Scholarly article on topic 'Oscillation results for second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations'

Oscillation results for second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations Academic research paper on "Mathematics"

0
0
Share paper
Academic journal
Adv Diff Equ
OECD Field of science
Keywords
{""}

Academic research paper on topic "Oscillation results for second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations"

0 Advances in Difference Equations

a SpringerOpen Journal

RESEARCH Open Access

Oscillation results for second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations

Tongxing Li1, Yuriy V Rogovchenko2* and Chenghui Zhang1

"Correspondence: yuriy.rogovchenko@uia.no

2Department of Mathematical Sciences, University ofAgder, Post Box422, Kristiansand, N-4604, Norway

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article

Abstract

We obtain several oscillation criteria for a class of second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations. New theorems extend a number of related results reported in the literature and can be used in cases where known theorems fail to apply. Two illustrative examples are provided. MSC: 34K11

Keywords: oscillation; second-order; neutral differential equation; integral averaging

ringer

1 Introduction

In this paper, we are concerned with the oscillation of a class of nonlinear second-order neutral differential equations

(r(t)((x(t) + p(t)x(t- r))')")' + q(t)f (x(t),x(a(i))) = 0, (1)

where t > t0 > 0, r > 0, and y > 1 is a quotient of two odd positive integers. In what follows, it is always assumed that

(Hi) r e C1([to,+(^),(0,+^));

(H2) p, q e C([t0,+c»), [0, +ro)) and q(t) is not identically zero for large t; (H3) f e C(R2, R) andf (x,y)/yY > k for all y =0 and for some k >0; (H4) a e C1([t0,+(^), R), a(t) < t, a'(t) > 0, and limt^+TO a(t) = +(».

By a solution of equation (1) we mean a continuous function x(t) defined on an interval [tx,+c») suchthatr(t)((x(t)+p(t)x(t- r))')v is continuously differentiable and x(t) satisfies (1) for t > tx. We consider only solutions satisfying sup{|x(t)|: t > T > tx} >0 and tacitly assume that equation (1) possesses such solutions. A solution of (1) is called oscillatory if it has arbitrarily large zeros on [tx,+c»); otherwise, it is called nonoscillatory. We say that equation (1) is oscillatory if all its continuable solutions are oscillatory.

During the past decades, a great deal of interest in oscillatory and nonoscillatory behavior of various classes of differential and functional differential equations has been shown. Many papers deal with the oscillation of neutral differential equations which are often encountered in applied problems in science and technology; see, for instance, Hale [1]. It is known that analysis of neutral differential equations is more difficult in comparison with that of ordinary differential equations, although certain similarities in the behavior of solutions of these two classes of equations are observed; see, for instance, the monographs [2-4], the papers [5-22] and the references cited there.

©2013 Li et al.; licensee Springer. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the originalworkis properly cited.

Oscillation results for (1) have been reported in [2, 4, 6, 8,11,14,18-20]. A commonly used assumption is

/ r-1/Y (s)ds = +c»,

although several authors were concerned with the oscillation of equation (1) in the case where

/ r-1/Y (s)& <+(».

In particular, Xu and Meng [19, Theorem 2.3] established sufficient conditions for the oscillation of (1) assuming that

p'(t) > 0 and lim p(t)=A. (4)

Further results in this direction were obtained by Ye and Xu [20] under the assumptions that

p'(t) > 0 and a(t) < t - t; (5)

see also the paper by Han et al. [8] where inaccuracies in [20] were corrected and new oscillation criteria for (1) were obtained [8, Theorems 2.1 and 2.2]. We conclude this brief review of the literature by mentioning that Li et al. [13] and Sun et al. [18] extended the results obtained in [8] to Emden-Fowler neutral differential equations and neutral differential equations with mixed nonlinearities.

Our principal goal in this paper is to derive new oscillation criteria for equation (1) without requiring restrictive conditions (4) and (5). Developing further ideas from the paper by Hasanbulli and Rogovchenko [9] concerned with a particular case of equation (2) with Y = 1, we study the oscillation of (1) in the case where y > 1.

