Scholarly article on topic 'The dramatic development of X-ray photocrystallography over the past six decades'

The dramatic development of X-ray photocrystallography over the past six decades Academic research paper on "Biological sciences"

0
0
Share paper
Academic journal
Structural Dynamics
OECD Field of science
Keywords
{""}

Academic research paper on topic "The dramatic development of X-ray photocrystallography over the past six decades"

The dramatic development of X-ray photocrystallography over the past six decades

Philip Coppens

Citation: Struct. Dyn. 4, 032102 (2017); doi: 10.1063/1.4975301 View online: http://dx.doi.org/10.1063/1.4975301 View Table of Contents: http://aca.scitation.org/toc/sdy/4/3 Published by the American Institute of Physics

Articles you may be interested in

Photoinduced molecular chirality probed by ultrafast resonant X-ray spectroscopy Struct. Dyn. 4, 044006044006 (2017); 10.1063/1.4974260

Structural enzymology using X-ray free electron lasers Struct. Dyn. 4, 044003044003 (2016); 10.1063/1.4972069

A short history of structure based research on the photocycle of photoactive yellow protein Struct. Dyn. 4, 032201032201 (2017); 10.1063/1.4974172

Electronic-structural dynamics in graphene Struct. Dyn. 3, 051301051301 (2016); 10.1063/1.4964777

[■) CrossMark

\pMM «-click for updates

The dramatic development of X-ray photocrystallography over the past six decades

Philip Coppens

Department of Chemistry, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, New York 14260-3000, USA

(Received 9 January 2017; accepted 13 January 2017; published online 1 February 2017)

A short description of some of the paradigm-changing developments of the study of light-induced structural changes in molecular crystals is presented. The review is by no means comprehensive. The extensive literature on the subject should be consulted for further information. © 2017 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). [http://dx.doi.org/10.106371.4975301]

I. INTRODUCTION

The birth of photocrystallography deserves much credit to work in the fifties and sixties by Gerhard Schmidt and co-workers at the Weizmann Institute of Science in Israel. Gerhard Schmidt (Fig. 1) (Schmidt, 1971) who had just started to set up the first X-ray laboratory in Israel at the Weizmann Institute of Science maintained that X-ray crystallography was more than solving crystal structures and should be directed towards solving chemical problems. One of those involved the study of light-induced processes in crystals. Lasers, which were unknown at the time so the preferred light source was the Sun, "conveniently installed at 92 955 807 miles above the roof of the Weizmann Institute." Schmidt described the preceding decades as the heroic era, in which hypotheses could not be based on the knowledge of crystal structures (Schmidt, 1971). Most of us would agree that the fifties and sixties were similar heroic areas, given, with hindsight, the primitive methods which had to be applied.

In the early crystallographic experiments, crystals would break down after a few percent conversion. Nevertheless is was possible to establish a firm relation between the crystal packing of cinnamic acids and their derivative, and the nature of the dimer produced by the photoreac-tion which would be the mirror-symmetric b-truxinic acid or the centro-symmetric a-truxillac acid leading to the term topochemical reactions, i.e., reactions governed by the topological relation between the reactants, a concept still valid with some exceptions due to defects in the crystals today.

The topochemical postulate, was first proposed by Kohlshutter in 1919 (Kohlschutter and Haenni, 1919) and systematically developed by Schmidt and co-workers with a new insight into molecular packing from X-ray diffraction. It states that chemical reactions in crystals proceed with a minimum amount of atomic motion (Cohen and Schmidt, 1964; Schmidt, 1964). Though exceptions have been found, it is clearly possible in many cases to predict the photo-induced reaction that will occur from the crystal structure of the reactants.

II. EARLY STUDIES

During the following period, studies on 2 + 2 and other dimerizations continued with very much improved conventional sources such as mercury lamps, typically used with wavelength filters (Atkinson, 1970) (Cohen et al, 1973; Cohen, 1975; Turowska-Tyrk, 2002; Turowska-Tyrk and Trzop, 2003). Noticeable are related studies of polymerization of diolefins and diacetylenes (Wegner; 1977; Hasegawa, 1983). The related multiple 2 + 2 isomerization of conjugated olefins

2329-7778/2017/4(3)7032102/6 4,032102-1 © Author(s) 2017. li^KS^d

FIG. 1. G. M. J. Scmidt in a typical pose.

leading among others to novel species, labeled ladderanes, was pioneered by MacGillavray and co-workers (Gao et al., 2003; Friscic and Macgillivray, 2005).

