CC BY
0Arch Toxicol • i CrossMark
DOI 10.1007/s00204-016-1808-6
GENOTOXICITY AND CARCINOGENICITY
Impact of genetic modulation of SULT1A enzymes on DNA adduct formation by aristolochic acids and 3-nitrobenzanthrone
Volker M. Arlt1 • Walter Meinl2 • Simone Florian2 • Eszter Nagy1 • Frantisek Barta3 • Marlies Thomann1 • Iveta Mrizova3 • Annette M. Krais1'4 • Maggie Liu5 • Meirion Richards5 • Amin Mirza5 • Klaus Kopka6 • David H. Phillips1 • Hansruedi Glatt2'7 • Marie Stiborova3 • Heinz H. Schmeiser6
Received: 4 June 2016 / Accepted: 4 August 2016
© The Author(s) 2016. This article is published with open access at Springerlink.com
Abstract Exposure to aristolochic acid (AA) causes aristolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) and Balkan endemic nephropathy (BEN). Conflicting results have been found for the role of human sulfotransferase 1A1 (SULT1A1) contributing to the metabolic activation of aristolochic acid I (AAI) in vitro. We evaluated the role of human SULT1A1 in AA bioactivation in vivo after treatment of transgenic mice carrying a functional human SULT1A1-SULT1A2 gene cluster (i.e. hSULT1A1/2 mice) and Sult1a1(-/-) mice with AAI and aristolochic acid II (AAII). Both compounds formed characteristic DNA adducts in the intact mouse and in cytosolic incubations in vitro. However, we did not find differences in AAI-/AAII-DNA adduct levels between hSULT1A1/2 and wild-type (WT) mice in all
* Volker M. Arlt
volker. arlt @ kcl .ac.uk
1 Analytical and Environmental Sciences Division, MRC-PHE Centre for Environment and Health, King's College London, Franklin-Wilkins Building, 150 Stamford Street, London SE1 9NH, UK
2 Department of Nutritional Toxicology, German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE) Potsdam-Rehbrücke, 14558 Nuthetal, Germany
3 Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, Charles University, Albertov 2030, 12840 Prague 2, Czech Republic
4 Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Lund University, 221 85 Lund, Sweden
5 Division of Cancer Therapeutics, Institute of Cancer Research, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5NG, UK
6 Division of Radiopharmaceutical Chemistry, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
7 Department of Food Safety, Federal Institute for Risk Assessment (BfR), 10589 Berlin, Germany
tissues analysed including kidney and liver despite strong enhancement of sulfotransferase activity in both kidney and liver of hSULT1A1/2 mice relative to WT, kidney and liver being major organs involved in AA metabolism. In contrast, DNA adduct formation was strongly increased in hSULT1A1/2 mice compared to WT after treatment with 3-nitrobenzanthrone (3-NBA), another carcinogenic aromatic nitro compound where human SULT1A1/2 is known to contribute to genotoxicity. We found no differences in AAI-/AAII-DNA adduct formation in Sult1a1(-/-) and WT mice in vivo. Using renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions of hSULT1A1/2, Sult1a1(-/-) and WT mice, we investigated AAI-DNA adduct formation in vitro but failed to find a contribution of human SULT1A1/2 or murine Sult1a1 to AAI bioactivation. Our results indicate that sulfo-conjugation catalysed by human SULT1A1 does not play a role in the activation pathways of AAI and AAII in vivo, but is important in 3-NBA bioactivation.
Keywords Aristolochic acid nephropathy • Sulfotransferase 1A1 • Carcinogen metabolism • DNA adducts • Balkan endemic nephropathy • 3-Nitrobenzanthrone
Introduction
Aristolochic acid (AA), the natural extract of Aristolochia plants consists of structurally related nitrophenanthrene carboxylic acids, the major components being aristolochic acid I (AAI) and aristolochic acid II (AAII) (Fig. 1a) (Arlt et al. 2002c). AA is found in all parts of plants of both the Aristolochia and Asarum genera of the family Aristolochi-aceae. Aristolochia herbs have been used for remedies throughout the world since antiquity and they remain in use
Published online: 24 August 2016
1 Springer
Fig. 1 Proposed pathways of bioactivation and DNA adduct formation by AA (a) and 3-NBA (b). See text for details
today, particularly in Chinese herbal medicine (Schmeiser et al. 2009).
In the 1970s the anti-inflammatory properties of AA prompted the production of pharmaceutical preparations until it was shown that AA is a strong carcinogen in rats (Mengs et al. 1982). Subsequently, AA was found to be a genotoxic mutagen and all pharmaceutical preparations containing AA were withdrawn from the market first in Germany and later in many other countries. In 2012 AA was classified by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) as carcinogenic to humans (Group 1) acting by a genotoxic mechanism. Today there is compelling evidence that human exposure to AA leads to chronic renal disease and upper urinary tract cancer known as aris-tolochic acid nephropathy (AAN) (Nortier et al. 2000),
which is now recognised as a global disease (Gokmen et al. 2013).
The metabolism of AA has been studied in several species demonstrating that the major metabolites found in urine and faeces are the aristolactams I and II (Chan et al. 2006; Krumbiegel et al. 1987), produced by exhaustive six-electron reduction of the nitro group. Other minor metabolites are formed through O-demethylation of AAI to 8-hydroxyaristolochic acid I (AAIa) and through deni-tration. Further reduction of AAIa leads to aristolactam Ia. The only metabolites identified in humans so far are the aristolactams I and II found in urine (Krumbiegel et al. 1987).
Many studies have shown that AAI and AAII are generally bioactivated by reduction of the nitro group (Fig. 1a)
(Stiborova et al. 2013, 2014a). Several human enzymes capable of activating AA by nitroreduction have been identified and include cytosolic NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreduc-tase (NQO1) (Stiborova et al. 2002, 2003), and microsomal enzymes including cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A1, CYP1A2 and NADPH:CYP oxidoreductase (Arlt et al. 2011, 2015a; Stiborova et al. 2001a, 2005, 2012). It has been shown that both AAI and AAII exert their genotoxic and carcinogenic properties by DNA adduct formation and that reductive metabolic activation is a prerequisite for generation of DNA adducts in vivo and in vitro (Gokmen et al. 2013; Schmeiser et al. 2009).
Deduced from the structures of the AA-DNA adducts characterised spectroscopically, we have proposed that a N-acylnitrenium ion with a delocalised positive charge is the ultimate carcinogen binding covalently to DNA and forming DNA adducts (Stiborova et al. 2014b). This pen-tacyclic aristolactam cation ion is formed during partial reduction of the nitro group to the N-hydroxy derivative (N-hydroxyaristolactam) after condensation with the car-boxylic acid moiety in the peri position is the direct precursor for binding to the exocyclic amino group of nucle-obases via the C7 position (Fig. 1a). The major AA-DNA adducts have been identified as: 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl) aristolactam I (dA-AAI); 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)aristo-lactam I (dG-AAI); 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)aristolactam II (dA-AAII); and 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)aristolactam II (dG-AAII) (Schmeiser et al. 2009, 2014). Characteristic AT to TA transversion mutations have been found in urothelial tumours of AAN patients highlighting the role of dA-AAI adducts as critical premutagenic lesions in AA malignancy (Arlt et al. 2007; Lord et al. 2004; Nik-Zainal et al. 2015; Poon et al. 2013).
The N-hydroxyaristolactams I and II have been detected in the urine of AA-treated rats (Chan et al. 2007) indicating that they are rather stable compounds. This was confirmed by the study of Sidorenko et al. (2014) which showed that both N-hydroxyaristolactams did not react with DNA in vitro at pH 5.8 in the presence or absence of zinc dust as a reducing agent. It is well known that conjugation reactions catalysed by phase II enzymes are often involved in the activating metabolism of carcinogenic nitroaromat-ics (Arlt et al. 2005; Glatt and Meinl 2004; Glatt et al. 2016; Rendic and Guengerich 2012). Phase II metabolites of AA have been found in the urine and faeces of AA-treated rodents and include the N- and O-glucuronide of aristolactam Ia and the Os-glucuronide, the Os-acetate and Os-sulfonated ester of AAIa (Chan et al. 2007); AAIa is considered to be a detoxification product (Levova et al. 2011; Stiborova et al. 2012). As shown for other aromatic hydroxylamines (Glatt and Meinl 2004; Glatt et al. 2016), like those generated during the metabolism of 3-nitroben-zanthrone (3-NBA) (Arlt et al. 2002b, 2003, 2005), the
N-hydroxyaristolactams may be further activated by O-acetylation or O-sulfonation to reactive esters capable of generating the same electrophilic species (aristolac-tam-nitrenium ions) as formed by direct cleavage of the hydroxyl group. However, such aristolactam-N-oxy-esters have not yet been identified in studies of the metabolism of AA, which may be owed to their high reactivity.
Some of us recently reported that phase II reactions do not play a role in the bioactivation of AAI; neither native enzymes present in human cytosol nor human recombinant sulfotransferase (e.g. SULT1A enzymes) nor N,O-acetyltransferases (NATs) enhanced AAI-DNA adduct levels in vitro (Stiborova et al. 2011). In contrast, Meinl et al. (2006) demonstrated that expression of human SULTs (mainly SULT1A1) increased the mutagenic activity of the natural mixture AA in bacterial and mammalian cells. Moreover, Sidorenko et al. (2014) showed that O-sulfonated and O-acetylated N-hydroxyaristolactam I and II readily form DNA adducts in vitro and that binding of N-hydroxyaristolactam I and II to DNA was stimulated by mouse cytosol in the presence of 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate (PAPS), the cofactor for SULT enzymes. Furthermore, analysis showed that human SULT1B1, SULT1A1 and SULT1A2 can stimulate DNA adduct formation by N-hydroxyaristolactam I and II (Sidorenko et al. 2014).
The primary aim of the present study was to evaluate the bioactivation of AAI and AAII mediated by human SULT1A1 in a transgenic mouse model. We employed a transgenic mouse line carrying the functional human SULT1A1-SULT1A2 gene cluster (Dobbernack et al. 2011). In addition, we used Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mouse lines (Bendadani et al. 2014a; Herrmann et al. 2014). DNA adduct formation in vivo and in vitro was investigated by the 32P-postlabelling method.
Materials and methods Carcinogens
Aristolochic acid mixture was purchased from ACROS Organics (#226095000). 3-NBA (CAS number 17117-349) was prepared as previously reported (Arlt et al. 2002b).
Isolation of AAI and AAII
AAI (CAS number 313-67-7) and AAII (CAS number 475-80-9) were purified from the commercially available AA mixture by reverse phase chromatography. Injections (1 mL) of AA mixture, at 10 mg/mL concentration in ace-tonitrile/25 mM triethylammonium acetate (TEA) mix, were made onto a Gemini column (10 ^m, 250 x 21.2 mm,
C18, Phenomenex, USA). Chromatographic separation at room temperature was carried out using 322 HPLC pump (Gilson, USA) over a 15-min gradient elution from 25:75 to 40:60 acetonitrile/25 mM TEA at a flow rate of 20 mL/ min. Collection was triggered by UV signal (acquired at 254 nm) and collected using a Gilson GX-281 Liquid Handler system (Gilson, USA). The resulting TEA salts of AAI and AAII were converted back to the free acids using HCl. Addition of molar equivalent of NaOH produced the sodium salts which were freeze-dried for use. The purity of AAI and AAII (as sodium salts) was checked using 1D and 2D NMR and high-resolution mass spectrometry (HRMS) which confirmed the compound structures.
Mouse lines
Wild-type (WT) FVB/N mice (subsequently termed WT mice) were purchased from Harlan (Borchen, Germany). The generation of transgenic FVB/N mice with multiple copies of the human SULT1A1-SULT1A2 gene cluster integrated in chromosome 9 has been described elsewhere (Dobbernack et al. 2011). The line termed tg1 in the original study was used. The homozygous transgenic line was bred with WT mice to generate animals with a hemizy-gous gene status with respect to the human transgene (subsequently termed hSULT1A1/2). Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice were constructed as described elsewhere (Bendadani et al. 2014a; Herrmann et al. 2014).
Animal treatment
All animal experiments were conducted in accordance with the law at the German Institute of Human Nutrition (DIfE) Potsdam-Rehbrücke, Nuthetal, Germany, after approval by the Landesamt für Umwelt, Gesundheit und Verbraucherschutz of the State of Brandenburg (reference 23-234718-2009). Animals were maintained under timed lighting conditions. Food (Altromin C1000 pellets, Altromin, Germany) and water were available ad libitum. Groups male mice (n = 4; 8-10 weeks of age) were used throughout the study. WT, hSULT1A1/2, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice were treated with a single dose of 50 mg/kg body weight AAI or AAII by oral gavage according to treatment protocols used previously to study AA metabolism (Arlt et al. 2011; Levova et al. 2011; Stiborova et al. 2012). AAI and AAII (as sodium salts) were dissolved in water at a concentration of 5 mg/mL. Control mice received gavage of solvent (water) only. Similarly, WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice were injected i.p. with a single dose of 2 mg/kg body weight of 3-NBA according to treatment protocols used previously to study 3-NBA metabolism (Arlt et al. 2005; Krais et al. 2016a; Kucab et al. 2016). 3-NBA was dissolved in tricaprylin at a concentration of 0.2 mg/mL.
Control animals received solvent (tricaprylin) only. Animals were killed 24 h post-treatment, and their kidney, bladder, liver, lung, forestomach, glandular stomach, small intestine and colon were removed, snap-frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 °C until further analysis. DNA was isolated from tissue by a standard phenol-chloroform extraction method.
Detection of DNA adducts by 32P-postlabelling
AAI- and AAII-DNA adduct formation was analysed by the nuclease P1 enrichment version of the 32P-postlabel-ling method as described (Schmeiser et al. 1996, 2012). Resolution of 32P-labelled adducts was performed by pol-yethyleneimine-cellulose (PEI) thin-layer chromatography (TLC) using the following chromatographic conditions: D1: 1 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.5; D3: 3.5 M lithium formate, 8.5 M urea, pH 4.0; D4: 0.8 M lithium chloride, 0.5 M Tris-HCl, 8.5 M urea, pH 9.0; D5: 1.7 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.0. After chromatography, TLC plates were scanned using a Packard Instant Imager (Dowers Grove, IL, USA), and DNA adduct levels (RAL, relative adduct labelling) were calculated as described (Schmeiser et al. 2013). Results were expressed as DNA adducts/108 normal nucle-otides. AA-DNA adducts were identified using reference compounds as described (Schmeiser et al. 1996). Urothe-lial DNA samples from AAN patients were included in the analysis for comparison (Nortier et al. 2000; Schmeiser et al. 2014). For 3-NBA, the butanol-enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling assay was performed to determine DNA adduct formation (Arlt et al. 2002b; Phillips and Arlt 2014). Chromatographic conditions for TLC were: D1: 1.0 M sodium phosphate, pH 6.0; D3: 4.0 M lithium formate, 7.0 M urea, pH 3.5; D4: 0.8 M lithium chloride, 0.5 M Tris, 8.5 M urea, pH 8.0. Using Instant Imager technology, DNA adduct levels (i.e. RAL) were calculated as described (Arlt et al. 2002b) and expressed as DNA adducts/108 nucleotides. 3-NBA-derived DNA adducts were identified as reported (Arlt et al. 2001, 2006).
Expression of Sult1a1/SULT1A1 and Nqol by Western blotting
For the preparation of whole tissue protein, tissues (5-10 mg) of WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice treated with AAI and AAII were homogenised in 300 pL of T-PER™ buffer supplemented with 1 % Halt™ Protease Inhibitor (both from Thermo Scientific). Samples were sonicated and cen-trifuged for 20 min at 13,000g at 4 °C. The supernatant was removed and protein concentration was determined using the Pierce® BCA protein assay kit (Thermo Scientific, USA) according to manufacturer instructions. Protein samples (20 pg) were denatured with ß-mercaptoethanol
at 80 °C for 10 min prior to loading onto 10 % Bis-Tris 26-well NuPAGE midi gels. Proteins were separated by sodium dodecyl sulfate-polyacrylamide electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE) in MOPS buffer at 130 V and subsequently transferred onto a nitrocellulose membrane at 100 V for 2 h. The membrane was blocked in 3 % w/v non-fat milk dissolved in 0.2 % TBS-T (Tris-buffered saline containing 0.2 % Tween-20), then probed overnight at 4 °C with the following antibodies: Human SULT1A1 was detected with antisera raised in rabbits against bacterial inclusion bodies of human SULT1A 1:10,000; (Martin et al. 2010), mouse Nqo1 was detected with rabbit pAb #N5288 (1:5000; Sigma). Peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-rabbit (#170-5046; 1:10,000; Bio-Rad) was used as secondary antibody. Gapdh was detected with mouse mAb #MAB374 (1:10,000; Millipore) in 3 % milk at room temperature for 1 h and peroxidase-conjugated goat anti-mouse as secondary anti-mouse (#170-5047; 1:10,000; Bio-Rad). All proteins were visualised using enhanced chemiluminescence SuperSignal West Pico detection reagent (#34080; Thermo Scientific).
Preparation of cytosols
Hepatic and renal cytosols were isolated as described (Arlt et al. 2008, 2015b; Krais et al. 2016a, b). Because treating the mice with AAI or AAII might influence levels and activities of xenobiotic-metabolising enzymes (XMEs), cytosols were isolated from organs of both control (vehicle-treated) and AAI-AAII-treated mice (see above). Pooled cytosolic fractions (n = 4 mice per group) were used for further analysis. Small aliquots were stored at -80 °C until use.
Cytosolic incubations used for AAI-DNA adduct analysis
The de-aerated and nitrogen-purged incubation mixtures, in which cytosols were used to activate AAI, contained 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), 0.2 % Tween 20, cofactors for cytosolic enzymes Nqo1 and sulfotransferase (1 mM NADPH with or without 100 pM PAPS), 1 mg mouse hepatic or renal cytosolic protein, 0.5 mg calf thymus DNA (2 mM dNp) and 0.5 mM AAI in a final volume of 750 pL. Incubations with cytosols were performed at 37 °C for 60 min; AAI-derived DNA adduct formation was found to be linear up to 2 h (Stiborova et al. 2003). Control incubations were performed either (1) without cytosol, (2) without cofactors (NADPH, PAPS), (3) without DNA or (4) without AAI. After extraction with ethyl acetate DNA was isolated from the residual water phase by a standard phenol/chloroform extraction method. AAI-DNA adduct formation was analysed by 32P-postlabelling as described above.
Determination of Nqol activity in cytosolic fractions
Nqo1 activity was measured in hepatic and renal cytosols using menadione (2-methyl-1,4-naphthoquinone) as a substrate as described previously (Levova et al. 2011, 2012; Mizerovska et al. 2011). The assay was improved by the addition of cytochrome c and Nqo1 activity expressed as nmol cytochrome c reduced.
