Scholarly article on topic 'Relationship between 5th Grade Students’ Attitudes towards Science and Technology Course and Misconceptions'

Relationship between 5th Grade Students’ Attitudes towards Science and Technology Course and Misconceptions Academic research paper on "Educational sciences"

CC BY-NC-ND
0
0
Share paper
OECD Field of science
Keywords
{"Science and Technology" / attitude / misconception}

Abstract of research paper on Educational sciences, author of scientific article — Asiye Bahtiyar, Ramazan Basturk

Abstract The purpose of this study is to determine the attitudes of the 5th grade students towards Science and Technology course, their level of misconceptions on the subject of “Heat and Temperature”, and the connection between the attitudes and misconceptions in terms of several variables. The tools used for data collection were “Attitude towards Science and Technology Course Scale” and “Concept Test”. According to the results, attitudes of unsuccessful students are higher than attitudes of middle level and successful students. It is found that misconceptions of students who take extra courses are lower than those who learn only in lessons.

Academic research paper on topic "Relationship between 5th Grade Students’ Attitudes towards Science and Technology Course and Misconceptions"

Available online at www.sciencedirect.com

SciVerse ScienceDirect

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 55 (2012) 575 - 584

INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON NEW HORIZONS IN EDUCATION

INTE2012

Relationship between 5th Grade Students' Attitudes towards Science and Technology Course and Misconceptions

Asiye Bahtiyara*, Ramazan Basturkb

a,bPamukkale University, Faculty of Education, Department of Educational Sciences, Denizli, Turkey

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to determine the attitudes of the 5th grade students towards Science and Technology course, their level of misconceptions on the subject of "Heat and Temperature", and the connection between the attitudes and misconceptions in terms of several variables. The tools used for data collection were "Attitude towards Science and Technology Course Scale" and "Concept Test". According to the results, attitudes of unsuccessful students are higher than attitudes of middle level and successful students. It is found that misconceptions of students who take extra courses are lower than those who learn only in lessons.

© 2012Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selectionand/or peer-reviewunderresponsibilityofTheAssociation ofScience, Education andTechnology

Keywords: Science and Technology, attitude, misconceptionT

1. Introduction

The aim of the modern science education is to gain required scientific attitude and cognitive process skills which are necessary for problem solving related to science that students encounter throughout their lives, rather than memorizing scientific knowledge about sciences (Bayrak ve Erden, 2007). Accordingly, in order to realize an effective science teaching; making them learn concepts that constitute the

Corresponding author Tel.: +90-258-296-10-75 E-mail address: asiye.bahtiyar@gmail.com.

1877-0428 © 2012 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Selection and/or peer-review under responsibility of The Association of Science, Education and Technology doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.539

knowledge and also keystones of that knowledge meaningfully is needed rather than transferring available knowledge about sciences to the students (Genger, 2006; Koray ve Tatar, 2003).

Students start their education having different experiences, ideas, and beliefs about scientific concepts. These ideas and beliefs which are far from being scientific and mostly gained by means of students' own experiences are called as misconception (Tekkaya, Ozkan ve Balci, 2002). Especially for the science and technology curriculum, due to its spiral nature, the misconceptions held in previous years are transferred to the years ahead and students continue to use these misconceptions increasingly (Yurd ve Oglun, 2008). Among the subjects in Science and Technology course, "Heat and Temperature" is a topic where misconceptions are encountered the most. One of the greatest reasons of this situation is that the concepts of heat and temperature are used as substitutes for each other (Turgut ve Gurbuz 2011).

In recent years, research in science education has concentrated on revealing of various conceptual understandings of students who have different levels of learning capacity. These studies have mostly been conducted for the purpose of creating a solution with respect to determining the difficulties that students encounter on understanding of scientific concepts, revealing and explaining misconceptions, and also how to correct them (Ozcan, 2006; Yurd ve Oglun, 2008; Adiguzel, 2006; Kose, Ayas ve U§ak, 2006; Koray ve Tatar, 2003; Ayvaci ve Coruhlu, 2009; Yah§i, 2006; Palut, 2006; Yurumezoglu, Ayaz ve Cokelez, 2009; Yildirim, Yalgin, §ensoy ve Akgay, 2008; Bayrakgi, 2007).

There is no enough study encountered neither about the variables which affect these misconceptions nor about the relations between the attitude towards science and technology course and misconception in this field. In this term, this study is thought to contribute the body of literature.

In this research, determining the relationship between attitudes towards science and technology course and misconceptions about "Heat and Temperature" of 5th grade students is aimed. Moreover, it is aimed to determine the variables that affect both attitudes towards science and technology course and misconceptions about "Heat and Temperature". For this purpose five basic research questions have been asked:

For students who study at fifth grade;

1. What are the attitudes of students towards science and technology course?

2. What is the level of misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" in science and technology course?

3. Is there a significant difference between their attitudes towards science and technology course and their gender, extracurricular learning, and final exam marks of the science and technology course?

4. Is there a significant difference between their misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" and their gender, extracurricular learning, and final exam marks of the science course?

5. Is there a significant relationship between the students' attitudes towards science and technology course and their misconceptions?

2. Methods

2.1. Participants

Research was carried out at three different elementary schools which were selected randomly in City of Denizli on the second term of 2010-2011 academic years. A total of 90 fifth grade students have participated as a study group for this research. Some qualities of the participants are summarized in the Table 1:

Table 1. Some Qualities of the Participants

Variables Category N %

Gender Male 40 44,4

Female 50 55,6

Custom Classroom 0 0

Extra-curricular Extra School Course 67 74,4

education Private Lesson 0 0

None 23 25,6

Lower than 58,18 16 17,8

Final exam grades Between 58,18 and 89,02 56 62,2

Higher than 89,02 18 20,0

Total 90 100,0

As can be seen in Table 1, the participants consist of 40 (44, 4%) male and 50 (55, 6%) female students. The groups for the variable of extra-curricular education were coded as extra school courses (n=67; %74,4) and none (n=23; %25,6) because no students chose the options of custom classroom and private lesson.

Moreover, the final exam marks of the students in Science and Technology course are divided into three groups in terms of ranges which are determined as to sum or subtract the standard deviation value (sd= 15, 417) from the general average. According to this grouping, it is deduced that the final marks of the 56 participants (62, 2%) in Science and Technology course were in a range of "2= 58,183 and 89,017".

2.2. Instruments

The data were collected through two different scales which were "Attitude towards Science and Technology Course Scale" and "Concept Test'.

"Attitude towards Science and Technology Course Scale" was developed by I§ik (2007) and consists of 23 items (eight of them is negative and fifteen of them is positive). The content validity of the scale was calculated as 0.93. According to 5 likert-type attitude scale, the lowest score that the students can get is 23 and the highest score is 115. Internal reliability of the scale is determined as 0.91 (I§ik, 2007).

For this study, in accordance with the aim of the study, three items were added to the scale in order to reach the students' personal information such as their gender, whether there are other areas that they take the Science and Technology course such as custom classroom, extra school course, or private lessons; and their final exam marks of Science and Technology course.

Developed by Seloni (2005) "Concept Tesf consists of 10 questions. Questions are composed of one right answer and two distracters and students are asked to write down the reasons of the answers due to measure the conceptual understanding of them. 10 questions in "Concept Tesf were evaluated (Cited in Seloni, 2005) according to an evaluation technique conducted by Abraham et al, (1992), and research technique called "Determination of Levels of Understanding Basic Science Concepts" developed by Bayram et al, (1997). Comprehension levels of students were evaluated by point scoring (ranging from 1 to 4) out of 40 points as a numerical data. It was deduced that the higher point that the students get, the less misconceptions they have.

2.3. Data Collection and Analysis

Research was conducted at the end of the spring semester 2010-2011. The data collection tools were applied throughout two different lessons by the researcher and teachers in the schools of application.

Dependent variables of this study are points that students get from "Attitude towards Science and Technology Course Scale", and points that students get from "Concept Test" in relation to "Heat and

Temperature". Independent variables of this study are gender, extra-curricular education, and students' final marks of Science and Technology course. The data were analyzed by SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences, Version 11,5).

First of all One Sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov (K-S) Test was used in order to test whether the data distributed normally (Ba§turk, 2010). According to the results of the analyses, it is determined that both variables show a normal distribution [ (K-S(Z) concept test = 0.708; p > 0,05 and (K-S(Z) attitude scale = 0.935; p > 0,05)]. The relationship between students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course and their misconceptions about the topic of Heat and Temperature is investigated by calculating the Pearson Correlation Coefficient. Descriptive statistical methods, independent samples t-test, and One -way ANOVA were utilized for data analysis, as well. One-sample t-test was used in order to determine whether the average attitude score of the sample is different from the expected value. The significance level was taken as 0.05.

3. Findings

In this section, findings related to sub-problems are described in the tables. Research question 1. What are the attitudes of students towards science and technology course?

Findings of students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course are given in Table 2.

Table 2. Analysis of students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course

N Min Max M sd

The Attitude Score 90 62,00 105,00 74,41 7,33

Table 2 shows that the minimum and maximum scores of the attitude scale are 62,00 and 105.00. In this study, the mean of the attitude scores of 90 participants is 74, 41. Expected value for the mean of the attitude scores in the population, considering the highest and lowest values that can be taken from the

attitude scale, is 23 +115 = 69. In order to determine whether the average attitude score of the sample is 2

different from the expected value, One-sample t-test was used and the results of the analysis are shown in Table 3:

Table 3. Analysis of students' attitude scores according to the expected value

Test Value=69

N M t df p

The Attitude Score 90 74,41 7,01 89 ,00*

* p<.05

As can be seen in Table 3, the difference between the students attitudes scores and the expected value is significant at 0.05 alpha level (t = 7,01; p < 0,05). Also, sample mean (M= 74, 41) is significantly higher than the expected mean of population (M= 69). Thus, it can be said that students' attitudes are closer to be in a positive manner.

Research question 2. What is the level of misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" in science and technology course?

Findings of students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" are given in Table4.

Table 4. Analysis of students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature"

N Min Max M sd

Misconceptions Scores 90 2 34 18,82 6,551

When Table 4 is examined, it is seen that students get minimum 2 and maximum 34 points from the Concept Test. The mean score of 90 students participated in the survey was calculated as 18.82. Descriptive statistics are presented in Table 5 for items belonging to the Concept Test:

Table 5. Descriptive statistics of Concept Test substances

Items' Content N Min. Max. M sd

1. The effect of heat on matter 90 0 3 1,30 ,76

2. Heat and temperature measurement 90 0 4 1,44 1,08

3. Heat conduction 90 0 4 2,28 1,02

4. The effect of heat on matter 90 0 4 2,02 1,32

5. Heat transfer 90 0 4 2,47 1,13

6. The effect of heat on matter 90 0 4 2,03 1,19

7. Thermal insulation 90 0 4 1,94 1,17

8. Heat conduction and isolation 90 0 4 1,58 1,16

9. The effect of heat on matter and expansion 90 0 4 1,80 1,38

10. Thermal insulation 90 0 4 1,96 1,45

Total 90

When Table 5 is examined, it is seen that the most common misconception that the students have is "The effect of heat on matter" with an average of 1.30, which is the first question of Concept Test. It is striking that according to the analysis, none of the students could get a full score of 4 from the first question. In this case, it shows that all of the students participating in the survey have misconceptions about the effects of heat on matter. On the other hand, the least common misconception that the students have is "Heat transfer" with an average of 2.47, which is the fifth question of Concept Test.

Research question 3. Is there a significant difference between the students' attitudes towards science and technology course and their gender, extracurricular learning, and final exam marks of the science and technology course?

To examine whether the gender and the extra-curricular education areas (custom classroom, extra school course, private lessons, or none) affect the students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course, Independent Samples T-test was used in this study. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 6.

Table 6. Students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course analysis by gender and extracurricular education areas variables

Variables Category N M sd t p

Gender Male 40 73,08 5,46 -1,559 0,122*

Female 50 75,48 8,44

Extra-curricular Extra School 67 74,33 6,51

education Course -0,182 0,856*

None 23 74,65 9,48

Total 90

*p>.05

As a result of the Independent Samples T-test analysis, the difference between attitudes scales scores of male and female students is not significant at 0.05 alpha level (t = -1,559; p > 0.05). In other words, as shown in Table 8, both male (M= 73,08) and female (M= 75,48) students' attitudes towards Science and Technology courses are similar to each other.

Also, the difference between attitudes scales scores of students who attend extra school course and of students who study only in course is not significant at 0.05 alpha level, (t= -0,182; p>0.05). In other words, as shown in Table 8, both the students who attend extra school course (M= 74,33) and the students who study only in course (M= 74,652) are similar to each other.

To determine whether there is a significant difference between students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course and students' final exam mark of the science and technology course, One -way ANOVA Test was used and the results of this test are presented in Table 7.

Table 7. Students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course analysis by final exam mark in Science and Technology course

Source of Variance Sum of Squares df Sum of Squares F Sig.

Between-groups Within-groups 438,42 4341,37 2 87 219,21 49,90 4,393 0,015*

Total 4779,79 89

* p<.05

According to the results of One-way ANOVA, there is a significant difference between the attitudes towards Science and Technology course of students who are in different ranges of the final exam marks (unsuccessful, average, or successful) in Science and Technology course (F = 4,393; p < 0.05). Descriptive analysis of students' final exam marks in Science and Technology course is described in Table 8.

Table 8. The students' marks range's mean and standard deviations

Variable Category N M sd

Range of Unsuccessful 16 79,13 11,79

students final Average 56 73,55 5,74

exam marks Successful 18 72,89 5,12

Total 90 74,41 7,33

Tukey's Post Hoc Test was conducted to determine the source of the difference. The mean of attitude scores of unsuccessful students (MU = 79,13) is lower than the mean of attitude scores of average students (MA = 73,55) and the mean of attitude scores of successful students (MS = 72,89).

Research question 4. Is there a significant difference between the students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" and their gender, extracurricular learning, and final exam marks of the science course?

To examine whether the gender and the extra-curricular education areas (custom classroom, extra school course, private lessons, or none) affect the students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature", independent samples t-test was used in this study. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 9:

Table 9. Students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" analysis by gender and extra-curricular education areas variables

Variables Category N M sd t p

Gender Male 40 19,80 6,54 1,271 0,207*

Female 50 18,04 6,52

Extra-curricular Extra School Course 67 20,27 5,642 3,842 0,00*

education None 23 14,61 7,291

Total 90

*p>0,05

As a result of the Independent Samples T-Test analysis, there is not a significant difference between between the misconceptions of male and female students about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" (t = 1,271; p > 0.05). In other words, as shown in Table 9, both male (M = 19,80) and female (M = 18,04) students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" are similar to each other.

As a result of the independent samples t-test analysis, there is a significant difference at 0.05 alpha level between the misconceptions of students who attend extra school course and who learn only in lessons (t = 1,271; p > 0.05) about the topic of "Heat and Temperature". In order to understand the reason of difference mean scores of groups was investigated. As shown in Table 9, the mean square of students who attend extra school is higher than (M = 20,27) the students' who learn only in lessons (M = 14,61). Students who attend extra school course can be said to have less misconceptions about the related topic.

One - way ANOVA Test was conducted to determine whether there is a significant difference between students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" and students' the final exam points of the science course. The results of this test are presented in Table 10.

Table 10. Students' misconceptions analysis by final exam mark in Science and Technology course

Source of Variance Sum of Squares df Sum of Squares F Sig.

Between-groups Within-groups 77,56 3741,60 2 87 38,78 43,01 ,902 ,410

Total 3819,16 89

p >.05

According to the results there is no significant difference between the students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" and their final exam marks of the science course (F = 0,902; p> 0.05). Descriptive statistics of students' final exam marks of the science course are presented in Table 11:

Table 11. Descriptive statistics of students' note range

Variable Category N M sd

Unsuccessful 16 17,06 4,65

Note Range Average 56 18,93 6,61

Successful 18 20,06 7,73

Total 90 18,82 6,55

Although the mean square of the final exam marks of the successful students is higher than the unsuccessful and average students', the difference is not statistically significant.

Research question 5. Is there a significant relationship between the students' attitudes towards science and technology course and their misconceptions?

To determine the relationship between students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course and their misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature", the Pearson Correlation Coefficient was used and the results are presented in Table 12.

Table 12. The relationship between students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course and their misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature"

Variables N M sd r p

Attitude 90 19,80 6,54 -0,133 0,212*

Misconception 90 18,00 6,62

Total 90

* p > 0,05

As seen in Table 12, there isn't a significant relationship between students' attitudes towards Science and Technology course and their misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" (r = - 0,133; p>0.05). In other words, there is no positive or negative effect of misconceptions on the attitudes of students towards science and technology course.

4. Results and Discussion

According to the findings, students' attitudes towards science and technology courses are positive. However, any significant difference could not be found according to gender and extra-curricular education variables for the students' attitudes. It is surprising that attitudes of unsuccessful students are more positive than the attitudes of average and successful students. It is not necessary for a student to be successful in this course for having a positive attitude towards it. However, any research is encountered in the body of literature which supports this result.

When students' misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature" are examined, there seem to have common misconceptions about the effect of heat on matters. Moreover, students could not differentiate the concepts of heat and temperature. Although they know the units of heat and temperature and how to measure them, they could not transfer the same knowledge to the various situations on different items. Here are some examples they gave; "The heat of thermometer was found to be °C 39" or "Only body heat can be measured by thermometer". In their research, Kinkkaya and Gullu (2008), and Aydogan and et.al. (2003) found a similar misconception such as "Weather heat is measured by °C". The least common misconception of the students is the heat-exchange.

There is no significant relationship between misconceptions of students according to gender and final exam grades on the other hand students who take extra school courses have less misconceptions than those who learn only in lessons. In this case, it is possible to say that misconceptions can be reduced when students have more opportunities for extra learning.

A reasonable relation could not be identified between students' attitudes towards science and technology course and misconceptions about the topic of "Heat and Temperature". In other words, students' attitudes toward Science and Technology course do not affect the misconceptions as positive or negative way.

References

1. Adigüzel, R., (2006). Mitoz ve Mayoz Hücre Bölünmesi Konusundaki Kavram Yanilgilarinin Tespiti ve Bu Konuda Fen Bilgisi Ögretmenlerinin Qözüm Önerileri (Mugla Iii Örnegi). Mugla Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

2. Aydogan, S., Gülgigek, £., Güne§, B., (2003). Isi ve Sicaklik Konusunda Kavram Yanilgilari, Gazi Üniversitesi Gazi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt:23, Sayi:2, 111-124. (http://w3.gazi.edu.tr/~bgunes//makaleler/ulusal/ulusal_2003_2.pdf).

3. Ayvaci, §., §enel, £., (2009). Fiziksel ve Kimyasal Degi§im Konularindaki Kavram Yanilgilarinm Düzeltilmesinde Agiklayici Hikaye Yönteminin Etkisi, On Dokuz Mayis Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayi:28, 93-104. (http://dergi.omu.edu.tr/index.php/EDUCATION/article/view/845).

4. Bastürk, R. (2010). Bütün Yönleriyle SPSS Örnekli Nonparametrik Istatistiksel Yöntemler. Ani Yayincilik. Ankara.

5. Bayrak, B. ve Erden, M. A. (2007). Fen Bilgisi Ögretim Programinin Degerlendirilmesi, Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi, Cilt:15 No:1 137-154. (http://www.kefdergi.com/pdf/15_1/137.pdf ).

6. Bayrakgi, M., (2007). Ilkögretim 5.Sinif Ögrencilerinin "Maddenin Degi§imi ve Taninmasi" Ünitesindeki Temel Kavramlari Anlama Seviyeleri ve Olu§an Kavram Yanilgilarinin Tespiti, Atatürk Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

7. Genger, Z., (2006). Ilkögretim Ögrencilerinin (6.,7., ve 8. Sinflar) Hücre Konusundaki Kavram Yanilgilarinin Tespiti Üzerine Bir Ara§tirma, Gazi Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

8. I§ik, A. D.,(2007). Ilkögretim 5.Sinif Fen ve Teknoloji Dersinde Olugturmaci Yakla§im Dogrultusunda Hazirlanmi§ Ögrenme Paketinin, Ögrenme Paketine ve Fen ve Teknoloji Dersine Yönelik Tutum ve Ba§ari Üzerine Etkileri, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

9. Kirikkaya, Bulu§. E. ve Güllü, D. (2008). Ilkögretim Be§inci Sinif Ögrencilerinin Isi - Sicaklik ve Buharla§ma - Kaynama Konularindaki Kavram Yanilgilari. ilkögretim Online, 7(1), 15-27. (http://ilkogretim-online.org.tr/vol7say1/v7s1m2.pdf).

10. Koray, Ö., Tatar N., (2003). ilkögretim Ögrencilerinin Kütle ve Agirlik ile ilgili Kavram Yanilgilari ve Bu Yamlgilarin 6., 7. ve 8. Sinif Düzeylerine Göre Dagilimi, Pamukkale Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi, Sayi:13, 187-198. (http://pauegitimdergi.pau.edu.tr/Makaleler/797461950_2%c4%b0LK%c3%96%c4%9eRET% c4%b0LE %b0L.. ,.E%20%c40.pdf).

11. Köse, S., Ayas, A., U§ak, M., (2006). Fen Bilgisi Ögretmen Adaylarinda Fotosentez Ve Bitkilerde Solunum Konularinda Görülen Kavram Yanilgilarinin Giderilmesinde Kavram Degi§im Metinlerinin Etkisi. Internatinal Journal of Environmental and Science Education, Vol 1 No: 1, pp 78 - 103. (http://www.ijese.com/Kose_et.all.pdf).

12. Özcan, H., (2006). llkögretim Ve Yüksekögretim Ögrencilerinin Farkli Disiplin Alanlari Açisindan Enerji Konusu Üzerine Kavramsal Anlamlari, Balikesir Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

13. Palut, Z.Ö., (2006). Fen Ögretiminde Aktif Ögrenmenin Kavram Yanilgilarini Gidermeye Etkisi, Marmara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

14. Seloni, §. R., (2005). Fen Bilgisi Ögretiminde Olu§an Kavram Yanilgilarinin Proje Tabanli Ögrenme lle Giderilmesi. Marmara Üniversitesi Egitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

15. Tekkaya, C., Özkan, §., Balci, S., (2002). Lise Ögrencilerinin Fotosentez Konusundaki Kavram Yanilgilarinin Tespiti: Kar§ila§tirmali Bir Çaliçma. (http://www.fedu.metu.edu.tr/ufbmek-5/ozetler/d033.pdf ).

16. Turgut, Ü., Gürbüz, F., (2011). Isi ve Sicaklik Konusunda 5E Modeliyle Ögretimin Ögrencilerdeki Kavramsal Degiçime ve Tutumlarina Etkisi, 2nd International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 27-29 April, 2011 Antalya-Turkey. (http://www.iconte.org/FileUpload/ks59689/File/327..pdf).

17. Yahçi, D., (2006). Farkli Laboratuar Yakla§imlarinin llkögretim 8. Sinif Ögrencilerinin Asit-Baz Konularindaki Kavramlarini Anlamalarina ve Kavram Yanilgilarinin Giderilmesi Etkisi, Abant izzet Baysal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Yüksek Lisans Tezi. (http://tez2.yok.gov.tr/).

18. Yildirim H.i. ve Digerleri, (2008). 6., 7. ve 8. Sinif Ögrencilerinin Elektrik Akimi Konusunda Sahip Olduklari Kavram Yanilgilari, Kastamonu Egitim Dergisi No:1 Cilt: 16 67-82. (http://www.kefdergi.com/pdf/cilt-16-no1-2008Mart/067.pdf).

19. Yurd, M., Olgun Ö.S., (2008). Probleme Dayali Ögrenme ve Bil-iste-Ögren Stratejisinin Kavram Yanilgilarinin Giderilmesine Etkisi, Hacettepe Üniversitesi Egitim Fakültesi Dergisi Sayi: 35386-396. http://www.efdergi.hacettepe.edu.tr/200835M%C3%9CGE%20YURD.pdf).

20. Yürümezoglu, K., Ayaz, S., Çôkelez, A., (2009). ilkögretim ikinci Kademe Ögrencilerinin Enerji ve Enerji ile ilgili Kavramlari Algilamalari, Balikesir Üniversitesi Necatibey Egitim Fakültesi Elektronik Fen ve Matematik Dergisi Cilt:3 Sayi:2 52-73. (www. nef.balikesir.edu.tr/~dergi/makaleler/.../EFMED_FBE128.doc).