Scholarly article on topic 'On the 5d instanton index as a Hilbert series'

On the 5d instanton index as a Hilbert series Academic research paper on "Physical sciences"

Share paper
Academic journal
Nuclear Physics B
OECD Field of science

Abstract of research paper on Physical sciences, author of scientific article — Diego Rodríguez-Gómez, Gabi Zafrir

Abstract The superconformal index for N = 2 5d theories contains a non-perturbative part arising from 5d instantonic operators which coincides with the Nekrasov instanton partition function. In this article, for pure gauge theories, we elaborate on the relation between such instanton index and the Hilbert series of the instanton moduli space. We propose a non-trivial identification of fugacities allowing the computation of the instanton index through the Hilbert series. We show the agreement of our proposal with existing results in the literature, as well as use it to compute the exact index for a pure U ( 1 ) gauge theory.

Academic research paper on topic "On the 5d instanton index as a Hilbert series"



Available online at


Nuclear Physics B 878 [PM] (2014) 1-11

On the 5d instanton index as a Hilbert series *

Diego Rodríguez-Gómeza'*, Gabi Zafrirb

a Department of Physics, Universidad de Oviedo, Avda. Calvo Sotelo 18, 33007 Oviedo, Spain b Department of Physics, Technion, Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa 32000, Israel

Received 21 June 2013; received in revised form 11 September 2013; accepted 14 November 2013

Available online 20 November 2013


The superconformal index for N = 2 5d theories contains a non-perturbative part arising from 5d in-stantonic operators which coincides with the Nekrasov instanton partition function. In this article, for pure gauge theories, we elaborate on the relation between such instanton index and the Hilbert series of the instanton moduli space. We propose a non-trivial identification of fugacities allowing the computation of the instanton index through the Hilbert series. We show the agreement of our proposal with existing results in the literature, as well as use it to compute the exact index for a pure U(1) gauge theory. © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

1. Introduction

Supersymmetric gauge theories in 5d automatically come with conserved topological global currents of the form j = * Tr F a F [1]. The electrically charged particles are instantons, which in 5d are particle-like excitations. Their role is crucial in the dynamics of 5d gauge theories leading, under some circumstances, to enhanced global symmetries on the Higgs branch [1]. Very recently, strong evidence in favor of this non-perturbative enhancement due to instantonic particles has been given in [2] (see also [3]) through the computation of the exact superconformal index, which admits an expansion in characters of the enhanced global symmetry group.

* This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. Funded by SCOAP3.

* Corresponding author.

E-mail addresses: (D. Rodríguez-Gómez), (G. Zafrir).

0550-3213/$ - see front matter © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

In order to compute the index, one considers the Euclidean theory in radial quantization and chooses a supercharge and its complex conjugate. Primary operators annihilated by this subalgebra contribute to the index weighted by their representation under all other commuting charges. In 5d the bosonic part of the N = 1 superconformal algebra is SO(2, 5) x SU (2)r , where SU(2)R is the R-symmetry. In turn SO(2, 5) contains the dilatation operator as well as a compact SO(5)L acting on the S4. The maximal compact subgroup is [SU(2)1 x SU(2)2]L x SU(2)R. Calling the U(1) Cartans respectively j1, j2, R, the generators commuting with the chosen supercharge are j2 and j1 + R. Then, the index reads [4,2]

I = Tr(-1) e

-jAx2(j1+R)y2hA = - 2j1 - 3R, (1)

where Q collectively stands for global symmetries - including the instanton current - with associated fugacities collectively denoted by q. As the index does not depend on j, only states whose scaling dimension satisfies e0 = 2 j1 + 3R contribute. In [2] it was shown that the index admits a path integral representation leading to

I = I Da Ipertlinst, (2)

where / Da stands for the integration over the gauge group with the suitable Haar measure, while Ipert and Iinst stand respectively for the perturbative and instantonic contributions to the index.

