BJID 535 1-4
ARTICLE IN PRESS
braz j infect dis. 2015;xxx(xx):xxx-xxx
The Brazilian Journal of
INFECTIOUS DISEASES
www.elsevier.com/locate/bjid
Case report
Oral manifestation of tuberculosis: a case-report
qi Bárbara Capitanio de Souzaa, Vania Maria Aita de Lemosa, Maria Cristina Muneratoa,b'*
a Dentistry School, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
b Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Brazil
article info
Article history: Received 17 August 2015 Accepted 1 December 2015 Available online xxx
Keywords:
Mycobacterium infection Oral lesion Oral tuberculosis
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
abstract
The present case-report describes tuberculosis on the oral mucosa, in a rare manifestation of the disease. The importance of appropriate diagnosis and awareness of the clinical manifestations is highlighted. Oral lesions seem to occur as chronic ulcers, nodular or granular areas, and rare, firm leukoplakia regions. Most extra-pulmonary lesions represent secondary infections of a primary lung infectious focus; therefore, early and accurate diagnosis is required for planning of the best treatment and strategies to control the disease.
© 2015 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
Introduction
20 Tuberculosis (TB) is a chronic infectious disease caused by
21 Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Most often it affects the lungs,
22 although some patients present the disease in other organs
23 and systems. Extra-pulmonary TB accounts for 25% of the
24 cases with 10-35% detected in the head and neck region.1,2
25 Oral manifestation of TB may affect people of all ages, espe-
26 cially the elderly, and is usually presented as an ulcer. It has
27 been hypothesized that autoinoculation may happen when
28 the infected pulmonary mucus interacts with wounded, sus-
29 ceptible areas of the mucosa, eliciting the emergence of
30 lesions.3 The present case-report describes oral manifestation
31 of TB in an adult patient.
Case-report
A 61-year-old male patient with a history of smoking habit 32
and alcohol abuse was being followed up for uncontrolled 33
type 2 diabetes mellitus, peripheral neuropathy associated 34
with vasculopathy, systemic hypertension, and chronic pan- 35
creatitis in Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre (HCPA), state 36
of Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. The patient was referred to the 37
Stomatology Service of the same hospital due to the emer- 38
gence of lesions on the oral mucosa. Preliminary examination 39
revealed two lesions, each measuring approximately 10 mm 40
across and presenting a granulomatous central portion and 41
whitish halo. The lesions were located on the upper lip mucosa 42 near the median line and on the left jugal mucosa adjacent to
* Corresponding author at: Faculdade de Odontologia - UFRGS, Rua Ramiro Barcelos, 2492, Departamento de Odontologia Conservadora (DOC), Porto Alegre, RS, CEP 90035-003, Brazil.
E-mail addresses: barbara.capitanio@gmail.com (B.C. de Souza), vaniaaita@yahoo.com.br (V.M.A. de Lemos), mcmunerato@gmail.com (M.C. Munerato).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.001 1413-8670/© 2015 Published by Elsevier Editora Ltda.
Please cite this article in press as: de Souza BC, et al. Oral manifestation of tuberculosis: a case-report. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.001
ARTICLE IN PRESS
BJID 535 1-4
2 braz j infect dis. 2015;xxx(xx):xxx-xxx
Fig. 1 - Clinical aspects of oral TB lesions and lung radiographic findings. Ulcerative lesions with granulomatous center and whitish halo on the upper labial mucosa near the median line (A) and on the left jugal mucosa, near the labial posterior commissure (B). Full radiograph of the lower left pulmonary lobe. Presence of active disease manifested as budding tree-like centrilobular nodules in both lungs, especially on the right (C).
43 the labial anterior commissure (Fig. 1A and B, respectively).
44 The patient complained of pain, productive cough for the
45 past 15 days, night sweats, episodic fever in the morning,
46 and slight weight loss in the previous two months. However,
47 these complaints were intermittently made by the patient
48 along the scheduled appointments, which may have added to
49 the difficulty for an early diagnosis of the disease. Samples
50 of lesions were collected by incision and stained accord-
51 ing to the hematoxylin-eosin (HE) and Ziehl-Neelsen (BAAR)
52 protocols. The pathological report was negative for the pres-
53 ence of alcohol-acid resistant microorganisms (Fig. 2). Due to
54 the comparatively low count of microorganisms in the tis-
55 sues analyzed, the special staining used did not successfully
56 detect the presence of the bacterium. However, since a neg-
57 ative result in this kind of analysis does not rule out TB, a
Fig. 2 - Histopathological analysis of a sample collected from oral TB lesions. Granulomas surrounded by intense mixed inflammatory infiltrate, with inflammatory cells inside the epithelium. Hematoxylin-eosin staining, 100x magnification (A). Well-shaped granulomas surrounded by epithelioid histiocytes and inflammatory cells. Arrows indicate incipient necrosis. Hematoxylin-eosin staining, 200x magnification (B). Arrow indicates giant Langhans cell, with nuclei distributed across the peripheral cytoplasm, in a necklace pattern. Langhans cells are typical of TB. Ziehl-Neelsen staining, 600 x magnification (C).