2 Oscillation criteria

In what follows, all functional inequalities are tacitly assumed to hold for all t large enough, unless mentioned otherwise. As usual, we use the notation z(t) := x(t) + p(t)x(t - t) and g+(t) := max{g(t),0}.Let

D = {(t,s): t0 < s < t and D0 = {(t,s):t0 < s < t .

We say that a function H e C(D, [0, +ro)) belongs to a class WY if

(i) H(t, t) = 0 and H(t, s) > 0 for all (t, s) e D0;

(ii) H has a nonpositive continuous partial derivative with respect to the second variable satisfying

¿H(t, s) = -h(t, s)(H (t, s)Y/(Y+U for a locally integrable function h e Aoc(D, R).

In what follows, we assume that, for all t > t0,

1-p(t) Rfei >0,

r-1/Y (s)ds.

In order to establish our main theorems, we need the following auxiliary result. The first inequality is extracted from the paper by Jiang and Li [11, Lemma 5], whereas the second one is a variation of the well-known Young inequality [23].

Lemma 1 (i) Let y > 1 be a ratio of two odd integers. Then

A1+1/Y - |A - B\1+1/Y < YBllY [(y + 1)A - B]

for allAB > 0.

(ii) For any two numbers C, D > 0 and for any q >1,

Cq + (q -1)Dq - qCDq-1 > 0,

the equality holds if and only ifC = D.

Theorem 2 Assume that conditions (H1)-(H4), (3), and (6) are satisfied. Suppose also that there exist two functions p1, p2 e C1([t0,+(^), R) such that, for some j > 1 and for some H e Wy ,

limsup HiTT^ f

t—+rn H (t, t0) Jt0

1 rr„ yarm hY+1(t, s)

(Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

ds = +cc (8)

limsup

t— + C H(t, -Q) J t0

(t, t0) Jt0

H (t, s)^(s)-

(Y + 1)Y+1

v2(s)r(s)hY+1(t, s)

ds = +c,

f1(t) := v1(t) v1(t) := exp f2(t) := v2(t)

v2(t) := exp

k q(t)(1-p(a (t)))Y + a\t)> r(t)P1(t)

r1/(Y+1)(a (t))

t /r(s)p1(sn1/Y

(y+1)/Y

- (r(t)p1(t))'

-(y+»/ - a'«

k q(t)( 1 -p( a (t))

R(a (-)-t ) R(a (t))

r(t)p2Y+1)/Y (t)-( r(t)p2(t))'

-(y +1)j p2/y (s)ds

(10) (1) (12)

Then equation (1) is oscillatory.

Proof Let x(t) be a nonoscillatory solution of (1). Since y is a quotient of two odd positive integers, -x(t) is also a solution of (1). Hence, without loss of generality, we may assume that there exists a t1 > to such that x(t) > 0, x(t - t)> 0, and x(o (t)) > 0 for all t > t1. Then z(t) > x(t) > 0, and by virtue of

the function (r(t)(z'(t))Y)' is nonincreasing for all t > t1. Therefore, Z(t) does not change sign eventually, that is, there exists a t2 > t1 such that either z'(t)> 0 or z'(t) < 0 for all t > t2. We consider each of two cases separately. Case 1. Assume first that z'(t) > 0 for all t > t2. Equation (1) and condition (H2) yield

(r(t)(z!(t))v)' = -q(t)f (x(t),x{o(t))) < 0,

(r{t)(z!(t))v)' + kq(t)xY(o(t)) < 0.

In view of (H4), there exists a t3 > t2 such that, for all t > t3,

(o (t)) > o (t)))4o (t)),

It follows from (14) and (15) that

(r(t)(Z(t))Y)' < -kq(t)(1-p(o(t)))YzY(o(t)).

