Scholarly article on topic 'Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanum melongena) under field conditions'

Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanum melongena) under field conditions Academic research paper on "Agricultural biotechnology"

Share paper

Academic research paper on topic "Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanum melongena) under field conditions"

Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult (2015) 4:73-83

DOI 10.1007/s40093-015-0087-1 CrossMark


Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth and productivity of brinjal (Solanum melongena) under field conditions

Ishtiyaq Ahmed Najar • Anisa B. Khan • Abdul Hai

Received: 15 April 2014/Accepted: 14 February 2015/Published online: 3 March 2015 © The Author(s) 2015. This article is published with open access at


Background Macrophytes (fresh water plants) comprise a diverse group of the flora which play important roles in the maintenance of trophic food chains and biogeochemical processes, but are deleterious when present in excess. However, due to various anthropogenic activities, there is accumulation of nutrients in aquatic ecosystems resulting in massive macrophytic growth. These weeds do not possess any economic value and remain laid on lake shores after harvesting and become a source of odor problem, thus posing a challenge to the lake management authorities regarding their proper disposal. However, vermicomposting turns these macrophytes into materials useful in horticulture/agriculture for restoration of soil fertility, in addition to providing a solution to the nuisance of harvested weeds. Results The study was conducted to investigate the effect of different rates (2, 4 and 6 t/ha) of macrophyte-based vermicompost on germination, growth and yield of Sola-num melongena under field conditions. The data revealed that different rates of vermicompost produced varied and significant effect (P < 0.05) as compared to the control on germination, growth and yield parameters with maximum value recorded at 6 t/ha, followed by 4 t/ha and the least at

I. A. Najar (&)

Hydrobiology Research Laboratory, S. P. College, Srinagar 190001, Jammu and Kashmir, India e-mail:

A. B. Khan

Department of Ecology and Environmental Sciences, Pondicherry Central University, Puducherry 605014, India

A. Hai

Department of Zoology, S. P. College, Srinagar 190001, Jammu and Kashmir, India

2 t/ha. The dose of 6 t/ha significantly (P < 0.05) increased germination (22.56 ± 2.5 %), number of fruits per plant (3.55 ± 0.07) mean fruit weight (73 ± 5.0 g), yield per plant (1.48 ± 0.05 kg) and marketable fruits (28.66 ± 3.0 %) when compared with the control. The study suggests that macrophyte-based vermicompost as a potential source of plant nutrients for sustainable crop production.

Conclusion Macrophyte-based vermicompost is an efficient quality yielder and economy enhancer for sustainable agriculture especially for the communities having vegetable gardens around lakes will benefit by using macrophyte ver-micompost, a balanced and low-cost organic fertilizer.

Keywords Fruits • Germination • Macrophytes • Solanum melongena • Vermicompost • Yield


Conventional farm systems have been characterized by a high input of chemical fertilizer leading to qualitative deterioration of soil as well as agricultural yield (Diacono and Montemurro 2010; Singh et al. 2007). However, a growing awareness of the adverse impacts of inorganic fertilizers on crop production as well as increasing environmental and ecological concerns has stimulated greater interest in the utilization of organic amendments for crop production. Organic manures act not only as a source of nutrients and organic matter, but also increase microbial diversity and activity in soil, which influence soil structure and nutrients turnover, in addition to improvement in other physical, chemical and biological properties of the soil (Albiach et al. 2000; Edmeades 2003). Thus organic amendments/manures are environmentally benign and help in maintaining soil

fertility as well as agricultural productivity. Among various organic products, vermicompost has been recognized as potential soil amendment.

Vermicompost is a product of non-thermophilic biodegradation of organic material by combined action of earthworms and associated microbes (Pathma and Sak-thivel 2013). It is a highly fertile, finely divided peat-like material with high porosity, aeration, water-holding capacity and low C:N ratios (Dominguez and Edwards 2004). Vermicompost is made up primarily of carbon (C), hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) and possesses remarkable plant growth-promoting properties due to the presence of nutrients in plant-available forms such as nitrates, calcium, phosphorus and potassium (Edwards and Burrows 1988). The enhancement of plant growth by vermicompost may not only be nutritional, but also due to its content of biologically active plant growth-influencing substances (Warman and AngLopez 2010). The presence of plant growth regulators such as auxins, gibberellins, cytokinins of microbial origin (Tomati et al. 1988) and humic acids (Atiyeh et al. 2002) has been reported in vermicompost. Stimulation of root growth (initiation and proliferation of root hair), increased root biomass, enhanced plant growth and development have been reported with the application of vermicompost, because of the presence of humic acids (Tomati et al. 1988; Mylonas and Mccants 1980; Chen and Aviad 1990). Moreover, the positive influences of humic acids on plant growth and productivity, which seem to be concentration specific, could be mainly due to hormonelike activities of humic acids through their involvement in cell respiration, photosynthesis, oxidative phosphorylation, protein synthesis and various enzymatic reactions (Chen and Aviad 1990). Further, humic acids are molecules that regulate other processes of plant development, such as macro and micronutrient adsorption (Gutierrez-Miceli et al. 2008a) and metabolism, which influence protein synthesis. Significant increase in soil enzyme activities such as urease, phosphomonoesterase, phosphodiesterase and arylsulfatase has been associated with the application of vermicompost (Albiach et al. 2000). Vermicomposts also possess disease-suppressing potential on a wide range of phytopathogens (Sahni et al. 2008). Vermicomposts harbour a wide variety of efficient antagonistic bacteria aiding in suppression of diseases caused by devastating soil-borne phytopathogenic fungi (Singh et al. 2008; Pathma and Sakthivel 2012). Several studies also report that vermi-compost application suppresses infection by insect pests, repel crop pests and induce biological resistance in plants against pests and diseases due the presence of antibiotics and actinomycetes (Munroe 2007).

