0Achieving tailorable magneto-caloric effect in the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys
C. Wu, D. Ding, L. Xia, and K. C. Chan'
Citation: AIP Advances 6, 035302 (2016); doi: 10.1063/1.4943506 View online: http://dx.doi.Org/10.1063/1.4943506 View Table of Contents: http://aip.scitation.org/toc/adv/6/3 Published by the American Institute of Physics
[l\ CrossMark
VHi «-dick for updates
Achieving tailorable magneto-caloric effect in the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys
C. Wu,1'2 D. Ding,2 L. Xia,1'2 and K. C. Chan1'3
1 Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Hong Kong
2Laboratoryfor Microstructure, Institute of Materials, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
(Received 12 December 2015; accepted 25 February 2016; published online 3 March 2016)
Tailorable magnetic properties and magneto-caloric effect were achieved in the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys. It was found that the Curie temperature (Tc) of the GdxCo100-x (x=50, 53, 56, 58, 60) metallic glasses can be tuned by changing the concentration of Gd as Tc =708.8-8.83x, and the mechanism involved was investigated. On the other hand, a linear correlation between the peak value of magnetic entropy change (-ASmpeak) and Tc-2/3 is found in the amorphous alloys with a linear correlation coefficients of above 0.992. Therefore, the -ASmpeak of the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys under different magnetic fields can be easily tailored by adjusting the composition of the alloy. © 2016 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). [http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/L4943506]
Magnetic refrigeration (MR) based on the magneto-caloric effect (MCE) shows several advantages superior to the traditional vapor-compression refrigeration such as: i) the using of solid working substance, which does not produce high level of greenhouse gases; ii) the saving of energy cost as much as 30%; iii) low noise; iv) high reliability; v) long service life and so on.1-3 It is well known that a practical magnetic refrigerant material, which is critical to the magnetic refrigerators, should exhibit excellent MCE, good mechanical properties, high corrosion resistance, low energy loss due to large electric resistance and nearly zero magnetic hysteresis. The unique properties of metallic glasses make the materials prospective candidates for magnetic refrigerant.4-22
Metallic glasses undergo a second order magnetic transition and exhibit a broadened magnetic entropy change peak.8-22 Therefore, although the peak values of magnetic entropy change (-ASmpeak) for the metallic glasses are not as high as some of the crystalline alloys, the amorphous alloys still have evoked intensive interests because their refrigeration capacity (RC) are usually several times higher than that of the crystalline alloys. Our recent results have shown that the RC can reach an ultra-high value of above 800 J kg-1 under 5 T, accompanied with a relatively high -ASmpeak value of nearly 10 J kg-1K-1 under 5 T in some of the Gd-based metallic glasses.19-22 Besides, as the essential requirement for industrial application of the magneto-caloric materials, the metallic glasses can be fabricated in a wide compositional range and thus the tailorable magnetic properties can be easily achieved in metallic glasses by adjusting the composition within the compositional range of glass forming alloys. However, the mechanism for the tailorable properties of the metallic glasses, such as the compositional dependence of the Curie temperature (Tc), has not been studied systematically.
In the present work, we employed a simple Gd-Co binary alloy system for the investigation of the compositional dependence of magnetic properties of metallic glasses and the mechanism involved. Based on our preliminary work on the glass forming ability of the Gd-Co binary alloys, we selected GdxCo1oo-x (x=50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous ribbons for the investigation. The field dependence of -ASmpeak was constructed for the investigation of magneto-caloric behavior of the
Corresponding author: Email: kc.chan@polyu.edu.hk
2158-3226/2016/6(3)/035302/6 6,035302-1 ~ "11111 if j "HIT \
metallic glasses. The relationships between Gd concentration and Tc, Tc and -ASmpeak were also constructed for revealing the mechanism of tailorable MCE of the Gd-Co amorphous alloys.
Ingots of Gd-Co alloys with nominal compositions GdxCo100-x(x=45, 50, 53, 56, 58, 60, 61) were prepared by arc-melting a mixture of the Gd and Co elements, respectively. The purity both the Gd and Co elements is above 99.9% (at%). The ingots were remelted for at least four times under a titanium-gettered argon atmosphere to ensure the homogeneity of the mother alloys. As-spun ribbons are produced by melt-spinning in a high-purified argon atmosphere using a single copper wheel with a surface speed of 30 m/s single-roller. The structure of the ribbons was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD) on a Rigaku D\max-2550 diffractometer using Cu Ka radiation. A Quantum Design Physical Properties Measurement System (PPMS 6000) was used to measure the magnetic properties of the amorphous ribbons. The temperature dependence of the magnetization (M-T) curves was measured under a field of 0.03 T in the cooling process. The hysteresis loops were measured at the temperature well below the Curie temperature under a field of 2 T. The isothermal magnetization curves (M-H) of the amorphous ribbons were measured at selected temperatures under a field of 5 T. All the data obtained by PPMS were corrected by high purity Ni.