The perturbative contribution is easily computed by gluing the appropriate building blocks [2]: one first needs to construct the single-particle index adding one factor of iV for each vector

multiplet and one factor of iM for each half-hypermultiplet. The corresponding functions read

x(y + y-1) . x

iV = -—-—-r- XAdj, iM = —-—-r- XM, (3)

(1 - xy)(1 - xy-1) (1 - xy)(1 - xy-1)

where xAdj and xM stand for the characters of the representation under the gauge group and other possible global non-instantonic symmetries. Note that as far as Ipert (and Inst) is concerned, the gauge fugacities a appear as global symmetries, it is the Da in Eq. (2) what projects to gauge-invariants. Thus, we will loosely refer to all non-Lorentz fugacities as global symmetries. Upon taking the plethystic exponential of the single-particle index one immediately finds Ipert.1

The instantonic contribution is, in turn, much harder to compute. On general grounds it localizes on instantonic configurations around both north (anti-instantons) and south (instantons) poles of the S4 [2], so that locally one needs to compute the path integral on S1 x R4 over the solution space of the constraint F + = o for the south pole and F - = o for the north pole. This is precisely the Nekrasov instanton partition function, which can be thought of as the Witten index of a supersymmetric quantum mechanics on the moduli space of instantons M. Making use of the results in [5], in [2] the instanton partition function for USp(2) theories with one antisymmetric hyper and Nf fundamental hypers were computed and the emergence of the global ENf+1 was shown. Alternatively, the same result was recovered in [3] by using the topological vertex.

The Nekrasov instanton partition function for pure instantons, regarded as the Witten index of a supersymmetric quantum mechanics, can be thought of as the equivariant index Y,i (-1) TrH(o,i) g where g is an element of the global symmetry group (see [6,7] for very comprehensive introductions). As such, it is intimately related with the Poincare polinomial a.k.a.

, „ v<» f(xn)

1 Recall that the plethystic exponential is defined as PE[f(x)] = e^n=1 n , where x stands for the set of all fugacities on which the single-particle index f might depend on. Besides xm = (xj1 ,x!JI,...).

Hilbert series [8,9] of the corresponding instanton moduli space M, a generating functional of the (graded) coordinate ring C[M] = 0i H(0,i) - where the elements of H(0,i) are holomorphic degree i homogeneous polynomials - whose unrefined version is defined as Y,i dimH(0,i)t'. In a sense, this object counts BPS wavefunctions on M, so it is natural to expect it to be related to the Witten index of the quantum mechanics on M. While this connection has been implicitly suggested in the literature (starting with [10]. See e.g. [5,11] for more recent relations), its status is somewhat vague. In this article we make it precise for the class of 5d pure gauge theories and check it in a few simple cases showing explicit agreement of the instanton index arising from the Hilbert series with known results in the literature.

The structure of this article is as follows: in Section 2 we make explicit our conjecture for the computation of the instanton index as a Hilbert series. In fact, Eq. (6) contains our main result. In Section 3 we test our conjecture in the particular example of the USp(2) theory whose global symmetry has been conjectured to be enhanced non-perturbatively to SU(2) [1] and find explicit agreement with [2,3]. In Section 4 we compute the exact index of a pure U(1) gauge theory. We conclude in Section 5 with some remarks.

2. Hilbert series and instanton index

We consider a 5d pure gauge theory with gauge group G. As reviewed above, the index contains a contribution from instantonic operators. Such contribution factorizes into the product of G-instantons localized around the south pole and G-anti-instantons localized around the north pole of the S4 [2]. Let us denote the instanton partition function for instantons around the south pole by iSst(q). Denoting by q the instanton current fugacity, such function can be expanded as

Is ~^!(k)qk (4)

iinst = iinstq , ^

so that I® is the k-instanton partition function (of course, I(0)t = 1). As such, it depends on the Lorentz fugacities x, y as well as on the G-fugacities ai. Recall that, from the point of view of the instanton index, gauge symmetries look like global symmetries, as it is / Da in Eq. (2) what projects to gauge-singlets. Thus, as far as Iinst is concerned, we can regard G as a global symmetry.2

On the other hand, the instanton index for anti-instantons localized around the north pole can be easily obtained [2] as IjNst(q) = ILt(q-1). Then, the whole instanton contribution to the

index is just Iinst = liLIL. It is then clear that the quantities of interest are the G k-instanton

partition functions I^. Our claim is that these are just close relatives of the Hilbert series of the G k-instanton moduli space.