There is accumulating scientific evidence that vermi-composts can influence the growth and productivity of plants significantly (Edwards 1998). Various greenhouse

and field studies have examined the effects of a variety of vermicomposts on a wide range of crops including cereals and legumes (Souzaa et al. 2013; Chan and Griffiths 1988), vegetables (Doan et al. 2013; Edwards and Burrows 1988; Atiyeh et al. 2000a), ornamental and flowering plants (Edwards and Burrows 1988; Atiyeh et al. 2000b) and field crops (Najar and Khan 2013a; Bhattacharya et al. 2012; Wu et al. 2012; Valdez-Pereza et al. 2011). Most of these investigations have confirmed that vermicomposts usually have significant beneficial effects on plant growth and yield. Vermicomposts, whether used as soil additives or as components of greenhouse bedding plant container media, have improved seed germination and enhanced seedling growth and development with overall increase in plant productivity. The beneficial effects include, but are not limited to stimulation of seed germination (Atiyeh et al. 2000b; Arancon et al. 2007a; Lazcano et al. 2010), activation of growth (Lazcano et al. 2009; Uma and Malathi

2009), protection against pathogens (Singh et al. 2003; Rivera et al. 2004; Zaller 2006), nematodes (Serfoji et al.

2010) and herbivores (Yardim et al. 2006; Arancon et al. 2007b; Edwards et al. 2010), and increasing overall crop productivity (Nattudurai et al. 2013; Gutierrez-Miceli et al. 2007; Singh et al. 2008; Azarmi et al. 2009). Several studies have assessed the effect of vermicompost amendments on the growth of a wide range of marketable fruits cultivated in greenhouses (Arancon et al. 2003, 2004a; Atiyeh et al. 2000c), as well as in fields (Najar and Khan 2013a; Wang et al. 2010; Singh et al. 2008).

Large quantities of macrophytes are harvested from different lakes across the Kashmir Valley. These macro-phytes could easily be used in horticulture/agriculture for the restoration of soil fertility or for the production of quality vegetables, as they have good nutrient value, mainly as nitrogen (N), phosphorous (P) and potassium (K). However, in the present form the nutrients are not readily available and the harvested weeds remain on lake shores and become a source of odor problem, thus posing a challenge to the lake management authorities regarding their proper disposal (Najar and Khan 2013b). However, vermicomposting turns these macrophytes into materials useful in horticulture and there would be great savings in primary plant nutrients and, in addition, a solution to the nuisance of harvested weeds. The objective of the study was to evaluate the response of different rates of macro-phyte-based vermicompost on germination, growth and yield of S. melongena under field conditions.

Materials and methods

The experiment was conducted at the experimental site of Hydrobiology Research Laboratory, Srinagar, Jammu and

Kashmir, India (34°08'N, 74°50'E). The study area lies in the temperate zone, characterized by wet and cold winter and relatively dry and moderate hot summer with mean annual precipitation of about 1100 mm, mainly falling during winter and spring. The hottest months are July and August, when the maximum temperature rises above 30 °C. September has cooler nights and the severe winter sets in about the middle of December. The coldest month is January, with temperature falling below freezing point. The winters vary from year to year; some are severe with very heavy snowfall, while others are mild with moderate snowfall (Najar and Khan 2011, 2014).

Preparation of macrophyte vermicompost

Different macrophytes (fresh water weeds) were collected from Dal Lake, excess water was allowed to drain for 2 days under sunlight (Najar and Khan 2010) and the macrophytes mixed with cattle dung in a 5:1 ratio (6 kg of macrophytes:1.2 kg of cow dung). Healthy and adult individuals of earthworm (Eisenia fetida) were allowed to feed on macrophytes which were converted into vermi-compost (macrophyte vermicompost) during 60 days' duration (Najar and Khan 2012, 2013b). The physiochemical characteristics of the macrophyte vermicompost are given in Table 1.

Experimental setup

Seeds and plants of S. melongena were germinated and grown during 2009 and 2010 to determine the effect of the vermicompost. Field plots were 4 m long and 4 m wide (16 m ) and separated by 1 m from unplanted areas. The physiochemical characteristics of soil are given in Table 1. Macrophyte based vermicompost was applied at the rate of 0 t/ha (control), 2, 4 and 6 t/ha. The vermicompost was incorporated into the top 15 cm of soil in the whole experimental bed (Arancon et al. 2003; Najar and Khan

Table 1 Physicochemical characteristics of soil and macrophyte vermicompost (mean ± SE, n = 3)

Parameter Soil Vermicompost

pH 7.2 ± 0.08 7.73 ± 0.13

EC (mS/m) 0.08 ± 0.01 0.98 ± 0.12

Ca (g/kg) 2.64 ± 0.04 16.22 ± 1.37

Mg (g/kg) 0.51 ± 0.01 7.62 ± 1.03

Na (ig/g) 11 ± 0.23 32.03 ± 1.91

K (ig/g) 3.52 ± 0.11 35.31 ± 13.13

P (ig/g) 110 ± 11 586.23 ± 26.65

OC (g/kg) 22.8 ± 1.5 170.58 ± 7.65

ON (g/kg) 1.7 ± 0.2 8.76 ± 0.83

2013a). The plots were arranged in a randomized complete block design with four replications for each treatment. All the necessary cultural practices and plant protection measures were followed uniformly for all the treatments during the entire period of experimentation.

Germination (%)

Seeds of S. melongena were sown in the plotted fields and were considered as emerged or germinated when cotyledons project out through the surface of the soil. Germination rate was expressed as the cumulative number of seeds germinating during monitoring days relative to the total number of seeds sown for germination. Seedlings were transplanted at three true leaves stage. Seedlings were planted at a distance of 25 cm between two plants.

Growth parameters and yield parameters

Plants of S. melongena were harvested after every fortnight and assessed for growth (shoot length, root length and leaf area) and their respective dry weight. The roots and leaves were cleaned carefully to remove adhering soil and dust particles. Leaves per plant were counted and leaf area (cm2) was measured by using a leaf area meter (Singh et al. 2007). Plant biomass was dried in an oven at 60 °C for 24 h and the dry weight obtained (Lazcano et al. 2009).

Marketable fruits

All the ripe fruits were harvested, weighed and graded as marketable and non-marketable. Fruits were classified as non-marketable when fruits showed sign of decay due to diseases or insect feeding or any other malformation on the fruit surface (Zaller 2007). Relative proportions of non-marketable fruits were expressed as percentages of the total number of fruits harvested. Marketable fruits do not show any sign of decay. However, non-marketable fruits were not evaluated for specific disease or type of insect feeding.

