Scholarly article on topic 'Botanical aspects of eco-civilisation construction'

Botanical aspects of eco-civilisation construction Academic research paper on "Biological sciences"

CC BY-NC-ND
0
0
Share paper
Academic journal
Plant Diversity
OECD Field of science
Keywords
{"Plant conservation" / "Biocultural diversity" / "Ecosystem services framework" / China}

Abstract of research paper on Biological sciences, author of scientific article — Alan Hamilton, Shengji Pei, Lixin Yang

Abstract The concept of eco-civilisation refers to the need for human affairs to be contained within the limits set by nature. Plants play such fundamental roles in the functioning of ecosystems and economies that due attention must be given to them for eco-civilisation to be achieved. Species are the basic functional units of the plant world and, taking a long term perspective, their conservation with their genetic diversity should be a primary objective in eco-civilisation construction. However, standard procedures used for plant conservation have met with only limited success. Therefore, plant conservationists need social allies to boost their efforts – referring to elements of society whose primary interests in eco-civilisation construction are different, but whose efforts, if successful, will bring benefits to plant conservation too. Potential allies can be identified using an ecosystem system services framework showing how benefits received from the delivery of ecosystem services overlap with those that favour conservation of plant diversity. The concept of eco-civilisation was adopted officially in China in 2014 as a principle guiding its future development. A project at Ludian, Yunnan Province, is used to show the relationships between an ecosystem services framework and a conservation initiative.

Academic research paper on topic "Botanical aspects of eco-civilisation construction"

Plant Diversity xxx (2017) 1-8

Botanical aspects of eco-civilisation construction

Alan Hamilton*, Shengji Pei, Lixin Yang

Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, No. 132 Lanhei Road, Kunming 650201, Yunnan, China

ARTICLE INFO ABSTRACT

The concept of eco-civilisation refers to the need for human affairs to be contained within the limits set by nature. Plants play such fundamental roles in the functioning of ecosystems and economies that due attention must be given to them for eco-civilisation to be achieved. Species are the basic functional units of the plant world and, taking a long term perspective, their conservation with their genetic diversity should be a primary objective in eco-civilisation construction. However, standard procedures used for plant conservation have met with only limited success. Therefore, plant conservationists need social allies to boost their efforts — referring to elements of society whose primary interests in eco-civilisation construction are different, but whose efforts, if successful, will bring benefits to plant conservation too. Potential allies can be identified using an ecosystem system services framework showing how benefits received from the delivery of ecosystem services overlap with those that favour conservation of plant diversity. The concept of eco-civilisation was adopted officially in China in 2014 as a principle guiding its future development. A project at Ludian, Yunnan Province, is used to show the relationships between an ecosystem services framework and a conservation initiative.

Copyright © 2017 Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-

NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Article history: Received 9 October 2016 Received in revised form 1 December 2016 Accepted 13 December 2016 Available online xxx

Keywords: Plant conservation Biocultural diversity Ecosystem services framework China

1. Eco-civilisation

The world considered as an ecosystem is becoming destabilised by human activities, as demonstrated by climate change and ocean acidification (Stocker et al., 2014). A sixth great mass extinction event may have begun (McCallum, 2015). Tropical forests are being reduced (Baccini et al., 2012), deserts are spreading, large quantities of soil are being eroded, oceanic ecosystems are being polluted by industrially-generated iron fertilisation (Lin et al., 2015) and the lives of many people are being blighted by problematic access to food, water or fuel. Armed conflicts and cases of unsolicited or forced migration can often be interpreted as due, at least in part, to conflicts over scarce resources or triggered by environmental degradation (Kelley et al., 2015; Wendle, 2016). The scale of human impact on biogeochemical systems has become so great that some geologists propose recognition of a new geological period to cover this modern time of great human influence, the Anthropocene (Smith and Zeder, 2013).

The concept of eco-civilisation provides a vision of a future state of harmony between people and nature — a target for attainment. It

* Corresponding author. E-mail address: alanchamilton@btinternet.com (A. Hamilton). Peer review under responsibility of Editorial Office of Plant Diversity.

was incorporated into the Charter of the Communist Party of China (CPC) at its 18th National Congress in 2012, moving it to the forefront of China's national development strategy. Hu Jintao, then leader of China, explained: "... the essence of the construction of ecological civilisation is building a resource-saving and environmentally friendly society based on the environmental carrying capacity of resources, the laws of nature and sustainable development..." (The Climate Group, 2014). For the environmentalist, the concept of eco-civilisation is one relevant to everywhere, not just China.1 Its adoption by China is especially welcome, given the country's large size and global influence, and because China has an exceptional record of turning radical policies into practice (for example the One

1 The word 'civilisation' is derived from Latin civis, originally referring to an inhabitant of a town, but nowadays it has modified meanings. One, according to Wikipedia, is: "any complex society characterized by urban development, social stratification, symbolic communication forms (typically, writing systems), and a perceived separation from and domination over the natural environment by a cultural elite." It is possible to regard virtually all humanity today as belonging to a single global civilization, given the large number of urban dwellers (more than 50% of the global population since 2008), the high degree of connectedness of town and country, the large scale movements of people within and between countries, and the increasing globalisation of economies and cultures. This means that no one country, especially one as internationally influential as China, will be able to achieve the end point of eco-civilisation, unless other countries do so too.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pld.2016.12.003

2468-2659/Copyright © 2017 Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences. Publishing services by Elsevier B.V. on behalf of KeAi Communications Co., Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

Child Policy launched in 1978—1980). China with its eco-civilisation policy has the potential to become a model for the rest of the world.

