CC BY-NC-ND
0Exercise Science & Fitness
www.elsevier.com/locate/jesf
Effect of short-term exercise intervention on cardiovascular functions and quality of life of chronic heart failure patients: A meta-analysis
Yahui Zhang a, Lisheng Xu a,b *, Yang Yao a, Xiaofan Guo c, Yingxian Sun c, Junyang Zhang a,
Qiang Fu a
a Sino—Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China b Key Laboratory of Medical Image Computing, Ministry of Education, Shenyang 110819, Liaoning, China c First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang City 110122, Liaoning Province, China
Received 30 October 2015; revised 16 July 2016; accepted 3 August 2016 Available online 9 November 2016
Abstract
Objective: The purpose of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the effect of short-term exercise intervention on the cardiovascular functions and quality of life (QoL) of patients with chronic heart failure (CHF).
Methods: This meta-analysis was analyzed using RevMan5.3 and Stata 13.0. The parameters of cardiovascular functions and QoL were assessed. Weighted mean differences and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were computed for continuous variables. Results: Data from 2533 CHF patients enrolled in 28 published studies of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collated. There were significant differences in VO2 max prior to and after exercise intervention in CHF patients who are 50—55 years old (5 RCTs; 95% CI, —4.86 to -2.29; I2 = 50.5%), 60—65 years old (10 RCTs; 95% CI, —2.66 to —2.04; I2 = 0%), and 69—75 years old (5 RCTs; 95% CI, —1.88 to —0.34;
I2 — 38.5%). VO2 max was significantly increased by aerobic exercise (9 RCTs; 95% CI, —3.45 to —1.92; I2 — 37.7%) and combined aerobic resistance exercise (4 RCTs; 95% CI, —4.41 to —0.26; I2 = 76.6%). There were significant differences in cardiac output (n — 303; 95% CI, —0.25 to —0.02; I2 — 12%) and QoL (n — 299; 95% CI, 3.19 to 9.70; I2 — 17%) prior to and after short-term exercise. Conclusion: Aerobic exercise and aerobic with resistance exercise can significantly improve the aerobic capacity of CHF patients, whereas resistance exercise cannot. The improvement in aerobic capacity caused by aerobic exercise and aerobic with resistance exercise decreases with age. Systolic blood pressure and ventricle structures and functions of CHF patients show no significant changes after the short-term exercise intervention.
Copyright © 2016, The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
CrossMark
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com
ScienceDirect
Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness 14 (2016) 67—75
Original article
Keywords: cardiovascular functions; meta-analysis; patients with chronic heart failure; short-term exercise intervention
Introduction
Chronic heart failure (CHF) is a progressive syndrome with debilitating symptoms and a poor prognosis. Severe exercise intolerance with marked dyspnea and fatigue at rest or exertion is one of the most prominent symptoms of CHF. It results in a
* Corresponding author. Sino—Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering School, Northeastern University, Shenyang City 110819, Liaoning Province, China.
E-mail address: xuls@bmie.neu.edu.cn (L. Xu).
poor quality of life (QoL) for the patients and an economic burden on healthcare systems. The estimated costs related to CHF have been steadily rising in the United States and other developed countries.1 With the aging of the population and improvement of medical management, the prevalence of CHF and studies of CHF are gradually spreading worldwide.2
CHF can be comprehensively evaluated using the cardiovascular functions and QoL. Aerobic capacity, blood pressure, ventricular structures, and functions are the important parameters to assess the cardiovascular functions of CHF. Aerobic capacity, which reflects the cardiorespiratory fitness of CHF
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jesf.2016.08.001
1728-869X/Copyright © 2016, The Society of Chinese Scholars on Exercise Physiology and Fitness. Published by Elsevier (Singapore) Pte Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/40/).
patients, is assessed by VO2 max.3 It is reported that systolic blood pressure (SBP) is the most relevant component of blood pressure for the prognosis of people suffering from arterial hypertension.4 Ventricular structures and functions manifest the ejection capacity of heart and ventricular filling capacity.5 They were quantified by such parameters as cardiac output (CO), left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), heart rate (HR), and heart rate variability (HRV). Minnesota Living with Heart Failure Questionnaire (MLHFQ) is a professional method developed by Rector to assess the QoL of patients with CHF, including the patient's perception of the effects of CHF and its treatment on her or his daily life.6
Medication was more commonly chosen by a vast number of patients with CHF to improve their cardiovascular functions and QoL compared with exercise intervention. Although exercise intervention cannot take the place of medication, it was highly recommended by the Agency for Health Care Policy and Research Guidelines on Cardiac Rehabilitation, and it was regarded as adjunctive therapy in the treatment of selected patients with CHF.7 Exercise intervention is also recommended by the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association as a safe and effective treatment for patients with CHF, and studies on exercise intervention mainly focus on short-term follow-up exercise intervention.8 Short-term exercise intervention is the most common method used by exercise rehabilitation in patients with CHF because it is easy to observe the effects of exercise on patients with CHF and to control other intervention factors.5 In addition, there have been numerous studies on the effects of short-term exercise intervention on the cardiovascular system in patients with CHF.5
Short-term aerobic exercise rehabilitation programs improve the aerobic capacity and QoL of CHF patients.5 Endurance exercise and continuous exercise have beneficial effects in CHF patients.5'9 However, the review study of *Pina et al5 reported that it was not clear whether short-term exercise could improve the cardiovascular system of CHF patients because there were several study limitations. Hedback and Perk10 found that 4 months of exercise training could improve the exercise tolerance of CHF patients; however, there was no significant difference between the exercise and control groups in ventricular changes. It thus remains controversial whether short-term exercise intervention can benefit the whole cardiovascular functions and QoL of CHF patients.
