Scholarly article on topic 'Development of bio-based fine chemical production through synthetic bioengineering'

Development of bio-based fine chemical production through synthetic bioengineering Academic research paper on "Agricultural biotechnology"

Share paper
Academic journal
Microb Cell Fact
OECD Field of science

Academic research paper on topic "Development of bio-based fine chemical production through synthetic bioengineering"


Development of bio-based fine chemical production through synthetic bioengineering

Hara et al.

Bio Med Central

Hara et al. Microbial Cell Factories 2014,13:173

Hara et al. Microbial Cell Factories (2014) 13:173 DOI 10.1186/s12934-014-0173-5


REVIEW Open Access

Development of bio-based fine chemical production through synthetic bioengineering

Kiyotaka Y Hara1, Michihiro Araki1, Naoko Okai1, Satoshi Wakai1, Tomohisa Hasunuma1 and Akihiko Kondo2*


Fine chemicals that are physiologically active, such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, nutritional supplements, flavoring agents as well as additives for foods, feed, and fertilizer are produced by enzymatically or through microbial fermentation. The identification of enzymes that catalyze the target reaction makes possible the enzymatic synthesis of the desired fine chemical. The genes encoding these enzymes are then introduced into suitable microbial hosts that are cultured with inexpensive, naturally abundant carbon sources, and other nutrients. Metabolic engineering create efficient microbial cell factories for producing chemicals at higher yields. Molecular genetic techniques are then used to optimize metabolic pathways of genetically and metabolically well-characterized hosts. Synthetic bioengineering represents a novel approach to employ a combination of computer simulation and metabolic analysis to design artificial metabolic pathways suitable for mass production of target chemicals in host strains. In the present review, we summarize recent studies on bio-based fine chemical production and assess the potential of synthetic bioengineering for further improving their productivity.

Keywords: Fine chemical, Synthetic bioengineering, Metabolic engineering, Enzymatic synthesis, Microbial fermentation, Bioinformatics


Physiologically active fine chemicals such as pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, nutritional supplements, flavoring agents as well as additives for foods, feed, and fertilizer are produced enzymatically or through microbial fermentation. Although many of these compounds are present naturally, few are commercially available, because most are present in low abundance and may be difficult and expensive to purify. These disadvantages are overcome by bio-based fine chemical synthesis.

Bio-based fine chemical production is summarized in Figure 1. The enzymes are isolated from diverse organisms and are used in purified form in vitro or expressed by a suitable host cell.

The advantage of microbial fermentation is that the supply of components required for growth of the host strain and synthesis of the product can be derived from inexpensive sources of carbon, nitrogen, trace elements, and energy [1]. In particular, coproduction of several fine

* Correspondence:

2Department of ChemicalScience and Engineering, Graduate Schoolof Engineering, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodaicho, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan Fulllist of author information is available at the end of the article

chemicals from common carbon sources is more economical. The conditional requirements to fulfill the price advantages for the production of target fine chemicals are rapid cell growth to high density, and high cellular content and easy extraction of target fine chemicals. The bio-production of fine chemicals is typically performed at lower temperatures compared with those required for chemical syntheses, and important advantages of bio-based fine chemical production are cost-effectiveness and the use of processes that are not hazardous to the environment.

Synthetic bioengineering represents a recently developed novel approach to create optimized microbial cell factories for efficient production of target compounds through fermentation (Figure 1). Synthetic bioengineering is achieved using genetic engineering strategies designed according to artificial metabolic maps generated by computer simulation. Metabolomic data are critical to redesign a rational artificial metabolic map in which metabolic sources flow efficiently into the target compound. The concentrations of enzyme and substrates are readily controlled in an enzymatic reaction mixture; however, this is difficult in fermentations because precursors may be shunted through different metabolic pathways.

O© 2014 Hara et al.; licensee BioMed Central. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative BlORflCCl Central Commons Attribution License (, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Synthesis Fermentation m Mutation

Figure 1 Bio-based fine chemical production through synthetic bioengineering. Enzymes convert substrates to the fine chemical of interest with or without a coenzyme. The enzymatic synthesis system is introduced into a microbial host strain to develop a microbial cell factory (blue arrow). The microbial system converts a common source into various fine chemicals, and they are accumulated in cells or in the medium. The productivity of a microbial cell factory is improved by genetic engineering of metabolic pathways (e.g. heterologous expression, overexpression, down-regulation, deletion, or mutation) according to an artificialmetabolic map designed by computer simulation. Further, synthetic bioengineering (gray arrows) improves productivity by additional metabolic engineering according to the artificial map redesigned by the metabolic data of the microbialcellfactory.

Thus, synthetic bioengineering plays a critical role in controlling metabolic pathways to supply the optimal substrate ratios. To develop highly productive microbial fermentation systems for producing fine chemicals, the genes encoding the required enzymes are introduced into an appropriate host strain (Figure 1). Thus, the key for selecting the host strain, target metabolic pathways, or both to improve the production of fine chemicals by fermentation is the ability to genetically engineer modifications to the relevant metabolic pathways. Escherichia coli is often selected as the first candidate for producing target enzymes because of its well-developed genetic engineering system and its ability to express high levels of genes encoding target enzymes. In contrast, microorganisms such as Saccha-romyces cerevisiae, Bacillus strains, Streptomyces strains, Corynebacterium glutamicum, and Aspergillus oryzae are selected as a host for fermentations depending on their specific metabolic pathways that are required to synthesize target products.

Here we summarize recently developed, well-characterized bio-based systems for producing the compounds as follows: y-aminobutyric acid (GABA), isoprenoids, aromatics, peptides, polyphenols, and oligosaccharides (Table 1). The developmental stages of these systems are different, and they illustrate the great potential of synthetic bioengineering approaches for producing all bio-based fine chemicals in the future.

The microbiological production of GABA serves as an excellent first example of how a system can be improved

to increase yields (Table 2). GABA is an amino acid, which is not present naturally in proteins, that is synthesized by microorganisms, animals, and plants [2]. GABA functions as a neurotransmitter signals decreases blood pressure [3] and is used in functional foods and pharmaceuticals [4]. GABA, which was originally identified in traditional fermented foods such as cheese, yogurt [5] and kimchi [6], is synthesized through the alpha-decarboxylation of L-glutamate catalyzed by glutamate decarboxylase (GAD, EC [2]. GABA is produced by lactic acid bacteria (LABs) such as Lactobacillus para-casei [7], L. buchneri [6], and L. brevis [8,9] (Table 2), and the latter produces high yields of GABA through fed-batch processes [10].

Corynebacterium glutamicum is an important industrial microorganism because of its ability to produce high levels of L-glutamate, and recombinant strains of C. glutamicum that express GADs from L. brevis [12,14] or Escherichia coli [13] produce GABA from glucose (Table 2). Disrupting the gene that encodes protein kinase G affects the function of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase in the TCA cycle, alters metabolic flux toward glutamate [16], and enhances the yields of GABA produced by a GAD-expressing strain of C. glutamicum [15]. Because C. glutamicum is generally recognized as safe, the system for GABA fermentation can be applied to the production of GABA as a component of food additives and pharmaceuticals.


Isoprenoids represent the most diverse group of natural products comprising more than 40,000 structurally

Table 1 Bio-based fine chemicals

Chemical category Example structure


Production types

y-aminobutyric acid (GABA)

Cosmetics Microbial fermentation


Food additive


Aromatic compound


Cinnamic acid

Medicine Cosmetics

Nutritionalsupplement Flavoring agent Food additive Feed additive Fertilizer additive

Medicine Cosmetics

Nutritionalsupplement Flavoring agent Food additive

Microbial fermentation

Microbial fermentation




Microbial fermentation



O Cosmetics

Glutathione Nutritionalsupplement Food additive Feed additive Fertilizer additive

Enzymatic production/ Microbial fermentation



Medicine Cosmetics

Nutritionalsupplement Flavoring agent Food additive Feed additive Fertilizer additive

Microbial fermentation

Table 1 Bio-based fine chemicals (Continued)



Medicine Cosmetics

Nutritionalsupplement Flavoring agent Food additive Feed additive Fertilizer additive

Enzymatic production

distinct compounds that are present in all classes of living organisms. These molecules play key roles in respiration and electron transport, maintenance of membrane fluidity, hormone signaling, photosynthesis, antioxidation as well as subcellular localization and regulation of protein activities [17]. Certain isoprenoids such as carotenoids are produced commercially as nutritional and medicinal additives [18].

Despite their enormous structural diversity, isoprenoids are biologically synthesized through consecutive condensations of five-carbon precursors, isopentenyl diphos-phate (IPP), and its allyl isomer dimethylallyl diphosphate (DMAPP) (Figure 2). IPP and DMAPP are synthesized via either the mevalonate (MVA) pathway in most eukaryotes or the 2-C-methyl-D-erythrito-l,4-phosphate (MEP) pathway in prokaryotes. In higher plants, the MVA and MEP pathways function in the cytosol and plastid, respectively [19-21]. The five-carbon precursors are condensed by pre-nyltransferase to form prenyl pyrophosphates such as gera-nyl pyrophosphate (GPP), farnesyl pyrophosphate (FPP),

geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP), and several polypre-nyl pyrophosphates [17]. The prenyl pyrophosphates are converted into monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, diterpenes, triterpenes, tetraterpenes, and polyprenyl side chains. The chemical diversity of isoprenoids is determined by specific terpene synthases and terpene-modifying enzymes, particularly cytochromes P450 [22].

Various synthetic bioengineering approaches improve isoprenoid production by microorganisms such as E. coli and S. cerevisiae. Examples include the synthesis of triter-penoids amorpha-4,11-diene and artemisinic acid, precursors of the antimalarial agent artemisinin and the precursor of the major antineoplastic agent taxol diter-penoid taxa-4(5),11(12)-diene [23-31]. The tetraterpenoids (carotenoids) such as astaxanthin are also synthesized by synthetic bioengineering approaches [32,33].

Isoprene, the simplest isoprenoid, is used to synthesize pharmaceuticals, pesticides, fragrances, and synthetic rubber. E. coli strains engineered to express the Poplus alba gene (IspS) encoding isoprene synthase and the

Table 2 Microbial fermentation of GABA

Strains Source or engineered phenotype Substrates Yield (g/L) Scale (L) Reference

L paracasei NFRI7415 Isolated from fermented crucians MSG 31.1 - Komatsuzaki et al., 2005 [7]

L. buchneri MS Isolated from Kimchi MSG, Saccharides 25.8 - Cho et al., 2007 [6]

S. salivarius subsp. thermophilus Y2 Starter for yoghurt and cheese MSG 7.98 0.4 Yang et al., 2008 [5]

L. brevis NCL912 Isolated from Paocai MSG 35.6 0.1 Li et al., 2010 [4]

L-glutamate (fed-batch fermentation) 102.8 3.0 Li et al., 2010 [10]

TCCC13007 Isolated from pickles MSG (2-step fermentation) 61 3.0 Zhang et al., 2012 [8]

E. coli gadB (L. lactis) MSG 76.2 1.5 Park et al., 2013 [11]

C. glutamicum gadRCB2 (L brevis) Glucose 2.15 0.02 Shi et al., 2011 [12]

gadB (E. coli) Glucose 12.3 0.02 Takahashi et al., 2012 [13]

gadB1B2 (L brevis) Glucose, urea 27.1 1.2 Shi et al., 2013 [14]

ApknG, gadB (E. coli) Glucose 31.1 0.02 Okai et al., 2014 [15]

MVA pathway



Acetyl-CoA Pyruvate GAP,

Acetoacetyl-CoA DXP


MEP pathway

HMG-CoA reductase



IPP isomerase synthase IPP <-> DMAPP -> Isoprene

GPP ^ pyrophosphatase


GPP synthase

Monoterpene synthase ^

synthase . Sesquiterpene

- Monoterpenes

3-Carene, Limonene, Linalool, a-Pinene, Terpinene





Artemisinic acid, Nootkatone

Amorphadiene, Bisabolene, Caryophyllene, Cubebol, Patchoulol, a-Santalene, Valencene








Avietadiene, Casbene, Kaur-15-ene, Kaur-16-ene, Levopimaradiene, Taxadiene

» Tetraterpenes

Astaxanthin, pi-Carotene, Lycopene

Figure 2 Biosynthetic pathway of isoprenoids produced by recombinant microorganisms. Abbreviations: DXP, 1-deoxy-D-xylulose-5-phosphate; MEP, 2-C-methyl-D-erythritol-4-phosphate; HMBPP, hydroxymethylbutenyl-4-diphosphate; IPP, isopentenyldiphosphate; DMAPP, dimethylallyldiphosphate; GPP, geranyl diphosphate; FPP, farnesyl diphosphate; GGPP, geranylgeranyldiphosphate; HMG-CoA, 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-CoA.

S. cerevisiae MVA pathway genes produce 532 mg/L of isoprene under fed-batch conditions [34]. A strain of the cyanobacterium Synechocystis, which was engineered to express IspS from kudzu, synthesizes isoprene photosyn-thetically [35].

Monoterpenes are used as aromatic additives in food, wine, and cosmetics. Certain monoterpenes exhibit antimicrobial, antiparasitic, and antiviral activities [36]. In S. cerevisiae, geraniol and linalool are produced from GPP by the expression of genes encoding geraniol synthase and linalool synthase (LIS), respectively [37-40]. Expression of the gene encoding Picea abies 3-carene cyclase in E. coli generates a range of monoterpenes, including a-pinene, myrcene, sabinene, 3-carene, y-terpinene, limonene, |3-phellandrene, a-terpinene, and terpinolene [41].

Sesquiterpenes exhibit anticancer, cytotoxic, and antibiotic properties as well as their characteristic flavors and aromas, making them industrially relevant compounds [17]. Valencene, cubebol, patchoulol, and a-santalene are produced by expressing heterologous sesquiterpene synthase genes in S. cerevisiae [42-47]. Coexpression of the genes encoding valencene synthase gene and a P450 mono-oxygenase in S. cerevisiae generates nootkatone that is industrially produced as a flavoring agent and fragrance [48]. The diterpenoid levopimaradiene is produced at high yield (700 mg/L) through combinatorial protein

engineering of plant-derived GGPP synthase and levo-pimaradiene synthase expressed by an E. coli strain with enhanced carbon flux toward IPP and DMAPP [49]. Miltiradiene, the precursor of tanshinones that belongs to a group of bioactive diterpenoids present in the Chinese medicinal herb Salvia miltiorrhizha, accumulates in a S. cerevisiae strain that expresses genes encoding S. miltior-rhiza copalyl diphosphate synthase and kaurene synthases homolog [50,51]. Few attempts were made to metabo-lically engineer triterpene production, because the genes encoding components of its biosynthetic pathway are unknown; Kirby et al. isolated a gene encoding |3-amyrin synthase from Artemisia annua and used it to produce P-amyrin in S. cerevisiae [52].

Elevating the levels of precursor pools based on improving carbon flux are efficient strategies to enhance isoprenoid production by recombinant microbial strains (Table 3). Scalcinati et al. adopted multiple metabolic engineering strategies for a-santalene production that were designed to increase precursor and cofactor supply by improving metabolic flux toward FPP and modifying the ammonium assimilation pathway, respectively [45,46]. The gene encoding 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase lacking its transmembrane region was expressed to avoid feedback regulation by sterols [45,46]. Repression of ERG9 that encodes squalene synthase and


Host strains Genetic engineeringa

Strategy for flux control







E. coli E. coli

E. coli

S. cerevisiae

S. cerevisiae


Artemisinic acid (Amorpha-4,11-diene) E. coli

S. cerevisiae

He: B. subtilis dxs, dxr and P. alba IspS

He: P. alba IspS

Oe: MVA pathway genes

He: H. pluvialis IPIisomerase and P. abies 3- carene cyclase genes

Oe: dxs, IspA variant

He: O. basiilcum geraniolsynthase gene

Mu: ERG20

He: C. breweri LIS

Oe: tHMG1

He: S. cerevisiae HMGS, tHMG1, ERG12, ERG8, MVD1, H. pluvialis ispA and A. annua ADS

Oe: atoB and idi

He: A. annua ADS and CYP71AV1

Oe: tHMG1, ERG20 and Upc2-1

Dr: ERG9

He: A. annua ADS, CYP71AV1, CPR1, CYB5, ALDH1 and ADH1

Oe: MVA pathway genes, tHMGR, and ERG20

-Improvement of MEP pathway flux 314 mg/L

-Integration of heterologous 532 mg/L

MVA pathway

-Improvement of flux toward GPP

-Repression of FPP synthesis 5 mg/L

-Improvement of MVA pathway flux

-Integration of heterologous MVA pathway

-Overexpression of FPP synthase gene

-Overexpression of tHMGR and FPP synthase genes

-Up regulation of globaltranscription activity

-Repression of squalene synthesis

-Integration of heterologous MVA 25 g/L


-Overexpression of tHMGR and FPP synthase genes

-Repression of squalene synthesis

Zhao et al., 2011 [30] Yang et al., 2012 [34]

3 jg/L/OD600 Reiling et al., 2004 [41]

Fischer et al., 2011 [40]

132.66 jg/L Rico et al., 2010 [39]

1.2 mg/L Martin et al., 2003 [53]

153 mg/L Ro et al., 2006 [54]

Paddon et al., 2013 [55]

Dr: ERG9








E coli He: G. biloba GGPPS and LPS

Oe: dxs, idi, ispD and ispF

S. cerevisiae Oe: S. cerevisiae FPPS/P. cablin PTS (chimera)

Dr: ERG9

S. cerevisiae He: C. lansium santalene synthase Oe: tHMG1, FPPS, GDH2 and Upc2-1 Dr: ERG9

De: GDH1, LPP1, DPP1

He: C. lansium santalene synthase

Oe: Adh2, Ald6, ACS variant, Erg10 and tHMG1

De: CIT2 and MLS1

S. cerevisiae He: A. thaliana FPP synthase and C. sinensis TPS1 genes in mitochondria

Oe: tHMG1

E. coli Oe: dxs, IspA variant

He: H. pluvialis IPI isomerase and R. communis casbene cyclase genes

S. cerevisiae He: S. acidocaldarium GGPPS and S. miltiorrhizha CPS and KSL

Oe: tHMG1, ERG20, BTS1 and Upc2-1

-Improvement of flux toward 700 mg/L


-Combinatorialmutation in GGPP synthase and LPS

-Avoidance of intermediate loss 40.9 mg/L

-Repression of squalene synthesis

-Overexpression of tHMGR and FPP 92 mg/L


-Increment of cofactor supply

-Up regulation of global transcription activity

-Repression of squalene synthesis

-Minimization of flux toward farnosol

-Improvement of flux toward 8.3 mg/L

acetoacetyl-CoA from ethanol

-Avoidance of acetyl-CoA consumption

-Overexpression of tHMGR 1.5 mg/L

-Mitochondrialexpression of FPP synthase and valencene synthase genes

-Improvement of flux toward GGPP 0.3 mg/L

-Overexpression of tHMGR, FPP synthase 8.8 mg/L and GGPP synthase genes

-Up regulation of globaltranscription activity

Leonard et al., 2010 [49]

Albertsen et al., 2011 [43]

Scalcinati et al., 2012 [42]

Chen et al., 2013 [44]

Farhi et al., 2011 [44]

Reiling et al., 2004 [41]

Dai et al., 2012 [47]

Taxadiene E. coli He: S. acidocaldariums GGPP synthase and T. chinensis taxadiene synthase genes Oe: dxs, ispC, ispF, idi, tHMG1 and Upc2-1 -Improvement of MEP pathway flux -Overexpression of GGPP synthase 1 g/L Ajikumar et al., 2010 [24]

S. cerevisiae He: S. acidocaldariums GGPP synthase and T. chinensis taxadiene synthase genes Oe: tHMG1 and Upc2-1 -Overexpression of tHMGR -Up regulation of globaltranscription activity 8.7 mg/L Engels et al., 2008 [31]


ß-Amyrin S. cerevisiae Oe: tHMG1 He: A. annua ß-amyrin synthase gene Dr: ERG7 -Overexpression of tHMGR -Repression of lanosterolsynthesis 6 mg/L Kirby et al., 2008 [52]

aTypes of genetic engineering: He, Heterologous expression; Oe, Overexpression of self-cloning gene(s); Dr, down regulation; De, Deletion; Mu, Mutation.

the deletion of LPP1 and DPP1 that encode enzymes that dephosphorylate FPP minimized the formation of by-products such as sterols and farnesol. Efficient provision of acetyl-CoA, the precursor of the MVA pathway, was critical to improve a-santalene synthesis [47].


Aromatic compounds such as vanillin, cinnamic acid, p-hydroxycinnamic acid, and caffeic acid are used as flavoring agents or food ingredients (Table 4). Vanillin, which was originally extracted from cured seed pods of the orchid Vanilla planifolia, is mainly synthesized from petroleum oil or lignin. Alternatively, vanillin is produced by bioconversion of fossil carbon, guaiacol, eugenol, or isoeugenol [56]. Vanillin was produced from glucose by fermentation using an engineered strain of barker's yeast [57]. To decrease the cytotoxic effects of converting intercellular 3-dehydroshikiminate to vanillin, genes encoding UDP-glucose transferase and o-methyltransferase were introduced into baker's yeast to produce vanillyl glucoside (VG) [58]. Further, the Minimization of Metabolic Adjustments (MOMA) [59] and OptGene [60] algorithms were used to improve VG production in yeast strains [58,61].

Cinnamic acid is used as a cinnamon flavoring agent and is antibacterial. Although cinnamic acid occurs abundantly in plants as a precursor of phenylpropanoids, it is produced industrially using synthetic organic chemistry. Cinnamic acid is produced from sugar by phenylalanine-ammonia lyase (PAL, EC expressed in a solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida strain [62] or by Streptomyces lividans, which is an ideal host, because its endogenous polyketide synthesis (PKS) pathways synthesize phenyl-propanoids [64]. A phenylpropanoid, p-hydroxycinnamic acid (p-coumaric acid), a constituent of the plant cell wall, which is covalently linked to polysaccharides and lignins, acts as an antioxidant in humans [63]. E. coli and S. cerevisiae strains engineered to express PAL/tyrosine-ammonia lyase (TAL, EC [68] or P. putida engineered to express PAL [69] produce p-hydroxycinnamic acid from glucose. Further, p-hydroxycinnamic acid can be produced from cellulose by S. lividans coexpressing TAL and endo-glucanase (EG, EC 3.2.1. 4) [70].


Alkaloids are nitrogen-containing compounds derived from amino acids such as histidine, lysine, ornithine, tryptophan, and tyrosine [71] that are present in plants. Most are used in biological and medicinal applications. They are mainly extracted from plants for practical use, but the yields are very low because low levels of alkaloids are produced by plants. Further, alkaloids consist of complex chemical backbones and structures with one or more chiral centers, which make it difficult to supply sufficient amounts of alkaloids for practical use through

chemical synthesis. Therefore, development of alternative approaches is expected to characterize and engineer the biosynthetic pathways in microbial and plant cells. Benzylisoquinoline alkaloids (BIAs) such as (s)-reticuline and (s)-scoulerine, which are categorized into one of the major alkaloid subclasses, include the analgesics codeine and morphine, the antimicrobial berberine, and the anticancer drug noscapine (Figure 3 right). Both (s)-reticuline and (s)-scoulerine are synthesized through the production of (R, S)-norlaudanosoline from aromatic amino acids (tyrosine and phenylalanine). The increasing volume of information on the genome sequences of alkaloid-producing plants makes it possible to identify and engineer genes in biosynthetic pathways to produce BIAs in E. coli [72,73] and S. cerevisiae [74] through the production of (R, S)-norlaudanosoline from aromatic amino acids.

Minami et al. reconstructed the (S)-reticuline bio-synthetic pathways in E. coli using monoamine oxidase (MAO) from Micrococcus luteus and four genes from Coptis japonica to produce (S)-reticuline from dopamine. They introduced the genes encoding BBE (berberine bridge enzyme) and CYP80G2 (plant cytochrome P450 enzyme) of C. japonica into S. cerevisiae, because active forms of certain plant enzymes cannot be expressed in E. coli S. cerevisiae provides the advantage of compartmentalizing these proteins in the cytosol and endoplasmic reticulum (ER). The engineered S. cerevisiae is co-cultured with E. coli to produce BIA derivatives (S)-scoulerine and magnoflorine. Nakagawa et al. engineered the shikimate (SK) pathway in E. coli to increase the amount of L-tyrosine and produced (S)-reticuline from glucose or glycerol [73]. The BIA pathways downstream of the precursor (R, S)-norlaudanosoline were assembled in S. cerevisiae [74]. The expression levels of norcoclaurine 6-O-methyltransferase (6-OMT), coclaurine-N-methyltransferase (CNMT), and 3' -hydroxy- N-methylcoclaurine 4' -O-methyltransferase (4'-OMT), and a hydroxylation reaction catalyzed by cyto-chrome P450 80B1 (CYP80B1) derived from Thalictrum flavum or Papaver somniferum were optimized to produce (S)-reticuline. A human cytochrome P450 (CYP2D6) was expressed as well to produce the morphinan intermediate salutaridine [71]. Most recently, 10 genes from plant BIA pathways were introduced into S. cerevisiae to produce dihydrosanguinarine and its oxidized derivative sangui-narine from (R,S)-norlaudanosoline [75].

Coumarins are present in plants and are used as antibacterials, anticancer drugs, and anticoagulants. The biosynthetic pathways of coumarins diverge from that of phenylalanine/tyrosine as well as BIA (Figure 3 left). Recent findings that coumarin is formed by the action of two hydroxylases allowed reconstruction of its biosyn-thetic pathway in microbial cells. Lin et al. designed artificial biosynthetic pathways in E. coli [76] and produced scopoletin and umbelliferone from the corresponding

Table 4 Microbial fermentation of aromatic compounds



Genetic engineeringa


Yield (g/L) Reference


Vanillin ß-D-glucoside

Cinnamic acid

p-hydroxycinnamic acid (p-coumaric acid)

Caffeic acid

S. pombe He: 3-dehydroshikiminate dehydratase (3DSD), Aryl carboxylic acid reductase (ACAR, Nocardia sp.), o-methyltransferase (OMT), UDP-glycosyltransferase (UGT, A. thaliana)

S. cervisiae He: 3DSD, ACAR, OMT, UGT

S. cervisiae He: 3DSD, ACAR,

phosphopantetheine transferase (PPTase), hsOMT (Homo sapiens), UGT

De: pdc1gdh1]GDH2

S. cervisiae He: ACAR, hsOMT, Oe: GDH2 De: pdc1 gdh1 yprC

P. putida He: Phenylalanine ammmonia lyase (PAL, Rhodosporidium toruloides)

S. lividans He: PAL (Streptomyces maritimus)

S. cervisiae He: PAL/TAL (Rhodotorula glutinis), plant Cytochrome P450 (Cyt P450), Cyt reductase

E coli He: PAL/TAL (R. glutinis)

S. lividans He: Tyrosine ammmonia lyase (TAL, Rhodobacter sphaeroides)

He: TAL (R. sphaeroides), Endoglucanase (Thermobifida fusca)

P. putida He: PAL (Rhodosporidium toruloides)

Mu: phenylalanine bradytrophic

De: fcs

E. coli He: TAL (Saccharothrix


Mu: tyrAfbraroGfbr

De: tyrR

E. coli He: Cyt P450

(Rhodopseudomonas palustris)

He, Mu: Cyt P450

He: TAL, 4-coumarate hydroxylase (Sam5, S. espanaensis),

Mu: tyrAfbraroGfbr

De: tyrR




Glucose Glycerol









0.74 0.8

0.12 0.46 0.3 0.13

0.10 0.75 0.74 0.5

p-hydroxycinnamic acid 2.8 Cinnamic acid

Glucose 0.15

Hansen et al., 2009 [51]

Brochado et al., 2010 [52]

Brochado et al., 2013 [58]

Nijkamp et al., 2005 [62]

Noda et al., 2011

Vannelli et al., 2007 [62]

Kawai et al., 2013 [63]

Nijkamp et al., 2007 [

Kang et al., 2012 [65]

Furuya et al., 2012 [

Kang et al., 2012 [65]

Table 4 Microbial fermentation of aromatic compounds (Continued)

He: TAL (R. glutinis codon-optimized), 4-coumarate: CoA ligase (4CL), 4-coumarate 3-hydroxylase (Coum3H, S. espanaensis)

Mu: tyrAfbraroGfbr

De: tyrR pheA

Glucose Xylose

0.10 0.07

Zhang et al., 2013 [67]

aTypes of genetic engineering: He, Heterologous expression; Oe, Overexpression of self-cloning gene(s); Mu, Mutation; De, Deletion.

phenylpropanoid acids, ferulic acid, caffeic acid, and 4-coumaric acid. They used TAL to produce scopoletin and umbelliferone from aromatic amino acids. Further work was extended to identify a |3-ketoacyl-acyl carrier protein synthase III-like quinolone synthase from P. aeruginosa that contributes to the biosynthesis of high levels of 4-hydroxycoumarin by E. coli [77].


Enzymatic hydrolysis of proteins generates mixtures of peptides. In contrast, purified carnosine (|3-alanine-L-histidine) and antimicrobial peptides (e.g. gramicidin S, actinomycin, polymixin B, and vancomycin) are prepared from organisms that contain higher amounts compared with other organisms [78] (Table 5). Carnosine is synthesized from H-|3-Ala-NH2 using |3-aminopeptidase expressed

by E. coli and Pichia pastoris [79]. Physiologically active polypeptides such as e-poly-L-lysine (e-PL) and poly-y-glutamic acid (y-PGA) are produced by microbial fermentation. e-PL is characterized by the peptide bond between the a-carboxyl and e-amino groups of 25-35 L-lysine residues [80] and is produced by secretory fermentation of Streptomyces strains isolated from soil [81]. The yield of e-PL was enhanced using genome shuffling [82]. y-PGA is an unusual anionic polypeptide comprising D/L-glutamate monomers polymerized through y-glutamyl bonds [83]. y-PGA is produced by Bacillus strains from glutamate or glucose [84,85]. B. subtilis was engineered to increase y-PGA production by overexpression of y-PGA synthetase [86] or by deletion of y-PGA-degrading enzymes [87]. B. amyloliquefaciens was engineered to enhance y-PGA production by heterologous expression of the Vitreoscilla

Aromatic amino acids





4-coumaric acid Caffeic acid





Benzylisoquinoline alkaloids (BIAs)



Figure 3 Production of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids (BIAs) and coumarins from aromatic amino acids. BIAs and coumarins are synthesized from aromatic amino acids (tyrosine and phenylalanine) through corresponding intermediates.

Table 5 Enzymatic conversion and microbial fermentation of peptides

Compounds Strains Typesa Genetic engineeringb Substrates and components Maximum yield Scale Reference

Carnosine E. coli or Pichia pastoris E He: Ochrobactrium anthropi ß-aminopeptidase or Sphingosinicella xenopeptidilytica L-aminopeptidase- D-amidase H-p-Ala-NH2 4.5 g/L 200 mL Heyland et al., 2010 [79]

£-poly-lysine (ePL) Streptomyces strains F He: Genome shuffling Glucose 24.5 g/L 3L Li et al., 2013 [82]

poly-gamma-glutamate (Y-PGA) Bacillus subtilis F Oe: y-PGA synthetases Xylose Arabinose Glutamate 9.0 g/L 50 mL Ashiuchi et al., 2006 [86]

F De: y-PGA degradation enzymes Glutamate 48 g/L 20 mL Scoffone et al., 2013 [87]

Bacillus amyrolique-haciens F He: Vitreoscilla hemoglobin Sucrose 3.5 g/L 100 mL Zhang et al., 2013 [67]

F He: Vitreoscilla hemoglobin De: cwlO and epsA-O cluster Sucrose 5.1 g/L 100 mL Feng et al., 2014 [88]

E. coli F He: B. licheniformis y-PGA synthetases, glutamate racemase Glutamate 0.65 g/L 100 mL Cao et al., 2013 [89]

F He: B. amyloliquefaciens y-PGA synthetases, glutamate racemase Glucose 0.52 g/L 100 mL

Glutathione E. coli E De: Single genes related to ATP regenerating activity Glucose, Glutamate, Cysteine, Glycine 2.9 g/L 1 mL Hara et al., 2009 [90]

S. cerevisiae E Oe: GCS, GS Glucose, Glutamate, Cysteine, Glycine 0.8 g/L 20 mL Yoshida et al., 2011 [91]

S. cerevisiae F Oe: GCS De: pep12 Glucose 168 nmol/OD600 300 mL Suzuki et al., 2011 [92]

S. cerevisiae F Oe: GCS, Sulfate assimilation pathway genes Glucose 43.9 mg/L 20 mL Hara et al., 2012 [93]

Alanyl-glutamine E. coli E He: B. subtilis L-amino acid a-ligase Alanine, Glutamate 4.7 g/L 1 mL Tabata et al., 2005 [94]

E. coli F He: B. subtilis L-amino, a-ligase, L-alanine dehydrogenase De: dipeptidases, aminopeptidases Glucose 24.7 g/L 2L Tabata et al., 2007 [95]

E. coli E He: Sphingobacterium siyangensis a-amino acid ester acyltransferase L-alanine methylester hydrochlorid, Glutamine 79.3 g/L 300 mL Hirao et al., 2013 [96]

Dipeptides E. coli E He: Ralstonia solanacearum RSp1486a Amino acids, ATP, MgSO4 2.9 g/L (Phe-Cys) 500 |jL Kino et al., 2008a [97]

E He: B. licheniformis BL00235 Amino acids, ATP, MgSO4 1.2 g/L (Met-Ala) 1.6 mL Kino et al., 2008b [98]

E He: B. subtilis RizA Amino acids, ATP, MgSO4 0.8 g/L (Arg-Ser) 300 |jL Kino et al., 2009 [99]

aProduction types: E, Enzymatic production including permeable cell conversion; F, Fermentation.

bTypes of genetic engineering: He, Heterologous expression; Oe, Overexpression of self-cloning gene(s); De, Deletion.

gene (vgd) encoding hemoglobin to overcome the low concentration of dissolved oxygen [67,88]. In contrast, Chao et al. developed a y-PGA-producing E. coli strain by heterologous expression of y-PGA synthetase and glutamate racemase from B. licheniformis or B. amyloli-quefaciens [89].

The tri-peptide glutathione, which is the most abundant antioxidant, thiol-containing compound among organisms [100], is produced enzymatically and by microbial fermentation. Glutathione is synthesized from glucose via glutamic acid, cysteine, and glycine through two consecutive ATP-consuming reactions catalyzed by ATP consuming two enzymes: y-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GCS) and glutathione synthetase (GS). Enzymatic conversion of these substrates to glutathione was developed using permeabilized S. cerevisiae or E. coli overexpressing GCS and GS [91,101,102]. ATP regeneration is critical for improving the yields of glutathione, and a permeable cellular ATP-regenerating system was studied to provide an economical supply of ATP [101]. However, the efficiency of ATP regeneration for glutathione production is low [101]. To address this problem, the products of genes that increase ATP regeneration were systematically identified by generating E. coli mutants each with single deletions of nlpD, miaA, hcp, tehB, nudB, glgB, yggS, pgi, fis, add, rfaB, ydhL, or ptsP [90] from a single-gene deletion mutant library using high-throughput measurements of ATP regenerating activity [103]. Certain deletion mutants synthesized increased levels of glutathione [102]. These genes were classified into the following groups: (1) glycolytic pathway-related genes, (2) genes related to degradation of ATP or adenosine, (3) global regulatory genes, and (4) genes with unknown contributions to ATP regeneration. In contrast, improving ATP generation enhanced the enzymatic synthesis of glutathione by S. cerevisiae of about 1.7-fold [91]. Industrial glutathione production mainly uses yeast fermentation, because enzymatic synthesis of glutathione requires addition of substrates. Overexpression of GCS is critical for enhancing glutathione fermentation [92,93]. Enhancement of cysteine synthesis by engineering of sulfate metabolism also improved gluta-thione production [93]. In contrast, the overexpression of the transcription factors YAP1 and MET4 increased gluta-thione production [104-106]. Kiriyama et al. developed a fermentation system to efficiently produce extracellular glutathione by overexpression of a novel glutathione export ABC protein (Adp1p, Gxa1p) in S. cerevisiae [107].

A dipeptide L-alanyl-L-glutamine was enzymatically produced by Sphingobacterium siyangensis a-amino acid ester acyltransferase from L-alanine methyl ester hydro-chlorid and glutamine [96]. A Bacillus subtilis a-dipeptide synthase processing specificity for L-amino acids was discovered by Tabata et al. through in silico screening based on its amino acids similarity with members of the

carboxylate-amine/thiol ligase superfamily, such as those that catalyze the synthesis of D-alanyl-D-alanine and y-peptides [94]. They searched for the presence of an ATP grasp motif encoded by functional unknown genes in B. subtilis, because this motif is present in all enzymes of this superfamily [108,109] and showed that YwfEp exhibited dipeptide synthesis activity [94]. A variety of dipeptide synthases were subsequently identified using in silico screening based on amino acid sequence similarities to YwfEp [97-99]. Such screening approaches are useful for identifying peptide synthases with different substrate specificities. A microbial dipeptide fermentation system was developed by introducing the gene encoding YwfEp into E. coli and achieved [95].


Polyphenols such as phenolic acids, stilbenes, and flavo-noids are secondary metabolites present in plants [110]. Polyphenols were traditionally extracted from plant sources using solvents or were chemically synthesized. Moreover, these methods are expensive and may be detrimental to the environment [111]. Recently, a metabolic engineering approach makes possible effective production of bio-based polyphenols. Phenolic acids are simple polyphenols. For example, ferulic acid and caffeic acid are produced by genetically engineered E. coli strains [65,112] (see "Aromatics" section). These phenolic acids, which form the skeletal structures of complex polyphenols, stilbenes, and flavonoids are biosynthesized through further genetic engineering (see [113] for an excellent review).

The biosynthetic pathway of the complex polyphenols requires coenzyme A (CoA)-esterified cinnamates and malonyl-CoA. Recently, the stilbene resveratrol was bio-synthesized at high yields (2.3 g/L) by an E. coli strain [114] that was genetically engineered to enhance the production of malonyl-CoA to increase the supply of malonyl-CoA, which is used to synthesize fatty acids (see [115] for a review). Such metabolic engineering may further improve production. For example, the shikimic acid pathway, which produces phenylalanine and tyro-sine as starting materials in the de novo production of polyphenols, would serve as a target. Actinomycetes may serve as useful hosts for producing aromatic amino acids. Further, Aspergilli, for which genetic engineering tools are available, may serve as promising hosts for producing antibacterial polyphenols, because Aspergillus oryzae was used to produce fine chemicals [116,117].

In general, producing high yields of polyphenols by microorganisms is difficult, because these compounds are strong antioxidants, and some are antibacterials, anti-fungals, or both [118]. Therefore, further improvements require using insensitive hosts and the development of an on-site recovery method for continuous fermentation. A

membrane-purification process, which concentrates a target compound, would be implemented in such an on-site recovery and fermentation system. The combination of bio-based and engineering-based improvements would be required for producing high yields of polyphenols.


Oligosaccharides and rare sugars derived from the hydrolysis of plant polysaccharides are functionally diverse. Such oligosaccharides are categorized according to their mono-saccharide subunits. For example, fructo-, xylo-, and gentio-oligosaccharides consist of short chains of fructose, xylose, and glucose, respectively, and are produced by enzymatic hydrolysis of extracts of natural sources, because they are difficult to synthesize de novo using microorganisms. For example, xylo-oligosaccharides are produced from xylan by enzymatic hydrolysis [119,120]; however, the quality and quantity of products strongly depend on the source compared with de novo synthesis.

Because of this, bio-based fermentation is under study. For example, the thermophilic fungus Sporotrichum thermophile and a genetically engineered E. coli strain produce fructo-oligosaccharides [121] and inulo-oligosac-charides (derived from insulin) [122], respectively. These bioconversions are advantageous, because the host cells do not metabolize the oligosaccharide products. Moreover, the specific functional monosaccharide L-arabinose was prepared from xylose [123]. Further, the microbial fermentation of 2'-fucosyllactose from lactose by a genetically engineered E. coli strain has been reported [124]. 2'-Fuco-syllactose is a functional oligosaccharide present in human milk and protects newborns against infection by enteric pathogens [125].

The production of oligosaccharides requires the decomposition of polysaccharides or the polymerization of monosaccharides. Polymer-producing microorganisms would serve as promising hosts in a strategy based on the decomposition of polysaccharides. For example, the halo-philic cyanobacterium Arthrospira platensis produces spir-ulan, which is an inhibitor of enveloped virus replication [126]. Moreover, it produces glycogen by fixing carbon dioxide, and the glycogen content reaches 65% of dry cell weight under optimum conditions [127]. Such photosyn-thetic microorganisms would serve as promising hosts for the de novo production of oligosaccharides. Specifically, the genetic engineering of microorganisms that produce polysaccharide-degrading enzymes, glycosyltransferases, or both may facilitate attaining this goal. In addition to fermentation, such polysaccharide-accumulating microorganism would be useful as a sugar source for bio-based production. In the future, combinations of polysaccharide-producing microorganism and decomposing, transferase-producing microorganism, or both would improve the bio-based production of oligosaccharides.

Conclusion and future perspectives for the production of fine chemicals

Synthetic bioengineering employs molecular genetic approaches to engineer metabolic pathways to enhance the biosynthetic capabilities of well-characterized host strains to produce fine chemicals. These efforts include identifying the genes in plants and microbes encoding enzymes that catalyze the reactions of interest. Converting bio-based production of fine chemicals from enzymatic reactions to microbial fermentation reduces costs, because the latter uses less expensive substrates. Computational approaches are essential for synthetic bioengineering to increase yields, and an important aspect of designing strategies is to identify the initial key enzymatic reactions of a biosynthetic pathway (Figure 1). Using bioinformatics to mine genome and transcriptome data is the method of choice to identify novel enzymes and biosynthetic pathways to generate a wide range of compounds [128,129]. Sequence comparisons of putative and authentic genes allow the prediction of catalytic homologs and motifs with potentially new functions. Structural analyses such as active site modeling and docking simulation are alternative approaches. The availability of high-throughput sequencing technology and improved computational resources should accelerate synergy between bioinformatics and structural analyses to identify key enzymes from the vast reservoir of genetic and environmental data [130,131].

Once key enzymes are identified, one can move to pathway design and optimization for microbial production of the target compound. Several computational tools are available, such as BNICE [132], FMM [133], RetroPath [134], and DESHARKY [135] and M-path [136] for designing de novo metabolic pathways. These resources provide different views of metabolic pathways for micro-bial production that are generated using the enormous amount of information in metabolic pathway databases such as KEGG [137], MetaCyc [138] and BRENDA [139].

However, there are still limitations because of the computational complexity of possible combinations, and further improvements or other approaches will be required for precise and practical design of metabolic pathways. A standard method to optimize metabolic pathways is available as an alternative that is called flux balance analysis [140], which was developed to indicate how gene deletions and expression might be manipulated to distribute carbon toward chemicals of interest without inhibiting cell proliferation. Genome-scale models for some model organisms and an open-source platform (e.g. OptFlux) based on flux balance analysis allow the precise control of engineered metabolic pathways [141,142]. The extension of these tools will lead to further efficient production of fine chemicals by microbial cell factories.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests. Authors' contributions

HKY wrote Abstract, Introduction, "Peptides" and "Conclusion and future perspectives for the production of fine chemicals" sections, and organized the manuscript. MA wrote "Alkaloids" and "Conclusion and future perspectives for the production of fine chemicals" sections. NO wrote "GABA" and "Aromatics" sections. SW wrote "Polyphenols" and "Oligosaccharides" sections. TH outlined the manuscript and wrote "Isoprenoids" section. AK reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.


This review was supported by the Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, Creation of Innovation Centers for Advanced Interdisciplinary Research Areas (Innovative Bioproduction Kobe), MEXT, Japan.

Author details

Organization of Advanced Science and Technology, Kobe University, Nada, Kobe, Japan. 2Department of Chemical Science and Engineering, Graduate School of Engineering, Kobe University, 1-1 Rokkodaicho, Nada, Kobe 657-8501, Japan.

Received: 31 July 2014 Accepted: 23 November 2014 Published online: 14 December 2014


1. Johnson ET, Schmidt-Dannert C: Light-energy conversion in engineered microorganisms. Trends Biotechnol 2008, 26:682-689.

2. Fonda ML: L-Glutamate Decarboxylase from Bacteria. Methods Enzymol 1985, 113:11-16.

3. Hayakawa K, Kimura M, Kasaha K, Matsumoto K, Sansawa H, Yamori Y: Effect of a gamma-aminobutyric acid-enriched dairy product on the blood pressure of spontaneously hypertensive and normotensive Wistar-Kyoto rats. BrJNutr 2004, 92:411-417.

4. Li HX, Cao YS: Lactic acid bacterial cell factories for gamma-aminobutyric acid. Amino Acids 2010, 39:1107-1116.

5. Yang SY, Lu ZX, Lu FX, Bie XM, Jiao Y, Sun LJ, Yu B: Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Streptococcus salivarius subsp thermophilus Y2 under submerged fermentation. Amino Acids 2008, 34:473-478.

6. Cho YR, Chang JY, Chang HC: Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus buchneri isolated from kimchi and its neuroprotective effect on neuronal cells. J Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 17:104-109.

7. Komatsuzaki N, Kawamoto S, Momose H, Kimura T, Shima J: Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid (GABA) by Lactobacillus paracasei isolated from traditional fermented foods. Food Microbiol 2005, 22:497-504.

8. Zhang Y, Song L, Gao Q, Yu SM, Li L, Gao NF: The two-step biotransformation of monosodium glutamate to GABA by Lactobacillus brevis growing and resting cells. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012, 94:1619-1627.

9. Li HX, Qiu T, Gao DD, Cao YS: Medium optimization for production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912. Amino Acids 2010, 38:1439-1445.

10. Li HX, Qiu T, Huang GD, Cao YS: Production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Lactobacillus brevis NCL912 using fed-batch fermentation. Microb Cell Factories 2010, 9:85.

11. Park SJ, Kim EY, Noh W, Oh YH, Kim HY, Song BK, Cho KM, Hong SH, Lee SH, Jegal J: Synthesis of nylon 4 from gamma-aminobutyrate (GABA) produced by recombinant Escherichia coli. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2013, 36:885-892.

12. Shi F, Li Y: Synthesis of gamma-aminobutyric acid by expressing Lactobacillus brevis-derived glutamate decarboxylase in the Corynebacterium glutamicum strain ATCC 13032. Biotechnol Lett 2011, 33:2469-2474.

13. Takahashi C, Shirakawa J, Tsuchidate T, Okai N, Hatada K, Nakayama H, Tateno T, Ogino C, Kondo A: Robust production of gamma-amino butyric acid using recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum expressing glutamate decarboxylase from Escherichia coli. Enzym Microb Technol 2012, 51:171-176.

14. Shi F, Jiang J, Li Y, Xie Y: Enhancement of gamma-aminobutyric acid production in recombinant Corynebacterium glutamicum by co-expressing two glutamate decarboxylase genes from Lactobacillus brevis. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 40:1285-1296.

15. Okai N, Takahashi C, Hatada K, Ogino C, Kondo A: Disruption of pknG enhances production of gamma-aminobutyric acid by Corynebacterium glutamicum expressing glutamate decarboxylase. AMB Express 2014, 4:20.

16. Niebisch A, Kabus A, Schultz C, Weil B, Bott M: Corynebacterial protein kinase G controls 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activity via the phosphorylation status of the OdhI protein. J Biol Chem 2006, 281:12300-12307.

17. Gershenzon J, Dudareva N: The function of terpene natural products in the natural world. Nat Chem Biol 2007, 3:408-414.

18. Chang MCY, Keasling JD: Production of isoprenoid pharmaceuticals by engineered microbes. Nat Chem Biol 2006, 2:674-681.

19. Rohmer M, Knani M, Simonin P, Sutter B, Sahm H: Isoprenoid biosynthesis in bacteria: a novel pathway for the early steps leading to isopentenyl diphosphate. Biochem J 1993, 295:517-524.

20. Kuzuyama T, Seto H: Diversity of the biosynthesis of the isoprene units. Nat Prod Rep 2003, 20:171-183.

21. Hunter WN: The non-mevalonate pathway of isoprenoid precursor biosynthesis. J Biol Cell 2007, 282:21573-21577.

22. Misawa N: Pathway engineering for functional isoprenoids. Curr Opin Biotechnol

2011, 22:627-633.

23. Kein-Marcuschmer D, Ajikumar PK, Stephanopoulos G: Engineering microbial cell factories for biosynthesis of isoprenoid molecules: beyond lycopene. Trends Biotechnol 2007, 25:417-424.

24. Ajikumar PK, Xiao WH, Tyo KEJ, Wang Y, Simeon F, Leonard E, Mucha O, Phon TH, Pfeifer B, Stephanopoulos G: Isoprenoid pathway optimization for taxol precursor overproduction in Escherichia coli. Science 2010, 330:70-74.

25. Keasling JD: Synthetic biology and the development of tools for metabolic engineering. Metab Eng 2012, 14:189-195.

26. Westfall PJ, Pitera DJ, Lenihan JR, Eng D, Woolard FX, Regentin R, Horning T, Tsuruta H, Melis DJ, Owens A, Fickes S, Diola D, Benjamin KR, Keasling JD, Leavell MD, McPhee DJ, Renninger NS, Newman JD, Paddon CJ: Production of amorphadiene in yeast, and its conversion to dihydroartemisinic acid, precursor to the antimalarial agent artemisinin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

2012, 109:E111 -E118.

27. Marienhagen J, Bott M: Metabolic engineering of microorganisms for the synthesis of plant natural products. J Biotechnol 2013, 163:166-178.

28. Wriessnegger T, Pichler H: Yeast metabolic engineering - Targeting sterol metabolism and terpenoid formation. Prog Lipid Res 2013, 52:277-293.

29. Li Y, Pfeifer BA: Heterologous production of plant-derived isoprenoid products in microbes and the application of metabolic engineering and synthetic biology. Curr Opin Plant Biol 2014, 19:8-13.

30. Zhao Y, Yang J, Qin B, Li Y, Sun Y, Su S, Xian M: Biosynthesis of isoprene in Escherichia coli via methylerythritol phosphate (MEP) pathway. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 90:1915-1922.

31. Engels B, Dahm P, Jennewein S: Metabolic engineering of taxadiene biosynthesis in yeast as a first step toward Taxol (Paclitaxel) production. Metab Eng 2008, 10:201-206.

32. Hara KY, Morita T, Endo Y, Mochizuki M, Araki M, Kondo A: Evaluation and screening of efficient promoters to improve astaxanthin production in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2014, 98:6787-6793.

33. Hara KY, Morita T, Mochizuki M, Yamamoto K, Ogino C, Araki M, Kondo A: Development of a multi-gene expression system in Xanthophyllomyces dendrorhous. Microbial Cell Factories 2014, 13:175.

34. Yang J, Zhao G, Sun Y, Zheng Y, Jiang X, Liu W, Xian M: Bio-isoprene production using exogenous MVA pathway and isoprene synthase in Escherichia coli. Bioresour Technol 2012, 104:642-647.

35. Lindberg P, Park S, Melis A: Engineering a platform for photosynthetic isoprene production in cyanobacteria, using Synechocystis as the model organism. Metab Eng 2010, 12:70-79.

36. Bohlmann J, Keeling CI: Terpenoid biomaterials. Plant J 2008, 54:656-669.

37. Herrero Ó, Ramón D, Orejas M: Engineering the Saccharomyces cerevisiae isoprenoid pathway for de novo production of aromatic monoterpens in wine. Metab Eng 2008, 10:78-86.

38. Oswald M, Fischer M, Dirninger N, Karst F: Monoterpenoid biosynthesis in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res 2007, 7:413-421.

39. Rico J, Pardo E, Orejas M: Enhanced production of a plant monoterpene by overexpression of the 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase catalytic domain in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol 2010, 76:6449-6454.

40. Fischer MJC, Meyer S, Claudel P, Bergdoll M, Karst F: Metabolic engineering of monoterpene synthesis in yeast. Biotechnol Bioeng 2011,108:1883-1892.

41. Reiling KK, Yoshikuni Y, Martin VJJ, Newman J, Bohlmann J, Keasling JD: Mono and Diterpene production in Escherichia coli. Biotechnol Bioeng 2004, 87:200-212.

42. Asadollahi MA, Mauri J, M0ller K, Nielsen KF, Schalk M, Clark A, Nielsen J: Production of plant sesquiterpenes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Effect of ERGp repression on sesquiterpene biosynthesis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2008, 99:666-677.

43. Albertsen L, Chen Y, Bach LS, Rattleff S, Maury J, Brix S, Nielsen J, Mortensen UH: Diversion flus toward sesquiterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by fusion of host and heterologous enzymes. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:1033-1040.

44. Farhi M, Marhevka E, Masci T, Marcos E, Eyal Y, Ovadis M, Abeliovich H, Vainstein A: Harnessing yeast subcellular compartments for the production of plant terpenoids. Metab Eng 2011, 13:474-481.

45. Scalcinati G, Knuf C, Partow S, Chen Y, Maury J, Schalk M, Daviet L, Nielsen J, Siewers V: Dynamic control of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae engineered for the production of plant sesquiterpene a-santalene in a fed-batch mode. Metab Eng 2012, 14:91-103.

46. Scalcinati G, Partow S, Siewers V, Schalk M, Daviet L, Nielsen J: Combined metabolic engineering of precursor and co-factor supply to increase a-santalene production by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact 2012, 11:117.

47. Chen Y, Daviet L, Schalk M, Siewers V, Nielsen J: Establishing a platform cell factory through engineering of yeast acetyl-CoA metabolism. Metab Eng 2013, 15:48-54.

48. Cankar K, van Houweligen A, Bosch D, Sonke T, Bouwmeester H, Beekwilder J: A chicory cytochrome P450 mono-oxygenase CYP71AV8 for the oxidation of (+)-valencen. FEBS Lett 2011, 585:178-182.

49. Leonard E, Ajikumar PK, Thayer K, Xiao WH, Mo JD, Tidor B, Stephanopoulos G, Prather KLJ: Combining metabolic and protein engineering of a terpenoid biosynthetic pathway for overproduction and selectivity control. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:13654-13659.

50. Dai Z, Liu Y, Huang L, Zhang X: Production of miltradiene by metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol Bioeng 2012, 109:2845-2853.

51. Zhou YJ, Gao W, Rong Q, Jin G, Chu H, Liu W, Yang W, Zhu Z, Li G, Zhu G, Huang L, Zhao ZK: Modular pathway engineering of diterpenoid synthases and the mevalonic acid pathway for miltiradiene production. J Am Chem Soc 2012, 134:3234-3241.

52. Kirby J, Romanini DW, Paradise EM, Keasling JD: Engineering triterpene production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae -ß-amyrin synthase from Artemisia annua. FEBS J 2008, 275:1852-1859.

53. Martin VJ, Pitera DJ, Withers ST, Newman JD, Keasling JD: Engineering a mevalonate pathway in Escherichia coli for production of terpenoids. Nat Biotechnol 2003, 21:796-802.

54. Ro DK, Paradise EM, Ouellet M, Fisher KJ, Newman KL, Ndungu JM, Ho KA, Eachus RA, Ham TS, Kirby J, Chang MC, Withers ST, Shiba Y, Sarpong R, Keasling JD: Production of the antimalarial drug precursor artemisinic acid in engineered yeast. Nature 2006, 440:940-943.

55. Paddon CJ, Westfall PJ, Pitera DJ, Benjamin K, Fisher K, McPhee D, Leavell MD, Tai A, Main A, Eng D, Polichuk DR, Teoh KH, Reed DW, Treynor T, Lenihan J, Fleck M, Bajad S, Dang G, Dengrove D, Diola D, Dorin G, Ellens KW, Fickes S, Galazzo J, Gaucher SP, Geistlinger T, Henry R, Hepp M, Horning T, Iqbal T, et al: High-level semi-synthetic production of the potent antimalarial artemisinin. Nature 2013, 496:528-532.

56. Kaur B, Chakraborty D: Biotechnological and Molecular Approaches for Vanillin Production: a Review. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2013, 169:1353-1372.

57. Hansen EH, Moller BL, Kock GR, Bunner CM, Kristensen C, Jensen OR, Okkels FT, Olsen CE, Motawia MS, Hansen J: De novo biosynthesis of vanillin in fission yeast (Schizosaccharomyces pombe) and baker's yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae). Appl Environ Microbiol 2009, 75:2765-2774.

58. Brochado AR, Matos C, Moller BL, Hansen J, Mortensen UH, Patil KR: Improved vanillin production in baker's yeast through in silico design. Microb Cell Fact 2010, 9:84.

59. Segre D, Vitkup D, Church GM: Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2002,99:15112-15117.

60. Patil KR, Rocha I, Forster J, Nielsen J: Evolutionary programming as a platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6:308.

61. Brochado AR, Patil KR: Overexpression of O-methyltransferase leads to improved vanillin production in baker's yeast only when complemented with model-guided network engineering. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013, 110:656-659.

62. Nijkamp K, van Luijk N, de Bont JA, Wery J: The solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida S12 as host for the production of cinnamic acid from glucose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005, 69:170-177.

63. Shahidi F, Chandrasekara A: Hydroxycinnamates and their in vitro and in vivo antioxidant activities. Phytochem Rev 2010, 9:147-170.

64. Noda S, Miyazaki T, Miyoshi T, Miyake M, Okai N, Tanaka T, Ogino C, Kondo A: Cinnamic acid production using Streptomyces lividans expressing phenylalanine ammonia lyase. Journal of Industrial Microbiology & Biotechnology 2011, 38:643-648.

65. Kang SY, Choi O, Lee JK, Hwang BY, Uhm TB, Hong YS: Artificial biosynthesis of phenylpropanoic acids in a tyrosine overproducing Escherichia coli strain. Microb Cell Fact 2012, 11:153.

66. Furuya T, Arai Y, Kino K: Biotechnological production of caffeic acid by bacterial cytochrome P450 CYP199A2. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012, 78:6087-6094.

67. Zhang W, Xie H, He Y, Feng J, Gao W, Gu Y, Wang S, Song C: Chromosome integration of the Vitreoscilla hemoglobin gene (vgb) mediated by temperature-sensitive plasmid enhances y-PGA production in Bacillus amyloliquefaciens. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2013, 343:127-134.

68. Vannelli T, Wei Qi W, Sweigard J, Gatenby AA, Sariaslani FS: Production of p-hydroxycinnamic acid from glucose in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Escherichia coli by expression of heterologous genes from plants and fungi. Metab Eng 2007, 9:142-151.

69. Nijkamp K, Westerhof RG, Ballerstedt H, de Bont JA, Wery J: Optimization of the solvent-tolerant Pseudomonas putida S12 as host for the production of p-coumarate from glucose. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2007, 74:617-624.

70. Kawai Y, Noda S, Ogino C, Takeshima Y, Okai N, Tanaka T, Kondo A: p-Hydroxycinnamic acid production directly from cellulose using endoglucanase- and tyrosine ammonia lyase-expressing Streptomyces lividans. Microb Cell Factories 2013, 12:45.

71. Dewick PM: ALKALOIDS. In Medicinal Natural Products: A Biosynthetic Approach. 2nd edition. Edited by Dewick PM. John Wiley & Sons; 2002:291 -404.

72. Minami H, Kim JS, Ikezawa N, Takemura T, Katayama T, Kumagai H, Sato F: Microbial production of plant benzylisoquinoline alkaloids. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:7393-7398.

73. Nakagawa A, Minami H, Kim JS, Koyanagi T, Katayama T, Sato F, Kumagai H: A bacterial platform for fermentative production of plant alkaloids.

Nat Commun 2011, 2:326.

74. Hawkins KM, Smolke CD: Production of benzylisoquinoline alkaloids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Chem Biol 2008, 4:564-573.

75. Fossati E, Ekins A, Narcross L, Zhu Y, Falgueyret JP, Beaudoin GA, Facchini PJ, Martin VJ: Reconstitution of a 10-gene pathway for synthesis of the plant alkaloid dihydrosanguinarine in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Nat Commun 2014, 5:3283.

76. Lin Y, Sun X, Yuan Q, Yan Y: Combinatorial biosynthesis of plant-specific coumarins in bacteria. Metab Eng 2013, 18:69-77.

77. Lin Y, Shen X, Yuan Q, Yan Y: Microbial biosynthesis of the anticoagulant precursor 4-hydroxycoumarin. Nat Commun 2013, 4:2603.

78. Kleinkauf H, von Döhren H: Nonribosomal biosynthesis of peptide antibiotics. Eur J Biochem 1990,192:1-15.

79. Heyland J, Antweiler N, Lutz J, Heck T, Geueke B, Kohler HP, Blank LM, Schmid A: Simple enzymatic procedure for L-carnosine synthesis: whole-cell biocatalysis and efficient biocatalyst recycling. Microb Biotechnol 2010, 3:74-83.

80. Shima S, Sakai H: Polylysine produced by Streptomyces. Agric Biol Chem 1997, 41:1807-1809.

81. Xia J, Xu Z, Xu H, Feng X, Bo F: The regulatory effect of citric acid on the co-production of poly (£-lysine) and poly (L-diaminopropionic acid) in Streptomyces albulus PD-1. Bioprocess Biosyst Eng 2014, 37:2095-2103.

82. Li S, Chen X, Dong C, Zhao F, Tang L, Mao Z: Combining genome shuffling and interspecific hybridization among Streptomyces improved £-poly-L-lysine production. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 2013, 169:338-350.

Ashiuchi M, Misono H: Biochemistry and molecular genetics of poly-y-glutamate synthesis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2002, 59:9-14. Ashiuchi M: Microbial production and chemical transformation of poly-y-glutamate. Microb Biotechnol 2013, 6:664-674. Xu Z, Feng X, Zhang D, Tang B, Lei P, Liang J, Xu H: Enhanced poly (Y-glutamic acid) fermentation by Bacillus subtilis NX-2 immobilized in an aerobic plant fibrous-bed bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 2014, 155:8-14. Ashiuchi M, Shimanouchi K, Horiuchi T, Kamei T, Misono H: Genetically engineered poly-gamma-glutamate producer from Bacillus subtilis ISW1214. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2006, 70:1794-1797. Scoffone V, Dondi D, Biino G, Borghese G, Pasini D, Galizzi A, Calvio C: Knockout of pgdS and ggt genes improves y-PGA yield in B. subtilis. Biotechnol Bioeng 2013,110:2006-2012.

Feng J, Gu Y, Sun Y, Han L, Yang C, Zhang W, Cao M, Song C, Gao W, Wang S: Metabolic engineering of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens for poly-gamma-glutamic acid (y-PGA) overproduction. Microb Biotechnol 2014, 7:446-455. Cao M, Geng W, Zhang W, Sun J, Wang S, Feng J, Zheng P, Jiang A, Song C: Engineering of recombinant Escherichia coli cells co-expressing poly-Y-glutamic acid (Y-PGA) synthetase and glutamate racemase for differential yielding of y-PGA. Microb Biotechnol 2013, 6:675-684. Hara KY, Shimodate N, Ito M, Baba T, Mori H, Mori H: Systematic genome-wide scanning for genes involved in ATP generation in Escherichia coli. Metab Eng 2009, 11:1-7.

Yoshida H, Hara KY, Kiriyama K, Nakayama H, Okazaki F, Matsuda F, Ogino C, Fukuda H, Kondo A: Enzymatic glutathione production using metabolically engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae as a whole-cell biocatalyst. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2011,91:1001-1006.

Suzuki T, Yokoyama A, Tsuji T, Ikeshima E, Nakashima K, Ikushima S, Kobayashi C, Yoshida S: Identification and characterization of genes involved in glutathione production in yeast. J Biosci Bioeng 2011,112:107-113. Hara KY, Kiriyama K, Inagaki A, Nakayama H, Kondo A: Improvement of glutathione production by metabolic engineering the sulfate assimilation pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012, 94:1313-1319.

Tabata K, Ikeda H, Hashimoto S: ywfE in Bacillus subtilis codes for a novel enzyme, L-amino acid ligase. J Bacteriol 2005, 187:5195-5202. Tabata K, Hashimoto S: Fermentative production of L-alanyl-Lglutamine by a metabolically engineered Escherichia coli strain expressing L-amino acid alpha-ligase. Appl Environ Microbiol 2007, 73:6378-6385. Hirao Y, Mihara Y, Kira I, Abe I, Yokozeki K: Enzymatic production of L-alanyl-L-glutamine by recombinant E. coli expressing a-amino acid ester acyltransferase from Sphingobacterium siyangensis. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2013, 77:618-623.

Kino K, Nakazawa Y, Yagasaki M: Dipeptide synthesis by L-amino acid ligase from Ralstonia solanacearum. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2008, 371:536-540.

Kino K, Noguchi A, Nakazawa Y, Yagasaki M: A novel L-amino acid ligase

from Bacillus licheniformis. J Biosci Bioeng 2008, 106:313-315.

Kino K, Kotanaka Y, Arai T, Yagasaki M: A novel L-amino acid ligase from

Bacillus subtilis NBRC3134, a microorganism producing peptide-antibiotic

rhizocticin. Biosci Biotechnol Biochem 2009, 73:901-907.

Meister A, Andersen ME: Glutathione. Annu Rev Biochem 1983, 52:711-760.

Murata K, Tani K, Kato J, Chibata I: Glycolytic pathway as an ATP

generation system and its application to the production of glutathione

and NADP. Enzyme Microb Technol 1981, 3:233-242.

Hara KY, Shimodate N, Hirokawa Y, Ito M, Baba T, Mori H, Mori H:

Glutathione production by efficient ATP-regenerating Escherichia coli

mutants. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2009, 297:217-224.

Hara KY, Mori H: An efficient method for quantitative determination of

cellular ATP synthetic activity. J Biomol Screen 2006, 11:310-317.

Wheeler GL, Trotter EW, Dawes IW, Grant CM: Coupling of the

transcriptional regulation of glutathione biosynthesis to the availability

of glutathione and methionine via the Met4 and Yap1 transcription

factors. J Biol Chem 2003, 278:49920-49928.

Moye-Rowley WS, Harshman KD, Parker CS: Yeast YAP1 encodes a novel form of thevjun family of transcriptional activator proteins. Genes Dev 1989, 3:283-392.

Thomas D, Jacquemin I, Surdin-Kerjan Y: MET4, a leucine zipper protein, and centromere-binding factor 1 are both required for transcriptional activation of sulfur metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 1992, 12:1719-1727.

Kiriyama K, Hara KY, Kondo A: Extracellular glutathione fermentation using engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing a novel glutathione exporter. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2012, 96:1021-1027. Galperin MY, Koonin EV: A diverse superfamily of enzymes with ATP-dependent carboxylate-amine/thiol ligase activity. Protein Sci 1997, 6:2639-2643.

Sheng Y, Sun X, Shen Y, Bognar AL, Baker EN, Smith CA: Structural and functional similarities in the ADP-forming amide bond ligase superfamily: implications for a substrate-induced conformational change in folylpolyglutamate synthetase. J Mol Biol 2000,302:427-440. Manach C, Scalbert A, Morand C, Rémésy C, Jiménez L: Polyphenols: food sources and bioavailability. Am J Clin Nutr 2004, 79:727-747. Chemler JA, Koffas MA: Metabolic engineering for plant natural product biosynthesis in microbes. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2008, 19:597-605. Zhang H, Stephanopoulos G: Engineering E. coli for caffeic acid biosynthesis from renewable sugars. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:3333-3341.

Lin Y, Jain R, Yan Y: Microbial production of antioxidant food ingredients via metabolic engineering. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2014, 26:71 -78. Lim CG, Fowler ZL, Hueller T, Schaffer S, Koffas MA: High-yield resveratrol production in engineered Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microbiol 2011, 77:3451 -3460.

Du J, Shao Z, Zhao H: Engineering microbial factories for synthesis of value-added products. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 2011, 38:873-890. Yamada R, Yoshie T, Wakai S, Asai-Nakashima N, Okazaki F, Ogino C, Hisada H, Tsutsumi H, Hata Y, Kondo A: Aspergillus oryzae-based cell factory for direct kojic acid production from cellulose. Microb Cell Fact 2014, 13:71. Wakai S, Yoshie T, Asai-Nakashima N, Yamada R, Ogino C, Tsutsumi H, Hata Y, Kondo A: L-lactic acid production from starch by simultaneous saccharification and fermentation in a genetically engineered Aspergillus oryzae pure culture. Bioresour Technol 2014, 173:376-383. Daglia M: Polyphenols as antimicrobial agents. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2012, 23:174-181.

Moure A, Gullon P, Domínguez H, Parajo JC: Advances in the manufacture,

purification and applications of xylo-oligosaccharides as food additives

and nutraceuticals. Process Biochem 2006, 41:1913-1923.

Okazaki F, Nakashima N, Ogino C, Tamaru Y, Kondo A: Biochemical

characterization of a thermostable ß-1,3-xylanase from the

hyperthermophilic eubacterium, Thermotoga neapolitana strain DSM

4359. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2013, 97:6749-6757.

Katapodis P, Kalogeris E, Kekos D, Macris BJ, Christakopoulus P: Biosynthesis

of fructo-oligosaccharides by Sporotrichum thermophile during

submerged batch cultivation in high sucrose media. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol

2004, 63:378-382.

Yun JW, Choi YJ, Song CH, Song SK: Microbial production of inulo-

oligosaccharides by an endoinulinase from Pseudomonas sp. expressed

in Escherichia coli. J Biosci Bioeng 1999, 87:291-295.

Cheng H, Wang H, Lv J, Jiang M, Lin S, Deng Z: A novel method to

prepare L-Arabinose from xylose mother liquor by yeast-mediated

bioproduction. Microb Cell Fact 2011,10:43.

Lee WH, Pathanibul P, Quarterman J, Jo JH, Han NS, Miller MJ, Jin YS,

Seo JH: Whole cell biosynthesis of a functional oligosaccharide,

2'-fucosyllactose, using engineered Escherichia coli. Microb Cell Fact 2012,


Morrow AL, Ruiz-Palacios GM, Altaye M, Jiang X, Guerrero ML, Meinzen-Derr JK, Farkas T, Chaturvedi P, Pickering LK, Newburg DS: Human milk oligosaccharides are associated with protection against diarrhea in breast-fed infants. J Pediatr 2004, 145:297-303.

Hayashi T, Hayashi K, Maeda M, Kojima I: Calcium spirulan, an inhibitor of enveloped virus replication, from a blue-green alga Spirulina platensis.

J Nat Prod 1996, 59:83-87.

Aikawa S, Izumi Y, Matsuda F, Hasunuma T, Chang JS, Kondo A: Synergistic enhancement of glycogen production in Arthrospira platensis by optimization of light intensity and nitrate supply. Bioresour Technol 2012, 108:211-215.

Lautru S, Deeth RJ, Bailey LM, Challis GL: Discovery of a new peptide natural product by Streptomyces coelicolor genome mining. Nat Chem Biol

2005, 1:265-269.

Fraaije MW, Wu J, Heuts DPHM, van Hellemond EW, Spelberg JHL, Janssen DB: Discovery of a thermostable Baeyer-Villiger monooxygenase by genome mining. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 2005, 66:393-400.

130. Bastard K, Smith AAT, Vergne-Vaxelaire C, Perret A, Zaparucha A, De Melo-Minardi R, Mariage A, Boutard M, Debard A, Lechaplais C, Pelle C, Pellouin V, Perchat N, Petit J-L, Kreimeyer A, Medigue C, Weissenbach J, Artiguenave F, De Berardinis V, Vallenet D, Salanoubat M: Revealing the hidden functional diversity of an enzyme family. Nat Chem Biol 2014, 10:42-49.

131. Zhao S, Kumar R, Sakai A, Vetting MW, Wood BM, Brown S, Bonanno JB, Hillerich BS, Seidel RD, Babbitt PC, Almo SC, Sweedler JV, Gerlt JA, Cronan JE, Jacobson MP: Discovery of new enzymes and metabolic pathways by using structure and genome context. Nature 2013, 502:698-702.

132. Hatzimanikatis V, Li C, lonita JA, Henry CS, Jankowski MD, Broadbelt LJ: Exploring the diversity of complex metabolic networks. Bioinformatics 2005, 21:1603-1609.

133. Chou CH, Chang WC, Chiu CM, Huang CC, Huang HD: FMM: a web server for metabolic pathway reconstruction and comparative analysis.

Nucl Acids Res 2009, 37(suppl 2):W129-W134.

134. Carbonell P, Planson AG, Fichera D, Faulon JL: A retrosynthetic biology approach to metabolic pathway design for therapeutic production. BMC Syst Biol 2011, 5:122.

135. Rodrigo G, Carrera J, Prather KJ, Jaramillo A: DESHARKY: automatic design of metabolic pathways for optimal cell growth. Bioinformatics 2008, 24:2554-2556.

136. Araki M, Cox RS 3rd, Makiguchi H, Ogawa T, Taniguchi T, Miyaoku K, Nakatsui M, Hara KY, Kondo A: M-path: A Compass for Navigating Potential Metabolic Pathways. Bioinformatics 2014. in press. PubMed PMID: 25398612.

137. Kanehisa M, Araki M, Goto S, Hattori M, Hirakawa M, Itoh M, Katayama T, Kawashima S, Okuda S, Tokimatsu T, Yamanishi Y: KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36(Database issue):D480-D484.

138. Caspi R, Foerster H, Fulcher CA, Kaipa P, Krummenacker M, Latendresse M, Paley S, Rhee SY, Shearer AG, Tissier C, Walk TC, Zhang P, Karp PD: The MetaCyc Database of metabolic pathways and enzymes and the BioCyc collection of Pathway/Genome Databases. Nucl Acids Res 2008, 36(suppl 1 ):D623-D631.

139. Schomburg I, Chang A, Placzek S, Söhngen C, Rother M, Lang M, Munaretto C, Ulas S, Stelzer M, Grote A, Scheer M, Schomburg D: BRENDA in 2013: integrated reactions, kinetic data, enzyme function data, improved disease classification: new options and contents in BRENDA. Nucleic Acids Res 2013,41 (Database issue):D764-D772.

140. Orth JD, Thiele I, Palsson B0: What is flux balance analysis? Nat Biotech 2010, 28:245-248.

141. Price ND, Reed JL, Palsson B0: Genome-scale models of microbial cells: evaluating the consequences of constraints. Nat Rev Micro 2004, 2:886-897.

142. Rocha I, Maia P, Evangelista P, Vila?a P, Soares S, Pinto JP, Nielsen J, Patil KR, Ferreira EC, Rocha M: OptFlux: an open-source software platform for in silico metabolic engineering. BMC Syst Biol 2010, 4:45.

Submit your next manuscript to BioMed Central and take full advantage of:

• Convenient online submission

• Thorough peer review

• No space constraints or color figure charges

• Immediate publication on acceptance

• Inclusion in PubMed, CAS, Scopus and Google Scholar

• Research which is freely available for redistribution

Submit your manuscript at Tpntral >_ciiuai