Data analyses

Data sets were subjected to multivariate statistical techniques: two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's t test were used as a post hoc analysis to compare the means (Zar 2009). Pearson correlation coefficient (r) was employed to examine the relationship between the vermicomposting application and yield parameters. All the tests were achieved with a significance level P < 0.05. Statistical analyses and graphical presentations were performed using SPSS statistical software (Version 16.0).


Application of different rates of vermicompost (2, 4 and 6 t/ha) in S. melongena significantly affected the germination of seeds, plant growth and development, marketable fruits and yield during the study period of 120 days.

maximum in the treatment of 6 t/ha with a value of 12.47 ± 0.30 g (Fig. 2f), and differed significantly among the treatments (F3 = 6.09, P < 0.05) and during different fortnights (F7 = 36.98, P < 0.05).

Yield parameters

Germination (%)

Germination was 44.33 ± 2.01 in 6 t/ha, 35.77 ± 2.02 in 4 t/ha and 21.77 ± 2.05 in the control (Fig. 1). The effect of vermicompost was significant (P < 0.05) on germination. Application of vermicompost at the rate of 2, 4 and 6 t/ha increased the germination in the respective treatments by 8.33 ± 0.9, 14 ± 1.1 and 22.56 ± 2.5 as compared to the control.

Plant growth parameters

The shoot and root length exhibited a maximum value of 69 ± 1.40 cm and 26.5 ± 1.28 cm in 6 t/ha and least values of 46 ± 1.17 cm and 19.5 ± 1.28 cm in the control, respectively (Fig. 2a, b). Shoot and root length varied significantly among the treatments (F3 = 11.59; 20.01, P < 0.05) and during different fortnights (F7 = 101.20; 73.57, P < 0.05). Dry weight showed significant variation (F3 = 5.80; 5.88, P < 0.05) among the treatments and during different fortnights (F7 = 19.60; 61.98, P < 0.05), with higher mean values of 8.62 ± 0.27 g (shoot) and 4.37 ± 0.23 g (root) in 6 t/ha and minimum of 3.42 ± 0.25 g (shoot) and 3.02 ± 0.06 g (root) in the control (Fig. 2c, d). Leaf area was 475.25 ± 7.40 cm2 in 6 t/ha and 368.25 ± 10.65 cm2 in the control (Fig. 2e). Application of vermicompost significantly increased the leaf area among the treatments (F3 = 8.28, P < 0.05) and also exhibited significant variation during different fortnights (F7 = 129.26, P < 0.05). Dry weight of leaves was less in the control with a mean value of 6.92 ± 0.24 g and

60 ^ 50

1 30 .g

§ 20 О

1 Control 12 t/ha

14 t/ha 6 t/ha


2 t/ha 4 t/ha


6 t/ha

Fig. 1 Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on germination of Solanum melongena (mean ± SE, n = 4). Significant differences at P < 0.05 (Tukey's LSD test) are indicated by different letters

Vermicompost application showed positive correlation with clusters/plant (r = 0.977, P < 0.05), fruits/cluster (r = 0.968; P < 0.05), number of fruits/plant (r = 0.965; P < 0.05), mean fruit weight (r = 0.988; P < 0.05), yield/plant (r = 0.965; P < 0.05) and strong positive correlation with marketable fruits (r = 0.997; P < 0.01), whereas strong negative correlation with non-marketable fruits (r = -0.997; P < 0.01). Application of vermicompost resulted in 2.83 ± 0.16 clusters/plant in 6 t/ha and 2.5 ± 0.22 in 4 t/ha as compared to 2 ± 0.01 in the control. Thus, the application of vermicompost at the rate of 6 t/ha increased significantly (P < 0.05) the number of clusters per plant by 0.83 ± 0.02 and 0.5 ± 0.01 in 6 and 4 t/ha, respectively, when compared with the control (Fig. 3a). Fruits/cluster were observed to be significantly (P < 0.05) higher in vermicompost treatments, with a maximum of 4.5 ± 0.60 in 6 t/ha and 2.83 ± 0.30 in 2 t/ ha, whereas it was 2.66 ± 0.21 in the control (Fig. 3b) with an overall increase of 1.84 ± 0.03, 1 ± 0.01 and 0.22 ± 0.01 fruits/cluster in the respective treatment. Fruits/plant recorded in the control were 6.83 ± 0.40 and varied significantly (P < 0.01) among treatments with a maximum value of 10.33 ± 0.66 in 6 t/ha. Vermicompost application enhanced the fruits/plant value by 0.78 ± 0.08 in 2 t/ha, 1.45 ± 0.09 in 4 t/ha and 3.55 ± 0.07 in 6 t/ha when compared with the control (Fig. 3c). Mean fruit weight (g) was 158.83 ± 5.41 in 6 t/ha, 126 ± 2.58 in 4 t/ha, 101.83 ± 4.09 in 2 t/ha and 85.83 ± 3.35 in the control. There was significant (P < 0.05) increase in mean fruit weight among the treatments, with a maximum increase of 73 ± 5.0 g recorded in the treatment of 6 t/ha and least of 16 in 2 t/ha (Fig. 3d). Yield/plant (kg) in the control was 0.49 ± 0.04, whereas among the treatments it was 1.97 ± 0.13 in 6 t/ha and 0.61 ± 0.07 in 2 t/ha (Fig. 3e) with a significant (P < 0.01) increase of 1.48 ± 0.05, 0.82 ± 0.01 and 0.12 ± 0.01 in the respective treatments when compared with the control. Marketable fruits (%) were significantly (P < 0.01) higher in vermicompost-amended plots: 92.49 ± 1.76 (6 t/ha), 85.13 ± 1.86 (4 t/ha) and 74.30 ± 3.47 (2 t/ha) against 63.83 ± 5.07 in the control (Fig. 4a). Among the amended plots, the maximum increase was recorded in 6 t/ha (28.66 ± 3.0). The effect of vermicompost application was significant (P < 0.05) on decrease in yield of non-marketable (%) fruits among the treatments and with the lowest value of 7.49 ± 1.76 (6 t/ha), 14.85 ± 1.86 (4 t/ha) and