Therefore, this study aimed to quantitatively explore and assess the effect of short-term exercise intervention on the cardiovascular system and QoL of CHF patients through meta-analytic techniques. It was hypothesized that short-term exercise intervention would improve the cardiovascular functions and QoL of patients with CHF.
Methods
Search strategy
A search of PubMed, Google Scholar, Cochrane Controlled Trials Registry, Yahoo, and Springer database was performed using these key terms: Aerobic, Aerobic exercise, resistance
exercise, exercise training, endurance exercise, short-term exercise, long-term exercise, sports, swimming, football, jogging, heart failure, CHF patients, and randomized controlled trials (RCTs). The published time of references that we used was from 2004 to 2014 in this study.
Inclusion criteria
The following inclusion criteria were used:
1. Only RCTs examining the effect of exercise intervention on CHF patients were included in this study.
2. The participants were patients with CHF (50—75 years old), and participants with CHF evoked by specific conditions or pathologies were excluded.
3. The exercise intervention was selected for short-term duration (8—24 weeks). The exercise types (aerobic exercise or resistance exercise or combination aerobic and resistance exercise), exercise frequency (more than 3 times per week), exercise intensity (40—80% VO2 reserve) were included in this study. Studies on participants who previously had exercise-based rehabilitations were excluded. The exercise intervention group should receive short-term exercise intervention. The control group must not do any exercise training.
4. There were several outcome measures in the study: (1) VO2 max; (2) SBP; (3) CO, LVEF, HR, and SDNN; and (4) MLHFQ.
Study selection
The prespecified criteria were used by two reviewers to screen the titles, abstracts, and full text of relevant articles. An article was excluded if it did not meet the inclusion criteria and selection standard. Any disagreements about the included studies were discussed and then resolved by a third author.
Data collation
The following information was extracted independently by two reviewers in these studies: design of the study, participant characteristics, selection of follow-up and outcome measures, detailed information of the intervention group (i.e., type of exercise, intensity, and duration of exercise intervention), and nature of the control group. Similarly, a third author was asked to make the final decision if any disagreement persisted.
Quality assessment
The Cochrane Collaboration recommendations were used to assess the risk of bias for all the included articles in this study.11 The following information was assessed: selection bias, performance bias, detection bias, and attrition bias.
Statistical analysis
Stata MP. 13.0 and RevMan5.3 were used for the meta-analysis. The between-studies heterogeneity was evaluated
using chi-square test and 12 statistic. The fixed-effects model was used if the heterogeneity test did not show significant difference (p > 0.1, I2 < 50%). Otherwise, the random-effects model was adopted in this study. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were used to analyze the continuous variables. A p value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. The potential heterogeneity was explored by metaregression and subgroup analysis in this study.
Results
Search results
A total of 7251 records were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, Yahoo, and other sources. Twenty-eight published reports, which analyzed exercise intervention in 2533 CHF patients, met the criteria for included RCTs studies (Figure 1). A total of 28 RCTs12—35 with exercise durations of 8—24 weeks were enrolled. In addition, the characteristics of patients with CHF enrolled in RCTs are listed in Table 1.
Risk of bias of included studies
Every included study had a high risk according to the Cochrane Collaboration recommendations. Accordingly, the evidence in this meta-analysis had a high overall risk of bias. Quality assessment of included studies was performed using the risk of bias table of RevMan 5.3, including random sequence generation, blinding of outcome assessments, allocation concealment, incomplete outcome data, blinding of participants and personnel, selective reporting, and other bias. The detailed risk of bias is illustrated in Table 2.