Define a generalized Riccati substitution by

Differentiating (18) and using (16) and (17), one arrives at

A :=-ur^ and B := A(t). V1(t)r(t)

By virtue of Lemma 1, part (i), we have the following estimate:

Lvx(t)r(t)

- P1(t)

(y+1)/y

/ U1(t) \ Vv1(t)r(t)y'

1 1/Y/A

- - Pl(t) Y1

(y+1)/y

I 1\ U1(t)

(Y + 1) 77 777 - P1(t)

V1(t)r(t)

It follows now from (19) and (20) that

u1(t) < -^i(t) - Yo'(t)ui(t)

V1(t)r(o (t))

where is defined by (10). Replacing in (21) t with s, multiplying both sides by H(t, s) and integrating with respect to s from t3 to t, we have, for some ¡3 > 1 and for any t > t3,

f H (t, s)^(s)ds + it h(t, s) (H (t, s))Y/(Y+1) u1 (s)ds

Jt3 Jt3

Y_ ft J ux(s) 1

< H (t, tsHfo)-

+ - I H(t,s)o'(s)u1(s)

ts \V1(s)r(o(s))

Y (¡_-1) ^ 3 Jts

tt Jts

H (t, s)o '(s)u1(s)

V1(s)r(o(s))

Let q := 1 + 1/y,

C = T ^Y/(Y+1V (H(t, s)g W^j1/(Y+1)u (s),

V1(s)r(o(s))

YfiY \Y/(Y+1)

■ + 1)Y+1 /

Application of Lemma 1, part (ii), yields

S :=-IH-^-T) (Ms)rQ(s))hY+1(t,s)

' (y +1)Y+v V (o'(s))Y (,)

Y/(Y+1)

h(t, s)( H (t, s))Y/(Y+1)u1(s) + ¡H (t, s) ¡Y V1(s)r(o (s))

o '(s)u{Y+1)/Y (s) v1/y (s)r1/Y (o (s))

- , x , ^ - hY+1(t, s). " (Y + 1)Y+1 (o '(s))Y v '

Hence, by the latter inequality and (22), we have

¡Y V1(s)r(o (s))

H(t,s)^(s)- i\Y+w „ „„ (Y + 1)Y+1 (o '(s))Y

< H(t, ts)u1(ts)-

hY+1(t,s)

Y (3-1) f' ,o'(s)u1Y+1)/Y (s)

f H(t,s)-1( 3 As v1/Y (s)r1/v (o (s))

Using monotonicity of H, we conclude that, for all t > t3, jY V1(s)r(a (s))

h (t, s)^(s)--^—hY+1(t, s) (Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

< H(t, t3) |u1(t3) | < H(t, to) |u1(t3) |.

'rH ^^ hY+1(t, s)

< H (t, to)

(Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

|u1(t3)1 + / ^(s)! ds

limsup-

t^+c H(t, 'Q) Jt0

t, to); to

H(t,s)^(s) -

jY V1(s)r(a (s)) (Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

hY+1(t, s)

|u1(t3)| + / |^1(s)| ds

which contradicts (8).

Case 2. Assume now that z'(t) < 0 for all t > t2. It follows from the inequality (r(t)(z'(t))Y)' < 0 that, for all s > t > t2,

z'(s) <(rg)"'z'W.

Integrating this inequality from t to l, l > t > t2,we have

z(l) < z(t) + r1/Y (t)z'(t)

]Jt r1/1

Passing to the limit as l ^ +c, we conclude that z(t) > -R(t)r1/Y (t)z'(t),

which yields

f ^ Y> 0.

VR(t)/ "

Hence, we have

x(t) = z(t) -p(t)x(t - r) > z(t) - p(t)z(t - r) > -p(t) R(RR ~)T^z(t). It follows from (1) and the latter inequality that there exists a t4 > t2 such that (r(t)(z'(t))Y)' + kq(t)^1 -p(a(t))V(a(t)) < 0.

For t > t4, define a generalized Riccati substitution by

V zf(t)\ Y u2(t):=V2(t)r(t) i—J + P2(t)

Differentiating (25), we have

u2(t) = -— u2(t) + V2(t)

V2(t) - Y V2(t)r(t)

,V2(t)r(t) Letting in Lemma 1, part (i), u2 (t)

(r(t)(z'(t))Y)' zY (t)

- P2 (t)

u2 (t)

(Y+1)/Y

■V2(tK r(t)P2(t^'.