1=Control, 2=2t/ha, 3=4t/ha, 4=6t/ha Treatments

15 days 30 days 45 days X60 days X75 days 90 days + 105 days -120 days

ад n 15

ей 5

ш s 9

£ • i ж

ж ж ж X X A

* f * É

1 2 3 4

1=Control, 2= 2t/ha, 3=4t/ha, 4=6t/ha Treatments

15 days 30 days 45 days X60 days 75 days 90 days + 105 days -120 days

1= Control, 2= 2t/ha, 3= 4t/ha, 4=6t/ha Treatments

15 days 30 days 45 days X60 days X75 days 90 days + 105 days -120 days


1= Control, 2= 2t/ha, 3= 4t/ha, 4= 6t/ha Treatments

15 days 30 days 45 days X60 days 75 days 90 days + 105 days -120 days

500 400 300 200 100 0

1= Control, 2= 2t/ha, 3= 4t/ha, 4= 6t/ha Treatments

15 days 30 days 45 days X60 days X75 days 90 days + 105 days -120 days

£ 10 a

5 8 ht

1= Control, 2=2t/ha, 3=4t/ha, 4=6t/ha Treatments

15 days 30 days 45 days X60 days 75 days 90 days + 105 days -120 days

Fig. 2 Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on growth parameters of Solanum melongena (mean ± SE, n = 4)

25.69 ± 3.47 (2 t/ha). Among the vermicompost treatments, maximum decrease was recorded in 6 t/ha (28.67 ± 2.9) followed by 4 t/ha (21.47 ± 2.1) when compared with the control (Fig. 4b).


Application of different rates of vermicompost in S. melongena resulted in varied response on germination, plant growth parameters, yield parameters, marketable and non-marketable fruits.


Vermicompost application resulted in differential effect on the germination of S. melongena among different

treatments. Vermicompost has been reported to stimulate germination of several horticultural plant species such as green gram (Phaseolus aureus) Karmegam et al. (1999) and tomato plants (L. esculentum) Atiyeh et al. (2000b). Najar and Khan (2013a) also reported an increase in germination of L. esculentum by 10.33 % with the application of macrophyte-based vermicompost. According to Zaller (2007) and Lazcano et al.(2010), increase in seed germination of Rumex obtusifolius by 48 % and Pinus pinaster by 16 % has been reported with the application of cattle manure and rabbit manure vermicompost, respectively. Germination is an internally regulated process influenced mainly by genotype, although external factors such as light period, temperature, moisture and presence of certain chemical compounds can also alter this process either through promotion or inhibition (Kucera et al. 2005). When all these factors are integrated, it is mediated by signaling

3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1

12 10 8 6 4 2 0


2.5 2 1.5 1

2 t/ha 4 t/ha Treatments

Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha


6 t/ha

Control s

2 t/ha

4 t/ha £

6 t/ha

3 Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha

3 Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha


200 150 100 50 0

2 t/ha 4 t/ha


6 t/ha

Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha


Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha

El Control 02 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha

Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha Treatments

Fig. 3 Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on yield parameters of Solanum melongena (mean ± SE, n = 4). Significant differences at P < 0.05 (Tukey's LSD test) are indicated by different letters

100 80 60 40 20 0

Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha


'3 <¡3 40

Control 2 t/ha 3 ta ! 30 20

4 t/ha ¡H a s 10

6 t/ha á o Z 0

Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha


Control 2 t/ha 4 t/ha 6 t/ha

Fig. 4 Effect of macrophyte vermicompost on marketable and non-marketable fruits of Solanum melongena (mean ± SE, n = 4). Significant differences at P < 0.05 (Tukey's LSD test) are indicated by different letters

through multiple hormones that either promote or inhibit germination (Finkelstein 2004). The germination rate (%) in S. melongena increased with subsequent increase in vermicompost dose. The results corroborate those of Alves

and Passoni (1997) that increasing doses of vermicompost application to the potting media of Licania tomentosa increased germination as compared to unamended soil. Lazcano et al. (2010) reported changes in the physical

properties of the germination media with the incorporation of vermicompost that influence the moisture retention and aeration of the soil, thereby potentially affecting seed germination. Improvement in the soil physical properties with the addition of macrophyte-based vermicompost might have resulted in increased germination rate of S. melongena.

Plant growth parameters

Vermicompost has been demonstrated to be a valuable soil amendment that offers slow, but a balanced nutritional release pattern to plants, providing nutrients such as available N, K, Ca, Mg and P that can be taken up readily by plants (Edwards 1998; Edwards and Fletcher 1988). Plant growth parameters like plant length and dry weight; root length and dry weight; number of leaves, area and dry weight were significantly higher in plots amended with different doses of vermicompost. Increase in plant growth with vermicompost application has been reported in different studies. The incorporation of pig manure vermi-compost enhanced shoot and root weight, leaf area and shoot:root ratios of tomato and French marigold (Bachman and Metzger 2008). Najar and Khan (2013a) reported significant increase in plant growth (shoot length, root length, leaf area and plant biomass) of L. esculentum in plots amended with 6 t/ha macrophyte vermicompost. Joshi and Vig (2010) also reported increase in plant growth parameters (plant height, number of leaves and plant dry biomass) with application of 45 % vermicompost (cattle dung) amended treatment in L. esculentum. According to Gupta et al. (2014), addition of cow dung and household-based vermicompost in appropriate quantities to the potting media resulted in increased growth and flowering of marigold seedlings including plant biomass, plant height, number of buds and flowers. Increase in length, biomass, number of seeds, number of shoots in Vinca rosea and tillers in Oryza sativa has been reported by Reddy (1986) in 50:50 soil to vermicompost mixtures. Tomati et al. (1983) showed positive effects of vermicompost on the growth of Begonias sp. and Coleus sp. (ornamental plants), especially a stimulation of rooting and time of flowering in plots amended with vermicompost. Plant height of maize increased significantly as compared to the control when grown in soil amended with vermicompost (Gutierrez-Miceli et al. 2008b). Azarmi et al. (2008) reported increase in leaf area and shoot dry weight by 43 and 27 %, respectively, in tomato with 15 t/ha sheep manure vermicompost applications, whereas Atiyeh et al. (2001) reported increase in shoot height of tomato plant with the amendment of 5 % pig manure vermicompost.