Effect of short-term exercise intervention on aerobic capacity
Among the 527 patients enrolled in 20 RCTs, the VO2 max of patients with CHF had significant differences prior to and after short-term exercise intervention. The meta-analysis of VO2 max showed high heterogeneity, so that it was analyzed by subgroup analysis according to the covariate of ages with a high proportion of adjusted R2 of covariates (39.60%) and a significant difference (p = 0.005) by metaregression (Table 3). VO2 max was significantly increased for CHF patients who were 50—55 years old [5 RCTs, random-effects weighted (WMD), -3.57; 95% CI, -4.86 to -2.29; I2 = 50.5%, p = 0.089; Figure 2Ai], 60—65 years old (10 RCTs; random-effects WMD, -2.35; 95% CI, -2.66 to -2.04; I2 = 0.0%, p = 0.469; Figure 2Aii), and 69—75 years old (5 RCTs; random-effects WMD, -1.11; 95% CI, -1.88 to -0.34; I2 = 38.5%, p = 0.165; Figure 2Aiii). The parameter of VO2 max was also analyzed by subgroup analysis according to the covariate of type of exercise. VO2 max was significantly increased by aerobic exercise (9 RCTs; random-effects SMD, -2.69; 95% CI, -3.45 to -1.92; I2 = 37.7%, p = 0.117;
Records from database searching (n=7251)
Records dupli (n= cates excluded 57)
Records screened (n=7194)
Records excluded the titles and abstracts (n=7135)
Full-text articles screened (n=59)
Full-text articles excluded Non-CHF patients (n=10) Non-randomized study design (n=7)
The high risk of study quality (n=6)
Inappropriate intervention (n=5) Inappropriate outcomes (n=3)
Figure 1. Flow diagram for inclusion of studies in meta-analysis.
Figure 2Bi) and aerobic with resistance exercise (4 RCTs; random-effects SMD, -2.20; 95% CI, -4.41 to -0.26; I2 = 76.6%, p = 0.005; Figure 2Biii), whereas VO2 max had no significant change after resistance exercise (5 RCTs; random-effects SMD, -1.79; 95% CI, -3.91 to 0.32; I2 = 82.1%, p = 0.000; Figure 2Bii).
Effect of short-term exercise intervention on SBP
The SBP, reported in 201 CHF patients enrolled in six RCTs, was not significantly decreased after short-term exercise intervention (n = 201, I2 = 81%; 95% CI, -3.85 to 2.99; p = 0.67; Figure 3), and there appears to be some heterogeneity.
Effect of short-term exercise intervention on ventricular structures and functions
CO, LVEF, HR, and HRV were assessed using the ventricular structures and functions. CO, reported in 303 CHF patients enrolled in four RCTs, was significantly increased after short-term exercise intervention (n = 303; I2 = 12%; 95% CI, -0.25 to -0.02; p = 0.02; Figure 4A). However, LVEF showed no significant difference prior to and after short-term exercise (LVEF; n = 154, I2 = 14%; 95% CI, -0.39 to 2.88; p = 0.14; Figure 4B). A total of 127 patients with CHF
Table 1
Baseline characteristics in CHF patients and intervention of included literature.
Reference Experimental group Control group Methods Follow-up time Exercise intervention
Blumenthal et al (2005)12 48 42 RCT 16 weeks Aerobic exercise training for 35 minutes 3 times/week for 16 weeks
Huang et al (2014)13 33 33 RCT 12 weeks High-intensity interval aerobic training at ventilatory anaerobic threshold for 50 min/day, 3 days/week for 4 weeks, and then 3-min intervals at 40 and 80% VO2 reserve for 50 min/day, 3 days/week for 8 weeks
Servantes et al (2011)14 18 14 RCT 3 months Home-based aerobic exercise 3 supervised exercise sessions
Maria Sarullo et al (2006)15 30 30 RCT 3 months 3 months of supervised physical training program using a bicycle ergometer for 30 min three times a week at a load corresponding to 60 —70% of their oxygen consumption (VO2)
Servantes et al (2011)14 18 14 RCT 3 months 3 months of home-based aerobic with strength exercise of three supervised exercise sessions
Edelmann et al (2011)16 44 20 RCT 3 months Supervised endurance or resistance exercise
Chrysohoou et al (2014)17 33 39 RCT 12 weeks High-intensity intermittent endurance training 30s at 100% of max workload, 30s at rest, for 45 min/day, 3 days/week by 12 weeks)
Westhoff-Bleck et al (2013)18 24 24 RCT 24 weeks 24 weeks of structured exercise training
Ricca-Mallada et al (2012)19 10 10 RCT 24 weeks Physical training 3 times a week for 24 weeks
Fu et al (2011)20 15 15 RCT 12 weeks Aerobic interval training (3-minute intervals at 40% and 80% VO2, sustained 60% VO2 max) for 30 min/day, 3 days/week for 12 weeks
Nishi et al (2011)21 33 12 RCT 3 months Walking, bicycling on an ergometer, and calisthenics of 40—60 min/ session 3—5 sessions/week for 3 months
Murad et al (2012)22 31 35 RCT 16 weeks Aerobic exercise 3 times per week for 16 weeks
Osbak et al (2011)23 240 23 RCT 12 weeks Aerobic exercise training 3 times weekly for 12 weeks
Yeh et al. (2011)24 50 50 RCT 12 weeks Tai Chi exercise program twice weekly for 12 weeks
Maiorana et al (2011)25 12 12 RCT 12 weeks Aerobic exercise 3 supervised sessions per week for 12 weeks
Kitzman et al (2010)26 26 27 RCT 16 weeks ET exercised 3 times per week for 16 weeks for a total of 48 sessions in a dedicated facility under medical supervision
Pullen et al (2009)27 21 19 RCT 3 months One-hour yoga sessions were conducted twice per week