Determination of sulfotransferase activity in cytosolic fractions
Sulfotransferase enzyme activity was characterised in renal and hepatic cytosolic samples by monitoring the formation of p-nitrophenol from a 5'-phosphoadenosine 3'-phospho-sulfate (PAPS)-regenerating system (Frame et al. 2000; Krais et al. 2016b). It is based on the catalysed synthesis of 2-naphthylsulphate from 2-naphthol and PAPS through sulfotransferase while PAPS is continuously regenerated by using p-nitrophenyl sulphate as sulfo-group donor. In a 96-well plate the incubation mixture (200 pL per well) contained 48 mM sodium phosphate buffer (pH 7.4), 20 pM PAPS, 5 mM p-nitrophenyl sulfate potassium salt, 0.1 mM 2-naphthol, 1 mM MgCl2 and 400-600 pg protein of cyto-solic fraction. Shortly before the measurement, the reaction was initiated by the addition of 2-naphthol. The colorimet-ric formation of p-nitrophenol was detected by its absorb-ance at 405 nm in kinetic manner every 2 min for 60 min on a Synergy HT Plate Reader (Bio-TEK Instruments). Enzyme activities were calculated as nmol p-nitrophenol per min/mg protein.
Cytosolic incubations used for 3-NBA-derived DNA adduct analysis
The de-aerated and nitrogen-purged incubation mixtures, in a final volume of 750 pL, consisted of 50 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4), containing 0.2 % Tween 20, cofactors for cytosolic enzymes Nqo1 and Sult/SULT (1 mM NADPH with or without 100 pM PAPS), 1 mg of mouse hepatic cytosolic protein, 100 pM 3-NBA (dissolved in 7.5 pL dimethylsulfoxide [DMSO]) and 0.5 mg of calf thymus DNA. The reaction was initiated by adding 3-NBA. Incubations with human cytosols were carried out at 37 °C for 3 h; the cytosol-mediated 3-NBA-derived DNA adduct formation was found to be linear up to 4 h (Arlt et al. 2005). Control incubations were carried out (1) without activating system (cytosol), (2) without cofactors (NADPH, PAPS), (3) without DNA or (4) without 3-NBA. After extraction with ethyl acetate, DNA was isolated from the residual water phase by phenol/chloroform extraction. 3-NBA-derived DNA adduct formation was analysed by 32P-postlabelling as described above.
Statistical analysis
Statistical analyses were performed with Prism Graph-Pad Software (version 6.04), and P < 0.05 was considered significant.
Results
DNA adduct formation in WT versus HSULT1A1/2 mice treated with AAI, AAII and 3-NBA
AAI-/AAII-DNA adduct formation was determined by 32P-postlabelling in kidney, bladder, liver, lung, forestom-ach, glandular stomach, small intestine and colon of WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice treated with a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg body weight AAI or AAII for 24 h. The adduct pattern induced by AAI and AAII were qualitatively similar in all organs of both mouse lines tested. The pattern induced by AAI consisted of two major adduct spots, identified previously (Arlt et al. 2002c) as 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-aristolactam I (dA-AAI) and 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam I (dG-AAI) (see insert Fig. 2a). Similarly, after treatment with AAII two observed major adduct spots were identified (Arlt et al. 2002c) as 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-aristolactam II (dA-AAII) and 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam II (dG-AAII) (see insert Fig. 2b). dA-AAI, dG-AAI and dA-AAII have been found in urothelial tissue of AAN patients (Arlt et al. 2002a; Bieler et al. 1997; Nor-tier et al. 2000; Schmeiser et al. 2012). No DNA adducts were detected in control (vehicle-treated) animals (data not shown).
Total AAI-DNA adduct levels found in organs ranged from 25 to 2300 adducts per 108 nucleotides (Fig. 2a). Highest DNA binding was observed in the kidney where adduct levels were ~35-fold higher than in liver, followed by forestomach and small intestine, but there were no significant differences between both mouse lines in DNA adduct formation in any of the tissues investigated (Fig. 2a). Similarly no differences in DNA binding between mouse lines were observed after AAII treatment (Fig. 2b). Again, total AAII-DNA adduct formation was the highest in the kidney (~1300 adducts per 108 nucleotides) with adduct levels being much lower in all other tissues. It is noteworthy that AAI-DNA adduct levels in forestomach and small intestine were much higher compared to levels of DNA adduct induced by AAII in these tissues. Collectively, these findings indicate that expression of human SULT1A does not contribute to the bioactivation of AAI and AAII in vivo.
As 3-NBA is activated by SULTs (Arlt et al. 2002b, 2003, 2005), 3-NBA-DNA adduct formation in the same mouse lines was measured by 32P-postlabelling
in kidney, bladder, liver, lung, forestomach, glandular stomach, small intestine and colon after 3-NBA treatment with a single i.p. dose of 2 mg/kg body weight for 24 h. We have shown previously that metabolic activation of 3-NBA occurs after initial nitroreduction catalysed by cytosolic nitroreductases (e.g. NQO1) leading to ^-hydroxy-3-aminobenzan throne (N-OH-3-ABA) (Fig. 1b) (Arlt 2005). The genotoxicity (i.e. DNA adduct formation) of N-OH-3-ABA is enhanced by the expression of SULT1A1 or SULT1A2 in bacterial and mammalian cells in culture (Arlt et al. 2002b, 2003, 2005). Previous studies have also shown that enrichment by butanol extraction yields more adduct spots and a better recovery of 3-NBA-DNA adducts than using enrichment by nuclease P1 digestion (Arlt et al. 2001). The adduct pattern induced by 3-NBA consisted of a cluster of four major adducts (spots 1-4) in all tissues tested (see insert Fig. 3). These were characterised previously as 2-(2'-deoxyaden-osin-N6-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dA-N6-3-ABA; spot 1), 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-N2-3-ABA; spot 3) and N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-N-3-ABA); spot 4), while spot 2 is an as-yet-uncharacterised deoxyadenosine adduct (Arlt et al. 2001, 2006). No DNA adducts were observed in DNA isolated from tissue of control animals treated with vehicle only (tricaprylin) (data not shown).
Except for the liver, compared to WT mice DNA binding by 3-NBA was up to -fivefold higher in kidney, bladder, lung, forestomach, glandular stomach, small intestine and colon of hSULT1A1/2 mice (Fig. 3). These findings demonstrate that the expression of human SULT1A increases the activation of 3-NBA in several organs in vivo.
Organ-specific expression of human SULT1A1/2 and mouse Nqol proteins in WT and HSULT1A1/2 mice treated with AAI and AAII
In order to verify the expression of human SULT1A1/2 proteins in the hSULT1A1/2 mice treated with AAI and AAII we used Western blotting (Fig. 4). Immunoblotting using anti-hSULT1A antisera that cross-reacted only marginally with murine Sult1a proteins was performed in colon, small intestine, glandular stomach, kidney, liver and lung. No tissue for analysis was left from forestomach and bladder as the whole organs were used for DNA adduct analysis. The tissue-specific expression of human SULT1A1/2 proteins in hSULT1A1/2 mice was qualitatively similar after treatment with AAI and AAII (Fig. 4a). No expression of human SULT1A1/2 protein (or a protein that could be confounded with human SULT1A1/2) was detected in WT mice under the experimental conditions used. No induction of human SULT1A1/2 proteins was found after AAI or AAII treatment relative to control (vehicle-treated) mice. Relatively
A 3000
<B 2000
0 1500 .2
3 1000 i c
500 -1-
1 500 0) a
_l 400 ¡2 300 200 100 0
hSULT1A1/2
rii-i fin
Kidney - hSULT1A1/2
dG-AAl
dA-AAl
3000 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 500 400 300 200 100 0
r—^r /
hSULT1A1/2
Kidney - hSULT1A1/2
dG-AAII
dA-AAII
Fig. 2 Total DNA adduct levels measured by the nuclease P1 enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling method in various organs of WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice after exposure to a single oral dose of 50 mg/ kg body weight AAI (a) or AAII (b). Values are the mean ± SD (n = 4 animals). Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t test; no significant differences were observed between WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice. Inserts Autoradiograms of DNA adducts, measured by 32P-postlabelling, in kidney tissue of hSULT1A1/2 mice.
high expression of hSULT1A1/2 proteins was observed in kidney, liver and lung; expression was lower in colon, small intestine and glandular stomach.
These profiles are representative of adduct pattern obtained with DNA from other mouse tissues including bladder, liver, lung, fores-tomach, glandular stomach, small intestine and colon, and those in WT mice. The origin (OR) on the TLC plate, at the bottom left-hand corners, was cut off before exposure. 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-aris-tolactam I (dA-AAI); 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam I (dG-AAI); 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-aristolactam II (dA-AAII); 7-(deoxy-guanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam II (dG-AAII)
Strong expression of murine Nqo1 protein was observed in colon, small intestine, glandular stomach and kidney (Fig. 4a). Interestingly, the strongest expression of Nqo1
a < 10
F=2.5*
F=4.6***
hSULT1A1/2
F=3.0**
F=5.3*
"I F=2.5*
I F=4.0
F=3.2*
v^ v^ /
// SS f / s
Kidney - hSULT1A1/2 4
y'w. .
S ■" ' v
m tn a) 30
Fig. 3 Total DNA adduct levels measured in various organs of WT and HSULT1A1/2 mice after exposure to a single i.p. dose of 2 mg/ kg body weight 3-NBA. DNA adduct formation was determined by the butanol-enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling method. Values are the mean ± SD (n = 3 animals). F, fold difference in DNA binding relative to WT mice. Statistical analysis was performed by Student's t test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001; different from WT mice). Insert Autoradiogram of DNA adducts, measured by 32P-postlabelling, in kidney tissue of HSULT1A1/2 mice. These pro-
was observed in glandular stomach, even though it had the weakest expression of human SULT1A1/2. Overall, the tissue distribution of the Nqol protein expression was similar in WT and HSULT1A1/2 mice, except for glandular stomach where expression levels were more variable (Fig. 4a). In comparison Nqol protein levels were relatively low in liver and lung and hardly visible on the blots comparing all tissues (Fig. 4a). Therefore, Nqo1 expression levels in kidney, liver and lung were reanalysed in separate blots using a longer film exposure time. As shown in Fig. 4b, Nqol expression was now clearly detectable in those tissues. Liver and kidney Nqo1 was induced by AAI and AAII in both WT and HSULT1A1/2 mice, whereas this effect was not seen in lung (Fig. 4b).
DNA adduct formation by AAI in vitro and enzyme activity in renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions isolated from WT and HSULT1A1/2 mice treated with AAI and AAII
In a second set of experiments to investigate the potential role of human SULT1A1/2 on the metabolic activation of AAI, we incubated renal or hepatic cytosolic fractions
files are representative of adduct pattern obtained with DNA from other mouse tissues including bladder, liver, lung, forestomach, glandular stomach, small intestine and colon, and those in WT mice. The origin (OR) on the TLC plate, at the bottom left-hand corners, was cut off before exposure. Spot 1, 2-(2'-deoxyadenosin-A'6-yl)-3-am-inobenzanthrone (dA-A^-3-ABA); spot 2, as-yet-uncharacterised deoxyadenosine adduct; spot 3, 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-3-amin-obenzanthrone (dG-N2-3-ABA); and spot 4, N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-N-3-ABA)
from WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice in vitro with DNA and AAI to determine AAI-DNA adduct formation by 32P-post-labelling (Fig. 5). Cytosolic incubations were conducted in the presence and absence of PAPS but all contained NADPH as a cofactor. In the absence of PAPS, NADPH-dependent DNA adduct formation of AAI in cytosols was used as a measure of AAI bioactivation by murine Nqo1. Subsequently in the presence of PAPS, any potential alterations in AAI-DNA adduct levels should be attributable to AAI bioactivation by murine Sult1a1/2 in WT mice or human SULT1A1/2 in HSULT1A1/2 mice. Renal (Fig. 5; upper panels) and hepatic (Fig. 5; lower panels) cytosols were capable of bioactivating AAI to form DNA adducts, generating the same pattern of AAI-DNA adducts as found in vivo (Fig. 5, inserts). In both renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions of untreated WT and HSULT1A1/2 mice no difference in AAI-DNA adduct formation was observed after the addition of PAPS (Fig. 5), indicating that neither murine nor human SULTs contribute to AAI bioactivation. This conclusion is in line with the observation that Nqo1 enzyme activity in renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions was similar for both genotypes (Fig. 6a, c), suggesting that AAI-DNA adduct formation in vitro is predominantly
Fig. 4 a Western blot analysis of human SULT1A1/2 and murine Nqol protein expression in whole tissue lysates isolated from WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice after exposure to a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg body weight AAI or AAII. b Western blot analysis of murine Nqol protein expression in whole tissue lysates isolated from the kidney, liver and lung of WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice after exposure to AAI or AAII. Gapdh was used as loading control and representative blots are shown. CO colon, SI small intestine, GS glandular stomach, KI kidney, LI liver, LU lung, SPL spleen. Representative images of the Western blotting are shown, and at least duplicate analysis was performed from independent experiments
hSULT1A1/2-humanised
Wild-type
31 kDa
32 kDa
AAI-treated J control AAI-treated control
mm m ~ 1 1
•mm ¡» -•«
hSULT1A1/2-humanised AAII-treated control Wild-type AAlI-treated1 control
hSULT1A1/2
38 kDa
hSULT1A1/2 Nqol
.r _ .r
31 kDa
tflMI^II
KI I LI I LU
32 kDa
31 kDa
38 kDa
catalysed by Nqol. In contrast, the sulfotransferase activities in renal and hepatic cytosols, measured colori-metrically as sulfo-transfer from p-nitrophenol sulfate to 2-naphthol, were manifold higher in hSULT1A1/2 mice compared to WT mice (Fig. 6b, d). As no difference in AAI-DNA adduct formation was observed in the presence of PAPS, despite massive differences in sulfotransferase activities in cytosolic fractions, these results confirm the conclusion that SULTs do not contribute to the metabolic activation of AAI (i.e. AAI-DNA adduct formation; Fig. 5) under these experimental conditions.
Treatment of mice with AAI and AAII led to an induction of Nqol activity in both kidney and liver (Fig. 6a, c). For example, in WT kidney induction of Nqo1 activity was found both after AAI and AAII treatment whereas in liver only AAII was able to induce Nqol activity. Induction of sulfotrans-ferase activity was also observed in both kidney and liver after AAI and AAII treatment; the pattern of induction was dependent on the mouse line (i.e. WT or hSULT1A1/2 mice) and compound used (i.e. AAI or AAII) (Fig. 6b, d). In incubations using cytosolic fractions isolated from AAI- or AAII-treated mice AAI-DNA adduct formation was significantly
increased under certain experimental conditions relative to cytosolic incubations from untreated animals (Fig. 5). However, it is noteworthy that the increases in AAI-DNA adduct levels were often relatively small. Under certain experimental conditions AAI-DNA adduct levels observed in vitro seem to correlate with Nqol activity (compare Fig. 6a, c). Whereas in renal cytosols isolated from AAI- and AAII-treated mice increased AAI-DNA adduct levels seem to be associated with enhanced Nqol activity, these associations were less clear in hepatic cytosols isolated from AAI- and AAII-treated mice. Although both AAI and AAII were capable of inducing sul-fotransferase activity in treated animals (Fig. 6b, d), no clear associations can be made to the observed AAI-DNA adduct levels in vitro in cytosolic incubations (compare Fig. 5). For example, given the strong differences in sulfotransferase activities in hepatic cytosols between WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice in both control (vehicle-treated) and AAI-/AAII-treated animals, these differences are not observed in AAI-DNA adduct formation in vitro in the same cytosolic sample. Thus, it seems unlikely that sulfotransferase detected in the transfer assay make any major contribution to AAI bioactivation leading to DNA adduct formation in vitro.
2.5 -2.0 1.5 H
0.5 0.0
Without PAPS
Renal cytosols
Renal cytosols
With PAPS
Renal cytosols
Renal cytosols
§§ #
K^ ^ /
^ jy ^ ,<y ^
Renal cytosol - hSULT1A1/2
dG-AAl
^ dA-AAl
Without PAPS
O 2.5 H
IS 2.0
o 1.5 H
<5 0.5H 0.0
Hepatic cytosols
Hepatic cytosols
(fl 3.0 a
■ r^ J-, flffi
With PAPS
Hepatic cytosols
tfl 3.0
"■§ 2 5 H .2
¡j 2.0 c
2.0 1.5 -
0.0 11 I 1 1 I 1 1 I 1
tfl a ;u
Hepatic cytosols
Hepatic cytosol - hSULT1A1/2
dG-AAl
\ dA-AAl
Fig. 5 Total AAI-DNA adducts, as measured by the nuclease Pl-enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling method, formed ex vivo in renal (a, b) and hepatic cytosols (c, d) isolated from untreated, AAI- or AAII-pretreated WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice incubated with AAI and DNA in the absence (a and c) or presence of PAPS (b, d). Values are the mean ± range (n = 4; duplicate incubations and each sample was determined by two independent 32P-post-labelling analyses). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001—different from control WT mice;
DNA adduct formation in WT versus Sult1a1(-/-) or Sult1d1(-/-) mice treated with AAI and AAII
We next studied the role of murine Sults on metabolic activation of AAI and AAII in vivo. AAI-/AAII-DNA adduct formation was determined by 32P-postlabelling in kidney, liver and small intestine of WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice treated with a single oral dose of 50 mg/kg body weight AAI or AAII for 24 h. Besides Sultlal we also studied the potential influence of Sultldl as this isoenzyme is also highly expressed in kidney
#P < 0.05, ###P < 0.001—different from control HSULT1A1/2 mice; §§P < 0.01—different from incubation without PAPS). Inserts Representative autoradiograms of DNA adducts, measured by 32P-postla-belling, in AAI incubations with renal and hepatic cytosols. The origin (OR) on the TLC plate, at the bottom left-hand corners, was cut off before exposure. 7-(deoxyadenosine-N6-yl)-aristolactam I (dA-AAI); 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam I (dG-AAI); 7-(deoxy-adenosine-N6-yl)-aristolactam II (dA-AAII); 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam II (dG-AAII)
(Alnouti and Klaassen 2006), the target organ of AA (geno) toxicity. The DNA adduct pattern induced by AAI and AAII in WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice was the same as that found in hSULT1A1/2 mice (Fig. 7, inserts).
Total DNA adduct levels after AAI and AAII treatment ranged from 25 to 800 adducts per l08 nucleotides (Fig. 7). Highest DNA binding was observed in the kidney after both AAI and AAII exposure. It should be noted that the treatment of hSULT1A1/2 (compare Fig. 2) and knockout animals (Fig. 7) with AAI and AAII was done on separate occasions and that DNA adduct analyses for both treatment sets were
1200 -i
Kidney ***
Kidney
1200-.
*** *** """
*** ***
1500-1 1200-
i? 900-1
~ 6002 300--¡5 300--
Ji 250-w
|5 200-
J; 150-
"5 100-
Kidney
Kidney
1500-1 1200-~ 900 -| 600 -
2 300 -L ¡8 300 j .2 250 -
I2°°- *
a 150 - jl.
3 100-
J* / ^
* / / XT \p
1200 n
900 ^ 600-
300-1-
| 300 T
fr 250-I
<5 200-
O 150-
Z 100-1
1200-1 900 = 6008 300-L | 300--& 250-
O 150-
Z 10050 0
1500 -| 1200 -
i? 900 -I
~ 600 -
to o w ra
300 J-300 -r
in c ra
'S 1503
1500 -1200 -~ 900 -| 600 -
2 300 -«-1
I 300 -1-1
iH 250 -w
| 200 -
| 150 -
3 100 -
Fig. 6 Measurement of Nqol (a, c) and sulfotransferase (b, d) enzyme activity in cytosolic fractions of the kidneys (upper panels) and livers (lowerpanels) from untreated, AAI- or AAII-treated WT and hSULT1A1/2 mice. Nqol enzyme activity was determined using menadione and cytochrome c as substrate and expressed as nmol cytochrome c/min/mg protein. Sulfotransferase enzyme activity was determined using a colorimetric assay with p-nitrophenol sulfate as sulfo-donor
also done separately. These are possible reasons to explain the differences in DNA adduct levels observed in WT animals between sample sets; in AAI-treated kidney samples the difference is more pronounced than in AAII-treated kidney samples. In kidney knockout of Sultlal or Sultldl had no impact on AAI- or AAII-DNA adduct formation (Fig. 7a, d). Similarly, no differences in DNA adduct formation between mouse lines were found in liver (Fig. 7b, e) and small intestine (Fig. 7c, f), except for AAI-treated Sult1d1(-/-) mice where DNA binding was -twofold higher in liver relative to WT. Collectively, these results demonstrate that in kidney murine Sults (i.e. Sultlal or Sultldl) do not contribute to AA genotoxicity (i.e. DNA adduct formation) in vivo.
and is expressed as nmol p-nitrophenol/min/mg protein. Values are the mean ± SD of three determinations. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001—different from control WT mice; ###P < 0.001—different from control hSULT1A1/2 mice)
DNA adduct formation by AAI and 3-NBA in vitro and enzyme activity in renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions isolated from WT, Sult1a1(-/-) or Sult1d1(-/-) mice treated with AAI and AAII
Hepatic and renal cytosols isolated from AAI-/AAII-pre-treated mice of all lines were incubated with AAI in the presence of DNA and the enzymatic cofactors NADPH and PAPS. We anticipated that any involvement of Sults in AAI bioactivation would result in diminished AAI-DNA adduct formation in incubations using cytosolic fractions from Sult-knockout mouse lines. Renal (Fig. 8a) and hepatic (Fig. 8b) cytosols were capable of bioactivating
Kidney - AAI
о 400 -
® 850
® о 500
8 о 400
Ф 300
Liver - AAI
F=2.1*
C Small intestine - AAI 1200 -i
® 850
500 500
С8 400 -1
<5 300 a
L 200 ^ 100 0
Kidney - Sult1a1(-/-)
dG-AAI
-AAI ^
Kidney - AAII
1200 -,
Ф 850
ф О 500
8 о 400
ф 300
_i 200
Liver - AAII
О r^i Fl
Small intestine - AAII
1200 -1
S 850 H О .2
n8 500 о
Г 400 н
а 300
S5 200 100 0
Kidney - Sult1a1(-/-)
dG-AAII
• т
dA-AAII
Fig. 7 Total DNA adduct levels measured by the nuclease P1 enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling method in kidney (a, d), liver (b, e) and small intestine (c, f) of WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice after exposure to a single oral dose of 50 mg/ kg body weight AAI (a-c) or AAII (d-f). Values are the mean ± SD (n = 4 animals). F, fold difference in DNA binding relative to WT mice. Statistical analysis was performed by one-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (*P < 0.05—different from WT mice). Inserts Autoradiograms of DNA adducts, measured
AAI to form DNA adducts, generating the same pattern of AAI-DNA adducts formed in vivo (Fig. 8, inserts). With both renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions of untreated WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice no difference in AAI-DNA adduct formation was observed in the presence of PAPS (Fig. 8), indicating that neither Sultlal nor Sultldl contributes to AAI bioactivation. This conclusion was in line with the observation that Nqol activity in renal and hepatic cytosolic fractions was similar for all three genotypes (Fig. 9), suggesting that AAI-DNA adduct formation in vitro is predominantly catalysed by Nqol. In contrast, when hepatic cytosols isolated from the same
by 32P-postlabelling, in kidney tissue of Sult1a1(-/-) mice. These profiles are representative of adduct pattern obtained with DNA from liver and small intestine, and those in WT and Sult1d1(-/-) mice. The origin (OR) on the TLC plate, at the bottom left-hand corners, was cut off before exposure. 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-aristolactam I (dA-AAI); 7-(deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-aristolactam I (dG-AAI); 7-(deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-aristolactam II (dA-AAII); 7-(deoxyguano-sin-N2-yl)-aristolactam II (dG-AAII)
mouse lines were incubated with 3-NBA in the presence of DNA, NADPH and PAPS, 3-NBA-induced DNA adduct levels were diminished by ~60 % in Sult1a1(-/—) cytosolic incubations relative to WT (Fig. 10b). These findings confirmed previous in vitro studies on the important role of SULT1A1 in 3-NBA genotoxicity (Arlt et al. 2001, 2003, 2005). The contribution of murine Sults in the bio-activation of 3-NBA was also demonstrated by the fact that 3-NBA-DNA adduct formation was up to -eightfold higher in incubations in the presence of PAPS compared to incubations without PAPS (Fig. 10). The pattern of 3-NBA-DNA adducts generated in vitro was the same as
With PAPS
With PAPS
With PAPS
Renal cytosols
Renal cytosols
Renal cytosols
О о о
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
^ ^ л
о 4.0
<u о 3.5
3 С 3.0
CO О 2.5
<U 2.0
£ 1.0
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
гг / /
Renal cytosol - Sult(-/-)
dG-AAI
dA-AAI
B With PAPS
With PAPS
With PAPS
Hepatic cytosols
Hepatic cytosols
Hepatic cytosols
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0
У / % /V
5.0 -,
и 4.5 -a
15 4.0 -I
Ф 3.5 -
1 3.0 -I с
со 2.5 о
! 1.5 J
< 10 -
2 0.5. 0.0
Hepatic cytosol - Sult(-/-)
dG-AAI
dA-AAI
Fig. 8 Total AAI-DNA adduct levels, as measured by the nuclease P1-enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling method, formed ex vivo in renal (a) and hepatic cytosols (b) isolated from untreated, AAI- or AAII-pretreated WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice incubated with AAI and DNA in the presence of PAPS. Values are the mean ± range (n = 4 analyses; duplicate incubations and each sample was determined by two independent 32P-postlabelling analyses). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.01,
that found in vivo (Fig. 10, insert). As shown in Fig. 10b disruption of Sult1d1 had no impact on 3-NBA-DNA adduct formation relative to WT.
The results obtained in incubations using cytosolic fractions isolated from AAI- or AAII-pretreated mice were more complex. As shown in Fig. 9 treatment of mice with
***P < 0.00l—different from control WT mice; ##P < 0.0l, ###P < 0.00l—different from control Sult1d1(-/-) mice). Inserts Representative autoradiograms of DNA adducts, measured by 32P-postlabelling, in AAI incubations with renal and hepatic cytosols. The origin (OR) on the TLC plate, at the bottom left-hand corners, was cut off before exposure. 7-(deoxyadenosine-A'6-yl-aristolactam I (dA-AAI); 7-(deoxyguanosin-W2-yl-aristolactam I (dG-AAI); 7-(deoxyadenosine-N6-yl-aristolactam II (dA-AAII); 7-(deoxyguano-sin-N2-yl-aristolactam II (dG-AAII)
AAI and AAII led to the induction of Nqol activity (compare also Fig. 6a, c). However, increased Nqol activity did not always correlate with the AAI-DNA adduct levels observed in in vitro incubations (compare Figs. 8 and 9). In other cytosolic incubations such as Sult1a1(-/-)-AAI and Sult1d1(-/-)-AAII (Fig. 9b) AAI-DNA adduct formation
Fig. 9 Nqol enzyme activity in cytosolic fractions of the kidneys (a) and livers (b) from untreated, AAI- or AAII-treated WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) using menadione and cytochrome c as substrate. Values are the mean ± SD of three determinations; Nqol enzyme activity is expressed as nmol cytochrome c/min/mg protein. Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (*P < 0.05, **P < 0.0l, ***P < 0.00l—dif-ferent from control WT mice; §§P < 0.0l, §§§P < 0.00l— different from control Sult1a1(-/-) mice; **P < 0.0l, ***P < 0.00l—different from control Sult1d1(-/-) mice, respectively)
.èr >
Kidney
Kidney
1250 -,
1000 -
500 500
1250 1000 750
re 500 -L
500 400 300 200 100 0
^ </ л-
500 500
§§§
Kidney
о n о
1250 1
1000 -
500 500
§§§
1250 1000
'5 750 -
to 500 -L 500 Т
ÎÎ 400 -
® 300 н
& 200 H z
100 -0
12501000750
500 500
400 3002001000
was actually lower compared to cytosolic incubations from control (vehicle-treated) mice of the same genotype. However, observed changes were relatively small, so it is difficult to draw any solid conclusions from these observations.
Discussion
A powerful tool of elucidating the activation pathway of chemical carcinogens is to analyse their ability to produce covalent DNA adducts and to determine what factors either enhance or inhibit adduct formation (Phillips 2013). This approach has been successfully used by Stiborova and co-workers to assess the bioactivation of AA (Arlt et al. 2015a; Stiborova et al. 2013, 2014a) and was therefore also employed in the present study. For the detection of DNA adducts we used the 32P-postlabelling method because the chemical structures of AA-DNA adducts observed in this assay have been identified. As for other nitroaromatics
(Arlt 2005), nitroreduction is the major activation pathway of AAI and AAII that is catalysed by a number of cyto-solic and microsomal enzymes, cytosolic NQOl being the most efficient nitroreductase (Stiborova et al. 200lb, 2002, 2003). Following activation by NQOl both AAI and AAII produce specific DNA adducts identical to those found in humans (Nortier et al. 2000; Schmeiser et al. l996, 20l2, 20l4), confirming that nitroreduction is the crucial step in the bioactivation of AA (Martinek et al. 20ll; Stiborova et al. 20ll).
Recently we reported that, in contrast to NQOl, human cytosolic phase II enzymes such as N,O-acetyltransferases (NATs) and SULTs do not play a role in AAI activation in cell-free in vitro systems (Stiborova et al. 20ll). Neither native enzymes present in human cytosol nor human recombinant sulfotransferase enhanced AAI-DNA adduct levels in vitro. Likewise, cofactors of NAT and SULT enzymes, acetyl-CoA and PAPS, respectively, did not stimulate the activation of AAI in human cytosolic samples rich
A 100 1 90
1 80 | 70
2 60 c
a 40 a
Without PAPS
Hepatic cytosols
100 1 90 80 70 60 50 -40 30 20 10
Without PAPS
Hepatic cytosols
§§§
§§§
§§§
Hepatic cytosol - Sult1a1(-/-)
'J.',. c-v' ■
Fig. 10 Total 3-NBA-DNA adduct levels, as measured by the butanol-enrichment version of the 32P-postlabelling method, formed in vitro in hepatic cytosols isolated from WT, Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice incubated with 3-NBA and DNA in the absence (a) or presence of PAPS (b). Values are the mean ± range (n = 4 analyses; duplicate incubations and each sample was determined by two independent 32P-postlabelling analyses). Statistical analysis was performed by two-way ANOVA followed by Tukey's multiple comparison test (***P < 0.001—different from WT mice; §§§P < 0.001—
in these enzymes. These findings fully correspond to results obtained in our previous study utilising cytosolic samples of several human donors to identify the participation of cytosolic enzymes in AAI activation (Stiborova et al. 2003).
Conjugation reactions catalysed by phase II enzymes like SULTs have been shown to be involved in the metabolic activation of many carcinogenic nitroaromatics and aromatic amines (Arlt et al. 2002b, 2003, 2005; Dob-bernack et al. 2011; Glatt and Meinl 2004; Glatt et al. 2016; Krais et al. 2016b). Hydroxylamine metabolites of nitroaromatics generally acquire increased reactivity upon sulfo-conjugation. We have shown in previous studies that the genotoxicity (i.e. DNA adduct formation) of another nitroaromatic, namely 3-NBA, is strongly influenced by human SULT1A1 and SULT1A2 (Arlt et al. 2002b, 2003, 2005). As expected treatment of hSULT1A1/2 mice with 3-NBA resulted in higher 3-NBA-DNA adduct formation in several organs compared to WT mice, demonstrating that the expression of human SULT1A1/2 increases the activation of 3-NBA in vivo. These results confirm the suitability of the employed mouse model to study the role of human SULT1A enzymes in the metabolism of environmental toxins. Other studies have used this mouse line to
different from incubation without PAPS). Insert Representative autoradiogram of DNA adducts, measured by 32P-postlabelling, in AAI incubations with hepatic cytosols. The origin (OR) on the TLC plate, at the bottom left-hand corners, was cut off before exposure. Spot 1, 2-(2'-deoxyadenosin-N6-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dA-N6-3-ABA); spot 2, as-yet uncharacterised deoxyadenosine adduct; spot 3, 2-(2'-deoxyguanosin-N2-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-N2-3-ABA); and spot 4, N-(2'-deoxyguanosin-8-yl)-3-aminobenzanthrone (dG-C8-N-3-ABA)
demonstrate the involvement of human SULT1A1/2 in the activation of the food genotoxicants 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine (PhIP) (Dobbernack et al. 2011), furfuryl alcohol (Sachse et al. 2014), 1-methylpyr-ene (Bendadani et al. 2014b) and methyleugenol (Herrmann et al. 2014).
In the case of AA, the N-hydroxyaristolactams may be further activated by O-acetylation or O-sulfo-conjugation to reactive esters capable of forming the same electrophilic species (aristolactam-nitrenium ions) as by nitroreductases and eventually the same AA-DNA adducts. However, such aristolactam-N-acetic acid esters or aristolactam-N-sulfuric acid esters have not yet been identified in in vivo studies on the metabolism of AA. When comparing DNA adduct formation of AAI and AAII between hSULT1A1/2 and WT mice, we found no significant differences in adduct levels or adduct patterns in several organs examined. Expression of human SULT1A1/2 proteins detected by immunoblot-ting was found only in the hSULT1A1/2 mice and not in WT mice. We also showed that the sulfotransferase activity in kidney and liver, the major organs involved in AA biotransformation, was many times higher in hSULT1A1/2 than WT mice but the increase in sulfotransferase activity
was not reflected in DNA adduct formation in these tissues as no differences were observed. These findings indicate that expression of human SULTlAl/2 does not contribute to the bioactivation of AAs in vivo.
Mouse models and cells derived from mice are often used to study experimental AAN and mechanisms related to AA carcinogenesis (Arlt et al. 20ll; Baudoux et al. 20l2; Krais et al. 20l5; Nik-Zainal et al. 20l5; Odell et al. 20l3; Wang et al. 20l2). Thus, it is also important to understand the role of murine Sults on AA bioactiva-tion. Alongside the Sult1a1(-/-) mice we also included mice with a knockout of Sultldl, an isoform that is preferentially expressed in mouse kidney (Alnouti and Klaas-sen 2006) and thus could contribute to the (geno)toxicity of AA in its target organ. In the tissues analysed adduct levels in Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice were similar to those in WT mice, except for AAI-treated livers of Sult1d1(-/-) mice where actually increased AAI-DNA adduct formation was observed. Collectively, these findings indicate that murine Sultlal and Sultldl do not contribute to the metabolic activation of AA in vivo. In contrast, we recently showed that Sultla-mediated bio-activation of PhIP in the kidney depended on Trp53 status in mice (Krais et al. 20l6b) and other studies using the Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/-) mice mouse lines have demonstrated that expression of murine Sultlal and Sultldl can be a critical determinant in the genotoxicity of furfuryl alcohol (Sachse et al. 20l4), methyleugenol (Herrmann et al. 20l4) and l-hydroxymethylpyrene (Ben-dadani et al. 20l4a).
It should be mentioned that studies using in vitro systems (e.g. utilising recombinant human enzymes) to elucidate the role of human SULTlAl in the bioactivation of AA have generated conflicting results (Martinek et al. 20ll; Meinl et al. 2006; Sidorenko et al. 20l4; Stiborova et al. 20ll). For instance, whereas overexpression of human recombinant SULTlAl in mammalian cells increased the genotoxicity (i.e. mutagenicity) of AA (Meinl et al. 2006), human recombinant SULTlAl did not increase AA geno-toxicity (i.e. DNA adduct formation) in a cell-free system (Stiborova et al. 20ll). Although useful, these models have limitations, including the challenge of predicting the in vivo situation from reductionist in vitro results. In contrast, in vivo mouse models (i.e. hSULT1A1/2 mice) take additional factors besides enzyme expression into account, such a route-of-administration, absorption, renal clearance and tissue-specific expression of XMEs. They also consider factors such as induction and/or inhibition of XMEs, as well as the presence of a variety of phase I and II enzymes, as critical determinants for the formation of reactive AA metabolites in vivo capable of forming DNA adducts. Several studies have shown that XMEs can behave differently in vitro and in vivo (Arlt et al. 2008, 20l2; Krais
et al. 2016a; Wohak et al. 2016). For example, some studies have revealed a paradox whereby CYP enzymes (particularly CYP1A1) appear to be more important for detoxification of benzo[a]pyrene in vivo, despite being involved in its metabolic activation in vitro (Arlt et al. 2008; Nebert et al. 2013).
Using ab initio calculations and molecular modelling have shown that the reaction free energy of dissociation of N-hydroxyaristolactam I is lower than that for N-OH-3-ABA (Stiborova et al. 2011, 2014b), the reactive intermediate of 3-NBA, the latter being used as a positive control in the present study. Hence, N-hydroxyaristolac-tam I decomposes spontaneously under the same conditions. Consequently, if the dissociation of the N-O bond in N-hydroxyaristolactam I (or its precursor, the open-ring hydroxylamine) is relatively fast, it is not the rate-limiting step in AAI-DNA adduct formation and any conjugation reaction (e.g. sulfation) would not make dissociation faster (i.e. would not lead to enhanced AAI-DNA adduct levels). These results indicate that the overall rate-controlling step during the reductive activation of AAI is not the enzymatic conjugation followed by spontaneous formation of the nitrenium/carbonium ion capable of reacting the DNA, but rather the initial nitroreduction mediated by NQO1 (Stiborova et al. 2011, 2014b). It should be noted that in the present study we did not treat the HSULT1A1/2 mice with N-hydroxyaristolactams as these AA metabolites were not available to us. Although it might be useful to treat HSULT1A1/2 mice with N-hydroxyaristolactams in future investigations, it is important to emphasise that humans are exposed to the natural mixture AA containing AAI and AAII and not N-hydroxyaristolactams 1 and 2. Interestingly, in vitro experiments with enzyme systems using AAI in the presence of NQO1, instead of N-hydroxyaristolactam I, showed that AAI-DNA adduct formation only increased after the addition of human SULT1B1 but not after the addition of SULT1A1 or SULT1A2 (Sidorenko et al. 2014), suggesting that human SULT1B1 may contribute to bioactivation of AA. Likewise, human SULT1B1 expressed in the target strain Salmonella typhimurium TA1538 enhanced the mutagenicity of AA, although somewhat less than expression of human SULT1A1 (Meinl et al. 2006). However, human SULT1B1 is primarily expressed in gut (Teubner et al. 2007); its expression in kidney is minimal (Meinl et al. 2006). Further studies are required to establish if human SULT1B1 contributes to the metabolic activation of AA in vivo.
In the present study, we investigated the contribution of the phase II enzyme SULT1A1 to the bioactivation of AAI and AAII in vivo using a transgenic mouse line carrying the functional human SULT1A1-SULT1A2 gene cluster as well as Sult1a1(-/-) and Sult1d1(-/—) knockout mouse lines. In summary, our results indicate that conjugation by
sulfation catalysed by SULT1A1/Sult1a1 does not play a role in the bioactivation of AAI and AAII in mice, whereas it is important in the activation of 3-NBA.
Acknowledgments Work at King's College London (Grant C313/ A14329) and Institute of Cancer Research (Grant C309/A8274) is supported by Cancer Research UK. Work at King's College London is further supported by the Wellcome Trust (Grants 101126/Z/13/Z and 101126/B/13/Z) and Natural Environmental Research Council (Grant NE/L006782/1). Work at Charles University was supported by Grant Agency of the Czech Republic (Grant 14-18344S in panel P301).
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecom-mons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
References
Alnouti Y, Klaassen CD (2006) Tissue distribution and ontogeny of
sulfotransferase enzymes in mice. Toxicol Sci 93(2):242-255 Arlt VM (2005) 3-Nitrobenzanthrone, a potential human cancer hazard in diesel exhaust and urban air pollution: a review of the evidence. Mutagenesis 20(6):399-410 Arlt VM, Bieler CA, Mier W, Wiessler M, Schmeiser HH (2001) DNA adduct formation by the ubiquitous environmental contaminant 3-nitrobenzanthrone in rats determined by (32)P-postlabe-ling. Int J Cancer 93(3):450-454 Arlt VM, Ferluga D, Stiborova M et al (2002a) Is aristolochic acid a risk factor for Balkan endemic nephropathy-associated urothelial cancer? Int J Cancer 101(5):500-502 Arlt VM, Glatt H, Muckel E et al (2002b) Metabolic activation of the environmental contaminant 3-nitrobenzanthrone by human acetyltransferases and sulfotransferase. Carcinogenesis 23(11):1937-1945 Arlt VM, Stiborova M, Schmeiser HH (2002c) Aristolochic acid as a probable human cancer hazard in herbal remedies: a review. Mutagenesis 17(4):265-277 Arlt VM, Glatt H, Muckel E et al (2003) Activation of 3-nitroben-zanthrone and its metabolites by human acetyltransferases, sul-fotransferases and cytochrome P450 expressed in Chinese hamster V79 cells. Int J Cancer 105(5):583-592 Arlt VM, Stiborova M, Henderson CJ et al (2005) Environmental pollutant and potent mutagen 3-nitrobenzanthrone forms DNA adducts after reduction by NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase and conjugation by acetyltransferases and sulfotransferases in human hepatic cytosols. Cancer Res 65(7):2644-2652 Arlt VM, Schmeiser HH, Osborne MR et al (2006) Identification of three major DNA adducts formed by the carcinogenic air pollutant 3-nitrobenzanthrone in rat lung at the C8 and N2 position of guanine and at the N6 position of adenine. Int J Cancer 118(9):2139-2146 Arlt VM, Stiborova M, vom Brocke J et al (2007) Aristolochic acid mutagenesis: molecular clues to the aetiology of Balkan endemic nephropathy-associated urothelial cancer. Carcinogenesis 28(11):2253-2261 Arlt VM, Stiborova M, Henderson CJ et al (2008) Metabolic activation of benzo[a]pyrene in vitro by hepatic cytochrome P450 contrasts with detoxification in vivo: experiments with hepatic cytochrome P450 reductase null mice. Carcinogenesis 29(3):656-665
Arlt VM, Levova K, Barta F et al (2011) Role of P450 1A1 and P450 1A2 in bioactivation versus detoxication of the renal carcinogen aristolochic acid I: studies in Cyp1a1-/—, Cyp1a2-/—, and Cyp1a1/1a2-/— mice. Chem Res Toxicol 24(10):1710-1719 Arlt VM, Poirier MC, Sykes SE et al (2012) Exposure to benzo[a] pyrene of Hepatic Cytochrome P450 Reductase Null (HRN) and P450 Reductase Conditional Null (RCN) mice: detection of benzo[a]pyrene diol epoxide-DNA adducts by immunohisto-chemistry and 32P-postlabelling. Toxicol Lett 213(2):160-166 Arlt VM, Henderson CJ, Wolf CR, Stiborova M, Phillips DH (2015a) The Hepatic Reductase Null (HRN) and Reductase Conditional Null (RCN) mouse models as suitable tools to study metabolism, toxicity and carcinogenicity of environmental pollutants. Toxicol Res 4(3):548-562 Arlt VM, Krais AM, Godschalk RW et al (2015b) Pulmonary inflammation impacts on CYP1A1-mediated respiratory tract DNA damage induced by the carcinogenic air pollutant benzo[a]pyr-ene. Toxicol Sci 146:213-225 Baudoux TE, Pozdzik AA, Arlt VM et al (2012) Probenecid prevents acute tubular necrosis in a mouse model of aristolochic acid nephropathy. Kidney Int 82(10):1105-1113 Bendadani C, Meinl W, Monien B et al (2014a) Determination of sulfotransferase forms involved in the metabolic activation of the genotoxicant 1-hydroxymethylpyrene using bacterially expressed enzymes and genetically modified mouse models. Chem Res Toxicol 27(6):1060-1069 Bendadani C, Meinl W, Monien BH, Dobbernack G, Glatt H (2014b) The carcinogen 1-methylpyrene forms benzylic DNA adducts in mouse and rat tissues in vivo via a reactive sulphuric acid ester. Arch Toxicol 88(3):815-821 Bieler CA, Stiborova M, Wiessler M, Cosyns JP, van Ypersele de Strihou C, Schmeiser HH (1997) 32P-post-labelling analysis of DNA adducts formed by aristolochic acid in tissues from patients with Chinese herbs nephropathy. Carcinogenesis 18(5):1063-1067
Chan W, Cui L, Xu G, Cai Z (2006) Study of the phase I and phase II metabolism of nephrotoxin aristolochic acid by liquid chro-matography/tandem mass spectrometry. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom 20(11):1755-1760 Chan W, Luo HB, Zheng Y, Cheng YK, Cai Z (2007) Investigation of the metabolism and reductive activation of carcinogenic aristolochic acids in rats. Drug Metab Dispos 35:866-874 Dobbernack G, Meinl W, Schade N et al (2011) Altered tissue distribution of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo[4,5-b]pyridine-DNA adducts in mice transgenic for human sulfotransferases 1A1 and 1A2. Carcinogenesis 32(11):1734-1740 Frame LT, Ozawa S, Nowell SA et al (2000) A simple colorimetric assay for phenotyping the major human thermostable phenol sulfotransferase (SULT1A1) using platelet cytosols. Drug Metab Dispos 28(9):1063-1068 Glatt H, Meinl W (2004) Use of genetically manipulated Salmonella typhimurium strains to evaluate the role of sulfotransferases and acetyltransferases in nitrofen mutagenicity. Carcinogenesis 25(5):779-786
