Scholarly article on topic 'Overview of the hypernuclear production in heavy-ion collision experiments'

Overview of the hypernuclear production in heavy-ion collision experiments Academic research paper on "Physical sciences"

CC BY
0
0
Share paper
Academic journal
J. Phys.: Conf. Ser.
OECD Field of science
Keywords
{""}

Academic research paper on topic "Overview of the hypernuclear production in heavy-ion collision experiments"

lopscience

¡opscience.iop.org

Home Search Collections Journals About Contact us My IOPscience

Overview of the hypernuclear production in heavy-ion collision experiments

This content has been downloaded from IOPscience. Please scroll down to see the full text. View the table of contents for this issue, or go to the journal homepage for more

Download details: IP Address: 91.215.136.23

This content was downloaded on 27/06/2016 at 05:54

Please note that terms and conditions apply.

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 668 (2016) 012025

Overview of the hypernuclear production in heavy-ion collision experiments

Christophe Rappold

GSI Helmholtz Centre for Heavy Ion Research - Darmstadt, Germany & Universidad de Castilla-La Mancha, Institute of Mathematics applied to Science and Engineering -Ciudad Real, Spain

E-mail: c.rappold@gsi.de Abstract.

In the last decade, heavy-ion collision experiments have brought new insight to the study of hypernucleus. Experiments using ion induced reactions for hypernuclear research focus on two distinct aspects: the spectroscopy and probing the nuclear reaction. In the case of the experimental spectroscopy, the internal structure of hypernuclei is investigated in order to determine the baryon-baryon interaction in the strangeness sector for the hyper-matter equation of state. The dynamical aspect of the nucleus-nucleus reaction can also be explored by studying the production of hypernuclei. The experimental observations of the production mechanisms responsible for the formation of the hypernuclei in ion collisions will be presented. Depending of the center-of-mass energy and the type of experiment, fixed target or collider, hypernuclei can be produced in the mid-rapidity and/or in the spectator regions. The experimental results from both cases will be presented and discussed.

1. Introduction

The hypernucleus, a bound state of ordinary nucleons and hyperons, has been a subject of research for the understanding of the baryon-baryon interaction in an unified way. The main purpose is to tackle the problem of the neutron stars or the equation of state of baryonic matter up to the strangeness sector. The baryon-baryon interaction could be easily extracted from the hyperon-nucleon and hyperon-hyperon scattering data; however the scarce data sets from the hyperon-nucleon scattering experiments and the impossibility to have hyperon-hyperon scattering experiments have made the direct determination of the baryon-baryon interaction strength within SU(3)f extremely difficult. By performing precise spectroscopy of A-hypernuclear bound states, interaction strength of A-N has been deduced indirectly by means of the experimental data and theoretical models [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6]. Those spectroscopy experiments have been performed mainly by means of secondary meson beams via (n, K), (K, n), or (K-,K+) elementary reactions or by means of e- primary beam via (e-,e'-K+) photoelectric production on fixed target [7]. Additionally to those experimental approaches, hypernuclear production by heavy-ion induced reaction has been theoretically investigated and predicted in 1973 [8]. This first theoretical prospect has led to new experimental approaches for the spectroscopic study of hypernuclei. Indeed, heavy-ion induced reaction on fixed targets and heavy-ion collision in colliders have been preformed in the most recent years. It has renewed interest in the production of hypernuclei in central collisions in which those hypernuclear bound

l/J^V ^ I Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution

of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI. Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1

states could be used as a probe to the possible phase transition or the presence of quark-gluon plasma.

VSNN (GeV) 2.7 5 11 200 2760

-1-1-1-1-1->■

HADES(GSI) FOPI(QSI)

CBM(FAIR)

E864(AGS) MPD(NICA) STAR(RHIC) ALICE(LHC) HypHI(GSi) BM@N(NICA)

Figure 1. heavy-ion experiments with their respective facility where hypernuclear production have been studied during the last decades.

