Chatterjee A, Banerjee D, Naik TN, Saha MK, Bhattacharya SK: Interface between drug use and sex work in Manipur. The Natl Med J India 2001, 14:209-211.
5. Tran TN, Detels R, Long HT, Lan HP: Drug use among female sex workers in Hanoi, Vietnam. Addiction 2005, 100:619-625.
6. Wang H, Chen RY, Ding G, Ma Y, Ma J, Jiao JH, Wu Z, Sharp GB, Wang N: Prevalence and predictors of HIV infection among female sex workers in Kaiyuan City, Yunnan Province China. Int J Infect Dis 2009, 13:162-169.
7. Camoni L, Regine V, Salfa MC, Nicoletti G, Canuzzi P, Magliocchetti N, Rezza G, Suligoi B: Continued high prevalence of HIV, HBV and HCV among injecting and noninjecting drug users in Italy. Ann Ist Super Sanita 2010, 46:59-65.
8. Strathdee SA, Stockman JK: Epidemiology of HIV Among Injecting and Non-injecting Drug Users: Current Trends and Implications for Interventions. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep 2010, 7:99-106.
9. Drumright LN, Patterson TL, Strathdee SA: Club drugs as causal risk factors for HIV acquisition among men who have sex with men: A review. Subst Use Misuse 2006, 41:1551 -1601.
10. Baozhang T, Kaining Z, Jinxing K, Ruchang X, Ming L, Caixia Z, Li T: Infection with human immunodeficiency virus and hepatitis viruses in Chinese drug addicts. Epidemiol Infect 1997, 119:343-347.
11. National AIDS Control Organization: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare. Government of India, New Delhi: Press release on HIV estimates; 2010. doi: [http://www.nacoonline.org].
12. National AIDS Control Organization: Ministry of health and family Welfare. Government of India: Technical report India HIV Estimates 2006, National AIDS Control Society; 2006. doi:[http://www.nacoonline.org].
13. National AIDS Control Organization: Ministry of Health and Family Welfare, Government of India: HIV Sentinel Surveillance and HIV Estimation in India 2007: A Technical Brief. National AIDS Control Society [http://www. nacoonline.org].
14. Medhi GK, Mahanta J, Paranjape RS, Adhikary R, Laskar N, Ngully P: Factors associated with HIV among female sex workers in a high HIV prevalent state of India. AIDS Care 2011, 24:369-376.
15. Devine A, Bowen K, Dzuvichu B, Rungsung R, Kermode M: Pathways to sex-work in Nagaland, India: implications for HIV prevention and community mobilisation. AIDS Care 2010, 22:228-237.
16. Bowen K, Dzuvichu B, Rungsung R, Devine A, Hocking J, Kermode M: Life circumstances of women entering sex work in Nagaland, north-east India. Asia Pac J Public Health 2011, 23:843-851.
17. Chandrasekaran P, Dallabetta G, Loo V, Mills S, Saidel T, Adhikary R, Alary M, Lowndes CM, Boily MC, Moore J: Evaluation design for large-scale HIV prevention programmes: the case of Avahan, the India AIDS initiative. AIDS 2008, 22(Suppl 5):S1 -S15.
18. Saidel T, Adhikary R, Mainkar M, Dale J, Loo V, Rahman M, Ramesh BM, Paranjape RS: Baseline integrated behavioural and biological assessment among most at-risk populations in six high-prevalence states of India: design and implementation challenges. Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2008, 22(Suppl. 5):S17-S34.
19. Johnston LG, Sabin K, Hien MT, Huong PT: Assessment of respondent driven sampling for recruiting female sex workers in two Vietnamese cities: Reaching the unseen sex worker. Journal of Urban Health 2006, 83 (Suppl 7):S16-S28.
20. McKnight C, Des Jarlais D, Bramson H, Tower L, Abdul-Quader A, Nemeth C, Nemeth C, Heckathorn D: Respondent-Driven Sampling in a Study of Drug Users in New York City: Notes from the Field. J Urban Health 2006, 83(Suppl 1):54-59.