V2(t)r(t)

and B := p2(t),

we have

u2(t) Lv2(t)r(t)

- P2 (t)

(Y+1)/Y

/ u2(t) \ \V2(t)r(t)^

(Y +1)/Y

- p2/y (t)

Y +1 u2(t) 1 , A

--TTwTT - _P2(t)

Y V2(t)r(t) Y

It follows from (24) and (26) that

^ / u2Y+1(tn1/Y

u2(t) < -^2(t)-K'

where is defined by (12). Replacing in (27) t with s, multiplying both sides by H(t,s) and integrating with respect to s from t4 to t, we conclude that, for some j > 1 and for all

t > t4,

f H (t, s)f2(s)ds + it h(t, s)(H(t, s))Y/(Y+1)u2(s)ds

«/'a * 'A

+ " /'a H(t, V2(s)r(s)/

Y+V-N \ 1/Y

Y (j -1) f / u

< H(t, t4)u2(t4)- „ H(t, s) 2

Letting in Lemma 1, part (ii),

, Y/(Y +1) / JJY U A \ 1/(Y+1)

Y+U V" ds.

V2(s)r(s)J

C K0.......(HH).......*«

YjY \Y/(y+1)

(v2(s)r(s)hY+1(t,s))

Y/(Y+1)

we conclude that

h(t,s)(H(,s))Y/(Y+1)u2(s) + 3H(t,s)(Vugl)1^ > -(V+Tv+TV2(s)r(s)hY+1(t,s). Using the latter inequality and (28), we have

it ¡Y Jt4

H (t, s)^(s)-

(Y + 1)+1

v2(s)r(s)hY+1(t, s)

< H(t, t4)«2(t4) - /tH(t,s)(USrSY ds.

Proceeding as in the proof of Case 1, we obtain contradiction with our assumption (9). Therefore, equation (1) is oscillatory. □

Theorem 3 Assume that conditions (H1)-(H4), (3), and (6) are satisfied. Suppose also that there exist functions H e WY, pi, p2 e C1([t0,+œ), R), </>2 e C([t0,+œ), R) such that, for all T > to and for some 3 >1,

0 < inf

.. . , H (t, s)

liminf —---

t^+œ H (t, t0)

< +œ,

t^+œ 'urn I

■rHu, s)Ws)-^-3Y_ "-«t«> hY+1(t,s)'

(Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

ds > &(T), (31)

t^+œ 'H5TT) fr

H(t,s)Ms) — V2(s)r(s)hY+1(t,s)

(y + 1)Y+1

where v1, and v2 are as in Theorem 2. If

ds > <fc(T),

r f a/(s)(^1+(s))(Y+1)/Y

limsup I —t--

t^+œ J to v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a (s))

ds = +œ

limsup

(^2+(s))(Y+1)/Y

t^+œ Jto v2/Y (s)r1/Y (s) equation (1) is oscillatory.

ds = +œ,

Proof Without loss of generality, assume again that (1) possesses a nonoscillatory solution x(t) such that x(t) > 0, x(t - t)> 0, and x(o(t)) > 0 on [t1,+c») for some t1 > t0. From the proof of Theorem 2, we know that there exists a t2 > t1 such that either z'(t) > 0 or z' (t) < 0 for all t > t2.

Case 1. Assume first that z'(t) > 0 for all t > t2. Proceeding as in the proof ofTheorem 2, we arrive at inequality (2s), which yields, for all t > ts and for some ¡3 >1,

«M^ < limsuP

t^+œ H (t, t3) Jt3

tTu<ï M M 3Y v1(s)r(a(s)) ^Y;

H(t, s)^1(s) - ---— hY+l(t, s)

(Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

< u1(t3) - Y(i —) liminf

a '(s)u{Y+1)/Y (s)

j H(t, t3) Jt3"y" v1/Y (s)r1/Y(a(s))

(t, t3) its

H (t, s)

The latter inequality implies that, for all t > t3 and for some j >1,

Y (i -1) 1

<mt3) +-;-liminf

, t3) Jt3

H (t, s)

a '(s)u1Y+1)/Y (s)

j H(t, t3) Jt3 v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a(s))

ds < u1(t3).

