Scholarly article on topic 'Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition with LCZ696: a novel approach for the treatment of heart failure'

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition with LCZ696: a novel approach for the treatment of heart failure Academic research paper on "Basic medicine"

Share paper
OECD Field of science

Abstract of research paper on Basic medicine, author of scientific article — Thomas H. Langenickel, William P. Dole

The natriuretic peptide system exerts beneficial cardiorenal effects in chronic heart failure, whereas activation of the renin–angiotensin–aldosterone system exerts opposing and deleterious effects. LCZ696, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, targets both neurohormonal systems by inhibiting neprilysin, which prevents natriuretic peptide degradation, while concomitantly blocking the angiotensin (AT1) receptor. In clinical studies of patients with chronic heart failure with reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, LCZ696 has been shown to improve biomarkers of cardiorenal function. The effects of LCZ696 on cardiovascular outcomes and survival in patients with heart failure are currently being investigated.

Academic research paper on topic "Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition with LCZ696: a novel approach for the treatment of heart failure"

Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies


Raymond Baker - formerly University of Southampton, UK and Merck Sharp & Dohme, UK Eliot Ohlstein - AltheRx Pharmaceuticals, USA




TtrrafGiEC Heart failure

Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibition with LCZ696: a novel approach for the treatment of heart failure§

Thomas H. Langenickel1, William P. Dole2*

'Translational Medicine, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

2Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research Inc., '00 Technology Square, '650 B, Cambridge, MA 01239 USA

The natriuretic peptide system exerts beneficial car-diorenal effects in chronic heart failure, whereas activation of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system exerts opposing and deleterious effects. LCZ696, a first-in-class angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor, targets both neurohormonal systems by inhibiting neprilysin, which prevents natriuretic peptide degradation, while concomitantly blocking the angiotensin (AT|) receptor. In clinical studies of patients with chronic heart failure with reduced and preserved left ventricular ejection fraction, LCZ696 has been shown to improve biomarkers of cardiorenal function. The effects of LCZ696 on cardiovascular outcomes and survival in patients with heart failure are currently being investigated.

Section editor:

Robert Willette- Heart Failure Drug Discovery Performance Unit, GSK Pharmaceuticals, King of Prussia, USA.


Heart failure (HF) is a common syndrome, resulting in high mortality. The prevalence of HF has risen steadily in recent years and this trend is expected to continue due to a growing aging population with more cardiovascular risk factors [1,2]. Indeed, risk factors, such as hypertension, are common prognostic comorbidities in chronic HF [3].

The impact of HF on patient quality of life and the financial burden imposed on the healthcare system are great, with frequent costly hospitalizations and a 5-year mortality rate of approximately 50% [2]. While survival rates have improved for HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) due to more widespread use of drugs that block the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) residual mortality rates remain high. For patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) no therapy has proven to be effective at reducing morbidity and mortality [4]. Consequently, there is an urgent need for new therapies to prevent and treat HFrEF and HFpEF.

§ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

*Corresponding author.: W.P. Dole (

Role of the RAAS and natriuretic peptides (NPs) in heart failure

The consequences of activation of the RAAS and sympathetic nervous system in the pathogenesis of HF are well established, as is the therapeutic benefit of RAAS blockers in improving HF

1740-6773/$ © 2013 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

outcomes. A growing body of experimental and clinical evidence indicates that the natriuretic peptide (NP) system, which mediates beneficial cardiorenal effects, is also impaired in HF [5]. This suggests that approaches designed to upregu-late NPs and/or enhance their biological activity may be of therapeutic benefit, particularly in conjunction with RAAS blockade [5].

The RAAS and HF

Chronic HF is a progressive condition characterized by elevated cardiac filling pressures, reduced cardiac output and decreased tissue oxygen delivery [6]. These hemodynamic abnormalities result in activation of the RAAS and sympathetic nervous system to maintain vital organ perfusion [6]. Initially, this serves as an acute compensatory response, but prolonged activation contributes to the pathophysiology of HF, resulting in progressive cardiorenal abnormalities, including myocardial hypertrophy, fibrosis and apoptosis, increased systemic vascular resistance, and increased sodium and water retention [6,7].

The NP system and HF

The NP system comprises three structurally similar peptides with cardiorenal protective properties: atrial NP (ANP), B-type NP (BNP) and C-type NP (CNP) [8]. ANP and BNP are primarily expressed in the heart and released by cardiomyocytes in response to mechanical stretch [5]. CNP is derived mainly from endothelial and renal cells and secreted in response to endothelium-dependent agonists and pro-inflammatory cytokines [5]. As filling pressures rise in HF, increased cardiac stretch causes the secretion of precursor NPs, which are cleaved by specific proteases to produce biologically active NPs which then act on NP receptors (NP receptor-A [NPR-A], NPR-B and NPR-C) [8]. Binding of NPs to NPR-A and NPR-B activates particulate guanylate cyclase resulting in increases in the second messenger, cyclic guanosine monophosphate (cGMP), which mediates many of the cardiovascular and renal effects of the NPs [8,9].

NPs are cleared from the circulation by two mechanisms -binding to NPR-C and inactivation (hydrolytic cleavage) by neprilysin [8]. Neprilysin has a high affinity for both ANP and CNP, and a lower affinity for BNP, which is more resistant to hydrolysis [10]. Since neprilysin does not hydrolyze N-term-inal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) [11], it remains a useful cardiac biomarker to assess therapeutic effect and prognosis in patients treated with neprilysin inhibitors.

The cardiovascular and renal effects of the NP system oppose those of the RAAS [12], providing the scientific and therapeutic basis for neprilysin inhibition in the setting of HF. One of the major effects of NPs is vasodilation, which results from cGMP-mediated relaxation of smooth muscle cells as well as indirect effects of NPs to inhibit the RAAS and decrease endothelin-1 (ET-1) production [9]. Indeed, NPs

have been shown to cause significant reductions in systemic vascular resistance, pulmonary artery pressure, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure and right arterial pressure in patients with severe HF [13]. NPs also mediate other beneficial hemodynamic effects, including reducing arterial stiffness and enhancing endothelial function [14].

NPs promote sodium and water excretion by inhibiting sodium reabsorption in the proximal and distal nephron, while preventing decreases in glomerular filtration rate by regulating tubuloglomerular feedback [9]. These effects of NPs have been observed in patients with severe HF, resulting in improvement in hemodynamics and renal function [13]. In addition to the direct effects of NPs on the kidney, their inhibitory actions on the RAAS and sympathetic nervous system also contribute to their natriuretic, diuretic and hemodynamic effects [9,14].

The NPs have potent cardiac antihypertrophic and anti-fibrotic properties. In animal models, ANP and CNP inhibit cardiac hypertrophy induced by angiotensin II (Ang II) or ET-1 [15,16]. Furthermore, in cardiac fibroblasts, ANP and BNP inhibit the fibrotic effects of transforming growth factor beta (TGF-b), while Ang II-induced interstitial fibrosis was inhibited by CNP [16].

Recent experimental and clinical data indicate that NPs have physiologically important metabolic effects that may be relevant to HF [17,18]. ANP has been shown to stimulate lipolysis in human adipocytes by activating the NPR-A receptor and increasing intracellular cGMP [19]. ANP-induced lipolysis could contribute to cardiac energy utilization by providing substrate in the form of free fatty acids and promoting lipid oxidation through increased mitochondrial biogenesis [17,20]. On the other hand, an imbalance between fatty acid uptake and utilization for adenosine triphosphate (ATP) generation could result in mitochondrial oxidative stress and lead to excessive cardiomyocyte accumulation of neutral lipids, contractile dysfunction and lipotoxicity [21]. Other metabolic effects of NPs demonstrated in human tissue samples include increased oxygen consumption and enhanced expression of adiponectin. Studies in animal and human adipocytes have also shown that NPs induce brown fat thermogenesis and can mediate a phenotypic switch from white to brown fat [17]. Furthermore, there is emerging evidence that NP signaling may directly improve glucose control and inhibit adipocyte growth [17,18,22]. Finally, a specific human ANP genetic polymorphism which increases circulating ANP has been reported to protect against hypertension and metabolic syndrome [23]. The relevance of the metabolic effects of NP to insulin resistance and cardiovascular diseases is an active area of research.

Dysregulation of the NP system and role of neprilysin in HF

While it was initially thought that the NP system was upregulated in HF due to high circulating levels of total

immunoreactive ANP and BNP, recent studies indicate that mature BNP (BNP1-32) levels are reduced and levels of less biologically active BNP fragments are increased [5]. This is due to altered processing of proBNP to biologically active BNP1-32 [24] and partly explains the blunting of the physiological response to high levels of total immunoreactive BNP observed in patients with HF [5]. Thus, advanced HF may represent a state of NP deficiency [5]. Furthermore, the expression and activation of neprilysin are increased in patients with HF, which enhances the rate of degradation of NPs and contributes to reduced levels of biologically active NPs [25].

As HF progresses, relative resistance or hyporesponsiveness to NPs develops, which is particularly evident in the kidney and vasculature [8,12]. This hyporesponsiveness is an important feature of HF that adversely affects prognosis by worsening sodium retention and volume overload and increasing peripheral vascular resistance. The mechanisms for NP resistance are multifactorial and include: downregulation of NP receptors, dysregulated NP signal transduction, increased cGMP degradation and activation of the RAAS [26].

In addition to hydrolyzing the NPs, neprilysin also hydro-lyzes other vasoactive peptides, including substance P, bra-dykinin, ET-1, angiotensin I (Ang I) and Ang II [27,28]. Since there are multiple neprilysin substrates with differing and, in some instances, opposing biologic actions, the pharmacolo-gic profile of neprilysin inhibitors is complex and will depend on the net effect on all biologically relevant substrates. While inhibition of neprilysin is expected to result in beneficial cardiovascular and renal effects in HF by increasing NP levels, corresponding increases in Ang II and ET-1, both of which have vasoconstrictor, pro-fibrotic and pro-hypertrophic properties, would be expected to oppose the beneficial effects of the NPs. In the case of angiotensin, neprilysin hydrolyzes and inactivates Ang II;therefore, neprilysin inhibition alone will not only increase NP levels but can also result in accumulation of Ang II, which could attenuate or negate any beneficial NP effects in the setting of HF. The increase in Ang II observed with neprilysin inhibition provides a rationale for concomitant RAAS blockade. However, neprilysin also converts Ang I to Ang 1-7 [28], which has vasodilating, anti-proliferative and natriuretic actions mediated through activation of the Mas receptor [29]. In the case of ET-1, neprilysin not only hydrolyzes ET-1, but also its precursor peptide big ET-1. Thus, the effect of a neprilysin inhibitor on ET-1 levels will depend on the net effect of hydrolysis of both big-ET1 and ET-1 [27]. It should also be noted that both substance P and bradykinin, which are both inactivated by neprilysin, have vasodilatory properties, increase vascular permeability and, when combined with an angiotensin-converting-enzyme inhibitor (ACEI), are implicated in the pathogenesis of angioedema [30], a potential side effect of neprilysin inhibitors.

NPs as treatment for chronic HF

The therapeutic rationale for the initial development of neprilysin inhibitors as a potential treatment for chronic HF is based on the observation that neprilysin inhibition increases endogenous NP levels [31,32]. One of the first selective neprilysin inhibitors studied in humans was can-doxatril, which produced beneficial hemodynamic, natriure-tic and diuretic effects in patients with chronic HF [32,33]. In patients with chronic HF receiving ACEI, candoxatril also improved exercise tolerance compared with placebo [34].

However, as noted above, neprilysin also degrades Ang II; therefore, neprilysin inhibition also activates Ang II-depen-dent pathways [31], limiting the utility of selective neprilysin inhibitors as monotherapy for HF. Activation of the RAAS attenuates the actions of NPs and RAAS inhibition has been reported to potentiate the effects of neprilysin inhibition in a canine model of HF [35]. Therefore, achieving the potential clinical benefits of neprilysin inhibition will likely require concomitant inhibition of the RAAS.

These observations led to the therapeutic strategy of concomitant inhibition of neprilysin and the angiotensin-con-verting enzyme (ACE), and to the development of omapatrilat. In a Phase III trial in patients with chronic HF, omapatrilat demonstrated a trend towards improved morbidity and mortality with once daily dosing that might have been even greater with a more frequent dosing regimen [36]. However, omapatrilat treatment was also associated with a substantially increased risk of angioedema [36], and its development was discontinued.

Angioedema is thought to be mediated by increases in bradykinin, des-Arg9-bradykinin and possibly substance P, potent vasoactive peptides that cause vasodilation and enhance vascular permeability [30]. Bradykinin is degraded predominantly by ACE, but also by aminopeptidase P (APP), neprilysin and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP-4) [37]. Compared with ACE and aminopeptidase P, the relative contribution of neprilysin to the degradation of substance P and bradykinin appears to be very small [37]. In the presence of ACE inhibition, the development of angioedema is believed to require functional (genetic or pharmacologic) defects in several non-kininase II enzymatic pathways [30,38]. Omapatrilat not only inhibits ACE, but also inhibits APP and neprilysin. The increase in bradykinin resulting from inhibition of all three enzymes may have been the cause of the increased incidence of angioedema observed with that agent [37].

The therapeutic strategy of concomitant neprilysin and RAAS inhibition still holds promise for patients with chronic HF assuming the risk of angioedema can be minimized while achieving superior efficacy compared to RAAS blockers alone. While angiotensin type 1 (AT1) receptor blockers (ARBs) are known to cause angioedema, the reported incidence is much less than that for ACEIs [39]. The proposed mechanism for ARB induced angioedema involves Ang-II/AT2 receptor

mediated increases in bradykinin due to weak indirect inhibitory effects on ACE and possibly neprilysin [40]. Thus, a potentially more successful therapeutic strategy would be to block the RAAS at the ATj receptor rather than inhibit ACE. Experiments in stroke-prone spontaneously hypertensive rats have shown that concomitant neprilysin inhibition and ATj receptor blockade improved endothelial function to a similar extent as that achieved with combined neprilysin and ACE inhibition [41]. In an in vitro study in rat cardiomyocytes and fibroblasts, simultaneous addition of a neprilysin inhibitor and ARB into the culture media was more effective than the ARB alone in inhibiting biochemical markers of cardiac hypertrophy and fibrosis [42]. Finally, an in vivo study in spontaneously hypertensive rats found that concomitant neprilysin inhibition and angiotensin receptor blockade lowered blood pressure (BP) to a similar extent as neprilysin-ACE inhibition with omapatrilat, but had no effect on tracheal

plasma extravasation (a bradykinin-dependent surrogate for upper airway angioedema), whereas neprilysin-ACE inhibition with omapatrilat increased tracheal plasma extravasation [43]. These experimental data highlight the potential for concomitant neprilysin inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade for producing beneficial cardiovascular effects without increasing the risk of angioedema.

LCZ696, a novel angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI): pharmacological profile, experimental and clinical results

ARNIs represent a novel class of drugs being developed for the treatment of HF whose multimodal mode of action involves neprilysin inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade. ARNIs enhance the beneficial physiological response of NPs while blocking the harmful effects of RAAS activation (Fig. 1).

Physiological response

Pathophysiological response


NPR-A receptor

Guanylate cyclase

Inactive fragments

Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI)

Inactive fragments*

l Systemic vascular resistance l Sympathetic tone l Aldosterone l Cardiac fibrosis l Ventricular hypertrophy T Natriuresis/diuresis

Heart Failure

-Q AT-, receptor

T Systemic vascular resistance T Sympathetic tone T Aldosterone T Cardiac fibrosis T Ventricular hypertrophy l Natriuresis/diuresis

Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies

Figure 1. Angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors have the potential to modulate two counter-regulatory neurohormonal systems in HF: the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system and natriuretic peptide system [6,8,12,27]. ANG: angiotensin; ARNI: angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors; AT|: angiotensin type 1; cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate; GTP:guanosine-5'-triphosphate; HF: heart failure; NP: natriuretic peptide (e.g. atrial natriuretic peptide [ANP], B-type natriuretic peptide [BNP], etc.); NPR-A: NP receptor-A; RAAS: renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system; zIn vitro evidence.

Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic profile of LCZ696

LCZ696 is the first in class ARNI in clinical development. LCZ696 is a new chemical entity comprising anionic moieties of the neprilysin inhibitor prodrug AHU377 and the ARB valsartan [44]. Oral administration of LCZ696 provides concomitant systemic exposure to AHU377, which is metabolized to the active neprilysin inhibitor LBQ657, and valsartan [45].

The pharmacokinetics of LCZ696 have been well characterized. Oral administration of single and multiple ascending doses of LCZ696 to 41 healthy volunteers resulted in rapid, approximately dose proportional systemic exposure to both the ARB and neprilysin inhibitor moieties of LCZ696 [45]. Following multiple dose administration, the systemic exposures of valsartan and the active neprilysin inhibitor LBQ657 occurred rapidly, with maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) for valsartan achieved within 1.6-4.9 hours, and for LBQ657 within 1.8-2.7 hours [45].

Experimental studies have demonstrated that LCZ696 inhibits both neprilysin and the RAAS. Sprague-Dawley rats infused with ANP (450 ng/kg/min) exhibited a dose-dependent augmentation of plasma ANP immunoreactivity in response to LCZ696, indicating neprilysin inhibition (Fig. 2). The antihypertensive effects of LCZ696 were studied in conscious chronically instrumented double trans-genic rats expressing the genes for human renin and angiotensinogen [45]. In this model of Ang-II-induced hypertension, oral administration of LCZ696 resulted in a dose-dependent and long-lasting reduction in mean arterial pressure (Fig. 2).

A study in healthy human subjects confirmed that LCZ696 provides concurrent neprilysin inhibition and AT1 receptor blockade [45]. Following multiple dose administration of LCZ696, 24-hour mean plasma cGMP (the NP effector signaling messenger) was increased compared with placebo, which is consistent with neprilysin inhibition. Dose-dependent increases in plasma cGMP compared with placebo were observed as early as 4 hours post-dose, with levels returning to baseline by 24 hours (Fig. 3; [45]). LCZ696 also resulted in dose-dependent increases in plasma renin concentration, plasma renin activity (PRA) and Ang II levels, which is consistent with AT1 receptor blockade (Fig. 3; [45]). The maximum concentrations of the RAAS biomarkers were reached by 4 hours after administration of multiple doses of LCZ696. Furthermore, the sustained pharmacodynamic effects following LCZ696 administration, together with the long observed plasma t1/2 for both valsartan and LBQ657, indicate the suitability of LCZ696 for once- or twice-daily dosing.

LCZ696 pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy and safety in patients with hypertension

A study in patients with hypertension (mean systolic BP 139.6 ± 9.2 (standard error) mmHgat baseline) has examined the effect of LCZ696 compared with valsartan on natriuresis, diuresis and urinary cGMP [46]. LCZ696 (400 mg once daily for 7 days) was associated with increases in natriuresis, diuresis and fractional sodium excretion compared with valsartan. For each of these measures, the natriuretic effect of LCZ696 was greatest on the first day of drug administration and diminished with continued dosing, likely

(a) (b) LCZ696 dose (mg/kg)

Vehicle 2 6 20 60

LCZ696 dose (mg/kg) _

Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies

Figure 2. Effect of oral administration of LCZ696 on (a) change from baseline in plasma atrial natriuretic peptide immunoreactivity (ANPir) in Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 4) infused with ANP (450 ng/kg/min); (b) change in mean arterial pressure (DMAP) in double-transgenic rats (dTGR) (n = 6) overexpressing human renin and angiotensin and exhibiting angiotensin Il-dependent hypertension [45]. ANP: atrial natriuretic peptide; ANPir: atrial natriuretic peptide immunoreactivity; dTGR: double-transgenic rats; MAP: mean arterial pressure. This material is reproduced with permission of John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Copyright 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

100 =,

O ö. 1

Time post-dose (h)

Time post-dose (h)

■<5 ^ 10 =

'■= o

E 1.0^

100 =,

0.1 Time post-dose (h)

Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies

Figure 3. Effect of oral administration of LCZ696 200 mg on (a) geometric mean change in plasma cGMP; (b) renin concentration; (c) plasma renin activity; (d) angiotensin II in healthy volunteers (n = 42) [45]. NB: In this dose-escalation study, patients received multiple doses of LCZ696 (50, 200, 600 and 900 mg). Data shown are for the 200 mg dose, which gave the greatest increase in cGMP. *p < 0.05 versus placebo. cGMP: cyclic guanosine monophosphate.

due to counter-regulatory mechanisms in response to the cumulative negative sodium balance. The study also showed that LCZ696 provided sustained neprilysin inhibition as indicated by increased urinary cGMP excretion throughout the study [46]. Treatment with LCZ696 in this study was further associated with larger reductions in both systolic BP and diastolic BP compared with valsartan. The clinical efficacy of LCZ696 has also been studied in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in 1328 patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension [47]. LCZ96 (200 and 400 mg) provided significantly greater BP reductions than comparable exposure to valsartan (160 mg and 320 mg, respectively). LCZ696 was well tolerated, with no reported cases of angioedema and no serious adverse events judged to be related to LCZ696 [47]. A study in Asian patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension has confirmed the BP-lowering effect and favorable safety profile of LCZ696 [48].

LCZ696 pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy and safety in patients with HFrEF

LCZ696 has been studied in patients with HFrEF. In an open-label, non-controlled study of 30 patients with stable chronic HF and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <40%, LCZ696 100 mg titrated to 200 mg twice daily was shown to increase plasma cGMP and urinary ANP after 7 and 21 days of drug administration, confirming inhibition of neprilysin [49]. Furthermore, administration of LCZ696 led to significant increases in PRA and plasma renin concentration, indicative of AT1 receptor blockade. In addition, plasma aldosterone and ET-1 levels were reduced, confirming clinically relevant RAAS inhibition [50]. Importantly, LCZ696 significantly decreased plasma NT-proBNP (p < 0.001) [49]. No serious adverse events occurred during the study. These effects support further studies of LCZ696 in chronic HF.

LCZ696 is currently being investigated in the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARA-DIGM-HF), a Phase III randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study comparing the long-term safety and efficacy of LCZ696 versus enalapril in patients with chronic HF and reduced LVEF (<40%). The primary endpoint is the composite of cardiovascular death or HF hospitalization. The secondary endpoints include assessment of changes in HF symptoms, physical limitations on quality of life, new onset of atrial fibrillation, and development/progression of renal dysfunction [51]. PARADIGM-HF is an event-driven trial and, as of January 17, 2013, the study is fully enrolled, with 8436 randomized patients at 985 centers in 47 countries [51].

LCZ696 pharmacodynamics, clinical efficacy and safety in patients with HFpEF

LCZ696 has also been investigated in patients with HFpEF. HFpEF is characterized by abnormal left ventricular diastolic function with associated increases in ventricular filling pressures, increased vascular stiffness and impairments in systolic function despite preserved ejection fraction [52]. HFpEF is associated with an impaired NP response and renal endocrine response to volume overload [52]. As a result, it is hypothesized that LCZ696, by augmenting the effects of NPs, would be of clinical benefit in these patients.

PARAMOUNT was a Phase II, randomized, double-blind multicenter trial in patients with HFpEF (LVEF >45%) [52]. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to Week 12 in levels of NT-proBNP [52], a marker of left ventricular wall stress that is associated with adverse outcomes in patients with HFpEF [53]. Patients were randomized to receive LCZ696 200 mg twice daily or valsartan 160 mg twice daily (dose equivalent) for 36 weeks. At 12 weeks, LCZ696 reduced NT-proBNP from baseline by 23% compared with valsartan (p = 0.005;Fig. 4). PARAMOUNT also assessed the effect of LCZ696 on left atrial structure and function by measuring left

1,000 -| 900 -800

[J 700 4

600 -500 -400 -300 -200

Week 4

LCZ696 Valsartan

Week 12

Week 36

Weeks post randomization

f= -0.05

я -0.10

Weeks 12 36

0.00 4

Weeks 12 36

® -1.0 m ol

± -2.0

1Ü -3.0

Weeks 12 36

Drug Discovery Today: Therapeutic Strategies

Figure 4. Effect of LCZ696 200 mg twice daily versus valsartan 160 mg twice daily (dose equivalent) in patients with chronic HF with preserved ejection fraction (NYHA class II-III, LVEF >45%, NT-proBNP >400 pg/mL). (a) NT-proBNP concentration (pg/mL) (geometric mean [95% CI]); (b) left atrial width, volume and volume index (mean SD) [52]. *p = 0.005; #p < 0.01 versus valsartan. CI: confidence interval; HF: heart failure; LVEF: left ventricular ejection fraction; NT-proBNP: N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; NYHA: New York Heart Association; SD: standard deviation.

atrial width, volume and volume index [52], parameters that have been shown to be predictors of outcome in chronic HF, with and without reduced LVEF [54,55]. After 36 weeks of treatment, left atrial width, volume, and volume index were significantly reduced from baseline to a greater extent with LCZ696 compared with valsartan (Fig. 4). LCZ696 was also shown to have beneficial effects on renal function, with smaller mean decreases in estimated glomerular filtration rate from baseline compared with valsartan (— 1.6mL/min/ 1.73 m2 versus —5.2 mL/min/1.73 m2; p = 0.007) over 36 weeks [52]. LCZ696 had a favorable safety profile similar to that observed with valsartan.

An outcomes study (Prospective comparison of ARni with ARB Global Outcomes in heart failure with preserved ejectioN

fraction [PARAGON-HF]) is currently planned to determine whether the promising biomarker results of LCZ696 in patients with HFpEF will translate into clinical benefit as measured by cardiovascular mortality and HF hospitalizations compared with valsartan.

Conclusion and future directions

The NP system has been shown to play an important cardiac and renal protective role. As a result it has been hypothesized that enhancing NPs may be beneficial in HF. Neprilysin inhibition enhances NP levels by reducing their enzymatic degradation. However, the utility of neprilysin inhibition requires management of the activation of the RAAS, which occurs with neprilysin inhibition alone. LCZ696, the first

ARNI in clinical development, meets this requirement since the compound enhances the actions of the NP system by inhibiting neprilysin while concurrently suppressing the activity of the RAAS by blocking the angiotensin ATj receptor.

Results from the clinical trial program of LCZ696 show that LCZ696 improves hemodynamics and cardiorenal biomarkers. Ongoing studies will determine whether these effects translate to improvements in outcomes of patients with chronic HF with either reduced or preserved LVEF. Additional studies of the NPs and of LCZ696 will be needed to further elucidate the mechanisms of its potential cardiorenal protection and the clinical relevance of the metabolic effects of the NPs.

Conflict of interest

Dr Langenickel is full time employee of Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland, and Dr Dole is full-time employee of Novartis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA, USA. Moreover, both authors are eligible to receive Novartis stock. The experimental and clinical studies of LCZ696 summarized in this review were supported and funded by Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland and Novar-tis Institutes for Biomedical Research, Cambridge, MA.


The author would like to thank Graham Allcock and Marianne Wells of CircleScience for providing writing assistance, which was funded by Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.


1. Hunt SA, et al. 2009 focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2005 Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Management of Heart Failure in Adults. A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines developed in collaboration with the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2009;53:e1-90.

2. Go AS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2013 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2013;127:e6-245.

3. Krum H, Gilbert RE. Demographics and concomitant disorders in heart failure. Lancet 2003;362:147-58.

4. McMurray JJ, et al. ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure 2012: The Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure 2012 of the European Society of Cardiology. Developed in collaboration with the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2012;33:1787-847.

5. Mangiafico S, et al. Neutral endopeptidase inhibition and the natriuretic peptide system: an evolving strategy in cardiovascular therapeutics. Eur Heart J 2013;34:886-93.

6. Schrier RW, et al. Therapy of heart failure. Kidney Int 2000;57:1418-25.

7. Brewster UC, et al. The renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system: cardiorenal effects and implications for renal and cardiovascular disease states. Am J Med Sci 2003;326:15-24.

8. Levin ER, et al. Natriuretic peptides. N Engl J Med 1998;339:321-8.

9. Boerrigter G, Burnett Jr JC. Recent advances in natriuretic peptides in congestive heart failure. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2004;13:643-52.

10. Kenny AJ, et al. Hydrolysis of human and pig brain natriuretic peptides, urodilatin, C-type natriuretic peptide and some C-receptor ligands by endopeptidase-24.11. BiochemJ 1993;291:83-8.

11. Martinez-Rumayor A, et al. Biology of the natriuretic peptides. Am J Cardiol 2008;101(Suppl):3A-8A.

12. Nathisuwan S, Talbert RL. A review of vasopeptidase inhibitors: a new modality in the treatment of hypertension and chronic heart failure. Pharmacotherapy 2002;22:27-42.

13. Marcus LS, et al. Hemodynamic and renal excretory effects of human brain natriuretic peptide infusion in patients with congestive heart failure. A double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized crossover trial. Circulation 1996;94:3184-9.

14. Rubattu S, et al. Natriuretic peptides: an update on bioactivity, potential therapeutic use, and implication in cardiovascular diseases. Am J Hypertens 2008;21:733-41.

15. Hayashi D, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits cardiomyocyte hypertrophy through mitogen-activated protein kinase phosphatase-1. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2004;322:310-9.

16. Izumiya Y, et al. Chronic C-type natriuretic peptide infusion attenuates angiotensin II-induced myocardial superoxide production and cardiac remodeling. Int J VascMed 2012;246058. 246058.

17. Moro C, Lafontan M. Natriuretic peptides and cGMP signaling control of energy homeostasis. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2013;304:H358-68.

18. Welsh P, McMurray JJ. B-type natriuretic peptide and glycaemia: an emerging metabolic pathway? Diabetologia 2012;55:1240-3.

19. Souza SC, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide regulates lipid mobilization and oxygen consumption in human adipocytes by activating AMPK. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2011;410:398-403.

20. Birkenfeld AL, et al. Atrial natriuretic peptide induces postprandial lipid oxidation in humans. Diabetes 2008;57:3199-204.

21. Borradaile NM, Schaffer JE. Lipotoxicity in the heart. Curr Hypertens Rep 2005;7:412-7.

22. Sarzani R, et al. Angiotensin II stimulates and atrial natriuretic peptide inhibits human visceral adipocyte growth. Int J Obes 2008;32:259-67.

23. Cannone V, et al. A genetic variant of the atrial natriuretic peptide gene is associated with cardiometabolic protection in the general community. J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:629-36.

24. Miller WL, et al. Comparison of mass spectrometry and clinical assay measurements of circulating fragments of B-type natriuretic peptide in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2013;4:355-60.

25. Fielitz J, et al. Neutral endopeptidase is activated in cardiomyocytes in human aortic valve stenosis and heart failure. Circulation 2002;105:286-9.

26. Charloux A, et al. Mechanisms of renal hyporesponsiveness to ANP in heart failure. Eur J Clin Invest 2003;33:769-78.

27. Ferro CJ, et al. Inhibition of neutral endopeptidase causes vasoconstriction of human resistance vessels in vivo. Circulation 1998;97:2323-30.

28. Deddish PA, et al. N-domain-specific substrate and C-domain inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme: angiotensin (1-7) and keto-ACE. Hypertension 1998;31:912-7.

29. Pinheiro SV, Simoes E Silva AC. Angiotensin converting enzyme 2, angiotensin-(1-7), and receptor MAS axis in the kidney. Int J Hypertens 2012;22:224-33.

30. Byrd JB, et al. Dipeptidyl peptidase IV in angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor-associated angioedema. Hypertension 2008;51:141-7.

31. Richards AM, et al. Chronic inhibition of endopeptidase 24.11 in essential hypertension: evidence for enhanced atrial natriuretic peptide and angiotensin II. J Hypertens 1993;11:407-16.

32. Northridge DB, et al. Comparison of the short-term effects of candoxatril, an orally active neutral endopeptidase inhibitor, and frusemide in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure. Am Heart J 1999;138:1149-57.

33. Westheim AS, et al. Hemodynamic and neuroendocrine effects for candoxatril and frusemide in mild stable chronic heart failure. J Am Coll Cardiol 1999;34:1794-801.

34. Newby DE, et al. Candoxatril improves exercise capacity in patients with chronic heart failure receiving angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition. Eur Heart J 1998;19:1808-13.

35. Margulies KB, et al. Angiotensin inhibition potentiates the renal responses to neutral endopeptidase inhibition in dogs with congestive heart failure. J Clin Invest 1991;88:1636-42.

36. Packer M, et al. Comparison of omapatrilat and enalapril in patients with chronic heart failure: the Omapatrilat Versus Enalapril Randomized Trial of Utility in Reducing Events (OVERTURE). Circulation 2002;106:920-6.

37. Fryer RM, et al. Effect of bradykinin metabolism inhibitors on evoked hypotension in rats: rank efficacy of enzymes associated with bradykinin-mediated angioedema. Br J Pharmacol 2008;153:947-55.

38. Cilia La Corte AL, et al. A functional XPNPEP2 promoter haplotype leads to reduced plasma aminopeptidase P and increased risk of ACE inhibitor-induced angioedema. Hum Mutat 2011;32:1326-31.

39. Toh S, et al. Comparative risk for angioedema associated with the use of drugs that target the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system. Arch Intern Med 2012;172:1582-9.

40. Campbell DJ, et al. Losartan increases bradykinin levels in hypertensive humans. Circulation 2005;111:315-20.

41. Pu Q et al. Effects of combined AT1 receptor antagonist/NEP inhibitor on vascular remodeling and cardiac fibrosis in SHRSP. J Hypertens 2008;26:322-33.

42. Von Lueder TG, et al. Renin-angiotensin blockade combined with natriuretic peptide system augmentation: novel therapeutic concepts to combat heart failure. Circ Heart Fail 2013;6:594-605.

43. Hegde LG, et al. Concomitant angiotensin AT1 receptor antagonism and neprilysin inhibition produces omapatrilat-like antihypertensive effects without promoting tracheal plasma extravasation in the rat. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol 2011;57:495-504.

44. Feng L, et al. LCZ696: a dual-acting sodium supramolecular complex. Tetrahedron Lett 2012;53:275-6.

45. Gu J, et al. Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of LCZ696, a novel dual-acting angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi). J Clin Pharmacol 2010;50:401-14.

46. Kobalava Z, et al. Blood pressure lowering and natriuretic effects of LCZ696 in patients with hypertension: a randomized, double-blind, controlled, crossover study. In: Poster presented at 28th Annual Scientific

Meeting and Exposition of the American Society of Hypertension (ASH); 2013.

47. Ruilope LM, et al. Blood-pressure reduction with LCZ696, a novel dual-acting inhibitor of the angiotensin II receptor and neprilysin: a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, active comparator study. Lancet 2010;375:1255-66.

48. Sun N, et al. Efficacy and safety of three doses of LCZ696 in Asian hypertensive patients. J Hypertens 2011;29(e.Suppl. B). e18, G-008.

49. Kobalava Z, et al. Natriuretic peptide inhibition in the presence of angiotensin receptor blockade following short-term treatment with LCZ696 in heart failure patients: effect on ANP, BNP, NT-proBNP and cGMP. Eur Heart J 2011;32(Abstract Suppl.):784-5.

50. Jordaan P, et al. Changes in RAAS (renin angiotensin aldosterone system) biomarkers in patients with stable chronic heart failure following short-term angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor (ARNI) treatment. SA Heart 2011;8:236.

51. McMurray JJ, et al. Dual angiotensin receptor and neprilysin inhibition as an alternative to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibition in patients with chronic systolic heart failure: rationale for and design of the Prospective comparison of ARNI with ACEI to Determine Impact on Global Mortality and morbidity in Heart Failure trial (PARADIGM-HF). Eur J Heart Fail 2013;15:1062-73.

52. Solomon SD, et al. The angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitor LCZ696 in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: a phase 2 double-blind randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2012;380:1387-95.

53. Komajda M, et al. Factors associated with outcome in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: findings from the Irbesartan in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction Study (I-PRESERVE). Circ Heart Fail 2011;4:27-35.

54. Brenyo A, et al. Cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces left atrial volume and the risk of atrial tachyarrhythmias in MADIT-CRT (Multicenter Automatic Defibrillator Implantation Trial with Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy). J Am Coll Cardiol 2011;58:1682-9.

55. Zile MR, et al. Prevalence and significance of alterations in cardiac structure and function in patients with heart failure and a preserved ejection fraction. Circulation 2011;124:2491-501.