CC BY-NC-ND
0Journal of Advanced Research (2013) 4, 13-26
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Diversity of bacteria nesting the plant cover of north Sinai deserts, Egypt
Amira L. Hanna a, Hanan H. Youssef a, Wafaa M. Amer b, Mohammed Monib a, Mohammed Fayez a, Nabil A. Hegazi a *
a Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt b Department of Botany, Faculty of Sciences, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt
Received 3 July 2011; revised 3 November 2011; accepted 23 November 2011 Available online 10 January 2012
KEYWORDS
North Sinai; Desert ecosystems; Xerophytes; Culturable bacteria; Rhizospheric microorganisms (RMOs); Diazotrophs; Rhizosheath
Abstract North Sinai deserts were surveyed for the predominant plant cover and for the culturable bacteria nesting their roots and shoots. Among 43 plant species reported, 13 are perennial (e.g. Fagonia spp., Pancratium spp.) and 30 annuals (e.g. Bromus spp., Erodium spp.). Eleven species possessed rhizo-sheath, e.g. Cyperus capitatus, Panicum turgidum and Trisetaria koelerioides. Microbiological analyses demonstrated: the great diversity and richness of associated culturable bacteria, in particular nitrogen-fixing bacteria (diazotrophs); the majority of bacterial residents were of true and/or putative diazotrophic nature; the bacterial populations followed an increasing density gradient towards the root surfaces; sizeable populations were able to reside inside the root (endorhizosphere) and shoot (endophyllosphere) tissues. Three hundred bacterial isolates were secured from studied spheres. The majority of nitrogen-fixing bacilli isolates belonged to Bacillus megaterium, Bacillus pumilus, Bacillus polymexa, Bacillus macerans, Bacillus circulans and Bacillus licheniformis. The family Enterobacteriaceae represented by Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter sackazakii, Enterobacter cloacae, Serratia adorifera, Serratia liquefaciens and Klebsiella oxytoca. The non-Enterobacteriaceae population was rich in Pantoae spp., Agrobacterium rdiobacter, Pseudomonas vesicularis, Pseudomonas putida, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Ochrobactrum anthropi, Sphingomonas paucimobilis and Chrysemonas luteola. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus were reported inside root and shoot tissues of a number of tested plants. The dense bacterial populations
* Corresponding author. Tel./fax: +20 2 3 5728 483. E-mail address: nabilhegazi@rocketmail.com (N.A. Hegazi).
2090-1232 © 2011 Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Peer review under responsibility of Cairo University. doi:10.1016/j.jare.2011.11.003
reported speak well to the very possible significant role played by the endophytic bacterial populations in the survival, in respect of nutrition and health, of existing plants. Such groups of diazo-trophs are good candidates, as bio-preparates, to support the growth of future field crops grown in deserts of north Sinai and irrigated by the water of El-Salam canal.
© 2011 Cairo University. Production and hosting by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Introduction
The semi-arid deserts of north Sinai represent a very important agricultural extension to the Nile Valley. Governmental plans are underway to develop agriculture productivity, especially through the mega project of El-Salam (Peace) canal. The canal brings Nile water, mixed with the Delta drainage water (1:1, v/ v), to reclaim 150,000 ha. This long-term planning project is confronted with a number of ecological concerns, in respect of upsetting the long-established biodiversity of flora and microflora, and possible erosion and salination of soils. Therefore, and since 1995, the microbe-plant-soil systems of north Sinai are under investigations through a number of successive research projects. As a result, the existing microflora-flora interactions were documented in a number of publications [1-3]. Special attention was given to prevailing N2-fixers (dia-zotrophs) and future manipulation of their representatives as biofertilizers [4,5]. In addition, efforts were devoted to specific plant-microbe models of ecological importance, e.g. fixing sand dunes and inhabiting salt-affected areas. In this respect, Othman et al. [3] demonstrated the richness of the plant-soil system with various groups of rhizospheric microorganisms (RMOs). They also drew the attention towards a potential group of plants possessing sand sheath encasing roots of plants, a phenomenon that was actually reported years ago [6]. It appeared that the rhizosheath in itself acts as additional compartments under the effect of plant roots, being chemically and physically enriched and subsequently nourishing functional populations of microorganisms [1]. In particular, it is reported to be a potential repository for the nitrogen fixing bacteria [7]. Aware of the ecological and economical importance of associated microflora, it was of rather interest to further explore the flora of north Sinai for rhizospheric microorganisms (RMOs), nesting the interior of roots (endorhizo-sphere) and shoots (endophyllosphere), as well as the unique root adjacent compartment known as rhizosheath. Special efforts are given to the prevailing groups of nitrogen-fixing (diazotrophs) community prevailing under the extremely harsh and variable environmental semi-arid conditions of north Sinai deserts.
Material and methods
Experimental sites
The studied region extends 160-km eastwards of the Suez Canal into north Sinai, from Rummanah (30°58'35.94"N-32° 45'35.94"E) to Wadi El-Arish (30°43'49.80''N-34°25'10.68''E). Based on the records of the regional meteorological station of El-Arish, the climatic data of the studied areas is outlined in Table 1. The summer months (July and August) are the hottest, and the mean temperature was highest in August (32.9 °C)
and lowest in January (8.0 °C). Very narrow variation in relative humidity is reported throughout the whole year, ranged from 70% in April to 76.0% in August. The total mean of annual rainfall was 157.11 mm during the period 1995 to 2005. The wind velocity reached its mean maximum (10.0 knot) in January and minimum (4.0 knot) in May till October.
The study covers three potential areas Fig. 1. The first area is ''Rummanah-Bir El Abd'' characterized by an open plain of gravely desert having scanty quantities of rainfall with very few inland salines. Seven plant samples were collected from three sites. The second area is ''Rafah-El Arish'' coastal area with scattered semi-stable dunes and coastal salines to the north. A number of 13 plant samples were obtained representing four sites. ''Wadi (Valley) El-Arish'' is representing the third area with 23 plant samples. It covers a virtual triangular with sides of ca. 29 km, 39 km and base of 40 km, and respective apices at Bir Lahfan, Abu Ujaylah and Gebel (heights) Libni. The area contains stable and semi-stable sandy fields, supported with relatively higher amounts of rainfall (ca. 100 mm/year) and low soil salinity that permits agricultural activities. The environmental conditions prevailing in the studied areas are presented in Table 1.
Sampling of flora
Sinai lies in the semi-arid regions of the world. Its natural flora is mainly xerophytes and dominated by Mediterranean elements; in addition to Saharo-Arabian and Irano-Turanian elements in the second position. Plants were sampled during their optimum growth in the rainy seasons (October-May) of 2004 and 2005, and identified at Cairo University Herbarium (CAI) based on the authentic herbarium specimens and available literature [8-11]. Each plant sample is a composite of at least three plants exists in the sampling site. The identified specimens were deposited as herbarium specimens in the ''Research Center for Agro-biotechnologies, Faculty of Agriculture, Cairo University'', Rafah, north Sinai.
Sampling of plant-soil systems
Bacteria closely associated to the surface layers of root tissues (named as rhizoplane or tentatively endorhizosphere) and shoots (endophyllosphere) of various plant-soil systems were examined for total culturable populations of bacteria and associated nitrogen-fixing bacteria (diazotrophs). Phyllosphere samples were obtained by first insertion and separation of the vegetation part of plant into plastic bags. Then, the root system (intact roots with closely-adhering soil) was removed and transferred to plastic bags. All samples were kept in a cold bow and brought within 24 h to the laboratory. Samples were kept in the refrigerator until analyses within 72 h of sampling.