21. Li Y, Detels R, Lin P, Fu X, Deng Z, Liu Y, Tan Y, Li J, Wu Z: Prevalence of HIV and STIs and associated risk factors among female sex workers in Guangdong Province, China. J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr 2010, 53 (Suppl 1):S48-S53.
22. Salganik MJ, Heckathorn DD: Sampling and estimation in hidden populations using respondent driven sampling. Sociol Methodol 2004, 34:193-239.
23. Heckathorn DD, Volz E: Respondent-driven sampling analysis tool (RDSAT) 5.6.0. Ithaca, NY: Department of Sociology, Cornell University; 2006.
24. Oinam A: Exploring the links of drug use and sexual risk practices among young female injecting drug users (FIDUs) in the state of Manipur, India. New Delhi India: Population Council; 2006.
25. Devine A, Kermode M, Chandra P, Herrman H: A participatory intervention to improve the mental health of widows of injecting drug users in
north-east India as a strategy for HIV prevention. BMC Int Health Hum Rights 2007, 7:3.
26. Medhi GK, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J: Tobacco and alcohol use among the youth of the agricultural tea industry in Assam, India. Southeast Asian J Trop Med Public Health 2006, 37:581-586.
27. Medhi GK, Hazarika NC, Mahanta J: Correlates of alcohol consumption and tobacco use among tea industry workers of Assam. Subst Use Misuse 2006, 41:691-706.
28. Chaturvedi HK, Phukan RK, Mahanta J: Association of socio-demographic factors and differences in pattern of substance use: a study in selected areas of North-east India. Subst Use Misuse 2003, 38:1305-1322.
29. Chaturvedi HK, Mahanta J: Sociocultural diversity and substance use pattern in Arunachal Pradesh, India. Drug Alcohol Depend 2004, 74:97-104.
30. Kermode M, Longleng V, Singh BC, Hocking J, Langkham B, Crofts N: My first time: Initiation into injecting drug use in Manipur and Nagaland, north-east India. Harm Reduction Journal 2007, 4:19.
31. Pando MA, Berini C, Bibini M, Fernández M, Reinaga E, Maulen S, Marone R, Biglione M, Montano SM, Bautista CT, Weissenbacher M, Sanchez JL, Avila MM: Prevalence of HIV and other sexually transmitted infections among female commercial sex workers in Argentina. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2006, 74:233-238.
32. Strathdee SA, Philbin M, Semple SJ, Pu M, Orozovich P, Martinez G, Lozada L, Fraga M, de la Torre A, Staines H, Magis-Rodriguez C, Patterson TL: Correlates of injection drug use among female sex workers in two Mexico-U.S. border cities. Drug Alcohol Depend 2008, 92:132-140.
33. Plant ML, Plant MA, Peck DF, Setters J: The sex industry, alcohol and illicit drugs: implications for the spread of HIV infection. Br J Addict 1989, 84:53-59.
34. Paone D, Cooper H, Alperen J, Shi Q, Des Jarlais DC: HIV risk behaviours of current sex workers attending syringe exchange: the experiences of women in five US cities. AIDS Care 1999, 11:269-280.
35. Abdul-Quader AS, Heckathorn DD, Sabin K, Saidel T: Implementation and Analysis of Respondent Driven Sampling: Lessons Learned from the Field. Journal of Urban Health 2006, 83:11 -15.
36. Johnstona LG, Sabin K: Sampling hard-to-reach populations with respondent driven sampling. Methodological Innovations Online 2010, 5:38-48.
doi:10.1186/1471-2458-12-273
Cite this article as: Medhi et al.: Factors associated with history of drug use among female sex workers (FSW) in a high HIV prevalence state of India. BMC Public Health 2012 12:273.
Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:
• Convenient online submission
• Thorough peer review
• No space constraints or color figure charges
• Immediate publication on acceptance
• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar
• Research which is freely available for redistribution
Submit your manuscript at Tpntral
www.biomedcentral.com/submit >_ciiuai