Consequently,

«frfe) < u1(t3),

liminf , t^ + TO H(t,

L f < , a'(s)u1Y+1)/Y (s) ^ 1 (t,^-ds <

v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a (s)) Y (j -1)

(u1(t3)-^1(t3^<+c. (36)

Assume now that

a '(s)u{Y+1)/Y (s) t3 v1/Y (s)r1^ (a (s))

ds = +c.

Condition (30) implies existence ofa & >0 such that

H (t, s) liminf —--- > &.

t^+TO H(t, tQ)

It follows from (37) that, for any positive constant n, there exists a t5 > t3 such that, for all

t > t5,

t a'(s)u1Y+1)/Y(s) ^ n

t3 v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a(s)) &

Using integration by parts and (39), we have, for all t > t5,

^ fH{t,s) a;«u1Y+"'-W ds

t, t3) its "

v1/Y (s)r1/" (a (s))

i H(t, s)d i , t3) Jt3 Ut3

a '(g )u1"+1)/Y (g)

lJt3 v1/Y(g)r1/Y (a(g))

, t3) Jt^ Jt3

1 1 / & H(t, t3)A

a '(g )u1"+1)/Y (g) * v1/Y (g)r1/Y (a(g)) t r dH(t, s)

d h (t, s)

, n H(t, t5) n H(t, t5)

ds =----- >-----.

& H(t, t3) - & H(t, to)

By virtue of (38), there exists a t6 > t5 such that, for all t > t6,

H(t, t5)

H (t, to)

which implies that

1 f^ ^'(s)u1Y+1)/Y(s)

,—t / h (t, s) ' 1-— ds > n, t > t6.

H (t, t3) Jt3 ( ) v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a (s)) " "

Since n is an arbitrary positive constant,

1 f * N o'(s)u1Y+1)/Y (s) J

liminf—--- H(t, s)^-ds = +(»,

H(t, ts) Jts v1/Y (s)r1/v(o(s))

but the latter contradicts (s6). Consequently,

a '(s)u[Y+1)/Y (s)

ds < +œ,

t3 v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a (s))

and, by virtue of (35),

r ^+1W(s) ds </ 1/ L v1/Y (s)r1/Y (a (s)) ~L -1/Y

a'(s)^Y+1)/Y(s) J f+œ a'(s)u1Y+1)/Y(s) J

J- - ' ds < +œ,

!t3 v1^(s)r1/Y (a (s)) Jt3 v1^(s)r1/Y (a (s))

which contradicts (33).

Case 2. Assume now that z'(t) < 0 for t > t2. It has been established in Theorem 2 that (29) holds. Using (29) and proceeding as in Case 1 above, we arrive at the desired conclusion. □

As an immediate consequence of Theorem s, we have the following result.

Theorem 4 Let v1, and v2 be as in Theorem s, and assume that conditions (H1)-

(H4), (s), and (6) are satisfied. Suppose also that there exist functions H e WY, p1, p2 e C1([t0,+c^), R), far fa e C([t0,+^)), R) such that (s0), (ss), and 04) hold. If, for all T > t0 and for some ¡3 >1,

liminf

t^+œ H (t, r ) ,/ r

t, t)./ r

H (t, s)^(s)-

3Y vj(s)r(a (s))

(Y + 1)Y+1 (a '(s))Y

hY+1(t, s)

ds > &(T) (40)

liminf-

(t, T)Jr

t^+œ H (t, T) J T equation (1) is oscillatory.

H (t, s)to(s) — +. v2(s)r(s)hY+1(t, s)

(y + 1)Y+1

ds > 02(T), (41)

3 Examples

Efficient oscillation tests can be easily derived from Theorems 2-4 with different choices of the functions H, p1, p2, fa, and 02. In this section, we illustrate possible applications with two examples.

Example 5 For t > 1, consider the second-order nonlinear neutral delay differential equation

Here, r(t) = t2, p(t) = t/(2t + 1), t = 1, q(t) = 1,f (x(t),x(a(t))) = (2 + x4(t))x(t/2), whereas R(t) = 1/t.

