Scholarly article on topic 'The potential and challenges of using stem cells for cardiovascular repair and regeneration'

The potential and challenges of using stem cells for cardiovascular repair and regeneration Academic research paper on "Biological sciences"

CC BY-NC-ND
0
0
Share paper
Academic journal
Genes & Diseases
OECD Field of science
Keywords
{"Adult stem cells" / "Cardiovascular disease" / "Embryonic stem cells" / "Endothelial progenitor cells" / "Hematopoietic stem cells" / "Mesenchymal stem cells" / "Myocardial repair" / "Pluripotent potent stem cells"}

Abstract of research paper on Biological sciences, author of scientific article — Qisi Sun, Zhonge Zhang, Zhongjie Sun

Abstract Recent progress in using stem cells for tissue repair and functional restoration has aroused much attention due to its potential to provide a cue for many diseases such as myocardial infarction. Stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease has been studied extensively at both experimental and clinical levels. Pluripotent stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells were proven to be effective for myocardial regeneration, angiogenesis, and cardiac functional restoration. In this review, we will concisely discuss advantages and disadvantages of currently-used stem cells for cardiovascular repair and regeneration. The limitations and uniqueness of some types of stem cells will also be discussed. Although substantial progress has been made over the last decade about stem cells in cardiovascular regeneration, many challenges lie ahead before the therapeutic potentials of stem cells can be fully recognized.

Academic research paper on topic "The potential and challenges of using stem cells for cardiovascular repair and regeneration"

Accepted Manuscript

The Potential and Challenges of Using Stem Cells for Cardiovascular Repair and Regeneration

Qisi Sun, Zhonge Zhang, Zhongjie Sun, MD, PhD,.FAHA

PII: S2352-3042(14)00008-7

DOI: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.07.003

Reference: GENDIS 7

To appear in: Genes & Diseases

Received Date: 11 July 2014 Revised Date: 16 July 2014 Accepted Date: 17 July 2014

Please cite this article as: Sun Q, Zhang Z, Sun Z, The Potential and Challenges of Using Stem Cells for Cardiovascular Repair and Regeneration, Genes & Diseases (2014), doi: 10.1016/j.gendis.2014.07.003.

This is a PDF file of an unedited manuscript that has been accepted for publication. As a service to our customers we are providing this early version of the manuscript. The manuscript will undergo copyediting, typesetting, and review of the resulting proof before it is published in its final form. Please note that during the production process errors may be discovered which could affect the content, and all legal disclaimers that apply to the journal pertain.

*Manuscript

The Potential and Challenges of Using Stem Cells for Cardiovascular Repair

and Regeneration

Qisi Sun1, Zhonge Zhang2 and Zhongjie Sun2*

1Yale University, New Haven, CT 06520, USA 2Department of Physiology, College of medicine, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences

Center, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA

Running title: Stem Cells and Cardiovascular Repair

*Address Correspondence to:

Zhongjie Sun, MD, PhD, FAHA

Professor of Physiology

Chair, Research Committee

Director, The Robert & Mary Cade Laboratory

BMSB 662A, Box 26901

Department of Physiology, BMSB 662A

College of Medicine

University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center (OUHSC) 940 S.L. Young Blvd. Oklahoma City, OK 73126-0901 USA

Zhongjie-sun@ouhsc.edu Tel. 405-271-2226 x 56237 Fax. 405-271-3181

Disclosures: Nothing to disclose

Abstract

Recent progress in using stem cells for tissue repair and functional restoration has aroused much attention due to its potential to provide a cue for many diseases such as myocardial infarction. Stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease has been studied extensively at both experimental and clinical levels. Pluripotent stem cells and mesenchymal stem cells were proven to be effective for myocardial regeneration, angiogenesis, and cardiac functional restoration. In this review, we will concisely discuss advantages and disadvantages of currently-used stem cells for cardiovascular repair and regeneration. The limitations and uniqueness of some types of stem cells will also be discussed. Although substantial progress has been made over the last decade about stem cells in cardiovascular regeneration, many challenges lie ahead before the therapeutic potentials of stem cells can be fully recognized.

Keywords: pluripotent potent stem cells, adult stem cells, embryonic stem cells, hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, endothelial progenitor cells, immune rejection, cardiovascular disease, myocardial repair

Introduction

Although numerous pharmacological drugs are available, cardiovascular disease

remains the leading cause of death worldwide There are over 5 million patients suffering from chronic heart failure post acute myocardial infarction due to no effective

treatment '. With the advent of an aging society in developed countries, an increased risk for cardiovascular disease and huge burden on human resources and health

budgets are promised in the near future 3 Therefore, there is an urgent need to develop more effective therapeutic approaches for cardiovascular disease. The emerging of cardiovascular regenerative medicine may provide an encouraging direction for future therapeutics, which focuses on replacing or regenerating damaged myocardium and blood vessels to restore or establish normal cardiac function 4 Great advantages exist in this new treatment compared to traditional therapy, which was considered only palliative strategy. Traditional cardiac therapy are effective in resolving the acute processes of the disease and extending the patient's lifespan, however, it does not

provide the patients a cure, but rather leaving them with chronic diseases as sequelae 5 In contrast, cardiovascular regenerative medicine makes it possible to replace damaged myocardial cells with the patient-specific pluripotent stem cell-derived cardiac myocytes, avoiding the aforementioned medical problems, and prevents or reverses the disease development 4 Moreover, most of the pluripotent stem cells, except for embryonic stem cells, are derived from the patients and possess the same genotype and phenotype, and thus are significantly valuable tools for studying the molecular mechanisms of the disease and for developing patient-specific therapy 6 Stem cell therapy has demonstrated beneficial effects on several cardiovascular diseases including ischemic