The different doses of vermicompost produced different responses in S. melongena and among these 6 and 4 t/ha

showed maximum positive effect on growth parameters. The results corroborate the findings that different doses of vermicompost caused different responses in the growth parameters of L. esculentum plant (Azarmi et al. 2008). Pritam et al. (2010) reported higher number of flowers in treatments with vermicompost amendments, with reduced time taken to transform bud into flower that has been attributed to readily available nutrients and growth-regulating substances present in the vermicompost. According to Ravi et al. (2008) and Taleshi et al. (2011), availability of plant nutrients in vermicompost increases growth and leaf area index of plant, which in turn increases absorption of light leading to more dry matter and yield. The differential response of plants to different doses of vermicompost is due to production of lesser quantity of growth-promoting substances by lower doses of vermicompost than higher doses (Arancon et al. 2004a). Plant root morphology is known to be influenced by water and nutrient availability as well as by external application of hormones (Lopez-Bucio et al. 2003). Vermicomposts have hormone-like activity that aids in greater root initiation, increased root biomass and enhanced plant growth (Bachman and Metzger 2008). According to Forde and Lorenzo (2001), root growth and branching are favored in nutrient-rich environment and in the presence of hormones such as auxins that enable the plant to optimize the exploitation of the available resources which are in turn transformed into photoassimilates and transported again to the root, consequently influencing plant growth and morphology in a systemic manner.

Yield parameters

Vermicompost amendment has influenced the number of clusters/plant, number of fruits/cluster, mean fruit weight and total yield/plant when compared with the control. Atiyeh et al. (2000b) reported increase in tomato fruit yield with the amendments of 10-20 % vermicompost in potting media. Arancon et al. (2004a, 2006) also reported growth and yield improvement in different crops with vermicom-post application. The results clearly indicated that the plants receiving vermicompost produced more fruits/cluster, clusters/plant and large-sized fruits with higher total yield than the control. Increase in yield of wheat in cattle dung-based vermicompost-amended soil has been reported by Joshi et al. (2013). According to Arancon et al. (2006), significant increase in plant growth and consequently lesser days to flowering with increase in fruit yield at higher doses of vermicompost amendment were observed. In other similar studies, increases in yield with vermicompost applications in okra, strawberry, eggplant, potato, cucumber cultivars, Abelmoschus esculentus, peppers, crossandra, lettuce and Amaranthus species were reported by Singh

et al. (2008); Alam et al. (2007); Azarmi et al. (2009); Vijaya and Seethalakshmi (2011); Arancon et al. (2005); Papathanasiou et al. (2012) and Uma and Malathi (2009) respectively. A high level of phosphorous is necessary for plants to produce good yield (Orozco et al. 1996). Ver-micompost contains macronutrients, beneficial microorganisms and hormones which influence the growth and yield of plants (Theunissen et al. 2010). Macronutrients play an important role in crop yield based on their role in activation of enzymes for chlorophyll synthesis, growth, fruit ripening and maintenance of the plant enzyme system (Grusak and Della Penna 1999). Vermicompost is known to provide a slow, balanced nutritional release pattern to plants, particularly in terms of release of plant-available N, soluble K, exchangeable Ca, Mg and P (Edwards and Fletcher 1988) which is subsequently used by plants efficiently. Vermicompost application generally improves the soil environment, particularly soil aeration, encouraging the proliferation of roots, which in turn draw more water and nutrient from distant areas and help to introduce and sustain beneficial micro-organisms into the rhizosphere (Padmavathiamma et al. 2008) in sufficient numbers for a longer period.

Marketable and non-marketable fruits

Optimum plant growth and development are essential for better quality yield (Theunissen et al. 2010). The application of vermicompost resulted in increase in marketable fruits and decrease in non-marketable fruits as compared to the control. Further, there was significant increase in marketable fruits with the macrophyte vermicompost when applied at 6 t/ha. The influence of macrophyte vermicompost on the marketable fruits of brinjal may be attributed to balanced plant nutrients present in vermicompost. Increase in vermicompost dose from 2 to 6 t/ha increased marketable fruits significantly, as increased dose provided more plant-available nutrients in the treatments. Singh et al. (2008) reported decreased occurrence of physiological disorders like albinism (4.6 %), fruit malformation (4.1 %) and gray mold (2.7 %) incidence with increase in marketable fruit yield (58.6 %) of Chandler strawberry in the plots amended with 7.5 t/ha vegetable waste-based vermicompost over the control. According to Arancon et al. (2003), there was a significant increase in the marketable fruits of tomato with the application of paper waste-based vermicompost when applied at 5 t/ha. Nath et al. (2011) observed decrease in the nematode population (Meloidogyne incognita) with the application of agro-based vermicompost in S. melongena and also the marketable fruit yield was consistently greater in vermicompost-treat-ed plots as compared to the control. According to Chan-drakumar et al. (2009), decrease in infection of Leucinodes

orbonalis on S. melongena with the application of the vermicompost. Wang et al. (2010) recorded significant increase in marketable weight of Chinese cabbage (Bras-sica campestris) with the application of cow manure ver-micompost. Plants treated with vermicompost receive nutrition in a balanced and sustained way than the control (Arancon et al. 2004b) and thus plants produce lesser number of non-marketable fruits.

Edwards et al. (2010) report statistically significant decrease in arthropods (aphids, buds, mealy bug and spider mite) populations and subsequent reduction in plant damage with vermicompost amendment. According to Ramesh (2000), plots amended with vermicompost exhibited decrease in the occurrence of leaf miner (Aproaerema modicella) on groundnuts. Further, Edwards et al. (2007) reported considerable suppression of root knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) and drastic suppression of spotted spider mites (Tetranychus spp.) and aphid (Myzuspersicae) in L. esculentum plants after application of vermicompost. Singhai et al. (2011) recorded appreciable suppression of common scab of potato through application of vermicom-post. According to Arancon et al. (2005), vermicomposts provide some essential nutrient elements that are not available in inorganic fertilizers and these could either have increased the plants resistance to pests or made the plants less palatable to the pests, based on the observation that there was decrease in dry weight losses of peppers, tomatoes and cabbage grown with substitutions of different rates of vermicompost in response to the aphid, mealy bug and caterpillar infestations. According to Rao (2002), there were considerable decreases in the population of aphids, coccinellid beetles and spider mites in groundnuts grown on soils amended with vermicompost, compared to those grown on soils amended with inorganic fertilizer. Munroe (2007) reported the presence of chitinase enzyme in ver-micompost which breaks down the chitin in the exoskele-ton of insects and thus repels many different insect pests. Thus the significant increase in marketable fruit yield of S. melongena might be attributed to improved availability of nutrients from macrophyte based vermicompost, in addition to the protection from pests.