III. FOLLOWING DEVELOPMENTS

The development of photocrystallography was tremendously stimulated when lasers became readily available so that it became possible to select very well-defined wavelengths. The use of tunable lasers was strongly simulated in 1993, with the discovery by Enkelman and co-workers, that the [2 + 2] dimerization of cinnamic acid could be performed to a very high conversion percentage with preservation of the crystal lattice, by carefully irradiating in the tail of the absorption band (Enkelmann and Wegner, 1993). Further increase in expansion of the technique resulted from the application of two-photon processes, which allowed the avoidance of strong absorption bands at shorter wavelengths which may strongly restrict the penetration of the light beams in the crystal samples as illustrated in the photo-induced cleavage of coumarin photodimers (Kim et al., 2003), by Harada, Nakajima, and Ogawa in a study of the photochromic ring closure of fungicides during which the crystal color changed from yellow to dark red (Harada et al., 2008). And also in the controlled dimerization of a-cinnamic acid which also led to a study of the kinetics of crystal reaction (Benedict and Coppens, 2009).

IV. PHOTOCHEMICAL REACTIONS IN SUPRAMOLECULAR SOLIDS

As now widely recognized, supramolecular solids are an excellent medium for the study of photochemical reactions (Ramamurthy and Inoue, 2011) unless luminescence is quenched by energy transfer to linker molecules in the host framework (Zheng and Coppens, 2005a, 2005b). However, when the framework is composed of photo-inert host molecules, photosensitive species embedded in the cavities formed allow the study of slow reactions using steady-state techniques, in which the change is studied after successive exposures, often of hours. C-methyl[4]-resorcinarenes and C-ethyl[4]resorcinarenes (Fig. 2) are particularly suitable framework formers for this purpose. They were used in our studies of the E ! Z and Z ! E (trans to cis and cis to trans) reactions of 3-chloroacrylic acid in C-ethylcalix[4]resorcinarene (CECR) (Zheng et al., 2007) and a similar photoreaction of Zn tiglic acid CECR-[Zn(TA)2 (H2O)2] 4H2O.p inclusion compound in CECR (Zheng et al., 2008). The latter is of particular interest, as the guest is contained in two cavities of different sizes, in which the reaction proceeds at different rates. Results performed at four different temperatures are shown in Table I.

The thermodynamic information on the crystal reactions summarized in Table I was derived from Arrhenius and Eyring plots. This is to our best knowledge, the first photocrystallo-graphic study of kinetics in crystals (Fig. 2).

(b) (c)

FIG. 2. (a) C-ethyl[4]resorcinarene. (b) Tiglic acid. (c) 3D-supramolecular architecture of CECR-[Zn(TA)2 (H2O)2]4H2O viewed along the b-axis direction (Zn atom is displayed as a sphere). Small and large cavities containing the Zn tiglic acid complex are circled. (Reproduced with permission from Zheng et al., Chem. Eur. J. 14, 706-713 (2008). Copyright 2008 John Wiley & Sons, Inc.)

V. SYNCHROTRON STUDIES OF FLEETING SPECIES WITH MICROSECOND TO PICOSECOND-LIFETIMES

With the advent of both high-brightness pulsed sources concentrating on a large photon flux in a small area and powerful pulsed lasers, previous limitations rapidly started to disappear, and it became possible to study the fleeting species with very short lifetimes. Third generation synchrotron sources initially the Synchrotrons the National Synchrotron Light Source at Brookhaven National Laboratory, Advanced Photon Source at Argonne National Laboratory, the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility in Grenoble France, and Spring8, Japan are now complemented by many new facilities.

Since the typical width of synchrotron sources is of the order of picoseconds, the study of excited molecular states and chemical reactions is controlled by this limit. However, this still opens a wide range of possibilities which include many luminescent inorganic and organic complexes, as well as biologically important reactions. The first time-resolved diffraction study of a fleeting species was performed at 17 K on (TEA)3H[Pt2(pop)4] with [pop = pyrophosphite, (H2P2O5)2, TEA = tetraethylammonium] (Kim et al., 2002). The observed bond shortening of

TABLE I. Activation energy Ea and pre-exponential factor A for Z/E isomerization of the tiglic acid ligand in the small (S) and large (L) cavities of the inclusion complex CECR-[Zn(TA)2 (H2O)2]4H2O.