7 Q q i O i i

heart disease , heart failure 9, endothelial dysfunction , peripheral artery disease 12-13, atherosclerosis 14, and pulmonary hypertension 15-16 (Fig. 1). Stem cells have potential to differentiate into several specific types of cells. Based on the source of origin, stem cells can be classified into embryonic stem cells (ESCs) and adult stem cells (ASCs), where the former comes from embryos and the latter originates

from mature adults . Furthermore, the ASCs can be divided into tissue-specific stem cells and bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMCs). Bone marrow contains at least two types of stem cells: hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) and mesenchymal stem cells

(MSCs), and endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) can also be found in the bone marrow

In this review, we will summarize the properties of different types of stem cells and their regenerative capabilities to restore or repair cardiac structure and function. We will also discuss selection and acquisition of stem cells and evaluation of effectiveness of stem cell therapy for cardiovascular disease.

Pluripotent Stem Cells

The goal of cardiac stem cell therapy is to restore or regenerate myocardium. The challenge was to identify a suitable source for generating sufficient and phenotypically confirmed cardiomyocytes. Over the past decade, rapid progress has been made in identification, derivation, and characterization of stem cells or progenitor cells. Among these, the embryonic stem cells (ESCs) have attracted attention due to their unique properties 6 ESCs are pluripotent stem cells which are derived from the inner cell mass

of the blastocyst-stage embryo Specifically, these cells remain in an undifferentiated state in culture for a long period but retain the potential to differentiate into all cell types

in the human body, including cardiomyocytes. Human ESCs (hESCs) were isolated by Thomson et al - more than a decade after the first isolation of mouse ESCs (mESCs) in 1981 20-21. Since then, the potential for using these unending multipotent cells to treat congenital and degenerative diseases has aroused great interest. Theoretically, the hESCs are capable to differentiate into all three germ layers-endoderm, ectoderm, and mesoderm, so it is important to investigate the signaling pathways and transcription

factors that direct its specific differentiation process From a large number of studies, researchers have identified several signaling molecules that are involved in early cardiac differentiation. Over-expression of transcriptional factors such as GATA4, Nkx2-5, or MEF2C can induce differentiation of hESCs into cardiomyocytes (Fig. 2), while inhibition of these factors halts the formation of cardiomyocytes Other factors like growth factors TGFpi and FGF2, cardiotrophin, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) might also affect the differentiation process 23-24 Despite the exciting achievements of hESCs-differentiated cardiomyocytes in both murine and human models, several pressing issues limit its clinical application. First of all, hESCs research has raised some serious ethical problems due to the fact that the establishment hESCs required the destruction of early human embryos, which was considered crimes against humanity . Additionally, the ESCs are generated from embryos and do not retain the same genome with the patients, thus has potential risk of immune rejection after transplantation 6. Furthermore, grafted ESCs in mice only generated a minor population of cardiomyocytes, which was even less in the human model 25 Since the number of differentiated cardiomyocytes significantly compromises the ultimate success of future cell-grafting procedures, strategies to enhance the

generation of myocytes by ESCs is of crucial importance. Finally, in vivo implantation of hESCs gave rise to formation of teratocarcinomas (Table I), although the malignant tumorigenic potential of ESCs is not well defined yet, this finding raises concerns about the safety of its clinical use 26

In contrast, the use of human inducible pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) overcomes the limitations and ethical concerns of hESCs (Table I) 27 The hiPSCs are derived by

reprogramming somatic cells to a pluripotent state Several research teams have compared hESCs and hiPSCs and their differentiated progeny. Laurent et al reported that both hESCs and hiPSC demonstrate similar degree of genomic instability 30-31, suggesting that much investigation is needed before evaluating their potential for cardiovascular repair and regeneration. Other groups reported that the ability of hESCs and hiPSCs to differentiate into cardiomyocytes is different. 32-33 Parthenogenetic genetic stem cells, another class of pluripotent stem cells, may also avoid disadvantages of hESCs with possibility of reduced immune rejection27. Didie et al showed that mouse parthenogenetic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes integrated electrically with host myocardium and improved cardiac function in a mouse model of myocardial infarction 34 Table I summarizes the limitations and advantages of using different types of stem cells for cardiovascular therapy.