Figure 1 shows the past, current and future experiments that have published results on the hypernuclear production or dedicates parts of their research plans to the hypernuclear study. First of all, those experiments are sorted by their experimental apparatus: fixed target (in blue rectangle) or collider mode (in green rectangle). Then those experiments are distributed as a function of y0 and jsNN, the rapidity in center-of-mass system region of hypernuclear observations and the center-of-mass energy of the reactions. The discrete repartition between the observed rapidity regions (central or peripheral collisions) and the collision energy has concrete consequences on the physical phenomenon of the hypernuclear production that will be presented in the following sections. Besides experiments that have heretofore been published or reported study of hypernuclei, namely ALICE [9], STAR [10], E864 [11], HADES [12], FOPI [13, 14] and HypHI [15, 16], the NICA and FAIR facilities will host novel experiments (CBM [17], BM@N [18], and MPD [18]) that have a dedicated hypernuclear physics program.

The experimental observables for describing the hypernuclear production mechanism in heavy-ion experiments are mainly the yields, cross sections and multiplicities of the observed hypernuclei. Most of them are reported either as an absolute value or within the experimental acceptance. Those observables can also be determined as a function of the rapidity y0 or/and the transverse momentum Pt. Those primal observables are essential when compared to theoretical models of the dynamics of the reaction, such as transport models. Additionally, yield ratios to the hyperon yield or to the nuclear yield, such as |H/A or |H/3He are useful to describe sensitive aspect of the dynamics, and can be more easily extracted from the experimental data, where the efficiency corrections can be canceled out. A double ratio, S3 = |H/3He ■ p/A or S4 = ^H/4He ■ p/A, has been introduced by the E864 collaboration [11]; afterwards it was used by the other STAR and ALICE collider experiments to describe possible phase transition and the QGP formation [19]. Those experimental observables will be the presented in the following sections.

2. Ultra-relativistic energy regime

The STAR experiment has been the first to show evidences of the observation of the hypertriton, ^H, and the anti-hypertriton hypernuclei in Au-Au collisions at jsNN=200 GeV in the ultra-relativistic energy regime [10]. Those hypernuclear bound states are considered to be formed at the freeze-out of the quark gluon plasma. The published results presented some

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 668 (2016) 012025

ALICE 10-50%

Background Pb-Pb ^ = 2.76 TeV -combined Fit

LH ® 3He + p-

: 2 < Pt < 10 GeV/c

2.98 2.99 3 3.01 3.02 3.03 3.04 Invariant mass (3He,p-)(GeV/c2)

(Л 250

с 3 200

о о 150

signal candidates rotated background signal+background fit

2.95 3 3.05 3.1

3He + n- Invariant mass (GeV/c2)

Figure 2. Invariant mass spectrum of the two-body decay reconstruction of Л H hypernuclei from the ALICE [9] and STAR experiments [10] in the left and right panel, respectively. Similar invariant mass spectra of anti-hypertriton can be found in the respective references [10, 9].

-•-Data

spectroscopy aspects, such as invariant mass spectrum shown in Figure 2 or its extracted lifetime besides several yield ratios and S3 factor [10]. It was first claimed that the enhancement of the production of hypertriton at the mid-rapidity would be a signature of the phase transition and formation of the QGP [10] based on theoretical prediction [19]. After the beam scan program of the STAR experiment, additional results on the S3 factor as a function of the energy in the center-of-mass system have been presented and reported [20]. As well, the ALICE experiment has reported and published the evidence of the hypertriton and anti-hypertriton observation in Pb-Pb collisions at 2.76 TeV [9], shown in Figure 2, with the extracted lifetime and yield ratios

The production mechanism in such collision has been theoretically investigated following the STAR experiment publication and ALICE experiment reports. On one hand, coalescence models through hadronic transport models describe the hypernuclear formation of hyper-cluster at the chemical freez^out of the QGP phase [19, 21]. On the other hand, thermal models propose a statistical approach to describe the production yield of particle, nucleus, and hypernucleus with their associated anti-particle and bound state at the chemical freeze-out equilibrium, where the entropy per baryon is defined and consequently conserved [22].

•Ü 1

* 1. 1.

0. 0. 0. 0.

Data : ALICE 0-10%, Pb-Pb ^N = 2.76 TeV ; □ Data : STAR 0-80%, Au-Au ^N = 0.20 TeV Thermal model -- SHARE -••• Hagedorn resonance gas model

— GSI - Heidelberg —THERMUS

LH ® (3He + л) assuming B.R.=25% L H / 3He 3 H / 3Hi

Figure 3. Yield ratios extracted by STAR [23] and ALICE experiment [9] compared to the expected yield estimated by several models.