Brubaker et al (2009)28 30 29 RCT 16 weeks Sixteen-week supervised ET program of endurance exercise (walking and stationary cycling) three times per week for 30 to 40 minutes at moderate
Collins et al (2003)29 intensity
15 16 RCT 12 weeks Aerobic exercise program 3 times per week for 12 weeks
Belardinelli et al (2008)30 44 42 RCT 8 weeks Aerobic dancing 3 times a week
Andersen et al (2006)31 21 20 RCT 5 months Aerobic and resistance training program twice a week for 5 months
Selig et al (2004)32 19 20 RCT 3 months Resistance training 3 sessions per week for 3 months
Fu et al (2011)20 15 15 RCT 12 weeks Moderate continuous training for 30 min/day, 3 days/week
Conraads et al (2007)33 8 9 RCT 4 months Undergo standard pharmacological therapy plus a 4-month-long endurance exercise training program consisting of 3 sessions/week
Pozehl et al (2010)34 22 20 RCT 12 weeks Aerobic exercise 3 times weekly in a hospital-based rehabilitation setting
Jurgens et al (2013)35 and resistance training twice weekly at home
48 51 RCT 5 stages Training intervention
Maiorana et al (2011)25 12 12 RCT 12 weeks Resistance exercise 3 supervised sessions per week for 12 weeks
Belardinelli et al (2008)30 44 42 RCT 8 weeks Aerobic exercise training at 70% of peak VO2, 3 times a week
CHF — chronic heart failure; ET — exercise training; RCT — randomized controlled trial.
were enrolled in six RCTs, and HR showed no significant difference prior to and after short-term exercise intervention (HR: n — 328, I2 — 76%; 95% CI, —0.30 to 5.20; p — 0.08; Figure 4C). There appears to be some heterogeneity. SDNN is a parameter of HRV in the time domain. HRV was not significantly improved after short-term exercise intervention (SDNN: 3 RCTs; n — 527, I2 — 29%; 95% CI, —11.06 to 1.52; p — 0.14; Figure 4D).
Effect of short-term exercise intervention on QoL of CHF patients
The QoL, reported in 299 CHF patients enrolled in four RCTs, was significantly improved after short-term exercise intervention (MLHFQ: n — 299, I2 — 17%; 95% CI, 3.19 to 9.70; p < 0.00001; Figure 5).
Discussion
There have been relatively few review studies on the effects of exercise on CHF patients in comparison with the numerous review studies on medication, even though there are several reports on exercise intervention of CHF patients.36,37 Although exercise intervention cannot take the place of medication for CHF patients, it is an effective method for the cardiac rehabilitation of patients with CHF. In addition, there numerous studies on short-term exercise intervention in patients with CHF, and short-term exercise intervention is recommended as an effective treatment for CHF patients. However, it is not clear whether short-term exercise intervention has effects on whole cardiovascular functions and QoL. This meta-analysis study comprehensively assessed the effect of short-term exercise interventions
Table 2
Risk of bias assessment of included studies.
Author (year) Adequate sequence Allocation Blinding of participants Blinding of Incomplete Selective Other
generation concealment and personal outcome assessment outcome data reporting bias
Blumenthal et al. (2005)12 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Huang et al. (2014)13 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Maria Sarullo et al. (2006)15 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Servantes et al. (2011)14 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Edelmann et al. (2011)16 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Chrysohoou et al. (2014)17 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Westhoff-Bleck et al. (2013)18 ✓ ✓ ? ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Ricca-Mallada et al. (2012)19 ✓ ✓ ? ✓ ✓ ✓ X
Fu et al. (2011)20 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Nishi et al. (2011)21 ✓ ✓ X ? ✓ ✓ ?
Murad et al. (2012)22 ✓ ✓ ? ? ✓ ✓ ✓
Osbak et al. (2011)23 ✓ X X ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Yeh et al. (2011)24 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ X
Kitzman et al. (2010)26 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Pullen et al. (2009)27 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Brubaker et al. (2009)28 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Collins et al. (2003)29 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Andersen et al. (2006)31 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ?
Selig et al. (2004)32 ✓ ✓ ? ✓ ? ✓ ?
Conraads et al. (2007)33 ✓ ✓ ? ✓ ✓ ✓ X
Pozehl et al. (2010)34 ✓ ✓ ✓ X ✓ ✓ X
Jurgens et al. (2013)35 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Maiorana et al. (2011)25 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
Belardinelli et al. (2008)30 ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓ ✓
X = high risk; ✓ = low risk; ? = unclear risk.
on whole cardiovascular functions and QoL in patients with CHF. In this systematic review and meta-analysis, the data of 2533 CHF patients in 28 published studies were studied to assess the cardiovascular systems and QoL.