Table 1 Metrological data of north Sinai based on recordings of El-Arish regional station 2003-2005.a
Item January February March April May June July August September October. November December Mean
Mean air temp (°C) 13.9 14.5 20.1 18.5 21.5 23.9 26.0 26.5 25.2 23.3 19.9 15.8 20.7
Mean RH% 70.0 69.0 67.0 67.0 68.0 72.0 74.0 75.0 71.0 73.0 71.0 66.0 70.3
Mean wind speed (m/sec) 4.7 5.5 5.7 4.8 4.6 4.5 4.3 4.0 4.1 3.5 3.9 4.6 4.5
Sun shine duration (h) 6.2 6.0 7.1 7.9 9.8 11.9 11.4 10.5 8.8 7.7 6.9 6.0 8.4
Net solar radiation (Mj/m2/day) 11.2 13.1 17.2 20.4 24.5 27.9 26.9 24.5 20.1 15.9 12.4 10.7 18.7
Rain (mm/month) 20.3 17.1 12.0 6.1 3.2 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.6 6.0 16.2 22.2 8.7
ETO (mm/day) 1.9 2.4 3.2 3.8 4.7 5.5 5.5 5.2 4.4 3.2 2.5 2.2 3.7
a Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate (CLAC 2006). Annual Climatic Book. Pp. 21. Ministry of agriculture, Dokki, Giza, Egypt.
Fig. 1 Map illustrating areas and sites sampled in north Sinai based on GPS data obtained. Sites I-1 through 3, Rummanah-Bir El Abdarea I: Bir al Rummanah 30°58'35.94"N-32°45'35.94"E; BiralAbd31° 1'35.94"N-33° 4'35.95"E; BiralAbd31° 2'35.94"N-33° 7'35.94"E; sites II-1 through 4, Rafah-El Arish coastal area II: Al Arish 31° 8'24.00''N-33°52'43.20''E; Rafah 31°17'6.00''N-34°13'12.00''E; Rafah 31 °17'41.94'' N-34°12'3.00''E; Rafah 31°18'6.00''N-34°12'54.00''E. sites III-1 through 11, Wady El Arish area III: Wadi al Arish 30°41'3.84'' N-33°47'59.40''E; Wadi al Arish30°41'51.96''N-33°49'58.80''E; Wadi al Arish 30°47'35.76''N-33°58'7.80''E; Bir lahfan 30°54'17.28'' N-33°50'43.20''E; Wadi al Amr 30°59'21.60''N-34°14'56.94''E; Ayn al Qusaymah 30°43'49.80''N-34°25'10.68''E; Ayn l Qusaymah 30°40'49.80''N-34°21'10.68''E; Wadi al Arish 30°29'43.32''N-34° 7'50.40''E; Wadi al Arish 30°30'48.00''N-34°10'36.00''E; Wadi al Arish 30°55'35.94''N-34° 1'35.94''E; Wadi al Arish 30°57'40.20''N-33°58'35.98''E.
Preparation of samples for microbial analyses
Surface sterilization for either roots or shoots was carried [12], the intact shoot or root was carefully washed with tap water, treated with 95% ethanol for 30 s followed by 3% sodium hypochlorite for 30 min, then thoroughly washed five times with sterile distilled water. Sterility check was carried out by placing segments of sterilized plant materials on the surface of prepared nutrient agar plates. Finally, the plant materials were triturated for 5 min in Warring blender using sufficient amount of half strength basal salts of the N-deficient combined carbon sources medium (CCM) liquid medium [13] as a diluent. Further serial dilutions were prepared, using the same diluent, for enumerating bacterial groups in the roots and shoots.
Roots with encasing sand sheath were divided into sub-samples prepared for: (a) the loose free sand; (b) the encasing
compact sand of the rhizosheath (sand sheath); (c) roots carefully deprived of their sand load by sterile forcipes (naked root/rhizoplane) and (d) surface-sterilized roots (endorhizo-sphere) using ethanol and sodium hypochlorite [12]. For each sub-sample, enough soil and/or plant material were used to prepare the first dilution in 100 ml glass bottles containing 45 ml diluent (the basal salt of CCM medium), shaked (150 rpm) for 60 min, then further serial dilutions were prepared for culturing representative groups of bacteria.
Bacteriological determinations
Suitable dilutions of prepared samples, three replicates for each plant sphere, were analyzed for total culturable bacteria using the nutrient agar and the pour plate method [14]. Diazotrophs were cultured using the surface-inoculated plates and the N-deficient combined carbon sources medium (CCM)
Table 2 Perennial and annual plants reported and sampled in the studied areas of north Sinai during the seasons 2004 and 2005.
No . Host plant Family Area-site a Season
Perennial
1 Cyperus laevigatus L Cyperaceae I Site 2 2005
2 Pancratium maritimum L Amaryllidaceae II Site 3 2005
3 Thymelaea hirsuta (L.) Endl Thymeliaceae II Site 1 2005
4 Astragalaus kahiricus DC Fabaceae III Site 5 2004
5 Cornulaca monacantha Delile Chenopodiaceae III Site 3 2004
6 Fagonia arabica L Zygophyllaceae III Site 1 2004
7 Fagonia mollis (Labill.) H.L. Wendl Zygophyllaceae III Site 1 2004
8 Haloxylon salicornicum (Moq.) Bunge ex Boiss Chenopodiaceae III Site 1 2004
9 Heliotropium dignum (Forssk.) C. Chr Boraginaceae III Site 3 2004
10 Panicum turgidum Forsskb Poaceae III Site 4 2004
11 Stipagrostis scoparia (Trin. & Rupr.) de Winter b Poaceae III Site 2 2004
12 Zilla spinosa (L.) Prantl Brassicaceae III Site 8 2004
13 Zygophyllum album L. var. amblyocarpum (Baker.) Hadidi Zygophyllaceae III Site 3 2004
Annual
14 Centaurea pallescens Delile Asteraceae I Site 1 2005
15 Chenopodium murale L Chenopodiaceae I Site 1 2005
16 Launaea capitata (Spreng.) Dandy Asteraceae I Site 1 2005
17 Polycarpaea repens (Forssk.) Asch. & Schweinf Caryophyllaceae I Site 3 2005
18 Silene succulenta Forssk Caryophyllaceae I Site 3 2005
19 Trachynia distachya (L.) Link = Brachypodium distachyum (L.) P. Beauv Poaceae I Site 1 2005
20 Anchusa humilis (Desf.) I.M. Johnst Boraginaceae II Site 4 2005
21 Bromus madritensis Lb Poaceae II Site 2 2004
22 Bromus scoparius Lb Poaceae II Site 2 2004
23 Erodium crassifolium L' Her Geraniaceae II Site 4 2005
24 Iflago spicata (Forssk.) Sch. Bip Asteraceae II Site 1 2005
25 Malva parviflora L Malvaceae II Site 4 2005
26 Phalaris minor Retz Poaceae II Site 4 2005
27 Polycarpon succulentum (Delile) J. Gay Caryophyllaceae II Site 4 2005
28 Pseudorlaya pumila (L.) Grande Apiaceae II Site 1 2005
29 Senecio glaucus L. subsp. coronopifolius (Maire) C. Alexander Asteraceae II Site 4 2005
30 Trisetaria koelerioides (Bornem and Hackel) Meldrisb Poaceae II Site 4 2005
31 Asphodelus tenuifolius Cav Liliaceae III Site 9 2005
32 Cotula cinerea Delile Asteraceae III Site 10 2005
33 Cutandia memphatica (Spreng.) K. Richtb Poaceae III Site 2 2004
34 Cyperus capitatus Vand Cyperaceae III Site 2 2004
35 Eremobium aegyptiacum (Spreng.) Asch. & Schwienf. var. aegyptiacum Brassicaceae III Site 11 2005
36 Erodium oxyrhynchum M. Bieb Geraniaceae III Site 4 2004
37 Euphorbia retusa Forssk Euphorbiaceae III Site 9 2005
38 Hordeum murinum L Poaceae III Site 6 2004
39 Lolium perenne L.b Poaceae III Site 7 2004
40 Neurada procumbens L Neuradaceae III Site 3 2004
41 Oligomeris linifolia (Hornem.) J.F. Macbr Resedaceae III Site 10 2005
42 Svignya parviflora (Delile.) Webb Brassicaceae III Site 4 2004
43 Trigonella stellata Forssk Leguminosae III Site 9 2005
a For detailed information on sites, please refer to the detailed map (Fig. 1); I, II and III are the major three studied areas; 1, 2-11 are the
number of sites within each area.
b Plants possessed sand sheath and subjected to further microbial analyses.