Adult Stem Cells

As discussed above, there are political, ethnical and technical concerns in clinical application of hESCs. Recent advances in adult stem cell research might offer a promising advanced alternative for cell-based therapies 4. The use of adult stem cells

avoids the ethical and religious fights triggered by hESCs; they possess the same genotype of the patient since they are isolated from adults, thus minimizing the risk of

immune rejection (Table I) For all these reasons, the adult stem cells seem more applicable to be used in cell-based cardiovascular repair and regeneration. The heart was previously considered a terminally differentiated organ without the capacity for self-renewal. However, recent evidence suggests the existence of endogenous cardiac stem cells (CSCs) that are able to generate new myocytes and blood vessels 36 Typically,

only a small number of CSCs cells (one for every 1x103 myocytes) are distributed in the atria, ventricles, and epicardium. In physiological conditions, CSCs are inactive and exiting cell cycle, with only 2-3% actively differentiated for normal myocardial turnover. However, most of the CSCs can be activated and differentiated into new myocytes or vascular cells in response to pathological or physiological stimuli such as ischemia or

cellular damage . Although some experiments demonstrated that injection of CSCs can generate new myocardium to replace the cells lost in MI 36, the natural regeneration capacity of CSCs are too limited to be used in clinical therapy, and therefore required ex vivo expansion (Table I) 38 There is great advantage to use this organ origin stem cell for myocyte replacement and repair as long as it has been effectively stimulated. However, major difficulties exist in the acquisition and isolation of CSCs from

myocardial samples, reducing available CSCs to be used for implantation Furthermore, the molecular mechanism that regulates the CSCs proliferation and differentiation into myocardium has not been elucidated. Despite numerous publications, no consensus has been reached on the identity and actual regenerative or renewal effects of CSCs. Thus, the application of CSCs in cardiovascular disease will

remain difficult until all these limitations are appropriately addressed. In addition, attention and effort should be paid to restoration of the fibroblasts function which provides a favorable environment for repair and regeneration of cardiomyocytes.

Mesenchymal Stem Cells

Mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were reported by Friedenstein et al who identified a sub-population of bone marrow cells that adhered to plastic and demonstrated fibroblast-like properties 39. MSCs have potential to differentiate into a variety of mesoderma lineage cells (e.g., osteoblasts, adipocytes, and cadiomyocytes) 40-41. Therefore, MSCs, also termed bone marrow stromal cells, are pluripotent progenitor cells of bone marrow origin 42 Human MSCs have distinct surface markers from hematopoietic stem cells: CD105 (SH2), SH3, Stro-1, and CD13 43 MSCs are considered immunologically privileged stem cells due to their lack of surface markers (antigens) required for activation of T lymphocytes 40. In a MHC-mismatched rat heart transplantation model, MSCs can induce tolerance and long-term graft acceptance 44. It was reported that the immuno-suppressive effect of MSCs may be mediated by inhibiting the maturation of dendritic cells and suppressing the function of T, B, and natural killer cells 41, 45. Interestingly, transplanted MSCs also secrete paracrine factors to regulate the immune system and modulate inflammatory responses 40. These unique features make MSCs attractive for future regenerative medicine such as tissue repair and gene delivery, allowing allogenic grafting without the use of immunosuppressive agents (Table I).

MSCs are an ideal source of replacement cells because of their potential for self renewal, proliferation and differentiation 46-48 It was shown that human MSCs injected into the left ventricle of an adult mouse heart effectively engrafted in the myocardium and differentiated into cardiomyocytes that were morphologically indistinguishable from the native cardiomyocytes 49 Notably, MSCs also promote the growth and proliferation of adjacent cells via their paracrine function 41. Although MSCs are known to secrete a variety of regulatory and trophic factors including growth factors, cytokines, and chemokines, the nature of the secretome remains to be determined 50 MSCs can enter the circulation and follow chemotactic gradients to home to sites of injury or inflammation participating in wound healing and tissue repair via its regenerative and paracrine function 51-54 In addition, MSCs also have other characteristics that facilitate their clinical application, such as their expansion potential, ease of collection, and decreased susceptibility to genetic mutations during in vitro passages 55 As a guide for future directions, MSCs engineered with desired therapeutic genes may expand and enhance their therapeutic potentials.

Hematopoietic Stem Cells

Hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) are the foundation of adult hematopoiesis and give rise to all types of blood cells throughout the lifespan 56 HSCs are of clinical significance in bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of blood-related genetic

cry CO

deficiency and leukemia HSCs are defined as multipotent stem cells, which have the capacity to differentiate into a number of cells, including cardiomyocytes and endothelial cells 38 HSCs can be isolated from the bone marrow as well as the

peripheral blood, but its circulating forms are much lower than in the bone marrow . In the normal condition, the number of quiescent HSCs is limited in the bone marrow (one

for every 1x 104 bone marrow cells) . In response to physiological or pathological stimuli, these stem cells can quickly proliferate and mobilize from their resident bone marrow to peripheral circulation, and then migrate to the site of injury 18 Murine progenitor cells do not have specific surface markers, whereas human HSCs express surface markers: CD34 and AC133, which can be used for positive selection and

isolation By characterization of CD34 -CD38- phenotype stem cells, researchers found that blood from the human umbilical cord is a relatively abundant source of HSCs 60 Moreover, highly purified CD34+-CD38- hematopoietic progenitors were also isolated from human fetal livers 61. It was reported that HSCs could result in cardiomyocyte generation via myeloid intermediates by fusion-dependent mechanism 62 The employment of myeloid derivatives as donor cells may provide more effective cell-based therapy for cardiac repair 62. The advantage of using HSCs in cardiovascular repair underlies that they potentially fulfill the goals required for stem cell transplantation— myogenesis and angiogenesis (Table I). However, their low frequencies, difficult maintenance in cell culture, as well as the unknown signaling pathways that regulate the

HSCs proliferation and differentiation, must be addressed . In addition, specific induction of HSCs into cardiomyocytes must be guaranteed to avoid tumorigenesis.