Effect of short-term exercise intervention on cardiovascular parameters
The systematic review of RCTs confirms a favorable effect of short-term exercise intervention on CHF patients who were 50—55, 60—65, and 69—75 years old. VO2 max was significantly improved by short-term exercise intervention at different ages. Meanwhile, the change of VO2 max decreased with age. VO2 max is the most important parameter to describe aerobic capacity, and it is a good predictor of prognosis for CHF patients; in addition, some studies reported that aerobic power, muscle strength, and skeletal muscle metabolism could be improved after short-term exercise interven-tion.5 In addition, VO2 max showed different changes with
Table 3
Univariate metaregression of the covariates of ages, and duration in the meta-analysis in parameter of VO2 max.
Coef. P Adj R2 95% CI
Ages 0.129 0.005 39.60% 0.045 to 0.214
Duration 0.746 0.183 8.24% -0.381 to 1.872
Class of HF 0.016 0.671 -7.16% -0.614 to 0.093
Adj R2 = adjusted R2, proportion of between-study variance explained; CI = confidence interval; Coef. = coefficient of metaregression; HF = heart failure.
different types of exercise. VO2 max was significantly increased by aerobic exercise and aerobic with resistance exercise. Some studies found that aerobic and resistance exercise showed different changes in the cardiovascular system.38
There was a significant difference in CO prior to and after exercise intervention. However, there were no significant differences in SBP, HR, and LVEF prior to and after exercise intervention. These findings agree in part with a previous study that explored the effects of modified high-intensity interval training on peak cardiac power output in patients with CHF. The study found that CO significantly increased after exercise training, whereas SBP, HR, and LVEF were not significantly improved.13 CO was significantly increased whereas SBP was not improved after exercise intervention because of the elevated peripheral vascular conductance peak.13 CO was mainly determined by stroke volume and HR at rest or during exercise. The change in HR was not only relevant to CO, but also to stroke volume, maximum HR, exercise intensity, and LVEF.8 Some studies reported that exercise training can increase the maximum CO, but this change was not paralleled by alterations in LVEF or end-systolic or end-diastolic volumes at rest.8,39 In addition, in the present study, these changes of parameters may be related to the disease status of patients with CHF or numbers of included studies. HRV analysis is a noninvasive method used to evaluate autonomic regulation.40 The reduction of HRV in patients with cardiovascular diseases is related to high cardiovascular mortality and is considered a risk factor for the occurrence of cardiac ar-rhythmias.41,42 HRV was assessed by SDNN, which indicates the standard deviation of all normal RR intervals in the time
Figure 2. (A) Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on VO2 max in CHF patients who were 50—55 years old (i), 60—65 years old (ii), and 69—75 years old (iii). (B) Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on VO2 max in CHF patients: (i) aerobic exercise; (ii) resistance exercise; (iii) aerobic with resistance exercise. CHF = chronic heart failure.
Experimental
Control
Mean Difference
Study or SuborouD Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weiaht IV. Random. 95% CI
Belardinelli 2008a 150 20 44 165 20 44 7.5% -15.00 [-23.36,-6.64]
Belardinelli 2008b 155 IS 44 168 16 44 8.9% -13.00[-20.12,-5.88]
Fu 2011a 142 3 15 140 3 15 17.1% 2.00[-0.15,4.15]
Fu 2011a 141 2 15 139 3 15 17.6% 2.00 [0.18,3.82]
Huang 2014 119.3 4.5 33 115.1 4.7 33 17.0% 4.20 [1.98,6.42]
Kitzman 2010 185 27 26 186 21 26 3.9% -1.001-14.15,12.15]
Maiorana 2011b 125 6 12 123 5 12 13.2% 2.00 [-2.42, 6.42]
Maiorana 2011b 127 4 12 127 5 12 14.7% 0.00 [-3.62, 3.62]
Total (95% CI) 201 201 100.0% -0.65 [-3.58, 2.29]
Heterogeneity: Tau2 = 11.86; ChP = 37.81, df= 7 (P < 0.00001); l* = 81%
Test for overall effect: 2= 0.43 . (P = 0.67)
Mean Difference IV. Random. 95'. CI
-100 -50 0 50
Favours [experimental] Favours [control]
Figure 3. Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on SBP of CHF patients in randomized controlled trials (RCTs).
A Experimental Control Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV. Fixed. 95% CI
Mean Difference IV. Fixed. 95% CI
Fu 2011a Fu 2011b Huang 2014 Osbak 2011
Total (95% CI) 303
Heterogeneity: Chl= = 3.41, df= 3 (P = 0.33); Test for overall effect: Z= 2.27 (P= 0.02)
7.2 0.4 15 7.1 0.4 15 15.9%
7 0.5 15 7.1 0.4 15 12.4%
4.1 0.3 33 4.3 0.3 33 62.2%
5.93 2.26 240 6.05 1.88 240 9.4%
0.10 [-0.10, 0.33] -0.10 [-0.42, 0.22] -0.20 [-0.34,-0.06] -0.12 [-0.40, 0.25]
303 100.0% -0.13 [-0.25,-0.02]
-100 -50 0 50
Favours [experimental] Favours [control]
Experimental Control Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV. Fixed, 95% CI
Andersen 2006 41.5 13.5 21 45.6 10.3 21 5.0% -4.10 [-11.36, 3.16]
Blumenthal 2005 59 9.5 48 57.9 6.25 48 25.7% 1.10 [-2.12, 4.32]
Collins 2003 31.7 6.9 15 31.7 5.6 15 13.2% 0.00 [-4.50, 4.50]
Edelmann 2011 67 7 44 66 6 44 35.9% 1.00 [-1.72, 3.72]
Kitzman 2010 61 5 26 57 8 26 20.2% 4.00 [0.37, 7.63]
Total (95% CI) 154 154 100,0% 1.24[-0.39, 2.8B]
Mean Difference IV. Fixed. 95% CI
Heterogeneity: ChP= 4.63, df = 4 (P = 0.33); l== 14% Test for overall effect: Z= 1.49 (P = 0.14)
-100 -50 0 50
Favours [experimental] Favours [control]
Experimental
Control
Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup
Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weiaht IV. Random. 95% CI
79 6 8 74 4 8 12.3% 5.00 [0.00,1 0.00]
110 5 15 109 5 15 15.3% 1.00 [-2.58, 4.58]
109 3 15 110 5 15 16.7% -1.00 [-3.95,1.95]
133 20 26 137 16 26 5.7% -4.00 [-1 3.84, 5.84]
65 3 12 65 2 12 18.6% 0.00 [-2.04, 2.04]
67 4 12 62 3 12 17.0% 5.00 [2.17, 7.83]
94.3 22.4 240 86.3 22.5 240 14.4% 8.50 [4.48,1 2.52]
328 328 100.0% 2.45 [-0.30, 5.20]
Mean Difference IV. Random. 95% CI
Conraads 2007 Fu 2011a Fu 2014b Kitzman 2010 Maiorana 2011a Maiorana 2011b Osbak 2011
Total (95% CI)
Heterogeneity: Taua = 9.50; Chi== 25.13, df Test for overall effect: Z= 1.74 (P = 0.08)
6 (P = 0.0003);!== 76%
-100 -50 0 50
Favours [experimental] Favours [control]
Study or Subgroup
Experimental Control Mean Difference
Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV. Random, 95% CI
34.9 18.4 477 38.7 20.2 477 72.2% -3.80 [-6.25,-1.35]
31.6 21 31 47 36.6 31 14.7% -15.40 [-30.25,-0.55]
38.7 21.6 19 36.9 28 19 13.1% 1.80 [-14.10,17.70]
527 527 100.0% -4.77 [-11.06,1,52]
Ahmad 2014 Murad 2012 SELIG 2004
Total (95% CI)
Heterogeneity: Tau== 12.71 ; Chi= = 2.80, df= 2 (P = 0.25); P= 29% Test for overall effect: Z= 1.49 (P = 0.14)
Mean Difference IV, Random. 95% CI
-100 -50 0 50
Favours [experimental] Favours [control)
Figure 4. (A) Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on CO of CHF patients in RCTs. (B) Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on LVEF of CHF patients in RCTs. (C) Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on HR of CHF patients in RCTs. (D) Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on HRV of CHF patients in RCTs. CHF = chronic heart failure; CO = cardiac output; LVEF = left ventricular ejection fraction; RCTs = randomized controlled trials.
Experimental
Control
Mean Difference
Study or Subgroup Mean SD Total Mean SD Total Weight IV. Fixed. 95% CI
Mean Difference IV. flXC-t . C
Gary 2011 Kitzman 2010 Osbak2011 Pullen 2009
56.1 32 21 41.55
24.4 20 18
12 26 240 21
33.5 25 15 30
22.9 24 17 15
Total (95S CI) 299
Heterogeneity: Chi5 = 3.60, df = 3 (P = 0.31); I2 = 17% Test for overall effect: Z= 4.61 (P < 0.00001)
12 26 240 21
2.3% 5.8% 85.3% 6.5%
22.60[3.67,41.53] 7.00 (-5.01,19.01] 6.00(2.87,9.13] 11.55(0.23, 22.87]
299 100.0S 6.81 [3.91,9.70]
-100 -50 0 50
Favours [experimental] Favours [control]
Figure 5. Forest plot showing the effect of short-term exercise intervention on QoL of CHF patients in RCTs. CHF = chronic heart failure; QoL = quality of life; RCTs = randomized controlled trials.