Following [8,9], the G k-instanton on C2 Hilbert series can be constructed by considering the auxiliary gauge theory - sometimes called the Kronheimer-Nakajima quiver - whose Higgs branch realizes the desired instanton moduli space through the ADHM construction. As it is well known, the k-instanton moduli space on C2 is realized as the Higgs branch of a gauge theory with gauge group Gk, an adjoint hypermultiplet and N fundamental hypermultiplets transforming

2 As we will be interested in pure gauge theories, for G = SU(N) we can have as well global baryonic symmetries. These can be thought of as the U(1) part in U(N). In those cases the global symmetry of Xinst is the full U(N) to which we will also refer as G. In fact, consistently, in the ADHM construction, the flavor symmetry of the dual ADHM quiver is G = U(N).

under a global G symmetry. The gauge group Gk is the ADHM dual gauge group (see for example [7] for an explicit description in various cases).

The auxiliary dual ADHM theory will generically have an SU(2) global symmetry associated to the adjoint hypermultiplet in addition to a global G symmetry associated to the flavor symmetry. Thus, the Hilbert series on the Higgs branch computed following the techniques in [8,9] will depend on a fugacity y for the SU(2) and on ai fugacities associated to G. Besides, it will depend on a fugacity x standing for the dimension of the operators - actually the fugacity t corresponding to the degree of the grading as defined above - which can be thought of as an R fugacity. As such, indeed only positive powers of x appear in the Hilbert series. Thus, the Hilbert

series on the Higgs branch of the ADHM auxiliary theory can be written as HSk = HSk(xc, y, <5 i).

In turn, the Nekrasov partition function Ii(ns)t depends on an element g of a compact global symmetry group involving both the Lorentz fugacities {x, y} as well as the global symmetry fugacities ai for G. For the latter, it is clear that the G fugacities ai in I® will be identified with the G fugacities <5i in HSk = HSk(x, y, <5i). It remains to clarify the mapping between (x, y) and

(x, y).

To that matter, recall that both x and y have a clear geometrical meaning. Indeed, consider the case of pointlike instantons on C2. As these have no internal structure, the Hilbert series will be purely geometrical. Furthermore, it can be written [12,8] as PE[x(y + y-1)], which shows that the moduli space is constructed with two dimension-1 generators transforming as an SU(2) doublet. On the other hand, upon introducing complex coordinates {z1,z2}, C2 is invariant under SU(2)a x SU(2)b, acting each on the doublets {z1 ,z2} and {z1,Z2}. Then the coordinate ring on C2 is constructed in terms of monomials of the generic form z1mz2n which obviously have definite transformation properties under SU(2)a. Hence the SU(2) with fugacity y associated to the adjoints directly maps to the SU(2)a geometric symmetry on C2. Besides, the degree of the monomial, basically given by 8 = n + m, directly maps to the fugacity x. As in polar coordinates, both z1,2 are proportional to the radial coordinate, so we have that x is an R fugacity.

In turn, both (x, y) in Ii(ns)t are SU(2) fugacities corresponding to the (compact) global symmetry group element g. Note that SU(2) characters [n]z 3 are invariant under z ^ z-1. This "symmetry" is inherited by the generating function. In fact, because of the same reason, it is easy to check that HSk(y) = HSk(y-1). Obviously, since x is not an SU(2) fugacity, HSk(x) = HSk(x-1). However, it is possible to construct an invariant quantity under this transformation by considering HSk(xx) = xaHSk(x) such that HSk(x) = HSk(x-1) by appropriately choosing a.

This is always possible because the Hilbert series is a function of the form [8,12,13] PN(x ,y)

HSk (x) = MN( ' , (5)

nM(! -xcmydm)

where PN is a palindromic polynomial of x, y invariant under y ^ y-1 of degree N. Besides, also the denominator must be invariant under y ^ y-1. In fact, such invariance follows from the fact that the corresponding SU(2) symmetry is present already in the auxiliary ADHM quiver, and hence its inherited by its F- and D-terms (the former ensures the invariance of the numerator, while the latter ensures the invariance in the denominator). Besides, {cm,dm} are some integer exponents. Note that, for simplicity, we have unrefined the G-fugacities (we will come back to this point below).

3 We use the notation [n]z for SU(2) characters, where [1]z = z + z 1, [2]z = z2 + 1 + z 2 and so on.

Since PN is a palindrome, the factor fn(y) multiplying xn will be equal to the fN-n(y) multiplying xN-n. Hence, upon sending x to x-1, the combination fnxn + fN-nxN-n will go to x-N(fnxn + fN-nxN-n), so that, under x ^ x-1, the palindrome goes to itself up to a factor of x-N. On the other hand, since the denominator is invariant under y ^ y-1, for each term (1 — xCmy]>dm]>) there must be a term (1 — xCmy-dml). This ensures that, upon sending x ^ x-1, the denominator transforms by picking an overall factor of xM for some integer M'. Note that naively one might worry of potentially dangerous factors of -1 which would be relevant if there were an odd number of monomials in the denominator. Note that if that was the case, then in particular, upon completely unrefining, the order of the pole of the Hilbert series at x = 1 would be odd. However, the order of the pole of the unrefined Hilbert series at x = 1 coincides with the complex dimension of the instanton moduli space, which, being a hyper-Kahler variety, must be an even number. Hence we conclude that such potentially dangerous factors of -1 in the denominator transformation under x ^ x-1 must all cancel among themselves. Thus, putting the transformations of the numerator and the denominator together, we have that HSk(x-1) = xaHSk(x) for some a e Z.

Given that we can construct the function HSk(x) which shows the (x, y) ^ (x-1, y-1) in-

^^ (k)

variance expected for SU(2) characters, it is then natural to identify HSk(x, y,at) with and x ^ x, y ^ y. That is, we conjecture

2(kst(x,y, at) = HSk(x,y,ai). (6)

Note that had we explicitly taken the G-fugacities into account by not unrefining when checking the variation of HSk under x ^ x-1 nothing would have changed. This is because in the ADHM auxiliary theory multiplets come in real representations, e.g. a hyper contains a fundamental and an antifundamental chiral in 4d N = 1 notation. Thus at ^ a-1 will also leave HSk invariant and the same manipulation as that done with y immediately shows that upon sending x to x-1, HSk only picks an overall factor xa.

Finally, note that in the 4d limit where one writes x = eij(e1+e2), y = , at = e'^ai and

sends j3 ^ 0 the leading behavior is not affected by the xa. Hence, in the 4d limit, the instanton partition function directly coincides with the Hilbert series as shown in e.g. [11].

3. Explicit check: pure SU(2) gauge theory and global symmetry enhancement

We now test our proposal with an explicit computation of a full index and compare it with the known results in the literature. In [1] it was argued that a USp(2) gauge theory with Nf < 8 fundamental hypers should be a fixed point theory exhibiting, at the origin of the Coulomb branch, an enhanced ENf+i global symmetry due to massless instantonic particles. This was checked by computing the exact index in [2,3]. On the other hand, this theory can be thought of as the N = 1 case of a USp(2N) theory with one antisymmetric hypermultiplet and Nf fundamental hyper-multiplets. For N = 1, when USp(2) = SU(2), the antisymmetric is a singlet and thus decouples. Hence, for all practical purposes, the theory is a pure SU(2) gauge theory with Nf fundamental hypers. On the other hand this theory can be regarded as the worldvolume theory on a stack of N D4 branes probing an O8- with Nf coinciding D8 branes. In turn, this system can be backre-acted finding in the near-brane region an AdS6 geometry [14], therefore strongly supporting that the dual theory is a fixed point theory.

We will be interested in the Nf = 0 case for the minimal rank, that is, a pure USp(2) = SU(2) gauge theory, for which we expect an enhanced SU(2) global symmetry due to instantonic

Fig. 1. Quiver engineering k-instantons of U(2), the same as 1-instanton of SU(2) ~ USp(2).

particles, and to which our methods are directly applicable. Following the general expressions above, the index will read

where f du

1 - u2 du Ipertlnst!

is the integration over the gauge group with the SU(2) Haar measure. Furthermore, for the perturbative part it is straightforward to write that

Ipert = PE

x(y + y-1)

((u + u-1)2 - 1

(1 - Xy)(1 - Xy-1 )

3.1. The non-perturbative part

Following our conjectured formula, we first need to compute the Hilbert series of the pure SU(2) k-instanton on C2 moduli space. The auxiliary ADHM quiver is shown in Fig. 1. The quiver comes with the superpotential

W = Tr ^ [01,02]+Q i®Qi- (9)

Naively there is a global U(2) flavor symmetry. However, the U(1) part coincides with the U(1) e U(k), and hence the global flavor symmetry will be just SU(2), whose fugacity we will denote by u. It will correspond to the u gauge fugacity in Eq. (7). Besides, there is a global SU(2) acting on 0i whose fugacity, as described in Section 2, will be y. Finally, there will be an x fugacity for the dimension of the operators. Once the Hilbert series is computed following the methods in [8,9], as described in Section 2, we will construct the associated function invariant under x ^ x-1.

3.1.1. One-instanton

This corresponds to the case k = 1 above. The F flat part of the Higgs branch yields

= PE[(y + y-1)x + (u + u-1)(r + r-1)x - x2], (10)

where r is the ADHM U(1) gauge group fugacity. Upon integrating over it we find the one-instanton Hilbert series HS\

(1 + x2)

HS1 =-2-V-H-• (11)

(1 - fr)(1 - u2x2)(1 - x)(1 - xy)

As expected, this is not invariant under x x-1. Imposing such invariance by multiplying by the adequate power of x fixes Z^ = x2HS\, which explicitly reads

Int =-2 + x2)-• (12)

(1 - £)(1 - u2x2)(1 - x)a - xy)

One can compare this expression with previous results in the literature (see e.g. [2]) obtaining exact agreement.

3.1.2. Two instantons

This corresponds to the case k = 2 in Fig. 1. In this case, since Nc = Nf the gauge group is not entirely broken. We can however compute the 2-instanton moduli space Hilbert series by brute force using Macaulay2 [15]. One can check that, enforcing the symmetry x ^ x-1, one finds mit = x4HS4. The final result is a bit cumbersome and can be written

r(2)= P Q

1>2> = — (13)

P = -u6x7y4 + u4x 9y4 + u8x9y4 + u4x "y4 + u8x11 y4 + u4x13y4 + u8x13 y4

- u6x15y4 - u6x4y5 - 2u6x6y5 - 2u6x8y5 + u4x 10y5 - u6x10y5 + u8x10y5 + u4x12y5 - u6x 12y5 + u8x 12y5 - 2u6x14y5 - 2u6x16y5 - u6x18y5 - u6x7y6 + u4x9y6 + u8x9y6 + u4x"y6 + u8x"y6 + u4x13y6 + u8x13y6 - u6x15y6,

Q = (x2 + u4x2 - u2 (1 + x^ (x + y + x2y + xy2) (y + x2y - x (1 + y2)) x (u4y + x6y - u2x3 (1 + y2))(y + u4x6y - u2x3 (1 + y2)). To give a flavor of the result, let us quote the fully unrefined index

V4 i 1 _I_ y _I_ ^ y 2 _I_ Sr^ iSv^ iSv^ ^ y 8 _I_ y 9 _I_ T-10"!

x4(1 + x + 3x2 + 6x3 + 8x4 + 6x5 + 8x6 + 6x + 3x8 + x9 + x10) inst = (1 - x)8(1 + x)4(1 + x + x2)3 • (14)

As in the one-instanton case, one can explicitly compare these expressions with results in the literature (see e.g. [2]) obtaining again exact agreement.

Note that, up to the x4 factor enforcing the x ^ x-1 invariance, the result is a palindrome as expected for a hyper-Kahler moduli space. Besides, the order of the pole at x = 1 is 8. Since the geometric Hilbert series of C2 has a pole at x = 1 of order 2, this means that the reduced instanton moduli space for 2 SU(2) instantons is 6-complex-dimensional, in agreement with [9].

3.2. The full index

As just shown, the instanton partition functions computed using our technique exactly agree with the expected results in the literature. For the sake of completeness, let us now compute the

full index just by combining the results above as described in Section 2 and integrating over u in (7). Note that the k-instanton index enters at order x2k. Hence up to the 2-instanton order computed here we can at most go up to x5. Up to that order we find

( 1 \ 2 (1 + q)2(1 + y2) 3

I = 1 + 1 + - + q Jx2 + ('q) ('y )x3 q qy

(y2 + q4y2 + q(1 + y2)2 + 2q2(1 + y2)2 + q3(1 + y2)2) 4


(1 + y2)(y2 + q4y2 + q(1 + y2)2 + q3(1 + y2)2 + q2(2 + 3y2 + 2y4)) 5


+ O{x 6). (15)

It is a straightforward exercise to show that this expression precisely agrees with Eq. (4.9) in [2]. In particular, one can see the appearance of the SU(2) characters in q, hence explicitly showing the enhanced global SU(2) symmetry.