[13]. Incubation took place at 30 0C, and the developed c.f.u were counted during 2-7 days of incubation [1,2].
The Gluconacetobacter-like populations were enumerated using the most probable number (MPN) and the semi-solid N-deficient LGI culture medium [12,15]. For each suitable dilution, 1 ml aliquots were transferred to five tubes containing 5 ml of semi-solid LGI medium, incubated at 30 0C for 7 days. MPN estimates were derived using tables of Meynell and Meynell [16].
For the culturable spore-forming populations, just prior to plating, suitable dilutions were pasteurized at 80 0C for 15 min. In general, bacterial populations were calculated on dry matter (105 0C for soils and 75 0C for plant materials) basis.
Isolation, purification and identification of representative isolates of diazotrophs
Representative colonies developed on CCM agar plates were selected for single colony isolation. In addition, sets of semisolid CCM medium inoculated with 0.5 ml aliquots of suitable dilutions were also prepared, incubated for 48-72 h. at 30 0C. Acetylene reducing activity [17] was measured for tubes exhibiting good growth, and cultures produced more than 5 nmoles C2H4 culture-1 h-1 were considered positive, streaked on CCM agar plates and incubated for 48-72 h. at 30 0C. For further purification of all selected isolates, single colony isolation was performed on agar plates of CCM. Pure
► Total bacteria
Total diazotrophs
1 • • • c- w m --
A A Z %
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
l)C.murale; 2)F.mollis; 3)L.capitata; 4)S.succulenta; 5)E.aegyptiacum; 6)A.kahiricus; 7)P.pumila 8)H.dignum; 9)F.arabica; 10)S.parviflora; 11)H.salicornicum; l2)I.spicata; 13)C.pallescens 14)N.procumbens; 15)M.parviflora; 16)Z.spinosa; l7)C.monacantha; 18)E. retusa; 19)C.cinerea 20)E.crassifolium; 21)T.hirsuta; 22)A.tenuifolius; 23)P.succulentum; 24)A.humilis; 25)T.stellata 26)Z.album; 27)O.linifolia; 28)P.minor; 29)P.repens; 30)S.glaucus; 31)E.oxyrhynchum; 32)P.maritimum.
1)E.aegyptiacum; 2)F.mollis; 3)C.murale; 4)P.pumila; 5)N.procumbens; 6)H.salicornicum; 7)S.succulenta; 8)H.dignum; 9)Z.spinosa; 10)A.kahiricus; 11)M.parviflora; 12)S.parviflora; 13)E.crassifolium; 14)C.pallescens; 15)L.capitata; 16)A.tenuifolius; 17)C.monacantha; 18)T.hirsuta; 19)F.arabica; 20)Z.album; 21)P.repens; 22)P.succulentum; 23)E. retusa; 24)P.minor; 25)T.stellata; 26)I.spicata; 27)A.humilis; 28)S.glaucus; 29)C.cinerea; 30)O.linifolia; 31)P.maritimum; 32)E.oxyrhynchum.
Fig. 2 Ranking of total culturable endophytic total bacteria (TB) and total diazotrophs (TD)in roots (endorhizosphere, A) and shoots (endophyllosphere, B) of sampled plants during the seasons 2004/2005. Inserted are the calculated correlation coefficients and linear regression among either populations.
isolates were re-examined for acetylene-reducing activity, colony morphology and cell characteristics according to Ber-gey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [18]. Representative isolates were also examined for growth and cultural characteristics based on API microtube systems gallery [19]; API 20E for Enterobacteriaceae; API 20 NE for non-Enterobacteria-ceae and API 50CHB for bacilli.
For Gluconacetobacter-like diazotrophs, the MPN tubes of LGI medium showing typical dark-orange surface pellicle and clear colorless medium below were considered positive. Representative isolates were obtained by single-colony isolation on agar plates of the same medium. After 7-10 days, pure orange colonies were transferred into LGIP medium. For more purification, isolates were streaked on potato agar [15], modified LGIP medium [20] and glucose-yeast-CaCO3
(GYC) [21,15] agar plates. Pure isolates were re-examined for acetylene reducing activity, colony morphology and cell characteristics and identified according to Bergey's Manual of Systematic Bacteriology [18]. The API microtube systems 20E and 20NE were further used as a standardized micro-method [19]. The Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus type culture (ATCC 49037) was used as a reference strain.
Culture media
Nutrient agar [14]: It contains (gP1): beef extract, 3.0; peptone, 5.0; glucose, 1.0; yeast extract, 0.5; agar, 15; pH, 7.2.
N-deficient combined carbon sources medium, CCM [13]: It comprises of (g P1): glucose, 2.0; malic acid, 2.0; mannitol, 2.0; sucrose, 1.0; K2HPO4, 0.4; KH2PO4, 0.6; MgSO4, 0.2; NaCl,
Fig. 3 Representatives of the richest (A) and the poorest (B) north Sinai plant cover in respect of endophytic culturable populations.
• ' =£5®5HBr ^ >■* • — s
Eremobium aegyptiacum Neurada procumbens
Pancratium maritimum
Plants
Fig. 4 Representatives of sand-sheathed plants (A) and the specific sand load (g sand g-1 root) on their roots (B).
0.1; CuSO4, 0.08 mg; ZnSO4, 0.25 mg; MnSO4, 0.01; yeast extract, 0.2; fermentol (a local product of corn-steep liquor), 0.2; KOH, 1.5; CaCl2, 0.02; FeCl3, 0.015; Na2 MoO4, 0.002. Sodium lactate was included as 0.6 ml (50% v/v).
LGI medium [15]: It contains (g T1): K2HPO4,0.2; KH2PO4, 0.6; MgSO4-7H2O, 0.2; CaCl22H2O, 0.02; Na2MoO4-H2O, 0.002; FeCl3H2O, 0.01; bromothymol blue 0.5% solution in 0.2 N KOH, 5 ml; agar, 1.8; crystallized cane sugar, 100; PH, 6.0.
Modified LGIP medium [20]: It contained per liter: 0.02 g of Na2MoO4-2H2O, 0.1 mg of biotin, 0.2 mg of pyridoxal HCl l and 5 ml of sugarcane juice (pressed from fresh sugarcane stem). The final pH was adjusted to 5.5 using 1% acetic acid. For single colony isolation, diluted cells were spread on solid LGIP agar medium (15 g of agar per liter plus 50 mg of yeast extract per liter).
Potato agar [15]: It comprises of (l-1): potato extract 200 ml; sucrose 100 g, agar 15 g. Glucose yeast extract CaCO3, GYC [21,15]: It contains (gl-1): glucose, 100; yeast extract, 10; CaCO3, 20; agar, 15; distilled water, 1000; pH 6.8.
Statistical analysis
Data obtained were statistically analyzed using STATISTICA 6.0 (StatSoft, Inc., Tulsa, USA). Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to examine the independent effects as well as possible interactions. Correlation coefficient and linear regression were also computed.
Results
Diversity of total cultlurable bacteria and diazotrophs in the endorhizosphere and endophyllosphere of tested plants
The studied region is extending eastward from Rummanah-Bir El Abd to Wadi (Valley) El-Arish Fig. 1. Sampling was carried out during the rainy seasons of 2004 and 2005. Forty-three species, 30 annuals and 13 perennials, were collected and showed the highest dominance and frequency as well as adaptation to north Sinai environment. Based on the data collected at El-Arish metrological station during the period 2003/2007 Table 1, it is documented that the environmental conditions are extremely harsh and variable, being reflected on the vegetation and associated microflora. Under such environment, it was of rather interest to report on the diversity of culturable bacteria nesting the naked surfaces and their lining tissues of plant roots and shoots, tentatively referred to in this study as endorhizosphere and endophyllosphere respectively.