Let " = 1, k = 1, H(t,s) = (t - s)2, p1(t) = -1/(2t), ps(t) = -1/t. Then h2(t,s) = 4, V1(t) = v2(t) = t2, f1(t) = t2((t + 2)/(2t + 2) + 1),^2(t) = t2(3-(t2/((2t + 2)(t-2)))), and a straightforward computation shows that all assumptions of Theorem 2 are satisfied. Hence, equation (42) is oscillatory.

Example 6 For t > 1, consider the second-order neutral delay differential equation

Here, r(t) = et, p(t) = 1/3, t = n/4, q(t) = 32v/65et/3, R(t) = e-1, andf (x(t),x(a(t))) = x(t -(arcsin(V65/65))/8).

Let " = 1, k = 1, H(t,s) = (t - s)2, p1(t) = P2(t) = 0. Then h2(t,s) = 4, V1(t) = V2(t) = 1, f1(t) = (64V65/9)et, ^(t) = (32V65/3)(1 - (1/3)en/4)et. It is not difficult to verify that all assumptions of Theorem 2 hold. Hence, equation (43) is oscillatory. In fact, one such solution is x(t) = sin 8t.

4 Conclusions

Most oscillation results reported in the literature for neutral differential equation (1) and its particular cases have been obtained under the assumption (2) which significantly simplifies the analysis of the behavior of z(t) = x(t) + p(t)x(t - t) for a nonoscillatory solution x(t) of (1). In this paper, using a refinement of the integral averaging technique, we have established new oscillation criteria for second-order neutral delay differential equation (1) assuming that (3) holds.

We stress that the study of oscillatory properties of equation (1) in the case (3) brings additional difficulties. In particular, in order to deal with the case when z'(t) < 0 (which is simply eliminated if condition (2) holds), we have to impose an additional assumption p(t) < R(t)/R(t - t) < 1. In fact, it is well known (see, e.g., [6,14]) that if x(t) is an eventually positive solution of (1), then

One of the principal difficulties one encounters lies in the fact that (44) does not hold when (3) is satisfied, cf. [8]. Since the sign of the derivative z! (t) is not known, our criteria for the oscillation of (1) include a pair of assumptions as, for instance, (8) and (9). On the other hand, we point out that, contrary to [8,13,18,19], we do not need in our oscillation theorems quite restrictive conditions (4) and (5), which, in a certain sense, is a significant improvement compared to the results in the cited papers. However, this improvement has been achieved at the cost of imposing condition (6).

x(t) > (1 -p(t))z(t).

Therefore, two interesting problems for future research can be formulated as follows. (PI) Is it possible to establish oscillation criteria for (1) without requiring conditions (4), (5), and (6)?

(P2) Suggest a different method to investigate (1) in the case where v <1 (and thus inequality (7) does not hold).

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing Interests. Authors' contributions

Allthree authors contributed equally to this work and are listed In alphabeticalorder. They all read and approved the final version of the manuscript.

Author details

1 Schoolof ControlScience and Engineering, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong 250061, P.R. China. 2Department of MathematicalSciences, University of Agder, Post Box422, Kristiansand, N-4604, Norway.

Acknowledgements

The research of TL and CZ was supported in part by the NationalBasic Research Program of PR China (2013CB035604) and the NNSF of PR China (Grants 61034007, 51277116, and 51107069). YR acknowledges research grants from the Faculty of Science and Technology of Umea University, Sweden and from the Faculty of Engineering and Science of the University of Agder, Norway. TL would like to express his gratitude to Professors Ravi P. Agarwaland Martin Bohner for support and usefuladvices. Last but not least, the authors are gratefulto two anonymous referees for a very thorough reading of the manuscript and for pointing out severalinaccuracies.