All in all, we have shown the explicit agreement between the index computed following our prescription with the known results in the literature up to order x6. Going to arbitrarily higher orders is a tedious but straightforward exercise. Note in particular that the prescription to select the poles contributing is completely fixed: just those with positive power of x, this is inherited from the original R nature of x in HS.

4. Exact index for a pure U(1) 5d SCFT

Let us now apply our technique to the case of pure U(1) gauge theory. Although U(1) instantons are singular, we can consider the non-commutative deformation removing the small instanton singularity. The exact index for a pure U(1) SCFT is

—linstlpert. (16)

Here, the perturbative part is simply

x(y + y-1)

Ipert = PE

(1 - xy)(1 - xy-1)_

Note that it does not depend on the U(1) fugacity u.

As for the instanton contribution, following our recipe, they arise from the Hilbert series on the Higgs branch of the auxiliary ADHM quiver depicted in Fig. 2.

Denoting by r the ADHM U(1) fugacity, the F-flat part of the Higgs branch yields

g(F) = PE[(y + y-1)x + x(r + r-1) - x2]. (18)

Thus, upon integrating over the ADHM auxiliary U(1) gauge group and imposing the x ^ x -1, the 1-instanton index is easily seen to be (see also [16])

X- =--(19)

(1 - xy)(1 - xy-1)

We can compute higher instanton indices. However, these are technically slightly more involved, as the auxiliary AHDM gauge group will not be completely higgsed for k > 1. Computing by brute force the Hilbert series using Macaulay2 [15], one can see that

Fig. 2. Quiver engineering i-instantons of U(1).

x(2) = _* 2(1 + * 2)_

inst (1 - xy)(1 - xy-1)(1 - x2y2)(1 - *2y-2)

I (x) +I (X2)

This is just the second coefficient of the Taylor expansion in q of

Itast(q) = PE

(1 - xy)(1 - xy-l)_

In fact, Eq. (21) is to be expected. Since we have a pure U(1) theory, instantons are non-interacting pointlike particles, and hence the k-instanton contribution is inherited from the 1-instanton. Furthermore, the fugacity q above counts instanton number, and hence indeed coincides with the original instanton fugacity. Indeed, one can check that higher order coefficients of this expansion agree with the instanton index computed from the appropriate k ADHM quiver.

Taking into account the south pole contribution - which is just the same upon doing q ^ 1/q - we find the instanton index

linst = PE

(1 - *y)(1 - *y-l)


Note that this coincides with the contribution to the index of a hypermultiplet, q playing the role of the global symmetry fugacity. Hence, all in all, the exact index for the pure U(\) theory is

*(y + y-1)

+ q-1)

(1 - xy)(1 - xy-1) (1 - xy)(1 - xy-1)

5. Conclusions

In this article we have made explicit the connection between the Hilbert series of the moduli space of instantons with the instanton index of 5d pure gauge theories. Since the Nekrasov instanton partition formula involves compact symmetries, while the Hilbert series is a generating function depending on an R fugacity, the mapping between Hilbert series and instanton index requires "covariantizing" the Hilbert series so that the fugacity counting the dimension of operators is converted into an SU(2) fugacity. We used the exact index computation of the pure USp(2) ~ SU(2) theory to show the agreement of our proposal, displaying explicit computations up to 2 instantons. It should be stressed that, although we are not displaying them to keep the presentation contained, similar consistency checks have been performed up to higher k as well

as on diverse other instanton indices for higher SU(N) groups obtaining perfect agreement with the results in the literature.

It is immediate to ask how our procedure can be extended to compute instanton indices of 5d theories with extra matter in arbitrary representations. While it is not clear how to extend the computation of the "Hilbert series" to moduli spaces of flavored instantons, comparison with [2] suggests that one can incorporate the flavor contribution simply by multiplying gf by an extra factor incorporating information about the extra matter.