E ! Z Z ! E

TA@S TA@L TA@S TA@L

EJkJmor1]1 2.3(3) 1.8(1) 2.1(2) 1.9(1)

A [10~3s~1]b 1.18 1.16 4.05 1.36

aArrhenius expression: ln(k) = ln(A)—Ea/RT.

bValues of A only have a relative meaning, as they depend on the photon flux incident on the crystals and the absorbance.

FIG. 3. (a) Molecular diagram of Rh2(l-PNP)2(PNP)2 (BPh4)2 [PNP = CH3N(P(OCH3)2)2, Ph = phenyl] and labeling of atoms. (b) Photodifference maps with isosurfaces (red positive, blue negative) of 0.25 e A~3. (Reproduced with permission from Makal et al, Acta Cryst. A 67, 319-326 (2011). Copyright 2011 International Union of Crystallography.)

0.28 (9) A was within the experimental error equal to values determined spectroscopically from analyses of the IR spectra in crystals (0.21 A) (Rice and Gray, 1983) and Raman spectra of an acetonitrile solution (0.225 A) (Leung et al., 1999). The value has since been confirmed by a value of 0.23 A in a second diffraction experiment (Ozawa et al., 2003), and more recently by scattering measurements on an aqueous solution (0.24 A) (Christensen et al., 2009) and a time-resolved EXAFS study (0.31 A) (van der Veen et al., 2008).

Additional examples of excited state studies of metalloorganic complexes are the 100 ps study of Rh2(i-PNP)2(PNP)2_BPh4 (Makal et al., 2011) (Fig. 3), and the very large shortening of the Rh-Rh distance of 0.85 A in [Rh2(1,8-diisocyano-p-menthane)4]2+ (Coppens et al., 2004).

The initial studies at monochromatic sources were followed by the development of the "pink" Laue technique, first applied to the dynamics of biological systems (Ren and Moffat, 1995; Moffat, 2001), and more recently to the analysis of the structure of fleeting molecular triplet states (Makal et al., 2011) (Fig. 3), and an Ag-Cu containing coinage metal complex (Jarzembska et al., 2014).

The narrow band Laue technique makes much more efficient use of the available synchrotron photons and thus shortens the data collection time and increases accuracy if appropriate procedures are followed (Coppens and Fournier, 2015). The spectral assignment of the individual reflections can be bypassed in the time-resolved Laue work by use of the Ratio Method (Coppens et al., 2009).

Other well-researched applications are the investigations of light-induced spin-cross-over processes as studied by, for example, Collet and Cailleau (Collet, 2010; Cailleau et al., 2010) and Lecomte (Legrand et al., 2006) and their co-workers.

VI. THE NEW FRONTIER: SERIAL FEMTOSECOND STUDIES AT X-RAY FREE ELECTRON LASER SOURCES

The ultimate goal of photo-crystallographic studies of structural dynamics must include the initial states of chemical reactions which take place on femtosecond time scales. The development of tracking of chemical reactions by serial femtosecond pump-probe X-ray crystallography (SFX) in which the diffraction patterns are rapidly recorded at closely spaced time intervals, and sample decay is avoided by reducing the X-ray intensity, (Chapman et al., 2011; Pande et al., 2016; Spence, 2017) is of particular importance. It is now being applied at X-ray Free Electron Lasers (XFELs) such as LCLS at Stanford and SACLA at the Riken lab in Japan. It is clear from the results that the direction-controlling initial stages of chemical reactions occur

FIG. 4. The ultimate goal!

below the 100 ps synchrotron limit. An example are the initial stages of the photoexcitation of photoactive yellow protein (PYP) which are triggered by the trans-cis isomerization of the cou-marin chromophore (Tenboer et al., 2014; Schmidt et al., 2015; Spence, 2017). The amount of data collected in such studies is astronomical, for PYP 2.5 x 106 snapshots were collected at 1.6 A resolution in the PYP study.

VII. FINAL REMARKS

The development of the field has been dramatic and impossible to predict in the early years. Photocrystallography is now a powerful technique spanning from time scales of hours to femtoseconds. Important dynamics take place in this whole span of ranges. I have emphasized that slower than femtosecond studies should not be ignored if a comprehensive picture of the structural dynamics of a system is to be achieved (Coppens, 2015). The ultimate goal is illustrated in Fig. 4.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

Funding of this work by the National Science Foundation (CHE1213223) is gratefully acknowledged.