Glatt H, Sabbioni G, Monien BH, Meinl W (2016) Use of genetically manipulated Salmonella typhimurium strains to evaluate the role of human sulfotransferases in the bioactivation of nitro- and ami-notoluenes. Environ Mol Mutagen 57(4):299-311 Gokmen MR, Cosyns JP, Arlt VM et al (2013) The epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of aristolochic acid nephropathy: a narrative review. Ann Int Med 158(6):469-477 Herrmann K, Engst W, Meinl W et al (2014) Formation of hepatic DNA adducts by methyleugenol in mouse models: drastic decrease by Sult1a1 knockout and strong increase by transgenic human SULT1A1/2. Carcinogenesis 35(4):935-941
Krais AM, Muhlbauer KR, Kucab JE et al (2015) Comparison of the metabolic activation of environmental carcinogens in mouse embryonic stem cells and mouse embryonic fibroblasts. Toxicol In Vitro 29(1):34-43 Krais AM, Speksnijder EN, Melis JP et al (2016a) The impact of p53 on DNA damage and metabolic activation of the environmental carcinogen benzo[a]pyrene: effects in Trp53(+/+), Trp53(+/-) and Trp53(-/—) mice. Arch Toxicol 90(4):839-851 Krais AM, Speksnijder EN, Melis JP et al (2016b) Metabolic activation of 2-amino-1-methyl-6-phenylimidazo [4,5-b]pyridine and DNA adduct formation depends on p53: studies in Trp53(+/+), Trp53(+/-) and Trp53(-/—) mice. Int J Cancer 138(4):976-982 Krumbiegel G, Hallensleben J, Mennicke WH, Rittmann N, Roth HJ (1987) Studies on the metabolism of aristolochic acids I and II. Xenobiotica 17(8):981-991 Kucab JE, Zwart EP, van Steeg H et al (2016) TP53 and lacZ mutagenesis induced by 3-nitrobenzanthrone in Xpa-deficient human TP53 knock-in mouse embryo fibroblasts. DNA Repair 39:21-33
Levova K, Moserova M, Kotrbova V et al (2011) Role of cytochromes P450 1A1/2 in detoxication and activation of carcinogenic aris-tolochic acid I: studies with the hepatic NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase null (HRN) mouse model. Toxicol Sci 121(1):43-56 Levova K, Moserova M, Nebert DW et al (2012) NAD(P)H:quinone oxidoreductase expression in Cyp1a-knockout and CYP1A-humanized mouse lines and its effect on bioactivation of the carcinogen aristolochic acid I. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol 265(3):360-367
Lord GM, Hollstein M, Arlt VM et al (2004) DNA adducts and p53 mutations in a patient with aristolochic acid-associated nephrop-athy. Am J Kidney Dis 43(4):e11-e17 Martin FL, Patel II, Sozeri O et al (2010) Constitutive expression of bioactivating enzymes in normal human prostate suggests a capability to activate pro-carcinogens to DNA-damaging metabolites. Prostate 70(14):1586-1599 Martinek V, Kubickova B, Arlt VM et al (2011) Comparison of activation of aristolochic acid I and II with NADPH:quinone oxi-doreductase, sulphotransferases and N-acetyltranferases. Neuro Endocrinol Lett 32(Suppl 1):57-70 Meinl W, Pabel U, Osterloh-Quiroz M, Hengstler JG, Glatt H (2006) Human sulphotransferases are involved in the activation of aris-tolochic acids and are expressed in renal target tissue. Int J Cancer 118(5):1090-1097 Mengs U, Lang W, Poch JA (1982) The carcinogenic action of aristolochic acid in rats. Arch Toxicol 51(2):107-119 Mizerovska J, Dracinska H, Frei E, Schmeiser HH, Arlt VM, Stiborova M (2011) Induction of biotransformation enzymes by the carcinogenic air-pollutant 3-nitrobenzanthrone in liver, kidney and lung, after intra-tracheal instillation in rats. Mutat Res 720(1-2):34-41
Nebert DW, Shi Z, Galvez-Peralta M, Uno S, Dragin N (2013) Oral benzo[a]pyrene: understanding pharmacokinetics, detoxication, and consequences-Cyp1 knockout mouse lines as a paradigm. Mol Pharmacol 84(3):304-313 Nik-Zainal S, Kucab JE, Morganella S et al (2015) The genome as a
record of environmental exposure. Mutagenesis 30(6):763-770 Nortier JL, Martinez MC, Schmeiser HH et al (2000) Urothelial carcinoma associated with the use of a Chinese herb (Aristolochia fangchi). N Engl J Med 342(23):1686-1692 Odell AF, Odell LR, Askham JM, Alogheli H, Ponnambalam S, Hollstein M (2013) A novel p53 mutant found in iatrogenic urothe-lial cancers is dysfunctional and can be rescued by a second-site global suppressor mutation. J Biol Chem 288(23):16704-16714 Phillips DH (2013) On the origins and development of the (32) P-postlabelling assay for carcinogen-DNA adducts. Cancer Lett 334(1):5-9
Phillips DH, Arlt VM (2014) 32P-postlabeling analysis of DNA
adducts. Meth Mol Biol 1105:127-138 Poon SL, Pang ST, McPherson JR et al (2013) Genome-wide muta-tional signatures of aristolochic acid and its application as a screening tool. Sci Transl Med 5(197):197ra101 Rendic S, Guengerich FP (2012) Contributions of human enzymes in
carcinogen metabolism. Chem Res Toxicol 25(7):1316-1383 Sachse B, Meinl W, Glatt H, Monien BH (2014) The effect of knockout of sulfotransferases 1a1 and 1d1 and of transgenic human sulfotransferases 1A1/1A2 on the formation of DNA adducts from furfuryl alcohol in mouse models. Carcinogenesis 35(10):2339-2345 Schmeiser HH, Bieler CA, Wiessler M, van Ypersele de Strihou C, Cosyns JP (1996) Detection of DNA adducts formed by aris-tolochic acid in renal tissue from patients with Chinese herbs nephropathy. Cancer Res 56(9):2025-2028 Schmeiser HH, Stiborova M, Arlt VM (2009) Chemical and molecular basis of the carcinogenicity of Aristolochia plants. Curr Opin Drug Dis Devel 12(1):141-148 Schmeiser HH, Kucab JE, Arlt VM et al (2012) Evidence of exposure to aristolochic acid in patients with urothelial cancer from a Balkan endemic nephropathy region of Romania. Environ Mol Mutagen 53(8):636-641 Schmeiser HH, Stiborova M, Arlt VM (2013) (32)P-postlabeling analysis of DNA adducts. Methods Mol Biol 1044:389-401 Schmeiser HH, Nortier JL, Singh R et al (2014) Exceptionally long-term persistence of DNA adducts formed by carcinogenic aristolochic acid I in renal tissue from patients with aristolochic acid nephropathy. Int J Cancer 135(2):502-507 Sidorenko VS, Attaluri S, Zaitseva I et al (2014) Bioactivation of the human carcinogen aristolochic acid. Carcinogenesis 35(8):1814-1822
Stiborova M, Frei E, Wiessler M, Schmeiser HH (2001a) Human enzymes involved in the metabolic activation of carcinogenic aris-tolochic acids: evidence for reductive activation by cytochromes P450 1A1 and 1A2. Chem Res Toxicol 14(8):1128-1137 Stiborova M, Hajek M, Frei E, Schmeiser HH (2001b) Carcinogenic and nephrotoxic alkaloids aristolochic acids upon activation by NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase form adducts found in DNA of patients with Chinese herbs nephropathy. Gen Physiol Biophys 20(4):375-392 Stiborova M, Frei E, Sopko B, Wiessler M, Schmeiser HH (2002) Carcinogenic aristolochic acids upon activation by DT-diapho-rase form adducts found in DNA of patients with Chinese herbs nephropathy. Carcinogenesis 23(4):617-625 Stiborova M, Frei E, Sopko B et al (2003) Human cytosolic enzymes involved in the metabolic activation of carcinogenic aristolochic acid: evidence for reductive activation by human NAD(P)H: qui-none oxidoreductase. Carcinogenesis 24(10):1695-1703 Stiborova M, Frei E, Hodek P, Wiessler M, Schmeiser HH (2005) Human hepatic and renal microsomes, cytochromes P450 1A1/2, NADPH:cytochrome P450 reductase and prostaglan-din H synthase mediate the formation of aristolochic acid-DNA adducts found in patients with urothelial cancer. Int J Cancer 113(2):189-197
Stiborova M, Mareis J, Frei E, Arlt VM, Martinek V, Schmeiser HH (2011) The human carcinogen aristolochic acid i is activated to form DNA adducts by human NAD(P)H: quinone oxidoreduc-tase without the contribution of acetyltransferases or sulfotrans-ferases. Environ Mol Mutagen 52(6):448-459 Stiborova M, Levova K, Barta F et al (2012) Bioactivation versus detoxication of the urothelial carcinogen aristolochic acid I by human cytochrome P450 1A1 and 1A2. Toxicol Sci 125(2):345-358
Stiborova M, Martinek V, Frei E, Arlt VM, Schmeiser HH (2013) Enzymes metabolizing aristolochic acid and their contribution to
the development of aristolochic acid nephropathy and urothelial cancer. Curr Drug Metab 14(6):695-705
Stiborova M, Frei E, Arlt VM, Schmeiser HH (2014a) Knockout and humanized mice as suitable tools to identify enzymes metabolizing the human carcinogen aristolochic acid. Xenobiotica 44(2):135-145
Stiborova M, Frei E, Schmeiser HH, Arlt VM, Martinek V (2014b) Mechanisms of enzyme-catalyzed reduction of two carcinogenic nitro-aromatics, 3-nitrobenzanthrone and aristolochic acid I: experimental and theoretical approaches. Int J Mol Sci 15(6):10271-10295
Teubner W, Meinl W, Florian S, Kretzschmar M, Glatt H (2007) Identification and localization of soluble sulfotransferases in the human gastrointestinal tract. Biochem J 404(2):207-215 Wang Y, Arlt VM, Roufosse CA et al (2012) ACB-PCR measurement of H-ras codon 61 CAA ^ CTA mutation provides an early indication of aristolochic acid I carcinogenic effect in tumor target tissues. Environ Mol Mutagen 53(7):495-504 Wohak LE, Krais AM, Kucab JE et al (2016) Carcinogenic polycy-clic aromatic hydrocarbons induce CYP1A1 in human cells via a p53-dependent mechanism. Arch Toxicol 90(2):291-304