It would be very interesting to apply these techniques - or else the more standard methods well known in the literature - to the computation of indices for the quiver theories introduced in [17,18], in particular clarifying whether enhanced symmetries do indeed arise in the quiver case. As these theories do admit an AdS6 dual, it would also be very interesting to study the large N version of the index and compare with the SUGRA dual. It is natural to expect that instantons correspond to spinning D0 branes, and it would be very interesting to compute the large N instanton index from the gravity dual.


We are grateful to Noppadol Mekareeya for very useful conversations. We would also like to thank Oren Bergman for collaboration at early stages of this project as well as for very useful conversations. We would like to thank the referee for raising relevant corrections on an early version of this paper. G.Z. is supported in part by the Israel Science Foundation under grant no. 392/09, and the US-Israel Binational Science Foundation under grant no. 2008-072. D.R.G. is partially supported by the research grants MICINN-09-FPA2009-07122 and the Ramon y Cajal Fellowship MEC-DGI-CSD2007-00042.


[1] N. Seiberg, Five-dimensional SUSY field theories, nontrivial fixed points and string dynamics, Phys. Lett. B 388 (1996) 753, arXiv:hep-th/9608111.

[2] H.-C. Kim, S.-S. Kim, K. Lee, 5-dim superconformal index with enhanced en global symmetry, J. High Energy Phys. 1210 (2012) 142, arXiv:1206.6781 [hep-th].

[3] A. Iqbal, C. Vafa, BPS degeneracies and superconformal index in diverse dimensions, arXiv:1210.3605 [hep-th].

[4] J. Bhattacharya, S. Bhattacharyya, S. Minwalla, S. Raju, Indices for superconformal field theories in 3, 5 and 6 dimensions, J. High Energy Phys. 0802 (2008) 064, arXiv:0801.1435 [hep-th].

[5] H.-C. Kim, S. Kim, E. Koh, K. Lee, S. Lee, On instantons as Kaluza-Klein modes of M5-branes, J. High Energy Phys. 1112 (2011) 031, arXiv:1110.2175 [hep-th].

[6] Y. Tachikawa, Seiberg-Witten theory and instanton counting, University of Tokyo Master's Thesis, http://member.

[7] N. Nekrasov, S. Shadchin, ABCD of instantons, Commun. Math. Phys. 252 (2004) 359, arXiv:hep-th/0404225.

[8] S. Benvenuti, A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, The Hilbert series of the one instanton moduli space, J. High Energy Phys. 1006 (2010) 100, arXiv:1005.3026 [hep-th].

[9] A. Hanany, N. Mekareeya, S.S. Razamat, Hilbert series for moduli spaces of two instantons, J. High Energy Phys. 1301 (2013)070, arXiv:1205.4741 [hep-th].

[10] N. Nekrasov, Five dimensional gauge theories and relativistic integrable systems, Nucl. Phys. B 531 (1998) 323, arXiv:hep-th/9609219.

[11] C.A. Keller, N. Mekareeya, J. Song, Y. Tachikawa, The ABCDEFG of instantons and W-algebras, J. High Energy Phys. 1203 (2012)045, arXiv:1111.5624 [hep-th].

[12] S. Benvenuti, B. Feng, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, Counting BPS operators in gauge theories: quivers, syzygies and plethystics, J. High Energy Phys. 0711 (2007) 050, arXiv:hep-th/0608050.

[13] J. Gray, A. Hanany, Y.-H. He, V. Jejjala, N. Mekareeya, SQCD: A geometric apercu, J. High Energy Phys. 0805 (2008) 099, arXiv:0803.4257 [hep-th].

[14] A. Brandhuber, Y. Oz, The D-4-D-8 brane system and five-dimensional fixed points, Phys. Lett. B 460 (1999) 307, arXiv:hep-th/9905148.


[16] R. Poghossian, M. Samsonyan, Instantons and the 5D U(1) gauge theory with extra adjoint, J. Phys. A 42 (2009) 304024, arXiv:0804.3564 [hep-th].

[17] O. Bergman, D. Rodriguez-Gomez, 5d quivers and their AdS(6) duals, J. High Energy Phys. 1207 (2012) 171, arXiv:1206.3503 [hep-th].

[18] O. Bergman, D. Rodriguez-Gomez, Probing the Higgs branch of 5d fixed point theories with dual giant gravitons in AdS(6), J. High Energy Phys. 1212 (2012) 047, arXiv:1210.0589 [hep-th].