sample of bronchoalveolar lavage was analyzed according to 58
the Ziehl-Neelsen (BAAR) protocol, with a positive result for 59
M. tuberculosis. A radiograph of the thorax was suggestive of 60
presence of active infectious disease, manifested as budding 61
tree-like centrilobular nodules in both lungs, especially on 62
the right. In this case report, the pathological analysis of the 63
samples collected from the patient was not conclusive, requir- 64
ing a Mantoux assay and the investigation of bronchoalveolar 65
Please cite this article in press as: de Souza BC, et al. Oral manifestation of tuberculosis: a case-report. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015. http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.001
BJID 535 1-4 ARTICLE IN PRESS
braz j infect dis. 2015;xxx(xx):xxx-xxx 3
lavage in order to confirm the TB suspicion. The Mantoux protocol indicated a 13-mm inflammatory reaction confirming TB. Anti-HIV test was negative. The patient was referred to a pulmonologist for examination and treatment based on the pulmonary extension of the disease (Fig. 1C). Nonetheless, 30 days into the treatment the patient died due to the worsening of clinical conditions, sepsis, respiratory failure, and acute kidney failure.
Discussion
Clinically, a patient infected with M. tuberculosis and presenting an active manifestation of TB may also exhibit signs and symptoms such as persistent and productive cough, night sweats, weight loss, and low morning fever. TB is an essentially airborne disease whose transmission depends on prolonged contact with an infected patient.4 The efficiency of transmission is a function of the patient's contagious potential (which is associated with M. tuberculosis load), the intensity and frequency of cough, and presence of lung cavitation (based on radiographic examination). In addition, the intensity and duration of contacts with a TB patient also are important to bring about the possibility of TB diagnosis.4 In the present case-report, the patient described the symptoms intermittently along different appointments, which made an early diagnosis of TB more difficult.
The tuberculine sensitivity assay, also called Mantoux test, is the standard procedure to diagnose TB. The assay includes the intradermal inoculation of a purified protein derivative of M. tuberculosis to assess the cellular immune response to the antigens. An inflammatory reaction takes place in M. tuberculosis sensitized patients. Inspection is conducted after 48-72 h, and is valid for 7 days. The evaluation is based on the diameter of the inflammation area measured transversally against the longitudinal direction of the challenged forearm. An inflammation area over 10 mm in immunocompetent subjects is considered a positive result. In immunocompromised patients, an area larger than 5 mm indicate TB. In turn, the minimum size of inflammatory area in low-risk individuals and children under 15 years of age is 15 mm. Although the Mantoux reaction is the method of choice in TB diagnosis, the test has a few limitations, such as the low sensitivity in immunocompromised patients (which points to the risk of false negative results), the difficulty to use in children, the subjective character of interpretations, and the need for a second appointment for confirmation purposes in some cases.4
Clinically, TB has several clinical forms. However, due to the low prevalence, the lesions characteristic of oral TB are often overlooked in the differential diagnosis of other oral lesions. It is assumed that oral TB lesions account for 0.1% to 5% of the infections caused by M. tuberculosis.5 Oral lesions caused by TB may be primary, which are rare and occur as a result of the direct inoculation of oral tissues, or secondary, due to hematogenous or lymphatic dissemination and extensions of nearby structures.1,6 Autoinoculation may take place upon direct interaction of infected mucus with a wound on the oral mucosa. Secondary oral TB is considered most prevalent in elderly patients, while the primary manifestation of the disease is more common in young individuals.7
Although the oral presentation of TB can be primary, in this case hematogenous spread is evident the. However, since the pathological analysis revealed no acid fast bacilli a Mantoux assay was requested in addition to bronchoalveolar lavage in order to confirm the TB suspicion. If oral TB is diagnosed, it is important to attempt to locate a primary site of the disease before the former can be considered primary. This is important in order to assess the extent of disease activity as well as to monitor complications in involved organs. The quantity of the bacilli observed indicates the demonstration of the severity of disease on site.
Systemic and local factors also play an important role in the development of oral lesions. Examples of systemic factors are immunosuppression and the increase in virulence of pathogens.8 In turn, the list of local factors includes poor oral hygiene, local trauma, chronic inflammations, tooth eruption, surgical lesions, periodontal disease, caries, pulp exposure, cysts, and tooth abscesses.6,8 It is possible that the virulence of the M. tuberculosis strain also influences the involvement of oral structures.9 The patient herein described failed to comply with follow-up and treatment instructions for his chronic underlying diseases, thus worsening his TB and leading to the unfavorable outcome reported.
The oral manifestation of TB may present as an ulcerative, painless lesion on the palate, lips, or tongue, accompanied by persistent cervical lymphadenopathy.8 The differential diagnosis of TB ulcers includes a variety of ulcerative diseases and conditions, such as squamous cell carcinoma, trauma ulcers, aphthous stomatitis, syphilis ulcers, actinomy-cosis, Wegener's granulomatosis, sarcoidosis, leishmaniosis, zygomycosis, and Hansen's disease.9 It is important to highlight that oral ulcers may present a similar Picture,10 requiring a diagnosis based on microscopic findings in addition to the Mantoux test and baciloscopy.11 The appropriate identification of oral TB is important not only for the patient, but also for the dentistry professionals and the community at large, since the patient is a potential source of transmission. Lesions in the head and neck region should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of TB, especially in high-risk populations. In case more than one clinical condition is suspected, a comprehensive laboratory investigation and thorax radiographic examination should be implemented to identify and control TB.9,12,13 Although oral manifestation of the disease is rare, a careful differential diagnosis of oral lesions is of paramount importance for a correct diagnosis, especially when there is suspicion of TB.14
In conclusion, despite being a rare manifestation of TB oral lesions should be included in the differential diagnosis of oral lesions in general, irrespective of the existence of pulmonary signs and symptoms, and whether the patient lives in a TB endemic region or not. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential in the establishment of appropriate treatment aiming at curing the patient with TB.
Conflicts of interest
The authors declare no conflicts of interest. Q2
Please cite this article in press as: de Souza BC, et al. Oral manifestation of tuberculosis: a case-report. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.001
ARTICLE IN PRESS
JID 535 1-4
4 braz j infect dis. 2015;xxx(xx):xxx-xxx
references
178 1. Santiago RA, Gueiros LA, Porter SR, et al. Prevalence of oral
179 lesions in Brazilian patients with tuberculosis. Indian J Dent
180 Res. 2013;24:245-8.
181 2. Kakisi OK, Kechagia AS, Kakisis IK, et al. Tuberculosis of the
182 oral cavity: a systematic review. Eur J Oral Sci. 2010;118:
183 103-9.
184 3. Vaid S, Lee YY, Rawat S, et al. Tuberculosis in the head and
185 neck: a forgotten differential diagnosis. Clin Radiol.
186 2010;65:73-81.
187 4. González Martín J, García-García JM, Anibarro L, et al.
188 Consensus document on the diagnosis, treatment and
189 prevention of tuberculosis. Arch Bronconeumol.
190 2010;46:255-74.
191 5. Gupta U, Narwal A, Singh H. Primary labial tuberculosis: a
192 rare presentation. Ann Med Health Sci Rev. 2014;4:
193 129-31.
194 6. Nagaraj V, Sashykumar S, Viswanathan S, et al. Multiple oral
195 ulcers leading to diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis. Eur J Dent. 2013;7:243-5.
7. Dinnes J, Deeks J, Kunst H, et al. A systematic review of rapid 196 diagnostic tests for the detection of tuberculosis infection. 197 Health Technol Assess. 2007;11:1-196. 198
8. Sezer B, Zeytinoglu M, Tuncay U, et al. Oral mucosal 199 ulceration: a manifestation of previously undiagnosed 200 pulmonary tuberculosis. J Am Dent Assoc. 2004;135:336-40. 201
9. Hale LT, Tucker CP. Head and neck manifestations of 202 tuberculosis. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 203 2008;20:635-42. 204
10. Ebenezer J, Samuel R, Mathew GC, et al. Primary oral 205 tuberculosis: report of two cases. Indian J Dent Res. 206 2006;17:41-4. 207
11. Mignogna MD, Muzio LL, Favia G, et al. Oral tuberculosis: a 208 clinical evaluation of 42 cases. Oral Dis. 2000;6:25-30. 209
12. Erbaycu AE, Taymaz Z, Tuksavul F, et al. What happens when 210 oral tuberculosis is not treated. Monaldi Arch Chest Dis. 211 2007;67:116-8. 212
13. Kumar S, Sen R, Rawal A, et al. Primary lingual tuberculosis in 213 immunocompetent patient: a case report. Head Neck Pathol. 214 2010;4:178-80. 215
14. Jain P, Jain I. Oral manifestations of Tuberculosis: step towards 216 early diagnosis. J Clin Diagn Res. 2014;8:ZE18-21. 217
Please cite this article in press as: de Souza BC, et al. Oral manifestation of tuberculosis: a case-report. Braz J Infect Dis. 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2015.12.001 BJID 535 1-