Atkinson, R. S., Tetrahedron Lett. 11, 3937-3940 (1970).

Benedict, J. B. and Coppens, P., J. Phys. Chem. 113, 3116-3120 (2009).

Cailleau, H., Lorenc, M., Guerin, L., Servol, M., Collet, E., and Buron-Le Cointe, M., Acta Crystallogr. A 66, 189-197 (2010).

Chapman, H. N., Fromme, P., Barty, A., White, T. A., Kirian, R. A., Aquila, A., Hunter, M. S., Schulz, J., DePonte, D. P., Weierstall, U., Doak, R. B., Maia, F. R. N. C., Martin, A. V., Schlichting, I., Lomb, L., Coppola, N., Shoeman, R. L., Epp, S. W., Hartmann, R., Rolles, D., Rudenko, A., Foucar, L., Kimmel, N., Weidenspointner, G., Holl, P., Liang, M., Barthelmess, M., Caleman, C., Boutet, S., Bogan, M. J., Krzywinski, J., Bostedt, C., Bajt, S., Gumprecht, L., Rudek, B., Erk, B., Schmidt, C., Homke, A., Reich, C., Pietschner, D., Struder, L., Hauser, G., Gorke, H., Ullrich, J., Herrmann, S., Schaller, G., Schopper, F., Soltau, H., Kuhne, K.-U., Messerschmidt, M., Bozek, J. D., Hau-Riege, S. P., Frank, M., Hampton, C. Y., Sierra, R. G., Starodub, D., Williams, G. J., Hajdu, J., Timneanu, N., Seibert, M. M., Andreasson, J., Rocker, A., Jonsson, O., Svenda, M., Stern, S., Nass, K., Andritschke, R., Schroter, C.-D., Krasniqi, F., Bott, M., Schmidt, K. E., Wang, X., Grotjohann, I., Holton, J. M., Barends, T. R. M., Neutze, R., Marchesini, S., Fromme, R., Schorb, S., Rupp, D., Adolph, M., Gorkhover, T., Andersson, I., Hirsemann, H., Potdevin, G., Graafsma, H., Nilsson, B., and Spence, J. C. H., Nature 470, 73-78 (2011).

Christensen, M., Haldrup, K., Bechgaard, K., Feidenhans'l, R., Kong, Q., Cammarata, M., Russo, M. L., Wulff, M., Harrit, N., and Nielsen, M. M., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 131, 502-508 (2009). Cohen, M. D., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 14, 386-393 (1975).

Cohen, M. D., Cohen, R., Lahav, M., and Nie, P. L., J. Chem. Soc., Perkin Trans. 2, 1095-1100 (1973). Cohen, M. D. and Schmidt, G. M. J., J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 1996-2000. Collet, E., Acta Crystallogr. A 66, 133-134 (2010). Coppens, P., Struct. Dyn. 2, 020901 (2015).

Coppens, P. and Fournier, B., J. Synchrotron Radiat. 22, 280-287 (2015).

Coppens, P., Gerlits, O., Vorontsov, I. I., Kovalevsky, A. Y., Chen, Y.-S., Graber, T., Gembicky, M., and Novozhilova, I. V., Chem. Commun. 2004, 2144-2145.

Coppens, P., Pitak, M., Gembicky, M., Messerschmidt, M., Scheins, S., Benedict, J., Adachi, S.-I., Sato, T., Nozawa, S.,

Ichiyanagi, K., Chollet, M., and Koshihara, S.-Y., J. Synchrotron Radiat. 16, 226-230 (2009).

Enkelmann, V. and Wegner, G., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 115, 10390-10391 (1993).

Friscic, T. and Macgillivray, L. R., Supramol. Chem. 17,47-51 (2005).

Gao, X., Friscic, T., and MacGillivray, L. R., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43, 232-236 (2003).

Harada, J., Nakajima, R., and Ogawa, K., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 130, 7085-7091 (2008).

Hasegawa, M., Chem. Rev. 83, 507-518 (1983).

Jarzembska, K., Kaminski, R., Fournier, B., Trzop, E., Sokolow, J., Chen, Y., Henning, R., and Coppens, P., Acta Crystallogr., Sect. A 70, C774 (2014).

