Scholarly article on topic 'Intraoperative CT navigation for glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty'

Intraoperative CT navigation for glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty Academic research paper on "Clinical medicine"

0
0
Share paper
Academic journal
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics
OECD Field of science

Academic research paper on topic "Intraoperative CT navigation for glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty"

Case

Report

Intraoperative CT navigation for glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty

Ashok S Gavaskar, K Vijayraj1, SD Muthukumar Subramanian

Abstract

CT navigation has been shown to improve component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty. The technique can be useful in achieving strong initial fixation of the metal backed glenoid in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. We report a 61 years male patient who underwent reverse shoulder arthroplasty for rotator cuff arthropathy. CT navigation was used intraoperatively to identify best possible glenoid bone and to maximize the depth of the fixation screws that anchor the metaglene portion of the metal backed glenoid component. Satisfactory positioning of screws and component was achieved without any perforation or iatrogenic fracture in the scapula. CT navigation can help in maximizing the purchase of the fixation screws that dictate the initial stability of the glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. The technique can be extended to improve glenoid component position [version and tilt] with the availability of appropriate software.

Key words: Computer-assisted surgery, CT navigation, reverse shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff arthropathy

Introduction

Reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA) is chiefly indicated in patients with rotator cuff arthropathy.1 Accurate glenoid component placement is paramount to a successful shoulder arthroplasty procedure.2 The glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty consists of a base plate, which requires to be rigidly fixed using locked and nonlocked screws. The central glenoid peg in most designs is hydroxyapatite (HA) coated which allows for bone ingrowth ensuring long term stability. Computer assisted surgery, both CT based and image free navigation, has been shown to improve component placement in total shoulder arthroplasty3 and we believe that the same will apply in RSA also. Apart from component positioning, CT navigation can also help in improving screw length and purchase, which are important for immediate and long term

Department of Adult Joint Reconstructive Surgery, Parvathy Hospital, Chennai, department of Orthopedics, Adiparasakthi Medical College, Melmaruvathur, Tamilnadu, India

Address for correspondence: Dr. Ashok S. Gavaskar, 63A/44, Gandhi Road, Choolaimedu, Chennai - 600094, India. E-mail: gavaskar.ortho@gmail.com

stability in a RSA. We present a case of CT guided RSA in a rheumatoid patient with rotator cuff arthropathy and discuss the advantages of the procedure and review the literature.

Case Report

61 years male from Nigeria with longstanding rheumatoid arthritis presented with a painful left shoulder. The clinical evaluation showed a weak rotator cuff. The cuff deficiency was also confirmed preoperatively with a magnetic resonance scan. True anteroposterior and axillary radiographs along with a 3D computerised tomography scan were taken as part of the preoperative evaluation. AP X-rays were assessed for squaring of the axillary border of the scapula.4 Glenoid version, available glenoid bone and defects were assessed using the CT scan.5,6 Version was measured as glenoid inclination at the level of a transverse plane through the center of glenoid perpendicular to the scapular body. The transverse plane was generated perpendicular to the midpoint of a line drawn on the glenoid fossa centered in AP direction which was calculated using 3D reconstruction as described by Hoenecke Jr et al.6 The glenoid preoperatively was retroverted by 7° [Figure 1].

The patient was operated in beach chair position by standard deltopectoral approach. Preparation of the humerus for component placement was done as per the guidelines of the component manufacturer [Delta CTA, reverse shoulder system, Depuy, India]. A positioning pin was placed in the coracoid process and the infrared markers were attached for intraoperative navigation. Registration was done using

Access this article online

Quick Response Code:

Website:

www.ijoonline.com

10.4103/0019-5413.106935

Figure 1: Pre operative Xray and CT images showing proximal migration of the humeral head, sclerosis and secondary erosions of the acromion suggestive of long standing rotator cuff arthropathy. The preoperative glenoid retroversion was 7° and depth of the posterosuperior glenoid defect was less than 1 cm

the intra operative CT [Brainlab] and the data were fed into the navigation suite to facilitate glenoid component fixation. The glenoid cavity was reamed conservatively in a plane perpendicular to the face of the glenoid till subchondral punctate bleeding was evident. The metaglene was positioned such that it sits flush with the inferior glenoid rim without overhang. Minor adjustments can then be made in the anteroposterior plane to maximize host bone contact and to identify the best possible bone stock for peg and screw fixation. After confirming position, the guide wire for the central peg was inserted using precalibrated instruments. The CT images in three planes were used to assess the position of the central peg before reaming so that there is no perforation. The superior and inferior locking screws were inserted in the best possible trajectory to improve purchase and screw length. The anterior and posterior nonlocking screws were inserted similarly using CT images to achieve the best possible screw position [Figure 2]. Remaining part of the procedure was done according to the recommendations of the manufacturer.

Component positioning was confirmed to be satisfactory in the post operative X-rays [Figure 3] and postoperative CT at 2 weeks revealed a glenoid anteversion of 2° and inferior tilt of 5°. None of the fixation screws or the central peg had perforated the glenoid bone.