domain. In this study, there was no significant difference in HRV prior to and after short-term exercise intervention. Reboredo et al43 found that HRV both in time and frequency domains had no significant difference for 12-week exercise training. In the present study, there were just three included studies analyzing the HRV of patients with CHF. Therefore, the change of HRV may relate to the numbers of studies. A condition-specific measure of MLHFQ was used to assess the effect of short-term exercise intervention on QoL. Some studies have shown that the MLHFQ is responsive to the QoL of CHF patients.6 The MLHFQ have a significantly lower (improved) physical score after short-term exercise in this study because of the improvement of cardiovascular functions.44
Study limitations
In this analysis, we spent a considerable amount of time on retrieval and evaluation of the related literature, and there were a few RCT studies on exercise and cardiovascular disease in contrast to the RCT studies on drug therapy. However, those articles still have some risk of bias according to the Cochrane Collaboration recommendations, and some methods of literature quality evaluation had a high subjectivity. Therefore, methodologically rigorous articles were still limited. The judgment of publication bias in funnel plot asymmetry showed unclear risk and small study bias. Future RCTs need to give detailed information between control and intervention groups. In addition, the outcome measures varied considerably in the studies, and some studies just assessed smaller outcome measures, such as SDNN. Finally, further studies on the relation between exercise and cardiovascular disease are needed because of the complicated physiology and pathology of exercise, such as different ages, long-term durations, and different sports.
Conclusions
The results of this meta-analysis regarding exercise, cardiovascular functions, and QoL confirm that short-term exercise intervention can significantly improve the aerobic capacity, CO, and QoL of CHF patients. Aerobic exercise and combined aerobic and resistance exercise can significantly improve the aerobic capacity of CHF patients, whereas resistance exercise cannot. In addition, the improvement of aerobic
capacity caused by aerobic exercise and aerobic with resistance exercise may decrease with age. SBP, HR, LVEF, and HRV are not improved after short-term exercise intervention. In summary, the effect of short-term exercise intervention on cardiovascular functions and QoL of CHF patients is associated with age, exercise intensity, exercise duration, and type of exercise.
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest or financial disclosures to report.
Funding/support
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 61374015, No. 61202258), the PhD Programs Foundation of Ministry of Education of China (No. 20110042120037), and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. N110219001).
References
1. Holland DJ, Kumbhani DJ, Ahmed SH, et al. Effects of treatment on exercise tolerance, cardiac function, and mortality in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;16:1676-1686.
2. Lloyd-Jones D, Adams RJ, Brown TM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2010 update: a report from the American Heart Association Statistics Committee and Stroke Statistics Subcommittee. Circulation. 2010;121:948.
3. Tong TK, Chung PK, Leung RW, et al. Effects of non-Wingate-based high-intensity interval training on cardiorespiratory fitness and aerobic-based exercise capacity in sedentary subjects: a preliminary study. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2011;9:75-81.
4. Kannel WB, Gordon T, Schwarz MJ. Systolic versus diastolic blood pressure and risk of coronary heart disease: Framingham Study. Am J Cardiol. 1971;27:335-346.
5. Pina IL, Apstein CS, Balady GJ, et al. Exercise and heart failure: a statement from the American Heart Association Committee on exercise, rehabilitation, and prevention. Circulation. 2003;107:1210-1225.
6. Rector TS, Kubo SH, Cohn JN. Validity of the Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire as a measure of therapeutic response to ena-lapril or placebo. Am J Cardiol. 1993;71:1106-1107.
7. US Department of Health and Human Services. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clinical Practice Guideline No. 17: Cardiac Rehabilitation. Washington, DC: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; October 1995. AHCPR Publication No. 96-0672.
8. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of
Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;15:e147—e239.
9. Hughes DC, Lenihan DJ, Harrison CA, et al. Exercise intervention for cancer survivors with heart failure: two case reports. J Exerc Sci Fit. 2011; 9:65—73.
10. Hedback B, Perk J. Can high-risk patients after myocardial infarction participate in comprehensive cardiac rehabilitation? Scand J Rehabil Med. 1990;22:15—20.
11. Higgins JP, Altman DG, G0tzsche PC, et al. The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2011;343:d5928.
12. Blumenthal JA, Sherwood A, Babyak MA, et al. Effects of exercise and stress management training on markers of cardiovascular risk in patients with ischemic heart disease. JAMA. 2005;293:1626—1634.
13. Huang SC, Wong MK, Lin PJ, et al. Modified high-intensity interval training increases peak cardiac power output in patients with heart failure. EurJAppl Physiol. 2014;114:1853—1862.
14. Servantes DM, Pelcerman A, Salvetti XM, et al. Effects of home-based exercise training for patients with chronic heart failure and sleep apnoea: a randomized comparison of two different programs. Clin Rehabil. 2011;26:45—57.
15. Maria Sarullo F, Gristina T, Brusca I, et al. Effect of physical training on aerobic capacity, gas-exchange and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide levels in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2006;13:812—817.
16. Edelmann F, Gelbrich G, Düngen HD, et al. Exercise training improves aerobic capacity and diastolic function in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58: 1780—1791.
17. Chrysohoou C, Tsitsinakis G, Vogiatzis I, et al. High intensity-interval exercise improves quality of life of patients with chronic heart failure: a randomized controlled trial. Q J Med. 2014;107:25—32.