Table 2 summarizes the botanical status of plants sampled throughout the study.
The endorhizospheric and phyllospheric populations of total culturable bacteria and diazotrophs are reported and ranked in Fig. 2. Majority of plant roots and shoots (96%) were nested with populations ranged from 106 to 108 cfu g
dwt of endorhizosphere and phyllosphere. The plant species Eremobium aegyptiacum, Neurada procumbens, Fagonia mollis, Chenopodium murale, Pseudorlaya pumila, Haloxylon salicorn-icum and Silene succulenta were particularly the richest in associated endophytic microflora compared to Erodium oxyrhynchum and Panicum maritimum Fig. 3.
Total cullturable diazotrophs, nitrogen-fixing bacteria, did positively correlate with the total bacterial populations
Fig. 2. Their populations in roots and shoots of majority of plants were in the range of > 106-108 cfu g_1 dwt. For the endorhizosphere, E. aegyptiacum and N. procumbens were top ranked Fig. 3a compared to P. maritimum and E. oxyrhyn-chum the very poorest Fig. 3b. The wealthiest plants in endo-phyllosphere (>108cfug_1) were E. aegyptiacum, C. murale and N. procumbens. Four plants supported populations less than 106 cfu g_1 dwt, with E. oxyrhynchum being the poorest.
The study areas were inhabited with 11 plants characterized by having a sand sheath closely adhering to the plant root Table 2. The specific sand load (g sand/g dwt root) did vary among plants, being extremely thick (62 g) for Cypreus laevig-atus, because of its intensive root biomass and network, and very thin (0.7 g) for Lolium perenne Fig. 4. Besides the free sand, the successive root spheres of sand sheath, rhizoplane and endorhizosphere were analyzed for their microbial load of total culturable bacteria, diazotrophs, total sporeformers and spore-forming diazotrophs. ANOVA analysis indicated the significant independent effects of plant type, sphere and microbial groups tested Fig. 5. Among plants, the poorest in total culturable microbial communities were Trisetaria koele-rides, Stipagrostis scoparia and C. laevigatus, being statistically inferior to the remaining eight plants among which differences were not significant except for B. madritensis, the richest of all Fig. 5. As to spheres, the free sand was statistically the poorest and rhizoplane the highest. Of interest is that the microbial load differences among sand sheath and rhizoplane of all tested plants were insignificant. It appears that the microbial communities in the root spheres were active and mobile in order to migrate and/or invade the root interiors (endorhizo-sphere) with substantial populations (P105 cfu g_1 dwt). Differences among culturable bacterial groups were significant, following the descending order of total bacteria, total diazo-trophs, total spore-forming bacteria and spore-forming diazotrophs.
The various combinations of 2-way interactions are illustrated in Fig. 5B. The total culturable bacteria ranged from 105 to 109 cfu g_1 dwt, significantly enriched in the root region, being highest on the rhizoplane followed by sand sheath, being lowest in the free sand Fig. 5B3. The total culturable diazo-trophs followed a similar trend, and were found abundant in the root spheres, representing more than 70% of the total population. The interaction between plants and bacterial groups Fig. 5B1, again indicated the statistical inferiority of S. scoparia, C. laevigatus and T. koelerides, together with the descending order of total bacteria, total diazotrophs, total spore formers, and spore-forming diazotrops. Irrespective of bacterial groups Fig. 5B2, the tested microbial communities were highest in the rhizoplane and sand sheath, with insignificant differences among them, compared to the free sand. The above conclusions were further confirmed by 3-way interaction.
The spore-forming bacteria, either diazotrophic or not, did occupy a significant niche, with populations ranged from >103 to 106 cfu g_1 dwt; representing 50-85% of the microbial population Fig. 5 B. Compared to the free sand (103-105 cfu g
dwt), the sand sheath and the root surfaces (rhizoplane) harbored higher populations (106 to 107 cfu g_1 dwt) reported for 8 out of 11 tested rhizosheathed plants. The spore-forming bacteria were able to taxi and nest the interiors of plant roots (endorhizosphere) with substantial populations of >103 to 105 cfu g_1 dwt, representing 50-97% of total endophytic bacterial community.
Fig. 5 Total culturable bacteria and diazotrophs reported for rhizo-sheathed plants. (A) The independent effect of plants; the inserted table demonstrates the effect of both spheres and culturable bacterial groups reported by ANOVA analyses. (B) The Two-way interactions computed during ANOVA analysis: B1, Plants and bacterial groups; B2, Plants and root spheres; B3, Spheres and bacterial groups. (T.B., Total Bacteria; T.D., Total Diazotrophs; T.S., Total Spore-formers; S.D., Spore-forming Diazotrophs).
Endophytic nitrogen-fixing isolates reported
Special attention was given to the nitrogen-fixing pure isolates nested the roots and shoots of xerophytic plants. Forty-one
pure isolates were secured and subjected to taxonomic analyses. The spore-forming diazotrophs were predominant and well represented by the genus Bacillus (23 isolates), particularly the species Bacillus megaterium (14), Bacillus pumilus (4),
Table 3 Taxonomic position of endophytic spore-forming isolates of diazotrophs obtained from roots and shoots of tested xerophytes (based on API 50CHB).
Host plant Area Isolate code Sphere N2-ase activity (nmoles C2H4 h-1 5 ml culture-1) Proposed position Identification
C. pallescens I B 1/B/48 Root >41.88 B. megaterium Excellent
L. capitata I B 15/B/48 Root 31.41 B. macerans Good
S. succulenta I B 36/B/48 Root >41.88 B. pumilus V. good
T. distachyaa I B 18/B/48 Sand sheath 12.26 B. polymyxa V. good
T. distachyaa I B 17/B/48 Root (endorhizosphere) >41.88 B. megaterium Excellent
I. spicata II B 45/B/48 Root 17.95 B. megaterium V. good
I. .spicata II B 46/B/48 Root 23.03 B. megaterium Excellent
M. parviflora II B 116/B/48 Root 14.96 B. megaterium Excellent
B. scopariusa II B 142/B/48 Root (endorhizosphere) 22.44 B. megaterium V. good
T. koelerioideas II B 5/B/48 Sand sheath 6.58 B. circulans Excellent
M. parviflora II B 117/B/48 Shoot 17.95 B. polymyxa Good
A. tenuifolius III B 60/B/48 Root 26.33 B. pumilus V. good
C. cinerea III B 87/B/48 Root 28.42 B. megaterium Good
C. cinerea III B 89/B/48 Root 41.29 B. megaterium Good
Z. spinosa III B 145/B/48 Root >41.88 B. licheniformis V. good
H. salicornicum III B 168/B/48 Root 25.13 B. megaterium Excellent
H. murinuma III B 129/B/48 Root (endorhizosphere) 14.96 B. megaterium V. good
C. capitatusa III B 165/B/48 Root (endorhizosphere) >41.88 B. megaterium V. good
A. tenuifolius III B 61/B/48 Shoot 6.58 B. pumilus V. good
E. retusa III B 65/B/48 Shoot 19.44 B. megaterium Excellent
E. aegyptiacum III B 71/B/48 Shoot >41.88 B. megaterium Excellent
O. linifolia III B 79/B/48 Shoot 19.44 B. megaterium V. good
Z. spinosa III B 144/B/48 Shoot >41.88 B. pumilus Good
a Rhizo-sheathed plants.
Table 4 Taxonomic position of endophytic non-spore-forming isolates of diazotrophs obtained from roots and shoots of tested xerophytes (based on API 20E and 20NE).