2. Plants in eco-civilisation construction

Plants play such fundamental roles in the functioning of ecosystems and economies that due attention must be given to them for eco-civilisation to be achieved.2 As photosynthetic organisms, plants provide the organic molecules on which animals feed and produce the oxygen required by most life. As living things attached to place, plants provide the main structural elements of terrestrial ecosystems, hold the soil together and, on decay, replenish soil fertility. Numerous products are obtained from plants, including food, construction materials, fuel, fibre and medicines. Also, plants form a major part of the sentient environments in which people enact the dramas of their lives. Aspects of the plant world — for instance, perhaps particular specimens of trees, or types of flowers, vegetation or landscapes — can come to hold special significance for people through their lifetime experiences, as mediated through the prisms of culture.

Taking a long term view — a relevant planning horizon to consider in this case3, we regard the single most important botanical task in eco-civilisation construction is the conservation of plant species with their genetic diversity. Species are the basic functional units of the plant world, those existing today being the products of evolutionary processes extending back hundreds of millions of years (Table 1). They can be considered a legacy from the past to the present, essentially non-renewable if viewed as natural capital (Constanza et al., 1997; WFNP, 2016).

3. Extent of threats to plant species

Despite the great importance of plant diversity to the future of humanity, it is alarming that already about 20% of the ca. 300,000 plant species now on earth are in danger of extinction, overwhelmingly at the hand of man (Kew, 2012). Another indicator of the problem is that an estimated 75% of the genetic diversity of agricultural crops was lost during the 20th Century (FAO, 1992; FAO, 1998; Hawkes et al., 2001).

We refer to two countries to illustrate the extent of threats to plant diversity, one of its financially poorest (Uganda) and one of its richest (UK). A review has highlighted the challenges faced by plant conservationists in Uganda (Hamilton et al., 2016). Threats to plant diversity include a very high rate of loss of tropical forest, loss or degradation of numerous protected areas, and difficulties in maintaining germplasm collections of crops.

In the case of the UK, inadequate support for conservation of biological diversity (in general) is apparent in the declines in population size over the last 50 years of 60% of the 3148 species of

2 The dependencies of people on plants can be particularly apparent in more subsistence-based economies, for instance when people grow much of their own food, collect wood locally for fuel, and draw water from springs protected by forests. These dependencies can be less obvious or psychologically meaningful to people who are distanced economically, physically or mentally from the realities of the natural world, for instance if living in more monetarised economies, urban places or immersed in digital worlds.

3 In principle, the structure and functioning of an eco-civilisation should be sufficiently robust to be able to continue indefinitely, at least regarding ecological constraints. For example, an eco-civilisation should be robust enough to survive the shocks that will be imposed by the major changes in climate anticipated over coming millennia, as the earth continues to traverse its present ice-age climatic phase (which began about 2.6 million years ago and is driven by three astronomical cycles with periodicities of between 23,000 and 100,000 years). A single ice—ice climatic cycle is not so long when compared with the span of time that the human species has already existed (200,000 years).

plants and animals for which quantitative assessments of population trends exist; 31% have declined strongly (Hayhow et al., 2016; RSPB, 2013). Plant conservation is of much less interest to the general public than birds, judging by the relative sizes of the membership of Plantlife International (about 10,000 members) and the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds (about 1,000,000 members) (Avery, 2012). Even the Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, an institution of the highest rank as a resource centre for international plant conservation, has failed to obtain adequate and consistent governmental support (Commons Select Committee, 2015; Sample and Bell, 2014; UK Plant Science, 2014). Culturally, the foundation for practical involvement in biological conservation seems set to decline. Children play much less outdoors than they used to, younger people tend not to join natural history societies and 'whole plant botany' has become a dying subject in schools and universities (Hindson and Carter, 2012; Natural England 2016; UK Plant Science, 2014).

4. An expanded agenda suggested for plant conservationists

Standard procedures adopted over the last 60 years to conserve plant species include the stepwise processes of taxonomic recognition of species, assessments of their degrees of endangerment and putting into place in situ and/or ex situ conservation measures as possible and appropriate (Given, 1994; IUCN, 2012). The main in situ tool has been the protected area. Places especially important for the conservation of plant species have been mapped (Anderson, 2002; Davis et al. 1994—1995), as too have centres of origin or diversity for traditional varieties of crops (Brush, 1999; Dvorak et al., 2011; Harris, 1990; Vavilov, 1926). Scientists concerned with plant genetic resources concentrated at first on conserving the landraces of a few major crops, especially using ex situ measures (seed banks and field collections), but subsequently have given more attention to in situ measures, wild crop relatives, minor agricultural crops and other uses of plants additional to food (FAO, 1992; Hawkes et al., 2001; Maxted et al., 2016).

Standard procedures for conservation of plant diversity have met with only limited success. We conclude that plant conservationists need social allies to boost their efforts — referring to elements of society whose primary interests in eco-civilisation construction are different, but whose efforts, if successful, will bring benefits to plant conservation too. Elsewhere, this expanded approach has been termed ecosystem-based plant conservation (EBPC) (Hamilton, 2007; Hamilton et al., 2012). Standard procedures still apply, but with more consideration given to who should be involved (not just to what needs to be done), taking into account the long-term sustainability of all ecological systems in which plants are significant components, and promoting conservation across the landscape. EBPC is a place-centred, not taxonomically-centred, approach.

We consider that the key people to drive this expanded agenda forward are those interested in conservation of plant diversity, given their dual interests in plants and conservation. Depending on their situations, not all need be experts on Red Listed species — if this was a universal requirement, then there would be very few plant conservationists available to catalyse the work in many parts of the world. Some of the many types of social players that can potentially contribute are indicated on Table 2 (listed in the cells after the symbol S). They include conservation-minded farmers, people concerned about the availability of water resources, teachers, religious leaders, and many others. Researchers have major roles to play in distributing practical information for the use of such parties appropriate to their roles. For instance, farmers and those managing water catchments could benefit from advice on how best to pursue their tasks in ways that benefit plant

Table 1

Events and milestones in the stories of plants, people, and relationships between them. Dates in years before present (BP) or years after present (AP). Note the rapidity with which human-induced changes influencing plant diversity have occurred in recent years compared with the long time taken for present plant species diversity to emerge. IUCN = International Union for Conservation of Nature.