Kim, C. D., Pillet, S., Wu, G., Fullagar, W. K., and Coppens, P., Acta Crystallogr. A58, 133-137 (2002). Kim, H. C., Kreiling, S., Greiner, A., and Hampp, N., Chem. Phys. Lett. 372, 899-903 (2003). Kohlschutter, V. and Haenni, P., Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 105, 121-144 (1919).

Legrand, V., Souhassou, S. P. M., Lugan, N., and Lecomte, C., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128, 13921-13931 (2006).

Leung, K. H., Phillips, D. L., Che, C.-M., and Miskowski, V. M., J. Raman Spectrosc. 30, 987-993 (1999).

Makal, A., Trzop, E., Sokolow, J. D., Kalinowski, J., Benedict, J. B., and Coppens, P., Acta Crystallogr. A 67,319-326 (2011).

Moffat, K., Chem. Rev. 101, 1569-1582 (2001).

Ozawa, Y., Terashima, M., Mitsumi, M., Toriumi, K., Yasuda, N., Uekusa, H., and Ohashi, K., Chem. Lett. 32, 62-63 (2003).

Pande, K., Hutchison, C. D. M., Groenhof, G., Aquila, A., Robinson, J. S., Tenbor, J., Basu, S., Boutet, S., DePonte, D. P., Liang, M., White, T. A., Zatsepin, N. A., Yefanov, O., Morozov, D., Oberthuer, D., Gati, C., Subramanian, G., James, D., Zhao, Y., Koralek, J., Brayshaw, J., Kupitz, J., Conrad, C., Roy-Chowdhury, S., Coe, J. D., Metz, M., Xavier, P. L., Grant, T. D., Koglin, J. E., Ketawala, G., Fromme, R., Srajer, V., Henning, J., Spence, J. C. H., Ourmazd, A., Schwander, P., Weierstall, U., Frank, M., Fromme, P., Barty, A., Chapman, H. N., Moffat, K., van Thor, J. J., and Schmidt, M., Science 352, 725-729 (2016).

Ramamurthy, V. and Inoue, Y., Eds., Supramolecular Photochemistry (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).

Ren, Z. and Moffat, K., J. Appl. Crystallogr. 28, 461-481 (1995).

Rice, S. F., and Gray, H. B., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 105,4511-4515 (1983).

Schmidt, G. M. J., J. Chem. Soc. 1964, 2014-2021.

Schmidt, G. M. J., Pure Appl. Chem. 27, 647-678 (1971).

Schmidt, M., Pande, K., Basu, S., and Tenboer, J., Struct. Dyn. 2, 041708 (2015).

Spence, J. C. H., "X-ray lasers in biology : Structure and dynamics," Adv. Electron. Phys. (2017) (in press). Tenboer, J., Basu, S., Zatsepin, N., Pande, K., Milathianaki, D., Frank, M., Hunter, M., Boutet, S., Williams, G. J., Koglin, J. E., Oberthuer, D., Heymann, M., Kupitz, C., Conrad, C., Coe, J., Roy-Chowdhury, S., Weierstall, U., James, D., Wang, D. J., Grant, T., Barty, A., Yefanov, O., Scales, J., Gati, C., Seuring, C., Srajer, V., Henning, R., Schwander, P., Fromme, R., Ourmazd, A., Moffat, K., Van Thor, J. J., Spence, J. C. H., Fromme, P., Chapman, H. N., and Schmidt, M., Science 346, 1242-1246 (2014).

Turowska-Tyrk, I., Chem. Phys. Lett. 361, 115-120 (2002). Turowska-Tyrk, I. and Trzop, E., Acta Crystallogr. B 59, 779-786 (2003).

van der Veen, R. M., Milne, C. J., Pham, V.-T., El Nahhas, A., Weinstein, J. A., Best, J., Borca, C. N., Bressler, C., and

Chergui, M., Chimia 62, 287-290 (2008).

Wegner, G., Pure Appl. Chem. 49, 443-454 (1977).

Zheng, S.-L. and Coppens, P., Cryst. Growth Des. 5, 2050-2059 (2005a).

Zheng, S.-L. and Coppens, P., CrystEngComm 7, 289-293 (2005b).

Zheng, S.-L., Messerschmidt, M., and Coppens, P., Chem. Commun. 2007, 2735-2737.

Zheng, S.-L., Velde, C. M. L. V., Messerschmidt, M., Volkov, A., Gembicky, M., and Coppens, P., Chem. Eur. J. 14, 706-713 (2008).