Host plant Area Isolate Sphere N2-ase activity Proposed Identification
code (nmoles C2H4 h 5 ml culture ) position
S. succulenta I S 39/NE/24 Root 31.14 Sphingomonas paucimobilis V. good
P. pumila II E 53/E/48 Root >41.88 Enterobacter agglomerance Excellent
P. pumila II B 50/NE/24 Root 13.46 Brevundimonas (Pseudomonas) vesicularis Good
P. maritimum II O 94/NE/24 Root not determined Ochrobactrum anthropi V. good
P. maritimum II E 91/E/24 Root 27.52 Enterobacter cloacae Good
P. maritimum II E 92/E/48 Root 22.44 Enterobacter sakazaki V. good
M. parviflora II C 115/NE/24 Shoot 29.92 Chrysemonas luteola Good
S. glaucus II A 28/NE/24 Shoot >41.88 Agrobacterium radiobacter Excellent
E. aegyptiacum III K 78/E/48 Root 29.92 Klebsiella oxytoca Good
F. Arabica III S 155/E/24 Root 28.42 Serratia adorifera Good
F. Arabica III S 156/E/24 Root >41.88 Serratia adorifera Good
A. tenuifolius III B 58/NE/24 Root 26.92 Brevundimonas (Pseudomonas) vesicularis Good
H. murinum III E 123/E/24 Root 14.96 Enterobacter agglomerance Good
H. murinum III P 131/NE/48 Root 35.9 Pseudomonas putida V. good
Z. album III S 147/NE/24 Root >41.88 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (Xantho. maltophilia) Excellent
Z. album III S 148/E/24 Root 17.95 Serratia liquefaciens V. good
E. oxyrhynchum III A 138/NE/24 Shoot 29.32 Agrobacterium radiobacter Excellent
H. salicornicum III A 170/NE/48 Shoot >41.88 Agrobacterium radiobacter Excellent
Bacillus polymyxa (2), Bacillus macerans (1), Bacillus lichenifor-mis (1) and Bacillus circulans (1) Table 3.
The non-sporing population was represented by 18 isolates. They belonged to the genera Enterobacter spp. (E. cloacae, E. agglomerance, E. sakazaki), Serratia spp. (S. adorifera, S. liquefaciens), Agrobacterium spp. (A. radiobacter), Klebsiella spp. (K. oxytoca), Pseudomona spp./Brevundimonas spp. (P. vesicularis, P. putida), Chrysemonas spp. (C. luteola),
Stenotrophomonas spp. (S. maltophilia), Ochrobactrum spp. (O. anthropi) and Sphingomonas spp. (S. paucimobilis) Table 4.
Both spore- and non-spore forming diazotrophs were present endophytically in roots or in the shoots of plants, but one B. circulans and one B. polymyxa were found in sand sheath layers Table 3. In general, the specific load of spore-forming community in the sand sheath differed among tested plants. Five plants, belonged to Gramineae (Poaceae), harbored in
H.dignum M.parviflora I.spicata S.parvflora N.procumbens S.succulenta E.aegyptiacum P.pumila A.tenuifolius Z.spinosa T.stellata O.linifolia S.glaucus F.arabica E.crassifolium P.succulentum
E. retusa C.cinerea P.repens
L.capitata Z.album A.humilis P.minor P.maritimum C.pallescens C.murale E.oxyrhynchum
F.mollis T.hirsuta
C.monacantha A.kahiricus H.salicornicum
I —I Endophyllosphere MPN _i Endorhizosphere MPN —1-1-1-1 i i —
6.0 4.0 2.0 Log cfu/g dwt root
2.0 4.0 6.0 8.( Log cfu/g dwt shoot
Fig. 6 MPN of culturable endophytic Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus-like populations reported in shoots (a) and roots (b) of tested xerophytic plants, and computed correlation coefficients and regression lines (c) in between.
Table 5 Taxonomic position of Pantoae spp. isolates obtained during the present study in relation to representatives of those reported
in literature.
Characteristics 9Ca ' P. agglomeransh P. ananasb P. terreab P. punctatac P. citreac P96 P92 P89 P88 P65
Indole production — V + - - - + + + - -
Citrate utilization + + + + + - + + + - -
Acid production in sorbitol + - + - - - + + + - -
Acid production in sucrose + + + + + - + + + - -
Acid production in inositol — - + - - - + + + + -
Nitrate reduction — + V V + + - -- --
Gelatine liquefaction — + + - - - - + + - +
Motility + + + + - - + + + - +
a Pantoae isolates (Ref. [56]).
b P. agglomerans and P. ananas (Ref. [30]); V, variable reaction.
c P. terrea, P. punctata and P. citrea (Ref. [31]).
their sand sheath populations exceeded 106cfug_1 dwt. They followed the descending order B. madrietensis, L. perenne, B. scoparius, P. turgidum and H. murinum. The load of C. laevig-atus, of the family Cyperaceae, was particularly the lowest (<106 cfu g_1 dwt) Fig. 5A. A trend that is very much comparable to the spore-forming community nesting the intact root surfaces (rhizoplane).
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus
The endophytic Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, present inside roots or shoots, were abundant in the selective LGI semi-solid culture medium. For the majority of plants (75-80%), their culturable populations in shoot and root tissues ranged from 104 to 107cfug-1 Fig. 6. Among the
Table 6 Taxonomic position, based on API 20 E and 20 NE, of endophytic isolates of diazotrophs other than Gluconacetobacter spp. developed in LGI semi-solid medium.
Plant Area Isolate code Sphere tested N2-ase activity Proposed position Identification
(nmoles C2H4 h-1 5 ml culture-1)
L. perenne III S 14/E/24 Root 2.69 Serratia plymuthica Good
L. perenne III E 15/E/24 Root 8.68 Enterobacter sakazaki Good
E. aegyptiacum III E 16/E/24 Root 3.29 Enterobacter ssakazaki Good
C. pallescens I E 21/E/24 Shoot 3.74 Enterobacter agglomerance Good
S. .succulenta I E 43/E/24 Shoot 10.17 Enterobacter agglomerance Good
P. pumila II A 49/E/24 Root 39.04 Aeromonas sobria Excellent
A. tenuifolius III E 52/E/24 Shoot 41.88 Enterobacter agglomerance Good
E. aegyptiacum III E 61/E/24 Root 2.99 Enterobacter .sakazaki Good
O. linifolia III E 62/E/24 Root 5.68 Enterobacter agglomerance Good
P. maritimum II E 76/E/24 Root ND Erwinia spp. V.good
C. capitatus III E 87/E/24 Root ND Enterobacter sakazaki Good
C. cinerea III P 65/E/24 Shoot 3.74 Pantoae spp. Good
C. capitatus III P 88/E/24 Shoot 2.99 Pantoae spp. Good
C. capitatus III P 89/E/24 Shoot 10.50 Pantoae spp. Good
C. capitatus III P 92/E/24 Root 18.7 Pantoae spp. Excellent
P. minor II P 96/E/24 Shoot 2.24 Pantoae spp. Excellent
S. parviflora III B 2/NE/24 Shoot 1.5 Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia Excellent
L. capitata I B 4/NE/24 Root 2.24 Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia Excellent
L. capitata I B 6/NE/24 Root 20.94 Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia Good
P. turgidum III B 19/NE/24 Sand sheath 10.62 Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia Good
C. pallescens I A 22/NE/24 Shoot 20.94 Chrysemonas luteola Good
L. capitata I A 25/NE/24 Shoot 29.92 Agrobacterium radiobacter Good
C. murale I X 57/NE/24 Root 6.73 Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia Excellent
E. aegyptiacum III B 59/ne/24 Shoot 15.71 Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia Good
E. aegyptiacum III C 60/NE/24 Shoot 15.71 Chrysemonas luteola Good
P. minor II C 97/NE/24 Root 20.94 Chrysemonas luteola V.good
ND, not detected.
richest plants, both in roots and shoots (>107), were Heliotro-pium dignum, Malva parviflora, Svignya parviflora, N. procum-bens and S. succulenta while the poorest (6104) were E. oxyrhynchum, F. mollis, Thymelaea hirsute, Cornulaca mona-cantha, Astragalaus kahiricus and H. salicornicum. Highly significant correlation coefficient (r = 0.9382) was reported between populations harbored the shoots and roots of plants.