Our preliminary results have demonstrated that some of the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys can be fabricated in the shape of ribbons under a high cooling rate.23 Figure 1 shows the XRD patterns of GdxCo1oo-x (x= 45, 50, 53, 56, 58, 60, 61) ribbons obtained at a wheel surface speed of 30 m/s. Gd50Co50, Gd53Co47, Gd56Co44, Gd58Co42 and Gd60Co40 ribbons exhibit typical amorphous characteristics of broadened diffraction maxima in the XRD patterns, while Gd45Co55 and Gd61Co39 are partially crystallized. The Gd50Co50, Gd53Co47, Gd56Co44, Gd58Co42 and Gd60Co40 amorphous ribbons are therefore employed for the further investigation on magnetic properties and magneto-caloric effect of Gd-Co amorphous alloys.
Figure 2(a) shows the M-T curves of the GdxCo100-x (x=50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous ribbons measured under a magnetic field of 0.03 T. The Curie temperature of the amorphous ribbons obtained from the derivative of their M-T curves respectively is about 267 K for Gd50Co50, 241 K for Gd53Co47,216 K for Gd56Co44, 196 K for Gd58Co42 and 179 K for Gd60Co40, respectively. As shown in Fig. 2(b), Tc decreases monotonically with the increasing Gd concentration, indicating that the Curie temperature of the Gd-Co amorphous alloys can be tuned by changing the concentration of Gd or Co on the binary alloys. The compositional dependence of Tc for the GdxCo100-x (x=50, 53, 56, 58,60) amorphous ribbons follows a Tc=708.8-8.83x relationship by linear fitting.
It is known that there are three kinds of exchange interaction in the Gd-Co binary alloys, the strong interaction between Co and Co atoms, and the indirect interactions between Gd-Gd atoms and Gd-Co atoms. The ordering temperature, namely, the Curie temperature of the Gd-Co amorphous alloys is mainly determined by the strong interaction between Co-Co atoms, which is closely related to the local environment of Co atoms.24,25 The increase of Gd concentration, however, will
FIG. 1. XRD patterns of the GdxCo100-x(x=45, 50, 53, 56, 58, 60, 61) as-spun ribbons.
FIG. 2. (a) M-T curves of the GdxCo100-x (x=50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous ribbons; (b) the relationship between the Tc and the Gd concentration x.
simultaneously reduce the amount of Co atoms, which means enlarge the distance between Co atoms and thus diminish the Co-Co interaction of the amorphous alloys. On the other hand, the interactions involving Gd, that is, the indirect interactions between Gd-Gd and Gd-Co, play a more important role in determining the magnetic behavior of the amorphous alloys. The increase of Gd concentration will enhance the Gd-Co indirect interaction, which may reduce the density of the Fermi surface states and lead to the suppression of Co-Co interaction.25 As a result, Gd-Co alloys containing less Co show lower Curie temperature, while most of the rare earth (R)-transition metal (M) permanent magnets such as the Sm2Co17 exhibit much higher Tc.26
The linear relationship between the alloy composition and Tc indicates the tailorable magneto-caloric effect of the Gd-Co amorphous alloys according to relationship between -ASmpeak and Tc-2/3 proposed recently by Belo et al. recently as follows:27
_ a speak=
2C \ K
)3 (Tc)3+
where C=NJ( J+1)g2^2B/(3kb) and K=(2J2+2J +1)/[10J( J +1)kBN], N is the density of the magnetic atoms, g is the Lande factor, jUB is the Bohr magneton, kB is the Boltzmann constant, J is the total spin number, and H is the applied magnetic field. For the binary Gd-Co amorphous alloys, the parameters N,^B and kB are constants. J for the GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys can be expresses as J=[7x/2+3(100 - x)/2]/100=1.5+0.02x. g of the amorphous alloys can be expressed as g= [2x+4/3(100-x)]/100=4/3+ x/150. Tc of the GdxCo100-x amorphous alloys, as mentioned above, is about 708.8-8.83x. As a result, the -ASmpeak of the GdxCo100-x glassy ribbons under a specific magnetic field can be determined by the composition of the alloys.
100 150 200 250 300 Temperature (K)
FIG. 3. The (-ASm)-T curves of the GdxCo100-x (x=50, 53 , 56, 58, 60) amorphous ribbons under a field of 5 T.
The magnetic entropy change (ASm) of the GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys can be derived from the isothermal M-H curves according to the Maxwell equation.28 Figure 3 shows the (-ASm)-T curves of GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys under a field of 5 T. Each sample shows a broadened -ASm peak, which is the typical characteristics of amorphous alloys undergoing a second order magnetic phase transition.1,29 -ASmpeak of the amorphous Gd50Co50, Gd53Co47, Gd56Co44, Gd58Co42 and Gd60Co40 ribbons under a field of 5T are 4.60 J kg-1K-1, 5.41 J kg-1K-1, 6.41 J kg-1K-1, 7.90 J kg-1K-1 and 8.62 J kg-1K-1, respectively. The value of -ASmpeak for the amorphous ribbons increase obviously with the increasing concentration of Gd, which is most likely due to the enhanced Gd-Co indirect interaction with the increasing Gd concentration. And thus the amorphous Gd60Co40 alloy containing only 60% (at. %) Gd exhibits a high value of - ASmpeak up to about 88% as high as pure Gd.
It is known that the field dependence of -ASm for an amorphous alloy undergoing a second-order magnetic phase transition can be expressed as -ASm ^ Hn. , In general, as proposed by Franco according to the Arrott-Noakes equation,30 the n value changes with temperature as follows: n=1 at the temperature well below TC, n=2 at the temperature much higher than Tc, and n^0.72 at the temperature near Tc. Therefore, the investigation on the field dependence of -ASmpeak for the GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) as-spun ribbons will be helpful for the identification of amorphous characteristics of the ribbons. -ASmpeak of Gd-Co amorphous alloys under different magnetic fields obtained from the (-ASm)-T curves are listed in Table I. Thus the -ASmpeak vs H plots of the GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys can be constructed accordingly, as shown in Fig. 4. From the -ASmpeak <x Hn fittings for each amorphous alloy, we can obtain the n value of 0.75 for Gd50Co50, 0.737 for Gd5sCo4v, 0.727 for Gd56Co44, 0.7 for Gd58Co42 and 0.686 for Gd60Co40 ribbons, respectively. The n values of the GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys are similar to those of other amorphous alloys, indicating the typical magneto-caloric behaviors of amorphous alloys.
Figure 5 shows the -ASmpeak vs Tc-2/3 (or (708.8-8.83x)-2/3) plots of the GdxCoW0-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys under the magnetic field ranging from 1 T to 5 T. A linear relationship
TABLE I. -ASmpeak of Gd-Co amorphous alloys under different magnetic fields.
-ASmpeak (J-kg-1K-1) 1T 2T 3T 4T 5T
Gd50Co50 1.38 2.36 3.16 3.92 4.6
Gd53Co47 1.66 2.78 3.74 4.61 5.41
Gd56Co44 1.99 3.34 4.47 5.48 6.41
Gd58Co42 2.56 4.22 5.58 6.8 7.9
Gd60Co40 2.84 4.74 6.1 7.42 8.62
FIG. 4. The temperature dependence of -ASm and the field dependence of -ASmpeak for the GdxCo100-x amorphous ribbons under the magnetic fields ranging from 1 T to 5 T: (a) Gd50Co50, (b) Gd53Co47, (c) Gd56Co44, (d) Gd58Co42 and (e) Gd60Co40, respectively.
between -ASmpeak and Tc-2/3 (or (708.8-8.83x)-2/3) is found in Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys and the linear correlation coefficients are above 0.992. Therefore, as predicted above, the -ASmpeak of the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys under different magnetic fields can be easily tailored by adjusting the composition of the alloy.
11—■-■-1-■-1-■-1-■-
0.024 0.026 0.028 0.030 0.032
Tc-2/3(K-2/3)
FIG. 5. The dependence of
-ASmpeak on Tc 2/3 under the magnetic fields ranging from 1 T to 5 T.
In summary, we obtained tailorable magnetic properties and magneto-caloric effect in the Gd-Co binary amorphous alloys. The magnetic properties and magneto-caloric effects of GdxCoioo-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys fabricated in the shape of ribbons were investigated. It was found that Tc of the ribbons decreases monotonically with the increasing Gd concentration, which is supposed to be due to the suppression of Co-Co interaction with the increase of Gd concentration. The linear relationship between the alloy composition and Tc can be expressed as Tc =708.8-8.83x, indicating the tailorable magneto-caloric effect of the Gd-Co amorphous alloys according to relationship between -ASmpeak and Tc-2/3 proposed by Belo et al. Experimental results have revealed a linear dependence of -ASmpeak on Tc-2/3 (or (708.8-8.83x)-2/3) in the GdxCo100-x (x= 50, 53, 56, 58, 60) amorphous alloys, justifying the tailorable -ASmpeak by adjusting the composition of Gd-Co binary alloys.
The work described in this paper was mainly supported by the Research Grants Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China (Project No. PolyU 511212).
1 K. A. Gschneidner and V. K. Pecharsky, Jr., Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 30, 387 (2000).
2 E. Bruck, J. Phys. D 38, R381 (2005).
3 K. A. Gschneidner, Jr., V. K. Pecharsky, and A. O. Tsokol A, Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1479 (2005).
4 A. Inoue, Acta Mater. 48, 279 (2000).
5 W. L. Johnson, JOM 54, 40 (2002).
6 W. H. Wang, C. Dong, and C. H. Shek, Mater. Sci. Eng. R 44, 45 (2004).
7 A. Inoue and A. Takeuchi, Acta Mater. 59, 2243 (2011).
8 M. Foldeaki, A. Giguere, B. R. Gopal, R. Chahine, T. K. Bose, X. Y. Liu, and J. A. Barclay, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 174, 295 (1997).
9 M. Foldeaki, R. Chahine, B. R. Gopal, T. K. Bose, X. Y. Liu, and J. A. Barclay, J. Appl. Phys. 83, 2727 (1998).
10 A. Atlay, H. Gencer, and V. S. Kolat, J. Non-Cryst. Solids 351, 2373 (2005).
11 X. Y. Liu, J. A. Barclay, M. Foldeaki, B. R. Gopal, R. Chahine, and T. K. Bose, Adv. Cryog. Eng. 42, 431 (1996).
12 N.S. Bingham, H. Wang, F. Qin, H.X. Peng, J.F. Sun, V. Franco, H. Srikanth, and M.H. Phan, Appl. Phys. Lett. 101,102407 (2012).
13 B. Schwarz, N. Mattern, Q. Luo, and J. Eckert, J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 324, 1581 (2012).
14 F. X. Qin, N.S. Bingham, H. Wang, H.X. Peng, J.F. Sun, X. Franco, S.C. Yu, H. Srikanth, and M.H. Phan, Acta Mater. 61, 1284 (2013).
15 V. Franco, J. M. Borrego, A. Conde, and S. Roth, Appl. Phys. Lett. 88, 132509 (2006).
16 P. Alvarez-Alonso, J. L. Sánchez Llamazares, C. F. Sánchez-Valdés, M. L. Fdez-Gubieda, P. Gorria, and J. A. Blanco, J. Appl. Phys. 117, 17A710 (2015).
17 V. Franco, C. F. Conde, A. Conde, and L. F. Kiss, Appl. Phys. Lett. 90, 052509 (2007).
18 Q. Y. Dong, B. G. Shen, J. Chen, J. Shen, F. Wang, H. W. Zhang, and J. R. Sun, J. Appl. Phys. 105, 053908 (2009).
19 L. Xia, C. Wu, S. H. Chen, and K. C. Chan, AIP Advances. 5, 097122 (2015).
20 L. Xia, M.B. Tang, K.C. Chan, and Y.D. Dong, J. Appl. Phys. 115, 223904 (2014).
21 L. Xia, Q. Guan, D. Ding, M.B. Tang, and Y.D. Dong, Appl. Phys. Lett. 105, 192402 (2014).
22 C. Wu, P. Yu, and L. Xia, Journal of Non-Cryst. Solids 422, 23 (2015).
23 Y. F. Ma, P. Yu, and L. Xia, Materials and Design 85, 715 (2015).
24 E. Belorizky, M. A. Fremy, J. P. Gavigan, D. Givord, and H. S. Li, J. Appl. Phys. 61, 3971 (1987).
25 J. H. Zhang, S. Liu, F. Gu, L. J. Yang, and M. Liu, Acta Phys. Sin. 55, 2928 (2006).
26 J. R. Jeffries, L. S. I. Veiga, G. Fabbris, D. Haskel, P. Huang, N. P. Butch, S. K. McCall, K. Holliday, Z. Jenei, Y. Xiao, and P. Chow, Phys. Rev. B 90, 104408 (2014).
27 J. H. Bloe, J. S. Amaral, A. M. Pereira, V. S. Amaral, and J. P. Araujo, Appl. Phys. Lett. 100, 242407 (2012).
28 T. Hashimoto, T. Numasawa, M. Shino, and T. Okada, Cryogenics 21, 647 (1981).
29 A. M. Tishin and Y. I. Spichkin, Magnetocaloric Effect and its Applications (Institute of Physics, Bristol, 2003).
30 V. Franco, J. S. Blázquez, and A. Conde, Appl. Phys. Lett. 89, 222512 (2006).
31 V. Franco, J. M. Borrego, C. F. Conde, A. Conde, M. Stoica, and S. Roth, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 083903 (2006).
32 V. Franco, J. S. Blázquez, and A. Conde, J. Appl. Phys. 100, 064307 (2006).