Endothelial Progenitor Cells

Endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) and their derivatives have been reported to have therapeutic potential for cardiovascular disease 11. EPCs were reported in 1997 by

Asahara et al who showed that purified CD34+ hematopoietic progenitor cells from adults can differentiate into endothelial cells and participate in postnatal angiogenesis 63 Although originated in the bone marrow, EPCs can also be found in the peripheral

blood and human umbilical cord blood EPCs share two surface antigens with HSCs, CD34 and the VEGF receptor Flk-1, and double labeling of these two markers can be used for positive selection of highly homogenous EPCs populations 38 Under normal condition, the number of EPCs is extremely low in the peripheral blood and bone marrow, which makes it difficult for the ex vivo expansion of sufficient EPCs required for

clinical applications . EPCs are angiogenic cells that mobilized in response to ischemia or exogenous cytokines which further guide EPCs homing into sites of ischemic tissue, and thus participate in the repair and maintenance of vascular homeostasis (Table I) 38 It was reported that EPCs have proliferative potential and play a vital role in vascular regeneration by replacing or restoring damaged endothelial cells.64 In the field of cardiac research, EPCs are found to increase its circulating numbers in response to myocardial ischemia or cytokine stimuli, homing to the site of myocardium injury and possibly differentiating into new myocytes 65-66. EPCs have the capacity to circulate, proliferate and differentiate into mature endothelial cells but have neither acquired mature endothelial markers nor formed a lumen 67 It was reported that transplanted autologous EPCs improved mean pulmonary artery pressure, cardiac

output and pulmonary vascular resistance in a dog model of pulmonary hypertension.68

Technical Challenges of Using Stem Cells for Cardiovascular Repair

To select appropriate stem cells for cardiovascular tissue regeneration and functional repair, the following issues might be considered: 1) acquisition of adequate stem cells, 2) ex vivo expansion efficiency, 3) the optimal approach of administration, 4) In vivo differentiation efficiency and functional integration.

Acquisition of adequate stem cells. It is challenging for acquisition of adequate ESCs due to limitations as discussed above. In contrast, isolation of BMCs such as hematopoietic, mesenchymal, or endothelial progenitor stem cells are relatively easier because they can be collected either from the peripheral blood or bone barrow. In addition, the organ-originated stem cells such as CSCs may also be difficult to collect because of their unique location and limited number of stem cells.

Ex vivo expansion efficiency. The ex vivo expansion and purification of specific subpopulations are required to facilitate their utilization because the number of stem cells from direct in vivo isolation is limited. Moreover, for ESCs, in vitro pre-differentiation can help prevent the risk of teratoma formation 69 The stimulation methods for optimal expansion and specific selection vary with cell types. For instance, administration of exogenous cytokines is often used to facilitate the differentiation of ESCs to specific cells 55 Flowcytometry is used for positive selection of new cardiomyocytes. The common cardiac markers for fluorescent labeling include GATA4, Nkx2.5, a-MHC, p-MHC, and ANP 19 Another popular method to track the generation of cardiomyocytes is encoding target gene with enhanced green fluorescent protein (GFP). The subsequent sorting of the GFP-positive cells yields a high level of purified myocyte subpopulation 55 The selected cells must be screened to ensure functional

properties of cardiomyocytes before transplantation. The myocytes should have automaticity and exhibit action potentials. The early myocytes may show immature AP properties, but the functional maturity is expected with prolonged duration in culture.

Optimal administration approach. Three approaches have been tested for delivery of stem cells to the cardiovascular system (intravenous vs. intracoronary vs. intramyocardial). Stem cell transplantation into heart can be carried out via the intracoronary route or coronary sinus, or directly administered to the site within

myocardium using endocardial mapping devices Moreover, bone marrow-derived cells can be administered intravenously, and homing of these cells to sites of injured myocardium can be confirmed using specific markers 55 To determine the best administration approach for candidate stem cells, it is necessary to test and compare all three delivery methods in an animal model of MI. Thus, the maximal homing rate of stem cells to the site of injured heart in conjunction with the most efficient approach for delivery (e.g. intravenous) can be selected as the optimal approach for future clinical transplantation. The delivery of stem cells into the pulmonary circulation via jugular veins is selected as an effective approach for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