The taxonomic profile using API 20E and API 20NE (data not shown) of 10 pure isolates was comparable to the reference type culture strain (ATCC 40379). Of interest is that the selective LGI culture medium did also support the growth of another group of isolates that did not match with the taxo-nomic profile of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus but Pantoea spp. Tables 5 and 6 and other species of diazotrophs, namely Enterobacter agglomerance, Enterobacter sakazaki, Serratia plymuthica, Aeromonas sobria, Erwinia spp., Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia, Chrysemonas luteola, Agrobacterium radiobacter and Stenotrophomonas (Xanthomonas) maltophilia Tables 6. All diazotrophic isolates were present endophyticaly in roots or in the shoots of plants, but one Bukholderia (Pseudomonas) cepacia was found in the sand sheath layers Table 6.
Discussion
The major goal of this study was to document the diversity of bacteria associated to the plant cover of north Sinai deserts. This necessitated surveying the predominant plant species and assaying the culturable bacteria associated to the plant canopy and root systems. Since microflora might be used as
bioindicators of plant-soil health, suitability and perturbation; the size, composition and nature of microbial populations are used as indicators of biological status of soil/plant health and nutrition. However, a lot of problems are encountered with culturable population of bacteria, either total or specific groups [22]. Although Frankenberger and Dick [23] concluded that plate count technique is not reliable measure of microbial growth and activity in plant-soil system, there is evidence that this technique is useful in comparative ecological studies of specific microbial population [24].
Within the studied areas, 30 annual and 13 perennial plants were encountered and selected for microbiological analyses. This number is rather limited compared to those recorded earlier in north Sinai. Gibbali [10] in his extensive survey reported more than 300 species. It is expected that the number of existing plant species are declining along the years because of low rainfall as well as the on-going human interaction through rural and agricultural developments and activities.
As to the xerophyte-microbe-environment panorama; several factors are expected to support the microbial establishment and growth in this particular environment, e.g., beneficial root exudates, shedding of plant parts to improve soil fertility, presence of shade to reduce the direct sun-rays, favorable pH, low soil salinity, plant stability among soil layers, limited fluctuations in rainfall and temperature, absence of allelopathic and/or bacteriostatic plant compounds and wide root/shoot ratio [2].
Both endorhizosphere and endophyllosphere of xerophytes tested accommodated high total culturable bacterial popula-
tions of ca. 108 cfu g-1 dwt, which proves many more bacterial infections of inner plant tissues. Similarly, associative diazo-trophs were extraordinary reported in both plant niches. Due to definition of James et al. [25], endophytes are heterotrophic microorganisms that are able to invade and penetrate plant organs encompassing roots, stems and leaves. The studies of Reis et al. [26] have shed the light upon the invasion process and indicated that the endophyte first colonizes the root surfaces and then infects the roots via lateral root junctions and/or root tips. The endophyte, thereafter, enters the root vascular system from whence it translocates to the lower stem in the xylem. In addition to the possibility of infection at lateral root junctions, James et al. [27] suggested that there are at least two other potential sites of infection; wounds and stomata. In either location, the bacteria elicited a localized host defense response in the form of a polymeric matrix material that surrounded them. The invasion process appears not always to be detrimental to plant nutrition and health but may even be confer some growth benefits [26]. In accordance, Chanway [28] reported that some endophytic bacteria are thought to produce compounds that render plant tissues less attractive to herbivores, while other strains may increase host plant drought resistance.
Endophytic bacteria comprise only part of the non-pathogenic microflora exist naturally inside plant tissues. Work with plant species of agricultural and horticultural importance indicates that some endophytic bacterial strains stimulate host plant growth by acting as biocontrol agents, either through direct antagonism of microbial pathogens or by inducing systemic resistance to disease-causing organisms. Other endophytic bacterial strains may protect crops from parasitic nematodes and insects. In Brazil, the N2-fixing endophytes of sugarcane, Acetobacter diazotrophicus, (now Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus), and Herbaspirillum spp. colonize internal root, stem and leaf tissues, and are thought to provide up to 80% of the host plant's nitrogen needs [28]. Other endophytic bacteria stimulate plant growth via mechanisms yet to be elucidated.
As reported by Olivares and James [29], at early stage of the plant-microbe interaction, the numbers of endophytes inside plant tissues appear to be quite high (107-108 cells g-1 fresh weight), although it should be noted that such numbers certainly include many surface-dwelling bacteria that have survived via tight adherence to plant surfaces within mucus and/or a preference for colonizing cracks and crevices. This applies very well to the present results of dense endophytic populations reported for the tested xerophytic plants of north Sinai.
Three hundred bacterial isolates were secured from endorhiz-osphere and endophyllosphere of tested plants. Among those, 41 isolates were further purified and identified based on colony and cell morphology as well as API (20E, 20NE and 50CHB) profiles. Of the forty one identified strains, 23 were BNF Bacillus spp. The majority of bacilli strains were B. megaterium followed by B. pumilusB. polymexa, B. macerans, B. circulans and Bacillus licheniformis. The family Enterobacteriaceae was represented by Enterobacter agglomerans, Enterobacter sackazakii, Enterobac-ter cloacae, Serratia adorifera, Serratia liquefaciens and Klebsiella oxytoca. Among non-Enterobacteriaceae were Pantoae spp. Agrobacterium rdiobacter, Pseudomonas vesicularis, Pseudomonas putida, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Ochrobactrum anthropi, Sphingomonas paucimobilis and Chrysemonas luteola. The taxonomic profile of Pantoae spp. isolates is most likely matches with the reported P. anans (2 isolates) and P. citrea (two isolates) [30,31]. Similarly, other workers have reported iso-
lation of indigenous endophytic bacteria from yellow dent type corn [32], sweet corn [33] and alfalfa [34].
The present study presents original data on the indigenous bacterial endophytes isolated from the natural plant cover of deserts, in particular north Sinai. The endophytic microorganisms were recovered based on the method of surface sterilization with ethanol and sodium hypochlorite followed by triturating of plant organs. Other methods such as Scholander pressure bomb was proposed [35] for releasing endophytes. They mentioned that crushing method mainly recovers the endophytes that residing the root cortex particularly Gram positive species as Bacillus spp. while the pressure bomb procedure detects vascular colonists such as Agrobacterium radiobacter and less common species. Genera like Pseudomonas and Phyllobacterium were recovered with equal frequencies using both techniques.
In fact, bacilli, particularly N2-fixing species, have already been found in association with grass roots. Among those, Bacillus polymyxa is well documented colonizer of wheat rhi-zosphere [28], while Bacillus circulans was identified in maize rhizosphere by [36]. The present study, as well as of Othman et al [2], are among the original reports on these species as endophytic diazotrophs to xerophytic plants.
Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus, previously known as Ace-tobacter diazotrophicus [37], is a strict aerobic N2-fixing endo-pyte originally isolated from sugarcane roots and stems [15]. It has been estimated that G. diazotrophous can fix up to 150 kg N ha-1 year-1 in sugarcane [38]. Such high levels of N2-fixation have not been reported in any other system outside legume-Rhizobium symbiosis. The bacterium has subsequently been isolated from sweet potato [39], sorghum [40], coffee [41], some tropical grasses [42], finger millet [43] and pineapple [44]. The bacterium was also able to establish an endophytic association with wheat [12].
This bacterium is of special interest because, besides fixing atmospheric dinitrogen in the presence of KNO3 and at low pH values <3.0, it can secrete up to 50% of the fixed N2 in a form potentially available to plants [45]. Such an endophytic diazotroph was also isolated from sugarcane in Mexico, Cuba, Australia and Egypt [46,47,12]. The occurrence of the microorganism was reported in roots, tubers and stems of sweet potato which confirm the endophytic nature of this particular diazo-troph [48].
So far, no information is available in literature on the natural endophytic occurrence of this particular diazotroph in xerophytic plants. Therefore, this work presents original data on the endophytic existence of Gluconacetobacter diazotrophi-cus in the rhizo- and plyllo-spheres of a number of desert plants in Sinai environment. But in several instances, difficulties in finding this bacterium may be related to methods used for surface sterilization and isolation. Here, Youssef et al. [12] reported that surface sterilization of plant organs by combined treatment with ethanol alcohol and sodium hypochlorite was very successful and efficient for the elimination of contaminants and hence facilitated the isolation of the diazotroph.
The root system of plant is as complicated as the shoot in its diversity, in its reactions with the matrix of substances and with the myriad organisms that surround it [49]. This complexity was illustrated in the much studied corn root system, covering the changes along the framework roots: the surface tissues and their interactions with the soil, the water conducting xylem, whose gradual elaboration dictates the water status
of the root. A conspicuous manifestation of the changes is the rhizosheath, whose microflora differs from those on the bare zones. The multitude of fine roots is the most active part of the system in acquiring water and nutrients, with its own multitude of root tips, sites of intense chemical activity, that strongly modify the soil they contact, mobilize reluctant ions, immobilize toxic ions, coat the soil particles with mucilage and select the microflora. Therefore, it was of rather interest to study in this work the phenomenon of rhizosheath formation during the ecological study on the plant community of Sinai deserts. Microbiological analysis indicated, generally, the richness of sand grain sheath compared to the surrounding free sand soil. In addition, microbial populations in rhizosheaths were comparable to those reported on the intact roots of tested plants. This indicates that the rhizosheath environment extends the root continuum that favors microbial activity and consequently magnifies plant-microbe interactions [3].
As to xerophytes examined, the rhizoplane of Bromus mad-ritensis accommodated extraordinary bacterial loads of both total bacteria and diazotrophs (ca. p 109 cfu. g_1 dwt) while Bromus scoparius (ca. 6107 cfu. g_1 dwt) was the poorest. This emphasizes that plant effect is among the major biotic criteria that governs the plant-microbe interaction in desert environments. In addition, the richness of sand sheath in microbial populations of total bacteria and diazotrophs, with bacterial load corresponding to ca. 93% of the root surfaces, is a distinguished phenomenon of ecological importance in the studied desert environment of north Sinai.
Indeed, the cylindrical sand grain sheaths encasing the root of grasses were first reported for the Egyptian desert flora [6]. Such sand grains are thought to be cemented by various bonding agents including secretions of mucilage and root cap tissues [50]. Microbial exudates might also be involved [51]. Exopoly-saccharides either capsular or hydrosoluble, are produced by a group of microorganisms in the root zone of different xero-phytes encompassing Leuconostoc mesenteroides, Rhonella aquatilis and Enterobacter amnigenus [52] and Agrobacterium sp. [53]. An explanation for the high microbial load in sheath zones of xerophytes tested in the present study is the possible richness in organic products [7], greater moisture content [54] and possible reduction of oxygen concentration [55] throughout the rhizosheath. This would create an environment which favors the activity of associative diazotrophs [51], and significantly high linear acetylene reducing activity was recorded in either intact-soil-plant cores or disintegrated rhizosheath.
In conclusion, the present study demonstrated the great diversity of culturable endophytic bacteria, particularly diazo-trophs, in the plant-soil systems of north Sinai deserts. Their prevalence with dense populations suggests their very possible contribution to the survival of such xerophytic plants under the stress conditions of north Sinai deserts. The successful colonization of such bacterial endophytes to other plant species strongly suggests their possible future application as bio-preparates for plant nutrition (biofertilizers) and health (bio-pesticides).
References
[1] Othman AA, Shawky ME, Amer MW, Fayez M, Monib M, Hegazi NA. Biodiversity of microorganisms in semi-arid soils of North Sinai deserts. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2003;49:241-60.
[2] Othman AA, Amer MW, Fayez M, Monib M, Hegazi NA. Biodiversity of diazotrophs associated to the plant cover of North Sinai deserts. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2003;49:683-705.
[3] Othman AA, Amer MW, Fayez M, Hegazi NA. Rhizosheath of Sinai desert plants is a potential repository for associative diazotrophs. Microbiol Res 2004;159:285-93.
[4] Ali MS, Hamza AM, Amin G, Fayez M, EL-Tahan M, Monib M, et al. Production of biofertilizers using baker's yeast effluent and their application to wheat and barley grown in north Sinai deserts. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2005;51(6):589-604.
[5] Ali MS, Amin G, Fayez M, El-Tahan M, Monib M, Hegazi NA. Production of rhizobia biofertilizers using baker's yeast effluent and their application to Leucaena leucocephala. Arch Agron Soil Sci 2005;51(6):605-17.
[6] Volkens G. Die Flora der aegytisch arabischen Wueste auf der Grundlage anatomisch-physiologischer Forschungen. Berlin: Gebrueder Borntraeger; 1887, p. 156.
[7] Martin JK. Factors influencing the loss of organic carbon from wheat roots. Soil Biol Biochem 1977;9:1-7.
[8] El-Hadidi MN. Observations on the flora of the Sinai mountain region. Bull Soc Geogrd Egypt 1969;40:123-55.
[9] Tackholm V. Students'Flora of Egypt. Cairo University: Beirut Publishing; 1974, p. 888.
[10] Gibbali MA. Studies on the Flora of Northern Sinai. M.Sc. Thesis, Fac. Agric. Cairo Univ. Egypt; 1988. p. 393.
[11] Boulos L. Flora of Egypt, monocotyledons (Alismataceae -Orchidaceae), vol. 4. Cairo (Egypt): Al Hadara Publishing; 2005, p. 617.
[12] Youssef HH, Fayez M, Monib M, Hegazi NA. Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus: a natural endophytic diazotroph of Nile Delta sugarcane capable of establishing an endophytic association with wheat. Boil Fert Soils 2004;6:391-7.
[13] Hegazi NA, Hamza AM, Osman A, Ali S, Sedik MZ, Fayez M. Modified combined carbon N-deficient medium for isolation, enumeration and biomass production of diazotrophs. In: Kauser Malik A, Sajjad Mirza M, editors. Nitrogen fixation with non-legumes. Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1998. p. 247-53.
[14] Parkinson D, Gary TRG, Williams ST. Methods for study the ecology of soil micro-organisms, vol. 19. IBP Handbook; 1971. p. 679.
[15] Cavalcante VA, Dobereiner J. A new acid-tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacterium associated with sugar cane. Plant Soil 1988;108:23-31.
[16] Meynell GC, Meynell EW. Theory and practice in experimental bacteriology. London: Cambridge University Press; 1965, p. 287.
[17] Hegazi NA, El-Mallawani AA, Monib M. Azospirilla and other asymbiotic nitrogen fixing bacteria in rhizosphere of some plants prevailing in Egyptian desert. In: Proceedings of the IV conference on microbiology, vol. 1. Cairo. Soil. Food and Industrial Microbiol Egypt. Society for Applied Microbiology; 1980. p. 119-24.
[18] Krieg NR, Holt JG. Bergy's manual of systematic bacteriology. 1st ed. Baltimore: Williams and Wiilkins; 1984, p. 548.
[19] Logan NA, Berkeley RCW. Identification of Bacillus strains using the API system. J Can Microbiol 1984;130:1871-82.
[20] Pan B, Kevin JV. Response of the endophytic diazotroph Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus on solid media to changes in atmospheric partial O2 pressure. Appl Environ Microbiol 2001;67(10):4694-700.
[21] Micales BK, Johnson JL, Claus GW. Deoxyribonucleic acid homologues among organisms in the genus Gluconobacter. Int J Syst Bactriol 1985;35:79-85.
[22] Kale SP, Raghu K. Relationship between microbial numbers and other microbial indices in soil. Bull Environ Cont Toxic 1989;43:941-5.
[23] Frankenberger WT, Dick WA. Relationship between enzyme activities and microbial growth and activity indices in soil. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1983;47:945-51.
[24] Harris JA, Birch P. Land reclamation and restoration. In: Fry JC, Gadd GM, Herbert RA, Jones CW, Wastson-Craik IA, editors. Microbial control of pollution society of general microbiology symposium, vol. 48. Cambridge:University Press; 1992. p. 269-91.
[25] James EK, Reis VM, Olivares FB, Baldani JI, Dobrereiner J. Infection of sugar cane by the nitrogen-fixing bacterium Acetobacter diazotrophicus. J Exp Bot 1994;45:757-66.
[26] Reis VM, Olivares FL, de Oliveira ALM, Dos Reis FB, Baldani JI, Döbereiner J. Technical approaches to inoculate micropropagated sugarcane plants with Acetobacter diazotrophicus. Plant Soil 1999;206:205-11.
[27] James EK, Olivares F, de Oliveira ALM, Dos Reis FB, Da Silva LG, Reis V. Further observations on the interaction between sugarcane and Gluconacetobacter dizotrophicus under laboratory and greenhouse conditions. J Exp Bot 2001;52:747-60.
[28] Chanway CP. Bacterial endophytes: ecological and particle implications. Sydowia 1998;50:149-70.
[29] Olivares FL, James EK. Endophytic establishment of diazotroph-ic bacteriain sugar cane plants. In: PedrosaFO, Hungria M, Yates MG, Newton WE, editors. Nitrogen fixation: from molecules to crop productivity. Dordrecht: Kluwer; 2000. p. 413-4.
[30] Schaad NW, Jones JB, Chun W. Laboratory guide for identification of plant pathogenic bacteria. St. Paul, American Phytopathological Society; 2001. p. 373.
[31] Kageyama B, Nakae M, Yagi S, Sonoyama T. Pantoea punctata sp. nov., Pantoea citrea sp. nov., and Pantoea terra sp. nov. isolated from fruit and soil samples. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1992;42:203-10.
[32] de Araujo JM, da Silva AC, Azevedo JL. Isolation of endophytic actinomycetes from roots and Leaves of maize (Zea mays L.). Braz Arch Biol Technol 2000;434:447-51.
[33] McInroy JA, Kloepper JH. Population dynamics of endophytic bacteria in field-grown sweet corn and cotton. Can J Microbiol 1995;41:895-901.
[34] Gagne S, Richard C, Rousseau H, Antoun H. Xylem residing bacteria in alfafa roots. Can J Microbiol 1987;33:996-1000.
[35] Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF, Kloepper JW. Bacterial endophytes in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol 1997;43:895-914.
[36] Stolp H. Beitrage Zur Frage der Beziehungen Zwischen Mikroorganisms und hoheren Pflanzen. Arch Mikrobiol 1952;17:1-29.
[37] Gillis M, Kersters K, Hoste B, Janssens D, Kroppenstedt RM, Stephan MP, et al.. Acetobacter diazotrophicus sp. Nov. a nitrogen-fixing acetic acid bacterium associated with sugarcane. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1989;39:361-4.
[38] Boddey RM, Urquiaga S, Reis V, Dobereiner J. Biological nitrogen fixation associated with sugarcane. Plant Soil 1991;37:111-7.
[39] Paula MA, Urquiaga S, Siqueira JO, Dobereiner J. Synergistic effects of vesicular-arbuscolar mycorrhizal fungi and diazotrophic bacteria on nutrition and growth of sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas). Biol Fert Soils 1992;14:61-6.
[40] Isopi R, Fabbri P, Del-Gallo M, Puppi G. Dual inoculation of Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moecgh ssp. Bicolor with vesicular
arbuscular mycorrhizas and Acetobacter diazotrophicus. Symbiosis 1995;18:43-55.
[41] Jimenez-Salgado T, Fuentes-ramirez LE, Tapia-Hernandez A, Mascarua-Esparza MA, Martinez-Romero E, Caballero-Mellado J. Coffea arabica L. a new host plant for Acetobacter diazotrophicus, and isolation of other nitrogen-fixing Acetobacteria. Appl Environ Microbiol 1997;63:3676-83.
[42] Kirchhof G, Reis VM, Baldani JI, Eckert B, Dobereiner J, Hartmann A. Occurrence, physiological and molecular analysis of endophytic diazotrophic bacteria in gramineous energy plants. Plant Soil 1997;194:45-55.
[43] Loganathan P, Sunita R, Parida AK, Nair S. Isolation and characterization of two genetically distant groups of Acetobacter diazotrophicus from a new host-plant Eleusine coracana L. J Appl Microbiol 1999;87:167-72.
[44] Tapia-Hernandez A, Bustillos-Cristales R, Jamenez-Salgado T, Caballero-Mellado J, Fuentes-Remirez L. Natural endophytic occurrence of Acetobacter diazotrophicus in pineapple plants. Microb Ecol 2000;39:49-55.
[45] Cojho EH, Reis VM, Schenberg AC, Dobereiner J. Interactions of Acetobacter diaztrophicus with an mylolytic yeast in nitrogen-free batch culture. FEMS Microbiol Lett 1993;106:341-6.
[46] Li R, MacRar IC. Specific identification and enumeration of Acetobacter diazotrophicus in sugarcane. Soil Biol Biochem 1992;24:413-9.
[47] Fuentes-Ramírez LE, Jimenez-Salgado T, Abarca-Ocampo IR, Caballero-Mellado J. Acetobacter diazotrophicus an indo lactic acid producing bacterium isolated from sugarcane cultivars of Mexico. Plant Soil 1993;154:145-50.
[48] Dobereiner J, Reis V, Lazarini AC. New N2-fixing bacteria in association with cereals and sugarcane. In: Bothe H, de Bruijn FJ, Newton WE, editors. Nitrogen fixation: one hundred years after. Stuttgart: Fischer; 1988. p. 717-22.
[49] McCully ME. Roots in soil: unearthing the complexities of roots and their rhizospheres. Ann Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 1999;50:695-718.
[50] Rovira AD. Plant root exudates and their influence upon soil microorganisms. In: Baker KF, Snyder WC, editors. Ecology of soil-borne plant pathogens. Prelude to biological control. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1970. p. 170-86.
[51] Wullstein LH, Bruening ML, Bollen WB. Nitrogen fixation associated with sand grain root sheaths (Rhizosheaths) of certain xeric grasses. Physiol Plantarum 1979;46:1-4.
[52] Tallgren A, Airaksinen U, Weissenberg R, Ojamo H, Kuusisto J, Leisola M. Exopolysaccharide-producing bacteria from sugar beets. Appl Environ Microbiol 1999:862-4.
[53] Hou CT, Ahlgren JA, Brown W, Nicholson JJ. Production of an extracellular polysaccharide by Agrobacterium sp. DS3 NRRL B-14297 isolated from soil. J Ind Microbiol 1996;16:129-33.
[54] Price RS. The roots of some North African desert grasses. New Phytol 1911;10:328-39.
[55] Griffen DM. A theoretical study, relation the concentration and diffusion of oxygen to the biology of organisms in soil. New Phytol 1968;67:561-77.
[56] Loiret FG, Ortega E, Kleiner D, Ortega-Rodees P, Rodees R, Dong Z. A putative new endophytic nitrogen-fixing bacterium Pantoea sp. from sugarcane. J Appl Microbiol 2004;97(3):504-11.