DiSCUSSiON

The glenoid component in reverse shoulder arthroplasty is secured using a combination of locking, nonlocking screws, and a central peg with or without HA coating. Secure fixation of the all metal glenoid component to the glenoid is one of the unique features of the reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. This secure fixation depends on proper preparation of the bone, positioning of the component, and screw placement. CT navigation provides a real time 3D feedback on the quality of glenoid bone available which can be utilized to provide optimal initial fixation of the glenoid component.

Previous reports on CT and non CT based navigation systems in shoulder arthroplasty have shown accurate assessment of the glenoid deformity and component placement can be achieved intraoperatively.7-9 In the only randomized trial published so far on the topic, Kircher et al.,10 reported that CT navigation significantly improves glenoid component positioning in the transverse plane in conventional total shoulder arthroplasty. No prospective clinical study has so far been reported on the use of CT navigation in RSA but the technique on cadavers has yielded satisfactory results. Verborgt and colleagues11 in a cadaveric study comparing CT navigation and conventional Figure 3: Postoperative X-ray showing Arthroplasty implants in situ

Figure 2: (a) Clinical peroperative photograph showing insertion of glenoid component (b) 3D CT images greatly help in improving purchase of the nonlocked screws by identifying best trajectory for the screw [thick yellow arrow]. Lower case screen caps just show a magnified version of the above images. The distance between each consecutive stop measures 10 mm [double headed arrow] which gives the appropriate screw length without perforation

technique concluded that CT navigation significantly improves glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Of the 14 cases in each group, there was perforation of the superior screw in four patients and the inferior screw in one patient. The glenoid component in our patient was positioned conventionally because of lack of software. We aimed for 0° version and 10° of inferior tilt. The CT navigation was used only for positioning of the fixation screws.

Given the importance of the fixation screws in RSA, (i) use of the longest possible screws without perforation and (ii) use of the best available bone can help in improving outcomes following RSA. Both of these can be achieved consistently with the use of CT navigation.6 Scapular fractures have been reported following RSA due to improper screw placements.12 Most of the type III fractures [fractures of the posterior acromion and scapular spine fractures] are associated with the superior screw and authors previously have advised against the use of the superior screw.12 CT navigation, by avoiding improper screw directions and perforations might decrease the risks of subsequent fractures and soft tissue impingements during shoulder movements.

References

1. Matsen FA 3rd, Boileau P, Walch G, Gerber C, Bicknell RT. The reverse total shoulder arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007;89:660-7.

2. Nyffeler RW, Werner CM, Gerber C. Biomechanical relevance of glenoid component positioning in the reverse Delta III total shoulder prosthesis. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2005;14:524-8.

3. Nguyen D, Ferreira LM, Brownhill JR, Faber KJ, Johnson JA. Design and development of a computer-assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.

Computer Aided Surg 2007;12:152-9.

4. Roberts CC, Ekelund AL, Renfree KJ, Liu PT, Chew FS. Radiologic assessment of reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Radiographics 2007;27:223-35.

5. Nyffeler RW, Jost B, Pfirrmann CW, Gerber C. Measurement of glenoid version: Conventional radiographs versus computed tomography scans. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2003;12:493-6.

6. Hoenecke HR Jr, Hermida JC, Flores-Hernandez C, D'Lima DD. Accuracy of CT based measurements of glenoid version for shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2010;19:166-71.

7. Edwards TB, Gartsman GM, O'Connor DP, Sarin VK. Safety and utility of computer - Aided shoulder arthroplasty. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2008;17:503-8.

8. Sarin VK, Pilgeram KC, Gartsman GM, Edwards TB. Computer assisted total shoulder arthroplasty - A cadaver study, Sixth annual meeting of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty 2005, Kyoto, Japan.

9. Stanley RJ, Edwards TB, Sarin VK, Gartsman GM. Computer-aided navigation for correction of glenoid deformity in total shoulder arthroplasty. Tech Shoulder Elbow Surg 2007;8:23- 8.

10. Kircher J, Wiedemann M, Magosch P, Lichtenberg S, Habermeyer P. Improved accuracy of glenoid positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty with intraoperative navigation: A prospectiverandomized clinical study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2009;18:515-20.

11. Verborgt O, Desmedt T, van Glabbeek F, et al. Accuracy of glenoid component placement in reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without navigation. Paper #569. Presented at the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons 76th Annual Meeting. Feb. 25-28, 2009. Las Vegas.

12. Crosby LA, Hamilton A, Twiss T. Scapula fractures after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: Classification and treatment; Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011;469:2544-9.

How to cite this article: Gavaskar AS, Vijayraj K, Muthukumar Subramanian SD. Intraoperative CT navigation for glenoid component fixation in reverse shoulder arthroplasty. Indian J Orthop 2013;47:104-6.

Source of Support: Nil, Conflict of Interest: None.

Copyright of Indian Journal of Orthopaedics is the property of Medknow Publications & Media Pvt. Ltd. and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use.