In vivo differentiation efficiency and functional integration. Several clinical trials indicated that the implanted stem cells may not be able to function as competent myocytes. The improvement of cardiac function may be due to other possibilities, including activation of resident myocyte function or amplification of the endogenous repair process via the paracrine effect mediated by transplanted cells 19, 35 The structural and functional characteristics of stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes, and their

ability to integrate into the host tissue, will need to be evaluated. First, the structural proteins in mature myocytes such as sarcomeric organization, e.g., a-actin, cardiac troponins, myosin heavy chain, myosin light chain, desmin, and tropomyosin, need to be confirmed. Second, the electrophysiological studies should be performed to study the ion channels and propagation of action potential in stem cell-derived cardiomyocyte. Furthermore, other parameters (e.g., the intracellular calcium) that depict normal myocyte function should also be examined 70 In addition, whether gap junctions are present between host and donor cardiomyocytes, and whether the electromechanical and structural integration have been formed between host and donor cardiomyocytes need to be examined. Finally, to assess whether stem cell transplantation can restore, maintain, or improve impaired heart function, it is necessary to assess clinical parameters such as cardiac pump function, coronary blood flow, cardiac remodeling, and cardiac oxygenation. Vascular endothelial function can be assessed by in vivo blood pressure responses to endothelial-derived vasodilators. The long-term therapeutic effect also need to be monitored to determine whether this treatment improves lifespan and decreases mortality. Lastly, the potential side effects of stem cell therapy must be fully evaluated to guide future clinical application.

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the NIH R01 HL105302, HL102074, HL118558, HL116863, and DK 093403.

Disclosure

The authors have no conflict of interest.

References

1. Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, Benjamin EJ, Berry JD, Borden WB, Bravata DM, Dai S, Ford ES, Fox CS, Fullerton HJ, Gillespie C, Hailpern SM, Heit JA, Howard VJ, Kissela BM, Kittner SJ, Lackland DT, Lichtman JH, Lisabeth LD, Makuc DM, Marcus GM, Marelli A, Matchar DB, Moy CS, Mozaffarian D, Mussolino ME, Nichol G, Paynter NP, Soliman EZ, Sorlie PD, Sotoodehnia N, Turan TN, Virani SS, Wong ND, Woo D, Turner MB. Heart disease and stroke statistics--2012 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2012;125(1):e2-e220.

2. Lauer MS. Advancing cardiovascular research. Chest. 2012;141(2):500-505.

3. Stewart S, MacIntyre K, Capewell S, McMurray JJ. Heart failure and the aging population: an increasing burden in the 21st century? Heart (British Cardiac Society). 2003;89(1):49-53.

4. Kovacic JC, Harvey RP, Dimmeler S. Cardiovascular regenerative medicine: digging in for the long haul. Cell stem cell. 2007;1(6):628-633.

5. Nadal-Ginard B, Torella D, Ellison G. [Cardiovascular regenerative medicine at the crossroads. Clinical trials of cellular therapy must now be based on reliable experimental data from animals with characteristics similar to human's]. Revista espanola de cardiologia. 2006;59(11):1175-1189.

6. Murata M, Tohyama S, Fukuda K. Impacts of recent advances in cardiovascular regenerative medicine on clinical therapies and drug discovery. Pharmacology & therapeutics. 2010;126(2):109-118.

7. Cheng Y, Jiang S, Hu R, Lv L. Potential mechanism for endothelial progenitor cell therapy in acute myocardial infarction: Activation of VEGF- PI3K/Akte-NOS pathway. Ann. Clin. Lab. Sci. 2013;43(4):395-401.

8. Traverse JH, Henry TD, Pepine CJ, Willerson JT, Ellis SG. One-year follow-up of intracoronary stem cell delivery on left ventricular function following ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2014;311(3):301-302.

9. Sanchez LA, Guerrero-Beltran CE, Cordero-Reyes AM, Garcia-Rivas G, Torre-Amione G. Use of stem cells in heart failure treatment: where we stand and where we are going. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013;9(4):195-200.

10. Gong M, Yu B, Wang YG, Xu M. Bone marrow rejuvenation. An excellent potential therapy for age-related endothelial dysfunction. Circ J. 2013;77(12):2886-2888.

11. Jian-Yong X, Yee-Ki L, Wang Y, Hung-Fat T. Therapeutic Application of Endothelial Progenitor Cells for Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases. Current stem cell research & therapy. 2014.

12. Gupta NK, Armstrong EJ, Parikh SA. The current state of stem cell therapy for peripheral artery disease. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2014;16(2):447.

13. Botham CM, Bennett WL, Cooke JP. Clinical trials of adult stem cell therapy for peripheral artery disease. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2013;9(4):201-205.

14. Liu J, Zhang Y, Peng H, Liu P. [Progress in mesenchymal stem cells for treatment of atherosclerosis]. Sheng Wu Gong ChengXue Bao. 2013;29(11):1538-1547.

15. Kanki-Horimoto S, Horimoto H, Mieno S, Kishida K, Watanabe F, Furuya E, Katsumata T. Implantation of mesenchymal stem cells overexpressing endothelial nitric oxide synthase improves right ventricular impairments caused by pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2006;114(1 Suppl):I181-185.

16. Takemiya K, Kai H, Yasukawa H, Tahara N, Kato S, Imaizumi T. Mesenchymal stem cell-based prostacyclin synthase gene therapy for pulmonary hypertension rats. Basic research in cardiology. 2010;105(3):409-417.

17. Asahara T, Kalka C, Isner JM. Stem cell therapy and gene transfer for regeneration. Gene therapy. 2000;7(6):451-457.

18. Borlongan CV, Glover LE, Tajiri N, Kaneko Y, Freeman TB. The great migration of bone marrow-derived stem cells toward the ischemic brain: therapeutic implications for stroke and other neurological disorders. Progress in neurobiology. 2011;95(2):213-228.

19. Lev S, Kehat I, Gepstein L. Differentiation pathways in human embryonic stem cell-derived cardiomyocytes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2005;1047:50-65.

20. Thomson JA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Shapiro SS, Waknitz MA, Swiergiel JJ, Marshall VS, Jones JM. Embryonic stem cell lines derived from human blastocysts. Science. 1998;282(5391):1145-1147.

21. Evans MJ, Kaufman MH. Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos. Nature. 1981;292(5819):154-156.

22. Skerjanc IS, Petropoulos H, Ridgeway AG, Wilton S. Myocyte enhancer factor 2C and Nkx2-5 up-regulate each other's expression and initiate cardiomyogenesis in P19 cells. The Journal of biological chemistry. 1998;273(52):34904-34910.

23. Kawai T, Takahashi T, Esaki M, Ushikoshi H, Nagano S, Fujiwara H, Kosai K. Efficient cardiomyogenic differentiation of embryonic stem cell by fibroblast growth factor 2 and bone morphogenetic protein 2. Circulation journal : official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2004;68(7):691-702.

24. Sauer H, Neukirchen W, Rahimi G, Grunheck F, Hescheler J, Wartenberg M. Involvement of reactive oxygen species in cardiotrophin-1-induced proliferation of cardiomyocytes differentiated from murine embryonic stem cells. Experimental cell research. 2004;294(2):313-324.

25. Amit M, Carpenter MK, Inokuma MS, Chiu CP, Harris CP, Waknitz MA, Itskovitz-Eldor J, Thomson JA. Clonally derived human embryonic stem cell lines maintain pluripotency and proliferative potential for prolonged periods of culture. Developmental biology. 2000;227(2):271-278.

26. Chambers I, Smith A. Self-renewal of teratocarcinoma and embryonic stem cells. Oncogene. 2004;23(43):7150-7160.

27. Lundy SD, Gantz JA, Pagan CM, Filice D, Laflamme MA. Pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocytes for cardiac repair. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014;16(7):319.

28. Takahashi K, Tanabe K, Ohnuki M, Narita M, Ichisaka T, Tomoda K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from adult human fibroblasts by defined factors. Cell. 2007;131(5):861-872.

29. Takahashi K, Yamanaka S. Induction of pluripotent stem cells from mouse embryonic and adult fibroblast cultures by defined factors. Cell. 2006;126(4):663-676.

30. Laurent LC, Ulitsky I, Slavin I, Tran H, Schork A, Morey R, Lynch C, Harness JV, Lee S, Barrero MJ, Ku S, Martynova M, Semechkin R, Galat V, Gottesfeld J, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Murry C, Keirstead HS, Park HS, Schmidt U, Laslett AL, Muller FJ, Nievergelt CM, Shamir R, Loring JF. Dynamic changes in the copy number of pluripotency and cell proliferation genes in human ESCs and iPSCs during reprogramming and time in culture. Cell Stem Cell. 2011;8(1):106-118.

31. Muller FJ, Schuldt BM, Williams R, Mason D, Altun G, Papapetrou EP, Danner S, Goldmann JE, Herbst A, Schmidt NO, Aldenhoff JB, Laurent LC, Loring JF. A bioinformatic assay for pluripotency in human cells. Nat Methods. 2011;8(4):315-317.

32. Toivonen S, Ojala M, Hyysalo A, Ilmarinen T, Rajala K, Pekkanen-Mattila M, Aanismaa R, Lundin K, Palgi J, Weltner J, Trokovic R, Silvennoinen O, Skottman H, Narkilahti S, Aalto-Setala K, Otonkoski T. Comparative analysis of targeted differentiation of human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) and human embryonic stem cells reveals variability associated with incomplete transgene silencing in retrovirally derived hiPSC lines. Stem Cells TranslMed. 2013;2(2):83-93.

33. Sepac A, Si-Tayeb K, Sedlic F, Barrett S, Canfield S, Duncan SA, Bosnjak ZJ, Lough JW. Comparison of cardiomyogenic potential among human ESC and iPSC lines. Cell Transplant. 2012;21(11):2523-2530.

34. Didie M, Christalla P, Rubart M, Muppala V, Doker S, Unsold B, El-Armouche A, Rau T, Eschenhagen T, Schwoerer AP, Ehmke H, Schumacher U, Fuchs S, Lange C, Becker A, Tao W, Scherschel JA, Soonpaa MH, Yang T, Lin Q, Zenke M, Han DW, Scholer HR, Rudolph C, Steinemann D, Schlegelberger B, Kattman S, Witty A, Keller G, Field LJ, Zimmermann WH. Parthenogenetic stem cells for tissue-engineered heart repair. J. Clin. Invest. 2013;123(3):1285-1298.

35. Leri A, Kajstura J, Anversa P, Frishman WH. Myocardial regeneration and stem cell repair. Current problems in cardiology. 2008;33(3):91-153.

36. Beltrami AP, Barlucchi L, Torella D, Baker M, Limana F, Chimenti S, Kasahara H, Rota M, Musso E, Urbanek K, Leri A, Kajstura J, Nadal-Ginard B, Anversa P. Adult cardiac stem cells are multipotent and support myocardial regeneration. Cell. 2003;114(6):763-776.

37. Urbanek K, Quaini F, Tasca G, Torella D, Castaldo C, Nadal-Ginard B, Leri A, Kajstura J, Quaini E, Anversa P. Intense myocyte formation from cardiac stem cells in human cardiac hypertrophy. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2003;100(18):10440-10445.

38. Abbott J, Giordano F. Stem cells and cardiovascular disease. Journal of Nuclear Cardiology. 2003;10(4):403-412.

39. Friedenstein AJ, Piatetzky S, II, Petrakova KV. Osteogenesis in transplants of bone marrow cells. J. Embryol. Exp. Morphol. 1966;16(3):381-390.

40. Krause K, Schneider C, Kuck KH, Jaquet K. Stem cell therapy in cardiovascular disorders. Cardiovascular therapeutics. 2010;28(5):e101-110.

41. Thakker R, Yang P. Mesenchymal stem cell therapy for cardiac repair. Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2014;16(7):323.

42. Pittenger MF, Mackay AM, Beck SC, Jaiswal RK, Douglas R, Mosca JD, Moorman MA, Simonetti DW, Craig S, Marshak DR. Multilineage potential of adult human mesenchymal stem cells. Science. 1999;284(5411):143-147.

43. Stem Cell Repair and Regeneration: Imperial College Press; 2007.

44. Popp FC, Eggenhofer E, Renner P, Slowik P, Lang SA, Kaspar H, Geissler EK, Piso P, Schlitt HJ, Dahlke MH. Mesenchymal stem cells can induce long-term acceptance of solid organ allografts in synergy with low-dose mycophenolate. Transplant immunology. 2008;20(1-2):55-60.

45. Bassi EJ, Aita CA, Camara NO. Immune regulatory properties of multipotent mesenchymal stromal cells: Where do we stand? World journal of stem cells. 2011;3(l):l-8.

46. Caplan AI. Review: mesenchymal stem cells: cell-based reconstructive therapy in orthopedics. Tissue Eng. 2005;11(7-8):1198-1211.

47. Caplan AI. Why are MSCs therapeutic? New data: new insight. J. Pathol. 2009;217(2):318-324.

48. Caplan AI, Correa D. PDGF in bone formation and regeneration: new insights into a novel mechanism involving MSCs. J. Orthop. Res. 2011;29(12):1795-1803.

49. Toma C, Pittenger MF, Cahill KS, Byrne BJ, Kessler PD. Human mesenchymal stem cells differentiate to a cardiomyocyte phenotype in the adult murine heart. Circulation. 2002;105(1):93-98.

50. Ranganath SH, Levy O, Inamdar MS, Karp JM. Harnessing the mesenchymal stem cell secretome for the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Cell Stem Cell. 2012;10(3):244-258.

51. Weil BR, Manukyan MC, Herrmann JL, Abarbanell AM, Poynter JA, Wang Y, Meldrum DR. The immunomodulatory properties of mesenchymal stem cells: implications for surgical disease. J. Surg. Res. 2011;167(1):78-86.

52. Chapel A, Bertho JM, Bensidhoum M, Fouillard L, Young RG, Frick J, Demarquay C, Cuvelier F, Mathieu E, Trompier F, Dudoignon N, Germain C, Mazurier C, Aigueperse J, Borneman J, Gorin NC, Gourmelon P, Thierry D. Mesenchymal stem cells home to injured tissues when co-infused with hematopoietic cells to treat a radiation-induced multi-organ failure syndrome. J Gene Med. 2003;5(12):1028-1038.

53. Chavakis E, Dimmeler S. Homing of progenitor cells to ischemic tissues. Antioxid Redox Signal. 2011;15(4):967-980.

54. Chavakis E, Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Homing and engraftment of progenitor cells: a prerequisite for cell therapy. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2008;45(4):514-522.

55. Stem Cell Biology and Regenerative Medicine; 2012.

56. Balmer GM, Riley PR. Harnessing the potential of adult cardiac stem cells: lessons from haematopoiesis, the embryo and the niche. JCardiovasc TranslRes. 2012;5(5):631-640.

57. Johnson FL, Look AT, Gockerman J, Ruggiero MR, Dalla-Pozza L, Billings FT, 3rd. Bone-marrow transplantation in a patient with sickle-cell anemia. N. Engl. J. Med. 1984;311(12):780-783.

58. Johnson FL, Sanders JE, Ruggiero M, Chard RL, Jr., Thomas ED. Bone marrow transplantation for the treatment of acute nonlymphoblastic leukemia in children aged less than 2 years. Blood. 1988;71(5):1277-1280.

59. Peichev M, Naiyer AJ, Pereira D, Zhu Z, Lane WJ, Williams M, Oz MC, Hicklin DJ, Witte L, Moore MA, Rafii S. Expression of VEGFR-2 and AC133 by circulating human CD34(+) cells identifies a population of functional endothelial precursors. Blood. 2000;95(3):952-958.