Received: 17 February 2013 Accepted: 24 October 2013 Published: 21 Nov 2013

References

1. Hale, JK: Theory of FunctionalDifferentialEquations. Springer, New York (1977)

2. Agarwal, RP, Bohner, M, Li, W-T: Nonoscillation and Oscillation: Theory for FunctionalDifferentialEquations. Marcel Dekker, New York (2004)

3. Agarwal, RP, Grace, SR, O'Regan, D: Oscillation Theory for Difference and FunctionalDifferentialEquations. Kluwer Academic, Dordrecht (2000)

4. Saker, SH: Oscillation Theory of Delay Differential and Difference Equations: Second and Third Orders. VDM Verlag Dr. Muller (2010)

5. Baculikova, B, Dzurina, J: Oscillation theorems for second order neutraldifferentialequations. Comput. Math. Appl. 61,94-99(2011)

6. Dong, JG: Oscillation behavior of second order nonlinear neutraldifferentialequations with deviating arguments. Comput. Math. Appl. 59, 3710-3717 (2010)

7. Grammatikopoulos, MK, Ladas, G, Meimaridou, A: Oscillation of second order neutraldelay differentialequations. Rad. Mat. 1,267-274(1985)

8. Han, Z, Li, T, Sun, S, Sun, Y: Remarks on the paper [Appl. Math. Comput. 207 (2009), 388-396]. Appl. Math. Comput. 215,3998-4007 (2010)

9. Hasanbulli, M, Rogovchenko, YuV: Oscillation criteria for second order nonlinear neutraldifferentialequations. Appl. Math. Comput. 215,4392-4399 (2010)

10. Hasanbulli, M, Rogovchenko, YuV: Asymptotic behavior of nonoscillatory solutions of second order nonlinear neutral differentialequations. Math. Inequal. Appl. 10,607-618 (2007)

11. Jiang, JC, Li, XP: Oscillation of second order nonlinear neutraldifferentialequations. Appl. Math. Comput. 135, 531-540 (2003)

12. Li, T, Han, Z, Zhang, C, Li, H: Oscillation criteria for second-order superlinear neutraldifferentialequations. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2011). doi:10.1155/2011/367541

13. Li, T, Han, Z, Zhang, C, Sun, S: On the oscillation of second-order Emden-Fowler neutraldifferentialequations. J. Appl. Math. Comput. 37,601-610 (2011)

14. Liu, L, Bai, Y: New oscillation criteria for second-order nonlinear neutraldelay differentialequations. J. Comput. Appl. Math. 231,657-663 (2009)

15. Rogovchenko, YuV, Tuncay, F: Oscillation criteria for second-order nonlinear differentialequations with damping. Nonlinear Anal. 69, 208-221 (2008)

16. Rogovchenko, YuV, Tuncay, F: Yan's oscillation theorem revisited. Appl. Math. Lett. 22,1740-1744 (2009)

17. Shi, W, Wang, P: Oscillation criteria of a class of second-order neutralfunctionaldifferentialequations. Appl. Math. Comput. 146,211-226 (2003)

18. Sun, S, Li, T, Han, Z, Sun, Y: Oscillation of second-order neutralfunctionaldifferentialequations with mixed nonlinearities. Abstr. Appl. Anal. (2011). doi:10.1155/2011/927690

19. Xu, R, Meng, FW: Some new oscillation criteria for second order quasi-linear neutraldelay differentialequations. Appl. Math. Comput. 182, 797-803 (2006)

20. Ye, L, Xu, Z: Oscillation criteria for second-order quasilinear neutraldelay differentialequations. Appl. Math. Comput. 207, 388-396 (2009)

21. Zafer, A: Oscillation criteria for even order neutraldifferentialequations. Appl. Math. Lett. 11, 21-25 (1998)

22. Zhang, C, Li, T, Sun, B, Thandapani, E: On the oscillation of higher-order half-linear delay differentialequations. Appl. Math. Lett. 24, 1618-1621 (2011)

Page 13 of 13

23. Hardy, GH, Littlewood, JE, Polya, G: Inequalities. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

10.1186/1687-1847-2013-336

Cite this article as: Li et al.: Oscillation results for second-order nonlinear neutral differential equations. Advances in Difference Equations 2013, 2013:336

Submit your manuscript to a SpringerOpen journal and benefit from:

► Convenient online submission

► Rigorous peer review

► Immediate publication on acceptance

► Open access: articles freely available online

► High visibility within the field

► Retaining the copyright to your article

Submit your next manuscript at ► springeropen.com