18. Westhoff-Bleck M, Schieffer B, Tegtbur U, et al. Aerobic training in adults after atrial switch procedure for transposition of the great arteries improves aerobic capacity without impairing systemic right ventricular function. Int J Cardiol. 2013;170:24—29.
19. Ricca-Mallada R, Migliaro ER, Piskorski J, et al. Exercise training slows down heart rate and improves deceleration and acceleration capacity in patients with heart failure. J Electrocardiol. 2012;45:214—219.
20. Fu TC, Wang CH, Lin PS, et al. Aerobic interval training improves oxygen uptake efficiency by enhancing cerebral and muscular hemody-namics in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol. 2013;167:41—50.
21. Nishi I, Noguchi T, Iwanaga Y, et al. Effects of exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure and advanced left ventricular systolic dysfunction receiving ß-blockers. Circ J. 2011;75:1649—1655.
22. Murad K, Brubaker PH, Fitzgerald DM, et al. Exercise training improves heart rate variability in older patients with heart failure: a randomized controlled single-blinded trial. Congest Heart Fail. 2012;18:192—197.
23. Osbak PS, Mourier M, Kjaer A, et al. A randomized study of the effects of exercise training on patients with atrial fibrillation. Am Heart J. 2011;162: 1080—1087.
24. Yeh GY, McCarthy EP, Wayne PM, et al. Tai Chi exercise in patients with chronic heart failure. Arch Intern Med. 2011;171:750—757.
25. Maiorana AJ, Naylor LH, Exterkate A, et al. The impact of exercise training on conduit artery wall thickness and remodeling in chronic heart failure patients. Hypertension. 2011;57:56—62.
26. Kitzman DW, Brubaker PH, Morgan TM, et al. Exercise training in older patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Circ Heart Fail. 2010;3:659-667.
27. Pullen PR, Thompson WR, Benardot D, et al. Benefits of yoga for African American heart failure patients. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010:651-657.
28. Brubaker PH, Moore JB, Stewart KP, et al. Endurance exercise training in older patients with heart failure: Results from a randomized controlled single-blind trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2009;57:1982-1989.
29. Collins E, Langbein WE, Dilan-Koetje J, et al. Effects of exercise training on aerobic capacity and quality of life in individuals with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2004;5:154-161.
30. Belardinelli R, Lacalaprice F, Ventrella C, et al. Waltz dancing in patients with chronic heart failure new form of exercise training. Circ Heart Fail. 2008;1:107-114.
31. Andersen K, Jonsdottir S, Sigurethsson AF, et al. The effect of physical training in chronic heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail. 2006;8:97-101.
32. Selig SE, Carey MF, Menzies DG, et al. Moderate-intensity resistance exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure improves strength, endurance, heart rate variability and forearm blood flow. J Card Fail. 2004;11:21-29.
33. Conraads VM, Vanderheyden M, Paelinck B, et al. The effect of endurance training on aerobic capacity following cardiac resynchronization therapy in chronic heart failure patients: a pilot trial. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2007;14:99-106.
34. Pozehl B, Duncan K, Hertzog M, et al. Heart failure exercise and training camp: effects of a multicomponent exercise training intervention in patients with heart failure. Heart Lung. 2010;6:S1-S13.
35. Jurgens CY, Lee CS, Reitano JM, et al. Heart failure symptom monitoring and response training. Heart Lung. 2013:1-8.
36. Recommendations for exercise training in chronic heart failure patients. Eur Heart J. 2001;22:125-135.
37. Clark AL, Poole-Wilson PA, Coats AJ. Exercise limitation in chronic heart failure: central role of the periphery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28: 1092-1102.
38. Gossard D, Haskell WL, Taylor B, et al. Effects of low- and high-intensity home-based exercise training on functional capacity in healthy middle-age men. Am J Cardiol. 1986;57:446-449.
39. Sullivan MJ, Higginbotham MB, Cobb FR. Exercise training in patients with severe left ventricular dysfunction: hemodynamic and metabolic effects. Circulation. 1988;78:506-515.
40. Reed MJ, Robertson CE, Addison PS. Heart rate variability measurements and the prediction of ventricular arrhythmias. QJM. 2005;98:87-95.
41. Hayano J, Takahashi H, Toriyama T, et al. Prognostic value of heart rate variability during long-term follow-up in chronic haemodialysis patients with end-stage renal disease. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1999;14: 1480-1488.
42. Fukuta H, Hayano J, Ishihara S, et al. Prognostic value of heart rate variability in patients with end-stage renal disease on chronic haemo-dialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2003;18:318-325.
43. Reboredo Mde M, Pinheiro Bdo V, Neder JA, et al. Effects of aerobic training during hemodialysis on heart rate variability and left ventricular function in end-stage renal disease patients. J Bras Nefrol. 2010;32:367-373.
44. Kitzman DW, Little WC, Brubaker PH, et al. Pathophysiological characterization of isolated diastolic heart failure in comparison to systolic heart failure. JAMA. 2002;288:2144-2150.