1 i H ANTICIPATED FUTURE EVENTS AND PROCESSES YEARS AP

Fragmentation of African continent by forces of plate tectonics 10,000,000

Completion from now of longest astronomical cycle causing ice ages (100,000 years) 100,000

Manmade climate change, global temperature 4UC higher (high emissions scenario) 85

Human population reaches 10,000,000,000 (projected) 40

CONDITIONS NOW 0

20 percent of world's higher plant species threatened with extinction

Human populations size 7,400,000,000

PAST EVENTS AND PROCESSES YEARS BP

First genetically modified crop (1982 CE) 35

Role of DNA in genetics discovered (1953 CE) 60

International conservation organised (IUCN founded 1948 CE) 60

Accelerated use of chemical fertilisers and pesticides in agriculture From 70

Global governance (League of Nations 1920 CE, United Nations 1945 CE) 90

Modern protected area movement begins (Yellowstone National Park 1872 CE) 150

Principles of genetics established (Gregor Mendel, lived 1822-1884 CE) 150

Human population reaches 1,000,000,000 210

Industrial Revolution, global commodification of plant products From 350

First multinational business organisations (e.g. East India Company) 500

Worldwide colonial European e mpires, American crops to other continents From 600

Homo sapiens to Hawaii, triggering biological extinctions 1700

Domesticated sheep and goats reach South Africa (originated in Southwest Asia) 2000

Silk Route established (trade between China and Europe) 2300

Human population reaches 100,000,000 2500

First city (Uruk, Sumerian Civilisation) 5000

Subsidised agriculture (e.g. irrigation), human populations reaches 10,000,000 6000

Domestication of plants/animals, first crop landraces, livestock on grazing lands From 11,000

Postglacial climatic amelioration, triggering major changes in biotic distributions From 14,500

Homo sapiens to Australia, triggering faunal extinctions (with consequences for plants) 50,000

Human population reaches 1,000,000 50,000

Human population reaches 100,000 130,000

Homo sapiens appears, societies based on hunting and gathering groups 200,000

Controlled use of fire (by Homo erectus) (with consequences for plants) By 400,000

Quaternary ice age cycles start (intensifying from 800,000 BP) 2,600,000

Land bridge formed between North and South America (facilitating biotic movements) 3,000,000

Last common ancestor of Arabidopsis thaliana and its nearest living relative 5,000,000

Australia detached from other continents (barrier to species dispersal) 99,000,000

Ancestral Angiosperm species 150,000,000

Last common ancestor of Ginkgo biloba and its nearest living relative By 270,000,000

First land plants 510,000,000

conservation, while teachers and religious leaders could benefit from advice on educational techniques useful for promoting learning about plants, as well as patterns of behaviour favourable to conservation.

Significant elements of EBPC thinking already penetrate some plant conservation plans and programmes. For instance, the major changes to the distributions of species, vegetation types and agricultural zones predicted with anthropogenic climate change have created a greater awareness of the need to think about conservation of plant diversity across the landscape and in a more dynamic way than has classically been the case (Araujo and Rahbek, 2006; Gitay et al., 2002; Hannah et al., 2002).

5. Suggested principles of ecosystem-based plant conservation

Some points made here are illustrated on Table 2, which gives a matrix indicating conditions favouring the delivery of ecosystem services together with conservation of plant diversity.

1. Acknowledge the need for geographically-based biocultural linkage

Both plant diversity and the delivery of plant-related ecosystem services are geographically related. It is therefore helpful if there are people associated with localities of interest who are knowledgeable about their plants. Long-standing residents, especially those closely dependent on local natural resources, typically accumulate much knowledge about local plants (including their types, uses, values and methods of management), thus providing exceptional foundations of expertise and interest upon which modern conservation solutions can be built. It is common for them to possess beliefs and related customs that are supportive of plant conservation (Pei, 2010; Pei et al., 2009b; Verschuuren et al., 2010). Where little in the way of long-standing indigenous knowledge survives, then other types of detailed interest in local plants must substitute.

2. Place local relationships between people and plants at the heart of analyses to determine how to proceed

Table 2

Conditions favouring the joint delivery of ecosystem services together with conservation of plant diversity. Potential social partners for plant conservationists are indicated (S). Supporting ecosystem services, the fourth type of ecosystem service, are not included on the table. This consists of underling processes, such as primary production, nutrient cycling and biological processes that maintain natural capital. Benefits received from these by people and less direct than in the case of provisioning, regulating and cultural services.

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (categories and examples of sub-categories) CONDITIONS FAVOURING THE DELIVERY OF ECOSYSTEM SERVICES TOGETHER WITH CONSERVATION OF PLANT DIVERSITY

CONDITIONS AT LOCALITY WIDER SYSTEMS INFLUENCING LOCALITY

PROVISIONING Biological products Land used for production managed in ways that maintain plant diversity. Emphasis on retention of endemic species and traditional cultivars in the landscape as a whole. S: Landowners, managers of land and plants, collectors of produce from wild plants, local representatives of line agencies Products favoured that are produced in ways supportive of plant conservation. S: Traders, manufacturers, consumers, product certifiers

Policies, international conventions, regional agreements and national laws that promote delivery of these services together with plant conservation. S: Governance systems, and relevant commercial and nongovernmental organisations and networks

Fresh water Landscape managed to maintain vegetation types or forms of land use that deliver these services together with plant diversity. S: As above, plus direct beneficiaries of these services

REGULATING Regulation of water flows, erosion and climate

Pest regulation and pollination Diversity of plant species maintained in production areas and across the landscape, especially those known to deliver these services. S: As above

CULTURAL Child-raising, education and information Child-raising practices and formal educational experiences favour acquisition of knowledge, skills and attitudes favourable to plant conservation. Information relevant to plant conservation available. S: Family, teachers and trainers, information providers Policies, international conventions and laws relating to child-raising and educational curricula that are supportive of plant conservation. S: Organisations concerned with child-raising. Educational and information systems

Worldviews, religions and ideologies Worldviews, faiths and ideologies favourable to plant conservation represented locally. S: Local cultural, religious and ideological leaders

Belief systems supportive of plant conservation. S: Cultural, religious and ideological leaders

Sectoral interests Sectoral interests that favour plant conservation represented. S: Hobbyists and communities activists concerned with plants or related ecosystem services. Aesthetes, artists and craft-makers culturally connected with local plants Organisations and networks concerned with sectoral interests supportive of plant conservation. S: Cultural leaders, policy makers, programme managers, researchers

SUPPORTING Primary production These services are supportive of maintaining natural capital. They underlie the more tangible services provided by provisioning, regulating and cultural services

Nutrient cycling

The locality is where plants grow and where people come into contact with them directly. This is where efforts made for plant conservation must succeed if they are to be counted a success (Hamilton and Hamilton, 2006; Pei et al., 2009a). Actions taken in wider socio-economic, political or cultural systems aimed at conservation — for example, new laws, revised Red Lists of threatened species, or the selling of carbon credits to ethically-minded consumers — must feed down to improvements at the locality level to be of any practical value. This point is reflected in the vertical division of Table 2 separating 'conditions at locality' and 'wider systems influencing locality'.

Plant conservationists will benefit from establishing good overall pictures of local people/plant relationships for their localities of concern. Care may be needed to guard against biases related to their cultural backgrounds. One potential source of bias stems from the division that exists within the professional plant conservation community between institutions and programmes concerned with conservation of wild plant species and those concerned with plant genetic resources (Maxted et al., 2016). Another potential source of bias stems from the ways in which the plant sciences are divided into the specialities of botany, agriculture, forestry and horticulture (Hamilton et al., 2003). Constrained thinking on the part of plant conservationists may impose artificial limitations when analysing local systems of management and use

of plants, which in actuality can refer to a variety of different types of vegetation and ways of managing plants.4

3. Adopt an ecosystem services framework to identify potential

social partners

Ecological services are "the benefits provided by ecosystems that contribute to making life both possible and worth living' (NEA, 2016). Four categories of ecosystem services are normally recognised -provisioning, regulating, cultural and supporting (reflected in the horizontal divisions ofTable 2) (Alcamo and Bennett, 2003). It is suggested that plant conservationists undertake analyses to determine relationships between local plant diversity and the delivery of ecosystem services, followed by the identification of the social players

4 The distinction between wild and other types of plants is often not easy to make. 'Wild' can variously mean not owned, not domesticated or not managed. The degree of precision defining ownership of land or plant resources can vary greatly between countries and sites, both legally and in practice. Many populations of plants seen as wild have been influenced in their genetic constitutions by human activities, while the intensity with which plants are managed is very variable, ranging along a spectrum from single specimens of plants that are intensively managed to plants that receive, along with their habitats, no management interventions at all.

A. Hamilton et al. / Plant Diversity xxx (2017) 1-8

associated with them, thus opening up the possibility of forging alliances for mutual benefit. Different aspects of the plant world can be of interest to different potential partners. For example, some may be interested in particular species (e.g. used for particular medical treatments), groups of plants (e.g. those contributing to pollinating systems that benefit crops), certain types of vegetation (e.g. those that help to regulate flooding) or forms of landscape (e.g. the concept of wilderness is culturally resonant in the USA) (Schama, 1995).

Ecosystem services can vary in their intensity of interest to communities. Those with greatest potential as motivators for plant conservation are likely to be those associated with benefits that are more immediate and socially resonant. For instance, this can sometimes be the case with medicinal plants (see Ludian example later).

4. Adopt an evidence-based approach to recognition of best

practice

The complexity of ecosystems can make it difficult to know how to influence them effectively to meet particular goals. We suggest that an evidence-based approach is useful in plant conservation (Hamilton, 2011; Hamilton et al., 2012), just as it has proved in healthcare — similarly a science-influenced art dealing

with complex systems with practical results required (Sackett et al., 1996). An evidence-based approach involves periodic reviews of the evidence relating to success or failure in dealing with practical issues, followed by the formulation of recommendations on best practice. These recommendations can then be disseminated for wider application, or treated as hypotheses for further testing. Both quantitative and qualitative methods can be used to judge success, as suitable for the case. The project described below was one of a suite of activities providing evidence for an analysis to determine best practices in plant conservation related to the interest of communities in medicinal plants (Hamilton, 2008; Pei et al., 2010).

6. Example of the application of ecosystem thinking to a conservation project in China

This is a project of the Kunming Institute of Botany (Chinese Academy of Sciences), initially in association with Plantlife International (Hamilton, 2008; Pei et al., 2010). It is based geographically at Ludian (Northwest Yunnan, China). The application of an ecosystem services framework to it (Table 3) is retrospective. Such a framework was not used explicitly in project design.

ECOSYSTEM SERVICES (categories and subcategories) LUDIAN: BASELINE CONDITIONS (B) AND PROJECT INITIATIVES AND RESULTS (P)

CONDITIONS AT LOCALITY (LUDIAN) WIDER SYSTEMS INFLUENCING LOCALITY

PROVISIONING Products from cultivated plants B: Farmers and collectors selling MAP on an individual basis at low prices. P: (1) Internet access provided at Ludian to raise local bargaining power. (2) Idea of establishing an MAP marketing cooperative explored B: (1) High market demand for MAP from Ludian. (2) HRS applied to farmland from 1979, giving farmers rights of use to particular areas of land (subject to regulations). HRS extended to forests from 2005 (excludes Community Benefit Forests serving as water sources or providing ecological protection)

Products from wild plants

B: (1) Ban on logging imposed in Ludian forests in 1998 (intensive logging reduced forest cover from 80% pre 1960 to 40% in 1990). (2) Increased soil erosion, drying up of streams and a less favourable agricultural climate blamed locally on forest destruction. P: Two MPCAs of 300 ha each established in forest at Diannam and Dianbei to safeguard species, serve local medical needs and provide planting stock. MPCAs retained when forests made Household Responsibility Forests in 2008

Fresh water B: (1) Upper catchment of Yangtze (including the Three Parallel Rivers Area of Yunnan) a priority for natural area protection and tree planting since disastrous flooding downriver in 1998. Logging in natural forest prohibited throughout China (but some non-timber forest collection allowed). (2) TNC assisting with establishment of Laujunshan NP (Ludian is in buffer zone)

REGULATING Regulation of water flows, erosion and climate

J ALR P L U u Medicinal plants in culture and healthcare B: Traditional medicine popular, using many species of MAP. (2) Many households grow some MAP for home treatments and some THPs have species-rich gardens. P: (1) 22 new herbal home gardens initiated, to provide herbs for local treatments, serve as education centres on Naxi culture and provide planting materials for farmers. (2). Workshops: 4 on Naxi Dongba medical knowledge, 5 on sustainable harvesting of wild MAP, 1 on the use of the internet for marketing B: (1) Widespread cultural support in China for traditional religions and philosophies (e.g. Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism). (2) Some healthcare traditions of minorities officially recognised (e.g. Tibetan Medicine), but not others (e.g. Naxi Dongba Medicine). P: LCNTC plans to establish a Naxi Dongba herbal garden and Naxi hospital

Education, training and awareness raising

Social organisation B: Community poorly organised regarding trading in MAP. P: (1) Multi-disciplinary project team formed. (2) Ludian Medicinal Plants Conservation Association formed (see note in caption) B: Institution exists at prefectural level supportive of ethno-medicine (LCNTC). P: LCNTC instrumental in starting Lijian City Ethnomedicine Association

Outreach to Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture P: (1) Yongzhi Medicinal Plants Conservation Group formed, stimulated by example of Ludian. (2) MPCA selected (1000 ha). (3) Training sessions provided (on cultivation of MAP and basic Tibetan Medicine. (4) 6 herbal gardens started (none present previously) B: TNC assisting establishment of new Meili Snow Mountain NP (Yongzhi is in buffer zone). P: (1) TNC supports project expansion to Yongzhi. (2) Deqing County Tibetan Medicine Doctor Association formed

Table 3

Ecosystem services framework for a conservation project based on medicinal plants at Ludian, Northwest Yunnan, China (Pei et al., 2010). Supporting ecosystem services have not been included (see caption to Table 2 for an explanation). B = background conditions; P = project initiatives and results. Acronyms: HRS = Household Responsibility System, LCNTC = Lijiang City Nationality Technical College, MAP = Medicinal and aromatic plants, MPCA = Medicinal Plants Conservation Area, NP = National Park, THP = Traditional Healthcare Practitioner, TNC = The Nature Conservancy (an international non-governmental conservation organisation). Note: Ludian Medicinal Plants Conservation Association started in Ludian Administrative Village and later expanded to coverall of Ludian Township. The name was changed to Ludian Medicinal Plants Conservation and Development Association, once it became clear that conservation had to be linked directly to development to gain much local public support. The social base of the association was adjusted, reducing a perceived over-representation of traditional doctors to better reflect the interests of the community as a whole.

Fig. 1. View of Ludian showing agriculture in valleys and forest on surrounding hills. There are many fields of medicinal plants, including of Saussurea costus (Falc.) Lipsch. (foreground).

It has been proposed that initiatives focusing on medicinal plants can sometimes prove beneficial for plant conservation in places where communities have close dependencies on them for healthcare or income; there can be strong connections to cultural identity (Hamilton, 2004). Further, it has been suggested that the conservation benefits received can extend to other (non-medicinal) plants and animals too, and also associated ecosystem services, these benefitting from the efforts made by communities to provide habitats for medicinal plants. Ludian was selected as the locality for this initiative through a preliminary exercise to identify Important Plant Areas (IPAs) for medicinal plants in the Himalaya (Hamilton and Radford, 2007). The choice of Ludian was based mainly on exceptional local cultural and economic interest in medicinal plants, less so on the standard criteria used for recognition of IPAs.5

Ludian Administrative Village (AV), the core locality for community-based work under the Ludian project (especially the villages of Diannan and Dianbei), has a population of 5700 people distributed over 8 villages, with an economy based on agriculture, pastoralism and the collection of non-timber forest plants for sale (Fig. 1). Ninety per cent of farmers grow some medicinal plants for sale (providing 10-70% of household income). It is part of Ludian Township (population 17,000), itself part of Lijiang City Prefecture, and lies within the Three Parallel Rivers area of Northwest Yunnan — these rivers being the Yangtze (or Jinsha), Mekong and Salween. Ninety per cent of people in Ludian AV are ethnically Naxi, one of China's 55 officially recognised minority socio-linguistic groups. The traditional medical system of the Naxi is known as Naxi Donghba Medicine. The Yangtze flooded disastrously in its lower reaches in 1998, an event blamed partly on the destruction and

5 The standard criteria used to identify IPAs are the presence of threatened species and/or habitats, also floristic richness (Anderson, 2002). The use of a subset of useful plants, in this case medicinal, to identify IPAs is questionable. Recognition of a plant as medicinal varies between individuals and communities. Plant species cannot be divided neatly in any absolute sense into those that are medicinal and those that are not. The use of medicinal plants to identify IPAs in the Himalaya is further debatable, in that the medicinal plants that have been Red-listed here are skewed towards widely-distributed species found in regional trade. Scientific knowledge about where they occur probably owes much to the history of scientific plant collecting.

degradation of forests upriver. This proved a turning point for environmental policy in China, catalysing a logging ban in natural forests throughout China, and programmes of large-scale tree-planting and establishment of new protected areas in the upper catchment of the Yangtze, including in Northwest Yunnan (Hongfu Yin and Changan, 2001; Zhao and Grumbine, 2011; Zhao and Shao, 2002).

Ludian Township, especially Ludian AV, is a locality famous for medicinal plants in Yunnan, being identified as the 'home of medicinal plants' by the Yunnan Provincial Scientific and Technological Department and a Di Dao locality for certain raw drugs used in Traditional Chinese Medicine (labelling as Di Dao means that plant material coming from here is seen as especially 'authentic', adding value to the produce and making its sale more reliable). There is a history of cultivation and trade in medicinal plants dating back over 200 years. A previous survey in Ludian Township had recorded a total of 363 locally growing species of plants in local medicinal use, nearly all wild collected (Wang, 1999), while another, undertaken in Diannan and Dianbei at the start of the project, found that 13% of informants relied exclusively on herbal medicine, 26% on western medicine and 61% on a combination of the two (Yang et al., 2014). This second survey further found that Naxi healers sourced 60% of the species that they use from the wild and 30% from their home gardens, with the remaining 10% purchased in the market. Healers tend to grow more species of medicinal plants than ordinary farmer-householders, those at Diannan and Dianbei being found to grow a total 63 species between them.

Table 3 is an ecosystem services framework for the project, with background conditions (B) and project initiatives and results (P) assigned to appropriate cells. The extent to which the project is responsible for some of the positive results shown is difficult to judge. Project members did make suggestions to members of the community and other social groups about what might be done, and the project did fund certain activities, but a main aim of the project team was to encourage other parties to take their own initiatives. There are signs that the project has had some success, for instance, the establishment of two Medicinal Plant Conservation Areas (MPCAs) at Ludian, the outreach of the project to the Tibetan Community of Yongzhi, and the establishment of ethno-medicine associations in Lijiang City and Diqing Tibetan Autonomous Prefectures.

A. Hamilton et al. / Plant Diversity xxx (2017) 1-8

Southwest China Germplasm Bank, , Kunming Institute

of Botany Ex situ conservation

Others uses of seedbahk (including based on links within China and bevond)

NATION (CHINA)

PREFECTURE (LIJIANG CITY)

Lijiang City Nationality Technical College (planned medicinal

plant garden) Ex situ conservation, education

Lijiang City Ethnomedicine Association Healthcare

Lijiang Alpine Botanic Garden Conservation, education, employment

TOWNSHIP (LUDIAN)

Medicinal Plants Conservation Areas In situ conservation

Gardens of local traditional doctors Healthcare, ex situ conservation

Nurseries Employment

Agricultural production of medicinal plants

Healthcare and income elsewhere

Fig. 2. Potential for linking in situ and ex situ conservation of plants at Ludian with ex situ conservation elsewhere, and with delivery of other societal benefits. Levels in social organisation in bold type, society benefits in italics. Arrows indicate potential for exchanges of germplasm and/or information.

The ecosystem services framework for Ludian (Table 3) differs in its detailed construction from that shown on Table 3. Flexibility could be a general principle to be followed in devising such frameworks for plant conservation purposes. It can also be seen on Table 3 that the Ludian project was fortunate in being able to benefit from a number of favourable pre-existing conditions. Local, provincial and national cultures and economies have strong connections to medicinal plants, environmental policies are favourable to forest conservation, and governmental structures give some recognition to ethno-linguistic minorities. A feature of the Ludian project is that interventions were made in connection with several different types of ecosystem services, involving several different types of social players at several social levels. Judgements on what to do and who to involve in the project were made by the multi-disciplinary project team (see Table 3).

A next step for the Ludian project could be to investigate how plant conservation at Ludian can be strengthened by linking to ex situ efforts at prefectural level (a proposed herbal garden at Lijiang City Nationality Technical College and the Lijiang Alpine Botanic Garden) and with the Southwest China Germplasm Bank of Wild Species at the Kunming Institute of Botany (Fig. 2). The elements at Ludian relevant to such an integrated conservation system include the MPCAs, the gardens of local herbalists (knowledgeable about cultivation techniques and the medicinal properties of plants) and local nurseries (developed to bulk up materials obtained from the MPCAs for use in agriculture). An initial step could be to study how plant materials and information flow around such integrated in situ/ex situ conservation systems, such as already exist globally. The need for better integration of in situ and ex situ conservation efforts worldwide has been emphasized, including the greater engagement of end-users and more dynamic ex situ conservation systems than is currently the case (Maxted et al., 2016).

7. Conclusions

The decision of China to incorporate the concept of eco-civilisation construction into its national development strategy is timely because of the severity of environmental degradation, courageous because tensions will inevitably arise from pressures for immediate economic development, and momentous, given China's record as a country capable of implementing radical policies. On the botanical front, China has several major assets that it can deploy to implement this decision, including a wealth of wild and cultivated plant diversity, a large store of indigenous ethno-botanical knowledge, and numerous local beliefs and practices (as well as the philosophical and religious traditions of Confucianism, Taoism and Buddhism), that are supportive of maintaining harmonious relationships between people and nature.