The present study reveals that application of macrophyte-based vermicompost is quite beneficial in field-grown S. melongena significant higher rate of germination, increased plant growth and yield parameters with higher marketable fruit. Vermicompost application of 6 t/ha resulted in relatively higher productivity and better quality of fruits. The study showed that the growth and yield of S. melon-gena was dose dependent and clearly indicated the

advantages of macrophyte vermicompost in quality yield production. Such effects could be attributed to the nutritional status of vermicompost and improvement in soil properties. It encompasses economic aspect also, since faster growth with decreased days for crop maturation and enhanced better quality yield not only result in their early availability in market, but also with higher market values/ returns. Thus, macrophyte based vermicompost is an efficient quality yielder and economy enhancer for sustainable agriculture, especially for people/communities having vegetable gardens around lakes. Further large-scale ver-micomposting of macrophytes helps in controlling their menace considerably and keeps water bodies clean, along with esthetic improvement.

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.


Alam MN, Jahan MS, Ali MK, Ashraf MA, Islam MK (2007) Effect of vermicompost and chemical fertilizers on growth, yield and yield components of potato in barind soils of Bangladesh. J ApplSci Res 3(12):1879-1888 Albiach R, Canet R, Pomares F, Ingelmo F (2000) Microbial biomass content and enzymatic activities after application of organic amendments to a horticultural soil. BioresourTechnol75:43-48 Alves WL, Passoni AA (1997) Compost and vermicompost of urban solid waste in Licania tomentosa (Benth) seedlings production to arborization. Pesqui Agropecu Brasil 32:1053-1058 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Metzger JD, Lee S, Welch C (2003) Effects of vermicomposts on growth and marketable fruits of field-grown tomatoes, peppers and strawberries. Pedo-biologia 47:731-735 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Atiyeh R, Metzger JD (2004a) Effects of vermicomposts produced from food waste on the growth and yields of greenhouse peppers. Bioresour Technol 93:139-144 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Welch C, Metzger JD (2004b) Influences of vermicomposts on field strawberries: effects on growth and yields. Bioresour Technol 93:145-153 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P, Metzger JD, Lucht C (2005) Effects of vermicomposts produced from cattle manure, food waste and paper waste on the growth and yield of peppers in the field. Pedobiologia 49:297-306 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Bierman P (2006) Influences of vermi-composts on field strawberries: effects on soil microbial and chemical properties. Bioresour Technol 97:831-840 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Dick R, Dick L (2007a) Vermicompost

tea production and plant growth impacts. Bio Cycle 48:51-52 Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Yardim EN, Oliver TJ, Byrne RJ, Keeney G (2007b) Suppression of two-spotted spider mite (Tetranychus urticae), mealy bug (Pseudococcus sp.) and aphid (Myzus persicae) populations and damage by vermicomposts. Crop Prot 26:29-39

Atiyeh RM, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Metzger JD (2000a) Influence of earthworm-processed pig manure on the growth and yield of greenhouse tomatoes. Bioresour Technol 75:175-180 Atiyeh RM, Dominguez J, Subler S, Edwards CA (2000b) Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by

earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouche) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 44:709-724 Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S, Metzger JD (2000c) Earthworm processed organic wastes as components of horticultural potting media for growing marigold and vegetable seedlings. Compost Sci Util 8:215-223 Atiyeh RM, Edwards CA, Subler S, Metzger JD (2001) Pig manure vermicompost as a component of a horticulture bedding plant medium: effect on physicochemical properties and plant growth. Bioresour Technol 78:11-20 Atiyeh RM, Lee S, Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Metzger JD (2002) The influence of humic acids derived from earthworm-processed organic wastes on plant growth. Bioresour Technol 84:7-14

Azarmi R, Ziveh PS, Satari MR (2008) Effect of vermicompost on Growth and nutrient status of tomato (Lycopersicumesculentum). Pakistan J BiolSci Azarmi R, Giglou MT, Hajieghrari B (2009) The effect of sheep manure vermicompost on quantitative and qualitative properties of cucumber (Cucumissativus L.) grown in the greenhouse. Afr J Biotechnol 8:4953-4957 Bachman GR, Metzger JD (2008) Growth of bedding plants in commercial potting substrate amended with vermicompost. Bioresour Technol 99:3155-3161 Bhattacharya SS, Iftikar W, Sahariah B, Chattopadhyay GN (2012) Vermicomposting converts fly ash to enrich soil fertility and sustain crop growth in red and lateritic soils. Resour Conserv Recy 65:100-106 Chan PLS, Griffiths DA (1988) The vermicomposting of pretreated

pig manure. Biol Wastes 24:57-69 Chandrakumar HL, Kumar CTA, Chakravarthy AK, Kumar NG, Puttaraju TB (2009) Influence of organic materials against shoot and fruit borer, Leucinodes orbonalis Guen. (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae) on brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). Current Biotica 2(4):495-500

Chen Y, Aviad T (1990) Effects of humic substances on plant growth. In: MacCarthy P, Clapp CE, Malcolm RL, Bloom PR (eds) Humic Substances in Soil and Crop Sciences: Selected Readings. ASA and SSSA, Madison, pp 161-186 Diacono M, Montemurro F (2010) Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility: a review. Agron Sustain Dev 30(2):401-422

Doan TT, Ngo PT, Rumpe C, Nguyen BN, Jouquet P (2013) Interactions between compost, vermicompost and earthworms influence plant growth and yield: a one-year greenhouse experiment. Sci Hortic 160:148-154 Dominguez J, Edwards CA (2004) Vermicomposting organic wastes: a review. In: Shakir HSH, Mikhail WZA (eds) Soil zoology for sustainable development in the 21st century. Self-Publisher, Cairo, pp 369-395 Edmeades DC (2003) The long-term effects of manures and fertilisers on soil productivity and quality: a review. Nutr Cyc Agroecosys 66:165-180