60. Hao QL, Shah AJ, Thiemann FT, Smogorzewska EM, Crooks GM. A functional comparison of CD34 + CD38- cells in cord blood and bone marrow. Blood. 1995;86(10):3745-3753.

61. Humeau L, Chabannon C, Firpo MT, Mannoni P, Bagnis C, Roncarolo MG, Namikawa R. Successful reconstitution of human hematopoiesis in the SCID-hu mouse by

genetically modified, highly enriched progenitors isolated from fetal liver. Blood. 1997;90(9):3496-3506.

62. Fukata M, Ishikawa F, Najima Y, Yamauchi T, Saito Y, Takenaka K, Miyawaki K, Shimazu H, Shimoda K, Kanemaru T, Nakamura K, Odashiro K, Nagafuji K, Harada M, Akashi K. Contribution of bone marrow-derived hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells to the generation of donor-marker(+) cardiomyocytes in vivo. PLoS One. 2013;8(5):e62506.

63. Urbich C, Dimmeler S. Endothelial progenitor cells: characterization and role in vascular biology. Circulation research. 2004;95(4):343-353.

64. Barst R. Is it possible to reverse the endothelial dysfunction in pulmonary arterial hypertension? Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;49(14):1572-1574.

65. Shintani S, Murohara T, Ikeda H, Ueno T, Honma T, Katoh A, Sasaki K, Shimada T, Oike Y, Imaizumi T. Mobilization of endothelial progenitor cells in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2001;103(23):2776-2779.

66. Badorff C, Brandes RP, Popp R, Rupp S, Urbich C, Aicher A, Fleming I, Busse R, Zeiher AM, Dimmeler S. Transdifferentiation of blood-derived human adult endothelial progenitor cells into functionally active cardiomyocytes. Circulation. 2003;107(7):1024-1032.

67. Wang XX, Zhang FR, Shang YP, Zhu JH, Xie XD, Tao QM, Zhu JH, Chen JZ. Transplantation of autologous endothelial progenitor cells may be beneficial in patients with idiopathic pulmonary arterial hypertension: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2007;49(14):1566-1571.

68. Takahashi M, Nakamura T, Toba T, Kajiwara N, Kato H, Shimizu Y. Transplantation of endothelial progenitor cells into the lung to alleviate pulmonary hypertension in dogs. Tissue Eng. 2004;10(5-6):771-779.

69. Dressel R, Schindehütte J, Kuhlmann T, Elsner L, Novota P, Baier PC, Schillert A, Bickeböller H, Herrmann T, Trenkwalder C, Paulus W, Mansouri A. The Tumorigenicity of Mouse Embryonic Stem Cells and <italic>In Vitro</italic> Differentiated Neuronal Cells Is Controlled by the Recipients' Immune Response. PloS one. 2008;3(7):e2622.

70. Mauritz C, Schwanke K, Reppel M, Neef S, Katsirntaki K, Maier LS, Nguemo F, Menke S, Haustein M, Hescheler J, Hasenfuss G, Martin U. Generation of functional murine cardiac myocytes from induced pluripotent stem cells. Circulation. 2008;118(5):507-517.

Figure Legends

Figure 1. Potential stem cell therapy for major cardiovascular disorders.

Figure 2. Effects of transcription factors on hESC differentiation. Overexpression of key transcriptional factors such as GATA4, Nkx2-5, or MEF2C leads to differentiation of human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) into cardiomyocytes. Inhibition of these transcription factors maintain hESC pluripotency.

ACCEPTED MANUSCRIPT

Table I. Comparison of Advantages and Limitations of Different Types of Stem Cells

Stem Cell Type Limitations Advantages

Embryonic Stem Cells (1) Ethical dilemmas (2) Possible immune rejection after implantation (3) Only a small number of differentiated cardiomyoctes can be generated (4) May lead to teratocarcinomas (5) Genetic instability Can differentiate into cells of all three germ layers

Pluripotent Stem Cells (1) Genetic instability (2) More research is needed before using for cardiovascular repair/regeneration Avoids ethical concerns

Adult Stem Cells (1) Natural regeneration capacity of CSCs are too limited (1) Avoids ethical concerns (2) Lower risk of immune rejection

(2) Acquisition and isolation difficulties (3) More research needed

Mesenchymal Stem Cells More research needed (1) Allow for allogenic grafting without the use of immunosuppressive agents (2) Can self-renew, proliferate, and differentiate (3) Promote growth of adjacent cells (4) Less susceptible to mutations (5) Easy to collect

Hematopoietic Stem Cells (1) High maintenance (2) Low frequencies (3) Unknown signaling pathways (1) Proliferate and migrate to injury site in response to physiological/pathological stimuli (2) Capable of myogenesis and angiogenesis

Endothelial Progenitor Cells Extremely low numbers in peripheral blood and bone marrow makes ex vivo expansion difficult Increase its numbers in response to ischemia/cytokine stimuli and can migrate to injury site and differentiate into new myocytes

Figure

Figure 1

Atherosclerosis

GATA4 Nkx2-5, MEF2C

Figure 2