The expanded approach to plant conservation outlined here would benefit from further refinement through its application in different thematic contexts and in different parts of the world. The more specific application of this model to conservation initiatives using medicinal plants as entry points (as at Ludian), would also benefit from further development. It could prove useful for accelerating plant conservation in those many other places globally where medicinal plants play significant roles in the lives of communities (Hamilton and Aumeeruddy-Thomas, 2013). With reference to China in particular, there are many other healthcare traditions additional to those of the Naxi and Tibetans seen at Ludian and Yongzhi, altogether using a large number of species of medicinal plants. The number of documented plant species used in Traditional Chinese Medicine is 4758 and the number of plant species used by China's minority communities estimated in total at ca. 7000-8000 (Yang et al., 2014). These figures are substantial when compared to the number of plant species in the Chinese flora as a whole (ca. 30,000). There would seem considerable potential

A. Hamilton et al. / Plant Diversity xxx (2017) 1-8

for pursuing plant conservation further motivated by people's interests in medicinal plants.

Acknowledgements

Alan Hamilton would like to acknowledge the generous invitation of the Kunming Institute of Botany to attend the 8th National Symposium on Ethnobotany, Hohhot, Inner Mongolia, China, 16—18 August 2016, the theme of which was 'Eco-civilisation construction'. Comments received from two anonymous referees were helpful in making improvements to the manuscript.

References

Alcamo, J., Bennett, E., 2003. Ecosystems and Human Well-being: a Framework for

Assessment. Island Press, Washington D.C., USA. Anderson, S., 2002. Identifying Important Plant Areas — a Site Selection Manual for Europe, and a Basis for Developing Guidelines for Other Regions of the World. Plantlife International, Salisbury, UK. Araújo, M.B., Rahbek, C., 2006. How does climate change affect biodiversity? Science 313,1396—1397. Avery, M., 2012. Fighting for Birds: 25 Years in Nature Conservation. Pelagic Publishing, Exeter, UK.

Baccini, A., et al., 2012. Estimated carbon dioxide emissions from tropical deforestation improved by carbon-density maps. Nat. Clim. Change 2,182—185. Brush, S.B. (Ed.), 1999. Genes in the Field: On-farm Conservation of Crop Diversity.

International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy. Commons Select Committee, 2015. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew. House of Commons, Parliament: Science and Technology Select Committee, London, UK. Constanza, R., et al., 1997. The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural

capital. Nature 387, 253—260. Davis, S.D., Heywood, V.H., Herrera-MacBryde, O., Villa-Lobos, J., Hamilton, A.C.

(Eds.), 1994—1995.1UCN. Centres of Plant Diversity, Cambridge. Dvorak, J., Luo, M.-C., Akhunove, E.D., 2011. N.I. Vavilov's theory of centres of diversity in the light of current understandings of genetic diversity, domestication and evolution. Czech J. Genet. Plant Breed. 47, 20—27. FAO, 1992. International Code of Conduct for Plant Germplasm Collecting and Transfer. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1taly.

FAO, 1998. The State of the World's Plant Genetic Resources for Food and Agriculture. Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 1taly. Gitay, H., Suarez, A., Watson, R.T., Dokken, D.J. (Eds.), 2002. Climate Change and Biodiversity. World Meteorological Organisation, 1ntergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Geneva, Switzerland. Given, D.R., 1994. Principles and Practice of Plant Conservation. Timber Press,

Portland, Oregon, USA. Hamilton, A.C., 2004. Medicinal plants, conservation and livelihoods. Biodivers.

Conservation 13,1477—1517. Hamilton, A.C., 2007. Could ecosystem thinking give plants a boost? Plantlife 49, 12—13.

Hamilton, A.C. (Ed.), 2008. Medicinal Plants in Conservation and Development: Case

Studies and Lessons Learnt. Plantlife 1nternational, Salisbury, UK. Hamilton, A.C., 2011. An evidence-based approach to conservation through medicinal plants. Med. Plant Conserv. 14, 2—7. Hamilton, A.C., Aumeeruddy-Thomas, Y., 2013. Maintaining resources for traditional medicine: a global overview and a case study from Buganda (Uganda). Plant Divers. Resour. 35, 407—423. Hamilton, A.C., Hamilton, P.B., 2006. Plant Conservation: an Ecosystem Approach.

Earthscan, London, UK. Hamilton, A.C., Radford, E.A., 2007. Identification and Conservation of Important Plant Areas for Medicinal Plants in the Himalaya. Plantlife 1nternational and Kathmandu, Salisbury, UK. Nepal: Ethnobotanical Society of Nepal. Hamilton, A.C., Pei, Shengji, Kessy, J., Khan, A.A., Lagos-Witte, S., Shinwari, Z.K., 2003. The Purposes and Teaching of Applied Ethnobotany. People and Plants Working Paper no. 11. WWF, Godalming, UK. Hamilton, A.C., Pei, Shengji, Huai, Huyin, Anderson, S., 2012. Why and how to make

plant conservation ecosystem-based. Sustain. Agric. Res. 1, 48—54. Hamilton, A.C., Karamura, D., Kakudidi, E.K., 2016. History and conservation of wild and cultivated plant diversity in Uganda: forest species and banana varieties as case studies. Plant Divers. 38, 23—44. Hannah, L., et al., 2002. Conservation of biodiversity in a changing climate. Conserv. Biol. 16, 264—268.

Harris, D.R., 1990. Vavilov's concept of centres of origin of cultivated plants: its genesis and its influence on the study of agricultural origins. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 39, 7—16.

Hawkes, J.G., Maxted, N., Ford-Lloyd, B.V., 2001. The ex situ Conservation of Plant Genetic Resources. Kluwer Academic Publishers, London, UK.

Hayhow, D., et al., 2016. State of Nature. State of Nature Partnership, Royal Society for Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK.

Hindson, J., Carter, L., 2012. Natural History Societies and Recording Schemes in the UK: a Consultation into the Factors that Limit Their Functioning and Effectiveness. Natural History Museum, London, UK.

IUCN, 2012. IUCN Red List Categories and Criteria, Version 3.1, second ed. International Union for Conservation of Nature, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK.

Kelley, C.P., Mohtadi, S., Cane, M.A., Seager, R., Kushnir, Y., 2015. Climate change in the Fertile Crescent and implications of the recent Syrian drought. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 112, 3241—3246.

Kew, 2012. Plants under Pressure — a Global Context. Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, London, UK.

Lin, Yi-Chiu, Chen, Jen-Ping, Ho, Tung-Yuan, Tsai, I-Chun, 2015. Atmospheric iron deposition in the northwestern Pacific Ocean and its adjacent marginal seas: the importance of coal burning. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 29,138—159.

Maxted, N., et al., 2016. Joining up the dots: a systematic perspective of crop wild relative conservation and use. In: Maxted, N., Dullo, M.E., Ford-Lloyd, B.V. (Eds.), Enhancing Crop Genepool Use: Capturing Wild Relative and Landrace Diversity for Crop Improvement. CAB International, Egham, UK.

McCallum, M.L., 2015. Vertebrate biodiversity losses point to a sixth mass extinction. Biodivers. Conservation 24, 2497—2519.

Natural England, 2016. Monitor of Engagement with the Natural Environment Pilot Study: Visits to the Natural Environment by Children. Natural England, Worcester, UK.

NEA, 2016. UK national Ecosystem Assessment. http://uknea.unep-wcmc.org/ EcosystemAssessmentConcepts/EcosystemServices/tabid/103/Default.aspx (Accessed 13 May 2016).

Pei, Shengji, 2010. The road to the future? The biocultural values of the Holy Hill Forests of Yunnan Province, China. In: Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McNeely, J.A., Oviedo, G. (Eds.), Sacred Natural Sites. Earthscan, London, UK, pp. 98—106.

Pei, Shengji, Huai, Huyin, Hamilton, A.C., Hamilton, P.B., 2009a. Plant Resource Conservation. China Environmental Science and Technology Press, Beijing, China.

Pei, Shengji, Zhang, Guoxue, Huai, Huyin, 2009b. Application of traditional knowledge in forest management: ethnobotanical indicators of sustainable forest use. For. Ecol. Manag. 257, 2017—2021.

Pei, Shengji, Hamilton, A.C., Yang, Lixin, Huai, Huyin, Yang, Zhiwei, Gao, Fu, Zhang, Quangxin, 2010. Conservation and development through medicinal plants: a case study from Ludian (Northwest Yunnan, China) and presentation of a general model. Biodivers. Conservation 19, 2619—2636.

RSPB, 2013. State of Nature. Royal Society for Protection of Birds, Sandy, UK.

Sackett, D.L., Rosenberg, W.M.C., Gray, J.A.M., Haynes, R.B., Richardson, W.S., 1996. Evidence-based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Br. Med. J. 312, 71—72.

Sample, I., Bell, A., 2014. Budget Cuts Threaten Kew Gardens' World-class Status. The Guardian, London. April 24.

Schama, S., 1995. Landscape and Memory. HarperCollins, London, UK.

Smith, B.D., Zeder, M.A., 2013. The onset of the Anthropocene. Anthropocene 4, 8—13.

Stocker, T.F., et al., 2014. Climate Change 2013: the Physical Science Basis. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.

The Climate Group, 2014. Eco-civilization: China's Blueprint for a New Era: Interpreting Outcomes from China's Latest Leaders Conference. http://www. theclimategroup.org/_assets/files/China-Ecocivilisation.pdf (Accessed 12 June 2016).

UK Plant Science, 2014. UK plant Science: Current Status and Future Challenges. UK Plant Sciences Federation, London, UK.

Vavilov, N., 1926. Studies on the origin of cultivated plants. Bull. Appl. Bot. Plant Breed. 26,1—248.

Verschuuren, B., Wild, R., McNeely, J.A., Oviedo, G. (Eds.), 2010. Sacred Natural Sites: Conserving Nature and Culture. Earthscan, London, UK.

Wang, Yuhua, 1999. Sustainable Management of Medicinal Plant Resource in Northwest of Yunnan: a Case Study on Ludian Administrative Village in Lijiang County (Ph.D. thesis). Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming, China.

Wendle, J., 2016. Syria's climate refugees. Sci. Am. 314, 42—47.

WFNP, 2016. What is Natural Capital? http://naturalcapitalforum.com/about/. World Forum on Natural Capital. (Accessed 28 May 2016).

Yang, Lixin, et al., 2014. Comparative homegarden medical ethnobotany of Naxi healers and farmers in Northwestern Yunnan, China. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomedi-cine 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-4269-10-6.

Yin, Hongfu, Changan, L., 2001. Human impact on floods and flood disasters on the Yangtze River. Geomorphology 41, 105—109.

Zhao, D.Q., Grumbine, R.E., 2011. National parks in China: experiments with protecting nature and human livelihoods in Yunnan Province, Peoples' Republic of China (PRC). Biol. Conserv. 144,1314—1321.

Zhao, G., Shao, G., 2002. Logging restrictions in China: a turning point for forest sustainability. J. For. 100, 34—37.