Edwards CA (1998) The use of earthworms in the breakdown and management of organic wastes. In: Edwards CA (ed) Earthworm ecology. CRC Press, Boca Raton Edwards CA, Burrows I (1988) The potential of earthworm composts as plant growth media. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser (eds) Earthworms in environmental and waste management. SPB Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 211-220 Edwards CA, Fletcher KE (1988) Interaction between earthworms and microorganisms in organic matter breakdown. Agricul Ecosyst Environ 20(3):235-249 Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Emerson E, Pulliam R (2007) Suppressing plant parasitic nematodes and arthropod pests with vermi-compost teas. Bio Cycle 12:38-39

Edwards CA, Arancon NQ, Vasko-Bennett M, Askar A, Keeney G (2010) Effect of aqueous extracts from vermicomposts on attacks by cucumber beetles (Acalymnavittatum) (Fabr.) on cucumber and tobacco hornworm (Manducasexta) (L.) on tomatoes. Pedobiologia 53:141-148 Finkelstein RR (2004) Hormones in seed development and germination. In: Davies PJ (ed) Plant hormones: biosynthesis, signal transduction and action. Kluwer Academic Publishers, USA, pp 513-537

Forde B, Lorenzo H (2001) The nutritional control of root development. Plant Soil 232:51-68 Grusak MA, DellaPenna D (1999) Improving the nutrient composition of plants to enhance human nutrition and health. Annu Rev Plant phys Plant Mol Biol 50:133-161 Gupta R, Yadav A, Garg VK (2014) Influence of vermicompost application in potting media on growth and flowering of marigold crop. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 3:47. doi:10. 1007/s40093-014-0047-1 Gutierrez-Miceli FA, Santiago-Borraz J, Molina JAM, Nafate CC, Abud-Archila M, Llaven MAO, Rincon-Rosales R, Dendooven L (2007) Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and fruit quality of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum). Bioresour Technol 98:2781-2786 Gutierrez-Miceli FA, Gracia-Gomez RC, Rincon RR, Abud-Archila M, Maria- Angela OL, Gullin-Cruz MJ, Dendooven L (2008a) Formulation of liquid fertilizer for sorghum (Sorghum bicolour (L.) Moench) using vermicompost leachate. Bioresour Technol 99:6174-6180

Gutierrez-Miceli FA, Moguel-Zamudio B, Abud-Archila M, Gutierrez-Oliva VF, Dendooven L (2008b) Sheep manure vermicom-post supplemented with a native diazotrophic bacteria and mycorrhizas for maize cultivation. Bioresour Technol 99:7020-7026

Joshi R, Vig AP (2010) Effect of vermicompost on growth, yield and quality of tomato (Lycopersicum esculentum L). Afr J Basic Appl Sci 2(3-4):117-123 Joshi R, Vig AP, Singh J (2013) Vermicompost as soil supplement to enhance growth, yield and quality of Triticum aestivum L.: a field study. Int J Recy Org Waste Agric 2:16. doi:10.1186/2251-7715-2-16

Karmegam N, Alagermalai K, Daniel T (1999) Effect of vermicom-post on the growth and yield of greengram (Phaseolus aureus Rob.). Trop Agric 76(2):143-146 Kucera B, Cohn MA, Leubner-Metzger G (2005) Plant hormone interactions during seed dormancy release and germination. Seed Sci Res 15:281-307 Lazcano C, Arnold J, Tato A, Zaller JG, Dominguez J (2009) Compost and vermicompost a nursery pot components: effects on tomato plant growth and morphology. Span J Agric Res 7:944-951

Lazcano C, Sampedro L, Zas R, Dominguez J (2010) Vermicompost enhances germination of the maritime pine (Pinus pinaster Ait.). New For 39:387-400 Lopez-Bucio J, Cruz-Ramires A, Herrera-Estrella L (2003) The role of nutrient availability in regulating root architecture. Curr Option Plant Biol 6:280-287 Munroe G (2007) Manual of On-farm Vermicomposting and Vermi-culture. Publication of Organic Agriculture Centre of Canada, Nova Scotia

Mylonas VA, Mccants CB (1980) Effects of humic and fulvic acids on growth of tobacco. I. Root initiation and elongation. Plant Soil 54:485-490

Najar IA, Khan AB (2012) Vermicomposting of fresh water weeds (macrophytes by Eisenia fetida (Savigny, 1826), Aporrectodea caliginosa trapezoides (Duges, 1828) and Aporrectodea rosea rosea (Savigny. Dyn Soil Dyn Plant 6(S1):73-77

Najar IA, Khan AB (2010) Vermicomposting of Azolla pinnata by

using earthworm Eisenia fetida. The Bioscan 5(2):239-241 Najar IA, Khan AB (2011) Earthworm communities of Kashmir

Valley, J&K, India. Trop Ecol 52(2):151-162 Najar IA, Khan AB (2013a) Effect of vermicompost on growth and productivity of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) under field conditions. Acta Biol Malaysiana 2(1):12-21 Najar IA, Khan AB (2013b) Management of fresh water weeds (macrophytes) by vermicomposting using Eisenia fetida. Environ Sci Pollut Res 20:6406-6417. doi:10.1007/s11356-013-1687-9 Najar IA, Khan AB (2014) Factors affecting distribution of earthworms in Kashmir Valley: a multivariate statistical approach. Proc Zool Soc 67(2):126-135. doi:10.1007/s12595-013-0081-4

Nath G, Singh DK, Singh K (2011) Productivity enhancement and nematode management through vermicompost and biopesticides in brinjal (Solanum melongena L.). World Appl Sci J 12(4):404-412

Nattudurai G, Vendan SE, Ramachandran PV, Lingathurai S (2013) Vermicomposting of coirpith with cow dung by Eudrilus eugeniae Kinberg and its efficacy on the growth of Cyamopsis tetragonaloba (L) Taub. J Saudi Soc Agric Sci. doi:10.1016/j. jssas.2012.12.003 Orozco SH, Cegarra J, Trujillo LM, Roig A (1996) Vermicomposting of coffee pulp using the earthworm Eisenia fetida: effects on C and N contents and the availability of nutrients. Biol Fertil Soils 22:162-166