Several coalescence calculation approaches have been developed [19, 21] and showed similar trends. It is proposed that the S3 factor could carry the information of the local correlation

between the baryon number and the strangeness, qualitatively similar to the CBS factor [19]. Some theoretical results were compared directly to the published STAR experiment results, as shown in the left panel of Figure 3. In this case, the coalescence model [23] reproduced the yield ratio |H/3He, while the THERMUS model [24, 25] used for this comparison could not. Additionally, the theoretical estimation of 0.35 ± 0.003 of this yield ratio by the thermal model [22] could not reproduce the STAR experimental results. Considering the ALICE experimental results on the same yield ratio |H/3He, shown in right panel of Figure 3, the situation seems to favor a good description from the thermal models [22, 21]. Besides those yield ratios, it should be noted the thermal model fit of the production yields [22, 26] reproduces the experimental data fairly well either for STAR or ALICE experimental data within several orders of magnitude difference, and especially the hypertriton and anti-hypertriton yield [22, 26].

---- Dubna Cascade Model

----UrQM+hydro Model

AMPT melting AMPT default

9 STAR Preliminary

A E864/AGS

□ STAR(Science 328 (2

it STAR(Science 328 (2

O HypHI / GSI

3H5 x Ä

1.6 1.4 1.2

0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2

. Data

▼E864 Au-Pt 0-10% 11.5A GeV/c T^tSTAR Au-Au 0-80% ^sNN = 020 TeV lAUCE Pb-Pb 0-10% ysNN= 2.76 TeV HypHI 6Li+12C 2AGeV

Default AMPT + Coal. String Melting AMPT + Coa . ■ Coalescence (DCM model) —Thermal model

(GSI - Heidelberg) -Hybrid UrQMD

tfV(G"V)

Figure 4. S3 factor extracted by STAR and ALICE experiments with different model comparisons [20, 9].

The case of the double ratio S3 is also interesting, since the distinct theoretical approaches for the hypernuclear production in the QGP describe differently the evolution of the S3 factor. The thermal models predict generally that this double ratio is mostly independent from the energy of the collision [22, 21], while the coalescence models predict different energy dependencies, decreasing or increasing as the beam energy is increased [21, 19]. Figure 4 shows the results from the reported STAR beam energy scan program, the published STAR and ALICE results [10, 20, 9]. The recent S3 estimation from the HypHI experiment at jsnn = 2.7 GeV has been added to those published figures. Several theoretical models are shown and compared to the experimental data available. With the current situation from the preliminary results of STAR beam scan program, an increasing trend is noticeable from the left panel of Figure 4, which is not confirm by the ALICE experimental results shown in the right panel of Figure 4. The estimation from thermal model [22] reproduces the ALICE results when a feed-down from the contribution of the strong decay of resonances is included, increasing the A/p ratio contribution to the S3. A similar tendency can be noticed from the second compared thermal model [21]; however, the theoretical calculation within this framework will need to extended to the beam energy of ALICE experiment to assure a proper comparison. Contrarily coalescence model calculations reported an higher S3 factor and energy dependency. The model [19] predicted a value close to unity which could corresponds to the manifestation of the quark deconfinement. The published STAR results have been considered as a first hint as expressed in [10]; however, the recent ALICE results [9] bring new contradictory light onto this possible interpretation of the "AMPT+melting string" model [19].

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 668 (2016) 012025

3. Relativistic energy regime

At a lower center-of-mass energy, several other experiments have already been performed in the past and more recently. With a lower beam energy than in ultra-relativistic regime, experiments have focused on different rapidity regions for the hypernuclear study. The E864 experiment at AGS facility published results of the iH production yield and upper limit of iH yield in the central collision of Au beam at 11.5 GeV/c per nucleon on a fixed Pt target [11]. Figure 5 shows the invariant mass spectrum of iH published by the E864 experiment with a reported iH signal significance of 2a [11]. The S3 double ratio was for the first time extracted and published by the E864 experiment [11]; a value of 0.36±0.26 was reported. This double ratio was introduced initially in order to compare the production of hypernuclei in central collision with the production of ordinary nuclei with a same baryon number A. This comparison would lead to estimate the additional penalty factor required, when a strange baryon is included in the coalescence process. It was notified that there was an extra penalty factor of 3 to produce iH compared to 3He; however, consideration about the smaller binding energy of iH (around 2.2 MeV) than the one of 3He (8.1 MeV) and the larger size of iH than 3He may explain the lower production yield of iH in the central collision. Besides iH, the study of iH could not be performed completely since the iH signal was not significant enough. An upper limit at 90% confidence level was then estimated for the iH production yield and the factor S4 = iH/4He •p/A

Figure 5. Invariant mass spectrum of the two-body decay reconstruction of hypertriton from E864 experiment [11].

At a lower beam energy, the HADES and FOPI experiments from the GSI facility have conducted hypernuclear study in the target rapidity region. HADES experiment analyzing the reaction Ar+KCl at 1.76 AGeV within the range of rapidity yo, [-0.7, 0.1], did not observed any iH signal [12], and reported a upper limit at 99.7% confidence level for the hypertriton production yield and for the iH/A yield ratio [12]. The yield ratio iH/A was estimated to be inferior to 2.5 ± 0.3 x 10-2 [12]. FOPI experiment has already reported preliminary results of evidence of the observation of iH and iH in specific rapidity range yo and transverse momentum interval Pt/m, [-0.56, -0.11] x [ 0.2, 0.4] and [-0.67, -0.11] x [0.15, 0.35], respectively [13, 14]. While the preliminary observation of 3 H and 4 H appeared clear, the comparison between the published upper limit of the yield ratio 3 H/A from HADES experiment within a similar rapidity interval and the estimated yield ratio iH/A of 0.52± 0.04 casts some incompatibility with the HADES upper limit. Additional considerations for the final FOPI experimental results are pending.

In the projectile fragment rapidity region, hypernuclear study has also been carried out, firstly at LBNL Bevatron with 16O beams at 2.1 A GeV on a polyethylene target [27] and then at JINR

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 668 (2016) 012025

mass (GeV) mass (GeV)

Figure 6. Invariant mass spectrum of two body decay reconstruction of ¡H and ¡H of the HypHI experiment in left and right panel respectively [15].

Dubna in the reaction of a beam of 4He at 3.7 A GeV and 7Li at 3.0 A GeV on a polyethylene target [28, 29]. The results on hypernuclear production from those first experiments were not clear enough because of the low statistics acquired and analyzed. More recently, the results from the HypHI experiment on the hypernuclear production have been published [15, 16]. ¡H and ¡H hypernuclei were observed in the reaction of 6Li beam at 2 AGeV on a 12C fixed target. Figure 6 shows the invariant mass spectrum of observed ¡H and ¡H by the HypHI experiment [15]. The ¡H and ¡H production cross section of 3.9±1.4^b and 3.1±1.0^b, and several yield ratios in the projectile rapidity region were extracted and published [16]. For example the ¡H/A yield ratio of 2.6 ± 1.4 x 10-3 is compatible with one of the HADES experiment, if we mirror observed rapidity ranges. Additionally, the differential multiplicity as a function of the rapidity and transverse moment for ¡H and ¡H were extracted for the first time and shown in Figure 7. Those published results from HypHI experiment has been compared with theoretical transport model and shows fair agreement with the theoretical calculations [30]. Besides, the S3 and S4 double ratio have been estimated to be 0.28±0.14 and 0.08±0.04. The S3 value from the HypHI experiment has been added to two published figures of Figure 4 and will help to constrain models in the hadronic phase at lower beam energy.

4. Conclusion

In the ultra-relativistic regime, STAR and ALICE experiments have provided new insights

on the hypertriton and anti-hypertriton study [10, 20, 9]. The production aspects have been

investigated in details by the ALICE experiment in [9]. Combining results from both experiments

shows theoretical models draw different conclusion on the hypertriton formation in the QGP

phase. Improvement on the experimental estimations will help to draw clearer conclusion on

the model predictions especially on the yield ratios like ¡H/3He and the S3 factor. At lower

beam energy, in the relativistic regime, recent results on the projectile rapidity region by the

HypHI experiment [15, 16] will help transport models and coalescence models to obtain a more

precise description of the reaction mechanism and of the dynamics between the participant and

spectator region [21, 31, 32, 33, 34]. Additional experiments, such as the FOPI experiment, are

also focusing on the hypernuclear study and will provide further information on the hypernuclear

production in the target rapidity region with their final experimental results. In the future,

more results from the HypHI experiment are also expected with the analysis of the second

experiment 20Ne+12C reaction at 2AGeV. Moreover, the STAR and ALICE experiments are

still accumulating new experimental data and will provide more precise estimation in future, and

for instance, the ALICE experiment might access the production of ¡H. Besides those running

0.6 0.7 0.B 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 yD

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.B 1

Pt (GeV/c)

.6 D.7 D.B D.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3

t 1D Pt

D D.2 D.4 D.6 D.B 1

Pt (GeV/c)

Figure 7. The differential multiplicity as a function of the rapidity y0 and Pt of extracted iH and iH signal [16].

experiments, new experiments are in preparation within the new FAIR and NICA facilities, which will contribute to the study of the hypernuclear production in heavy-ion reaction.

Acknowledgements

This work has been supported by the HypHI project funded by the Helmholtz association as Helmholtz-University Young Investigators Group VH-NG-239 at GSI, and the German Research Foundation (DFG) under contract number SA 1696/1-1 and EU FP7 Hadron-Physics-2 SPHERE. This work has also been supported by the co-funded program of the University of Castilla-La Mancha "Ayudas para estancias de investigadores invitados en la UCLM para el ao 2015" and FEDER 2014-2020.

References

[1] Nagels M.M. et al. 1977 Phys. Rev. D 15 2547

[2] Nagels M.M. et al. 1979 Phys. Rev. D 20 1633

[3] Maessen P.M. et al. 1989 Phys. Rev. C 40 2226

[4] Rijken Th.A. and Stokes V.G.J. 1999 Phys. Rev. C 59 21

[5] Dalitz R.H. and A. Gal A. 1978 Ann. Phys. 116 167

[6] Millener D.J., Gal A., Dover C.B. and Dalitz R.H. 1985 Phys. Rev. C 31 499

[7] Hashimoto O. and Tamura H. 2006 Prag. Part. Nucl. Phys. 57 564

[8] Kerman A. K. and Weiss M. S. 1973 Phys. Rev. C 8 408

[9] ALICE Collaboration, 2015 Preprint arXiv:1506.08453

[10] STAR Collaboration 2010 Science 328 58

[11] Armstrong T. A. et al. 2004 Phys. Rev. C 70 024902

[12] HADES Collaboration 2013 Eur. Phys. J. A 49 146

[13] Y. Zhang, PhD Thesis 2013

Journal of Physics: Conference Series 668 (2016) 012025

[14] Leifels Y. 2013 J. Phys.: Conf. Series 420 012019

[15] Rappold C. et al. 2013 Nucl. Phys. A 913 170

[16] Rappold C. et al. 2015 Phys. Lett. B 747 129

[17] Friman B., Hohne C., Knoll J., Leupold S., Randrup J., Rapp R. and Senger P. 2011 Lect.Notes Phys. 814

[18] Kovalenko A.D. et al. 2015 PoS BaldinISHEPPXXII 002

[19] Zhang S., Chen J. H., Crawford H., Keane D., Ma Y.G. and Xu Z.B. 2010 Phys. Lett. B 684 224

[20] Ma Y.G. for STAR collaboration 2014 EPJ Conf. 66 04020

[21] Steinheimer J., Gudima K. , Botvina A. , Mishustin I., Bleicher M. and Stocker H. 2012 Phys. Lett. B 714

[22] Andronic A., Braun-Munzinger P., Stachel J., and Stocker H. 2011 Phys. Lett. B 697 203

[23] Cleymans J. et al. 2011 Phys. Rev. C 84 054916

[24] Wheaton S. and Cleymans J. 2005 J. Phys. G 31 S1069

[25] Wheaton S., Cleymans J. and Hauer M. 2009 Comput. Phys.Commun. 180 84

[26] Elia D. for ALICE Collaboration 2015 EPJ Conf. 95 03008

[27] Nield K. et al., 1976 Phys. Rev. C 13 1263

[28] Abdurakhimov A.U. et al. 1989 Nuovo Cimento A 102 645

[29] Avramenko S. et al. 1992 Nucl. Phys. A 547 95c

[30] Le Fevre A. 2015 these proceedings

[31] Gaitanos T., Lenske H. and Mosel U. 2009 Phys. Lett. B 675 297

[32] Botvina A. S., Mishustin I. N. and Pochodzalla J. 2012 Phys. Rev. C 86 011601

[33] Topor Pop V. and Das Gupta S. 2010 Phys. Rev. C 81 054911

[34] Botvina A. S. and Pochodzalla J. 2007 Phys. Rev. C 76 024909