Padmavathiamma PK, Li LY, Kumari UR (2008) An experimental study of vermibio waste composting for agricultural soil improvement. Bioresour Technol 99:1672-1681 Papathanasiou F, Papadopoulos I, Tsakiris I, Tamoutsidis E (2012) Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth, yield and quality of lettuce. J Food Agric Environ 10(2):677-682 Pathma J, Sakthivel N (2012) Microbial diversity of vermicompost bacteria that exhibit useful agricultural traits and waste management potential. Springer Plus 1:26. doi:10.1186/2193-1801-1-26

Pathma J, Sakthivel N (2013) Molecular and functional characterization of bacteria isolated from straw and goat manure based vermicompost. Appl Soil Ecol 70:33-47 Pritam S, Garg VK, Kaushik CP (2010) Growth and yield response of marigold to potting media containing vermicompost produced from different wastes. Environmentalist 30:123-130 Ramesh P (2000) Effects of vermicomposts and vermicomposting on damage by sucking pests to ground nut (Arachis hypogea). Indian J Agric Sci 70(5):334 Rao KR (2002) Induce host plant resistance in the management of sucking insect pests of groundnut. Ann Plant Prot Sci 10(1):45-50

Ravi S, Channal HT, Hebsur NS, Patil BN, Dharmatti PR (2008) Effect of sulphur, zinc and iron nutrition on growth, yield, nutrient uptake and quality of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Karnataka. J Agric Sci 21:382-385 Reddy MV (1986) The effect of casts of Pheretima alexandri (Beddard) on the growth of Vinca rosea and Oryza sativa L. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 241-248 Rivera MC, Wright ER, Lopez MV, Garda D, Barrague MY (2004) Promotion of growth and control of damping-off (Rhizoctonia solani) of greenhouse tomatoes amended with vermicompost. Phyton 53:229-235 Sahni S, Sarma BK, Singh DP, Singh HB, Singh KP (2008) Vermicompost enhances performance of plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria in Cicer arietinumrhizosphere against Sclerotium rolfsii. Crop Protect 27:369-376

Serfoji P, Rajeshkumar S, Selvaraj T (2010) Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita on tomato cv Pusa Ruby by using vermicompost, AM fungus, Glomus aggregatum and mycorrhiza helper bacterium, Bacillus coagulans. J Agric Tech-nol 6:37-45

Singh UP, Maurya S, Singh DP (2003) Antifungal activity and induced resistance in pea by aqueous extract of vermicompost and for control of powdery mildew of pea and balsam. J Plant Dis Protect 110:544-553 Singh R, Sharma RR, Tyagi SK (2007) Pre-harvest foliar application of calcium and boron influences physiological disorders, fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria xananassa Duch.). Sci Hortic 112:215-220 Singh R, Sharma RR, Kumar S, Gupta RK, Patil RT (2008) Vermicompost substitution influences growth, physiological disorders, fruit yield and quality of strawberry (Fragaria ananassa Duch.). BioresourTechnol 99:8507-8511 Singhai PK, Sarma BK, Srivastava JS (2011) Biological management of common scab of potato through Pseudomonas species and vermicompost Bio. Control 57:150-157 Souzaa MEP, Carvalhoa AMX, Deliberali DC, Juckscha I, Brownb GG, Mendonc ES, Cardosoa IM (2013) Vermicomposting with rock powder increases plant growth. Appl Soil Ecol 69:56-60 Taleshi K, Shokoh-far A, Rafiee M, Noormahamadi G, Sakinejhad T (2011) Effect of vermicompost and nitrogen levels on yield and yield component of safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) Under late season drought stress. Int J Agron Plant Prod 2(1):15-22 Theunissen J, Ndakidemi PA, Laubscher CP (2010) Potential of vermicompost produced from plant waste on the growth and nutrient status in vegetable production. Int J Phys Sci 5(13):1964-1973

Tomati U, Grappelli A, Galli E (1983) Fertility factors in earthworm humus. In: Proceeding of international symposium agric environ. Prospects in earthworm farming. Publication Ministerodella Ricerca Scientificae Technologia, Rome, pp 49-56 Tomati U, Grappelli A, Galli E (1988) The hormone like effect of earthworm casts on plant growth. Biol Fertil Soils 5:288-294

Uma B, Malathi M (2009) Vermicompost as a soil supplement to improve growth and yield of Amaranthus species. Res J Agric Biol Sci 5:1054-1060 Valdez-Pereza MA, Fernandez-Luque F, Franco-Hernandezb O, Flores-Coteraa LB, Dendoovena L (2011) Cultivation of beans (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) in limed or unlimed wastewater sludge, vermicompost or inorganic amended soil. Sci Hortic 128:380-387 Vijaya KS, Seethalakshmi S (2011) Contribution of Parthenium vermicompost in altering growth, yield and quality of Alel-moschus esculentus (I) Moench. Advanced Biotech. 11(02):44-47 Wang D, Shi Q, Wang X, Wei M, Hu J, Liu J, Yang F (2010) Influence of cow manure vermicompost on the growth, metabolite contents, and antioxidant activities of Chinese cabbage (Brassica campestriss sp. chinensis) cow manure vermicompost. Biol Fertil Soils 46:689-696 Warman PR, AngLopez MJ (2010) Vermicompost derived from different feedstocks as a plant growth medium. Bioresour Technol 101:4479-4483 Wu Y, Zhang N, Wang J, Sun Z (2012) An integrated crop-vermiculture system for treating organic waste on fields. Eur J Soil Biol 51:8-14 Yardim EN, Arancon NQ, Edwards CA, Oliver TJ, Byrne RJ (2006) Suppression of tomato hornworm (Manduca quinquemaculata) and cucumber beetles (Acalyma vittatum and Diabotrica undec-impunctata) populations and damage by vermicomposts. Pedo-biologia 50:23-29 Zaller JG (2006) Foliar spraying of vermicompost extracts: effects on fruit quality and indications of late-blight suppression of fieldgrown tomatoes. Biol Agric Hortic 24:165-180 Zaller JG (2007) Vermicompost as a substitute for peat in potting media: effects on germination, biomass allocation, yields and fruit quality of three tomato varieties. Sci Hortic 112:191-199 Zar JH (2009) Biostatistical analysis, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs